• Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
• /
• v.15 no.3
• /
• pp.263-268
• /
• 2010

Purpose: Eye movements and fixation ability are an important procedure to obtain external information and essential means of clear vision. The purpose of this study was to determine the reading performance such as reading time and number of fixations when random text was viewed at varying distances. Methods: Twenty two presbyopes were participated. All subjects were screened for their suitability to participate in the study by clinical examination, and none of the participants had previously worn contact lenses and no previous experience of wearing any types of presbyopic vision correction except single vision. The reading time and number of fixations were recorded using eye tracker while each subjects was waring four vision corrections which included single vision for distance (SV), bifocal spectacle lenses (BIF), progressive addition lenses (PAL), and monovision (MV). The reading material was presented at distance and near distance. Results: Reading time and number of fixations for near stimulus were significantly different among vision correction used in this study (p<0.001). In particular, wearing SV required longer reading time and produced longer fixation duration for near text. However, reading distance text was similarity performed across vision corrections tested and there was no statistical difference found for either reading time and number of fixations. Conclusions: Wearing presbyopic vision correction is advantageous for reading task of near stimuli, but not having near correction such as wearing SV could result in longer reading time and higher number of fixation due to lacks of accommodative ability for near task. For the future studies, it would be interesting to examine the performance of reading both at adapted and unadapted stages as examining only unadapted wearers was limitation of this study.

• Radioisotope journal
• /
• v.10 no.4
• /
• pp.29-35
• /
• 1995

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Precision Engineering Conference
• /
• 1991.11a
• /
• pp.139-145
• /
• 1991

본 논문에서는 chamfer가 없는 경우에도 조립이 가능한 로봇 조립용 손목기구를 개발하였다. 손목기구에서는 chamfer있는 경우에 우수란 적응능력을 가지는 RCC(Remote Center Compliance) 구조가 이용되었으며 위치측정용 sensor와 공압 actuator를 이용하여 조립시 생기는 RCC 구조의 변형을 측정하여 이로부터 능동적으로 오차를 교정하도록 하였다. sensor signal로부터 적절한 오차교정방향을 찾아내는 algorithm 으로는 신경회로망을 이용하였으며 이 결과 손목기구의 비선형성에도 잘 적응함을 볼 수 있었다. 제작된 로봇 조립용 손목을 이용하여 chamferless part의 조립을 실험한 결과 clearance ratio가 0.02인 경우 eccentricity가 2mm 까지 오차교정이 가능함을 볼 수 있었다.

• The KSFM Journal of Fluid Machinery
• /
• v.17 no.4
• /
• pp.5-10
• /
• 2014

It is possible for the nation's largest flowmeter calibration system in K-water to calibrate flow rate up to $2,700m^3/h$ and diameter 800mm. However, the calibration and measurement capability of K-water's system is not satisfied in comparison with other developed countries. In this study, we find the dominant factors related to the uncertainty of weight and time measurement for gravimetric flowmeter calibration system. As a results of improving the system, the combined standard uncertainty has been improved $1.099{\times}10^{-3}$ to $2.332{\times}10^{-4}$. So calibration and measurement capability got 0.08 percent of the relative expanded uncertainty for maximum flow rate using the coverage factor(k=2).

• 대한방사선방어학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2009.04a
• /
• pp.226-227
• /
• 2009

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Precision Engineering Conference
• /
• 2013.05a
• /
• pp.895-896
• /
• 2013

• Journal of the Korean Society for Precision Engineering
• /
• v.13 no.2
• /
• pp.62-66
• /
• 1996

Since 1980, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS) have performed 8 round robin tests in gauge block measurement in order to evaluate the measurement capability and the state of environment control of National Calibration and Test Institutions. Two sets of five gauge blocks (nominal size : 1, 3, 10, 25, 100 mm) having different thermal expansion coefficients for each set were circulated for the measurement, and the measurement results were collected and analyzed to evaluate the traceability to the standard of KRISS. The method and results of the test are presented.

• Journal of Sensor Science and Technology
• /
• v.4 no.1
• /
• pp.43-50
• /
• 1995

We measured the traceability error for nine high temperature calibration service centers including KRISS through the round-robin test. In this test the type S thermocouple, which used as a calibration standard thermometer commonly, was accommodated as a test thermocouple. Intercomparison data of three institutions were coincident with KRISS's data within ${\pm}0.5^{\circ}C$, which was the calibration uncertainty of the type S thermocouple, but the remaining six institution's data were deviated from the assigned uncertainty level. Deviation of the intercomparison data increased gradually according to the increase of the test temperature. and the maximum difference was so large as about $2.0^{\circ}C$ at the highest test temperature, gold point. In this study we found the traceability error of high temperature calibration service center for a high temperature standard was within $2.0^{\circ}C$.

• Proceedings of the Korean Radioactive Waste Society Conference
• /
• 2007.05a
• /
• pp.245-246
• /
• 2007

• Transactions of the KSME C: Technology and Education
• /
• v.5 no.2
• /
• pp.105-113
• /
• 2017

KOLAS (KOrea Laboratory Accreditation Scheme) belongs to APLAC (Asia Pacific Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation). KOLAS manages the accreditation scheme for measurement traceability to SI units. As per June 2016, there are 22 KOLAS laboratories for liquid flow metering. Among them, 12 laboratories participated in the proficiency test (PM2015-08) for water flow metering, organized by KASTO (Korea Association of Standards and Testing Organizations). This proficiency test was performed with three kinds of flow ranges ($3.6m^3/h{\sim}12m^3/h$, $40m^3/h{\sim}80m^3/h$, $40m^3/h{\sim}200m^3/h$) considering the CMC (calibration and measurement capability) of the participating laboratories. The purpose of the proficiency test was to find out measurement equivalence of the CMC's between each participating laboratory and the reference testing laboratory (KRISS). The measurement equivalence was tested by the number of equivalence ($E_n$). If ${\mid}E_n{\mid}$ < 1, the measurement equivalence was established. All the participating laboratories passed this proficiency test.