• Proceedings of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute Conference
• /
• 2010.04a
• /
• pp.413-416
• /
• 2010

본 연구에서는 복합소재 교량용 방호울타리를 개발하여 컴퓨터 시뮬레이션을 통해 강재 교량용 방호울타리와 복합소재 교량용 방호울타리의 성능을 비교하였다. 구조적 강도 성능 측면에서 복합소재 교량용 방호울타리의 경우 교량용 방호울타리의 변형이 31.7%로 감소하여 강재 교량용 방호울타리 보다 강도 성능이 우수하였다. 탑승자 보호 성능 측면에서, 복합소재 교량용 방호울타리는 THIV 47.1%, PHD 49.0%로 감소하여 강재 교량용 방호울타리 보다 탑승자 보호성능이 우수하였다. 충돌 후 차량의 거동 측면에서, 복합소재 교량용 방호울타리는 이탈속도가 증가하고 이탈각도가 감소하여 강재 교량용 방호울타리 보다 충돌 후 차량의 거동이 우수하였다. 교량용 방호울타리의 비산 측면에서, 강재 및 복합소재 교량용 방호울타리는 비산이 발생하지 않았다.

• Journal of Korean Society of Transportation
• /
• v.20 no.2
• /
• pp.117-124
• /
• 2002

새로 개발한 철재 교량용 방호울타리는 기존 시설에 비해 충격흡수기능과 조망권 확보, 융설작업, 유지보수가 용이하도록 설계되었다. 본 연구는 새로 개발한 철재 교량용 방호울타리를 건설교통부의 $\ulcorner$도로안전시설 설치 및 관리지침 - 교량용 방호울타리 편. 1999$\lrcorner$ 의 설계기준에 따라 기존 고속도로에 사용하고 있는 F형 콘크리트 교량용 방호울타리와 성능비교를 통해 평가하고자 하였다. 비교평가는 S2급 교량용 방호울타리의 시험기준으로 실시하였으며 결과는 다음과 같이 나타났다. 첫째, 소형승용차를 대상으로 한 운전자의 안전도 평가에서는 두가지 시설 모두 강도성능, 충돌 후 차량 안전성능 구성 부재 비산 억제 성능 등 세 가지 기준을 만족하였으나, 가속도 기준에 있어서는 철재 교량용 방호울타리는 기준인 20g 이하인 18.2605g로 나타나 안전기준을 만족하였고, F형 콘크리트 교량용 방호울타리는 20.1791g로 나타나 기준을 약간 상회하는 것으로 나타났으나 안전기준의 범위에 있는 것으로 평가하였다. 둘째. 대형차량을 대상으로 한 방호울타리의 구조적 안정성 평가에 있어서는 F형과 철재 교량용 방호울타리 모두 평가기준에 적합한 것으로 나타났다. 새로 개발한 철재 교량용 방호울타리는 국내 최초로 모의충돌시험과 실물차량 충돌시험을 통해 개발하였다는 의의를 가지고 있으며 성능측면에서도 기존의 시설에 비해 충분히 안전하다는 것을 증명하였다. 그러나 측정시설의 미비로 충돌후의 차량의 이탈속도나 이탈각도에 대하여 만족할 만한 수준의 결과를 제시하지는 못하였다.

• Journal of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea
• /
• v.23 no.2
• /
• pp.175-182
• /
• 2010

A composite safety barrier for bridge has been developed and the performance of the composite safety barrier for bridge has been compared with the steel safety barrier for bridge through computer simulation. As the structural strength performance, the composite safety barrier for bridge is superior to the steel safety barrier for bridge according that the deformation of the composite safety barrier for bridge is 17.0% of that of the steel safety barrier for bridge. As the passenger protection performance, the composite safety barrier for bridge is superior to the steel safety barrier for bridge according that THIV and PHD of the composite safety barrier for bridge are 47.1% and 49.0% respectively of those of the steel safety barrier for bridge. As the behavior of the vehicle after crash, the composite safety barrier for bridge is superior to the steel safety barrier for bridge showing the increased exit velocity and the reduced exit angle. Both of the steel and composite safety barrier for bridge are not scattered in the analysis.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Advanced Composite Structures
• /
• v.2 no.4
• /
• pp.11-18
• /
• 2011

In this study, the performance of a steel-FRP composite bridge safety barrier was evaluated through vehicle crash simulation. Surface veil, DB and Roving fibers were used for FRP. The MAT58 material model provided by LS-DYNA software was used to model FRP material. Spot weld option was used for modeling contact between steel and FRP beam. The structural strength performance, the passenger protection performance, and the vehicle behavior after crash were evaluated corresponding to the vehicle crash manual. As the result, A steel-FRP composite safety barrier was satisfied with the required performance.

• Journal of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea
• /
• v.24 no.5
• /
• pp.499-506
• /
• 2011

In this study, the performance of composite safety barriers was evaluated through computer simulation. A composite safety barrier of SB4 grade was modeled. The MAT58 material model provided by LS-DYNA software was used to model composite material. The performance of composite material varies according to fiber, resin type, and fiber direction. Polyurethane resin and glass fiber were used. The performance of three different stacking designs was evaluated by carrying out vehicle impact simulation. The performance evaluation based on the vehicle crash manual includes the structural strength performance, the passenger protection performance, the vehicle behavior after crash, scattering of the guardrail. As the result of the finite element analysis, the barrier composed of the more transverse direction fibers shows the better performance on the impact simulation.

• 도로교통
• /
• s.90
• /
• pp.46-60
• /
• 2002

• 도로교통
• /
• s.90
• /
• pp.61-69
• /
• 2002

• Journal of the Korean Society for Advanced Composite Structures
• /
• v.2 no.1
• /
• pp.1-7
• /
• 2011

In this study the optimal stacking section was selected by pendulum impact test for six different stacking sections of the composite safety barrier. The beam cross-section shape was determined through the poll on six different beam cross-section shapes. The six kinds of stacking design for the determined beam cross-section were suggested. CSM, DB, DBT and Roving fibers were used for stacking design. Horizontal beam and 3:1 sloped beam were modeled by using LS-DYNA. The fall impact simulation was carried out by using rectangular pendulum and cylinder pendulum. Optimal stacking section was determined by comparing and analyzing the impact simulation results.

• The magazine of the Korean Society for Advanced Composite Structures
• /
• v.1 no.3
• /
• pp.46-55
• /
• 2010

• The magazine of the Korean Society for Advanced Composite Structures
• /
• v.3 no.2
• /
• pp.20-24
• /
• 2012