• 대한치과교정학회지
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.399-407
• /
• 1998

불소를 유리하는 치과재료인 글라스 아이오노머 시멘트와 불소함유 레진을 대상으로 경화후의 시간경과에 따른 1일간 불소유리량을 측정하고, 이들의 경시적 변화추세를 비교 검토하기 위하여 광중합형 글라스 아이오노머 시멘트로서 치과교정용 브라켓 접착제($Orthobond^{\circledR}$)와 충전응(Fuji GC $LC^{\circledR}$), 자가중합형 글라스 아이오노머 시멘트로서 충전용 (Fuji GC $II^{\circledR}$)과 아말감 합금이 첨가된 충전용(Miracle-$Mix^{\circledR}$) 및 광중합형 불소함유 충전용 레진($Heliomolar^{\circledR}$)을 실험재료로 하여 중합 1일, 3일, 7일, 14일, 42일, 70일 경과후 각각 불소유리량을 측정하고, 변화추세를 비교 검토하여 다음의 결론을 얻었다. 1. 전 실험기간에 걸쳐 불소함유 레진의 1일간 불소유리량은 글라스 아이포노머 시멘트에 비해 현저히 적었다. 2. 중합 70일 경과후 1일간 불소유리 량은 Miracle-$Mix^{\circledR}$는 평균 $3.4{\mu}g/cm^2$, Fuji GC $II^{\circledR}$가 평균 $2.7{\mu}g/cm^2$, $Orthobond^{\circledR}$가 평균 $2.3{\mu}g/cm^2$, Fuji GC $LC^{\circledR}$이 평균 $1.4{\mu}g/cm^2$였고, 불소함유 레진인 $Heliomolar^{\circledR}$은 평균 $0.1{\mu}g/cm^2$이었다. 3. 1일간 불소유리량은 자가중합형 글라스 아이오노머 시멘트와 광중합형 글라스 아이오노머 시멘트사미에 차이를 발견할 수 없었고, 제조회사의 제품에 따라 유의한 차이가 있었다 아말감 합금이 첨가된 Miracle-$Mix^{\circledR}$은 아말감 합금이 첨가되지 않은 다른 시멘트에 비해 현저히 많은 양의 불소를 유리하였다. 4. 모든 실험재료의 1일간 불소유리 량은 중합 3일이전까지 현저한 감소를 보였고, 중합 3일경과이후 중합 14일 이전까지 완만한 감소를, 중합 14일이후부터 중합 70일경과까지 매우 완만한 감소추세를 보였다.

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제34권1호
• /
• pp.81-90
• /
• 2007

본 연구에서는 세 가지 서로 다른 광원(할로겐 램프 :. Elipar Trilight ; 3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany, Light Emitting Diode (LED) ; Elipar Freelight2 ; 3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany, 플라즈마 광 : Flipo ; LOKKI, France)을 사용하여 브라켓과 광원사이의 거리에 따른 광중합형 글라스 아이오노머 시멘트(Fuji ORTHO LC : GC, Japan)의 전단 결합 강도를 알아보고자 하였다. 1. 광중합기에 따른 전단 결합 강도는 광중합기로부터 브라켓까지의 거리가 0mm일 때 3가지 광원에 유의할 만한 차이는 보이지 않았고 광중합기로부터 브라켓까지의 거리가 3mm, 6mm일 때, 할로겐 광과 플라즈마 광 사이에는 유의할 만한 차이가 없었으나 LED 광은 유의성 있게 낮은 전단 결합 강도를 나타냈다. 2. 할로겐 광과 플라즈마 광으로 광중합시 거리에 따른 전단 결합 강도에 유의한 차 없었고 LED광을 사용하여 광중합시에는 거리가 증가할수록 전단 결합 강도가 감소하였다. 특히 0mm에서 3mm로 거리가 증가시 유의할 만한 감소를 나타내었다.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제30권3호
• /
• pp.158-169
• /
• 2005

본 연구는 간접 복합 레진 인레이 수복 시 기저재로 사용되는 광중합형 글래스아이오노머와 인레이 접착에 사용되는 레진 시멘트간의 접착 전까지의 시간 경과에 따른 전단 결합강도를 측정하고, 상아질과 글래스아이오노머, 글래스아이오노머와 레진 시멘트간 접착계면에 대해 SEM 관찰하였다. 2종의 광중합형 글래스아이오노머 시멘트 Fuji II LC (GC Co, Tokyo, Japan)와 Vitrebond$^{TM}$ (3M, Paul, Minnesota, U.S.A)의 시편을 제작하였다 5 mmx7 mm의 실리콘 주형에 Artglass$^{(R)}$ (Heraeus Kultzer, Germany)를 이용하여 레진 인레이를 제작하였다. 글래스아이오노머 베이스를 각 각 1시간, 24시간, 1주 및 2주 동안 37$^{\circ}C$ 증류수에 보관한 후 Variolink$^{(R)}$ II (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein)를 적용하여 인레이를 접착하였다. 만능 물성시험기(Model 4302, Instron, U.S.A)를 이용하여 결합 면에 1 mm/min의 속도로 1000 kg 하중을 가하여 전단 결합강도를 측정하였고, one-way ANOVA를 이용하여 통계 분석하였다. SEM 관찰을 위해 발거된 제 3대구치에 2급 와동을 형성하였고, 기저재로 광중합형 글래스아이오노머 시멘트를 적용하였다. 인레이를 접착한 시편을 수직 절단하여 상아질, 글래스아이오노머, 및 복합레진 인레이 간의 계면을 SEM (JSM-5400$^{(R)}$ Jeol, Tokyo, Japan) 관찰하였다. 시간 경과에 따른 글래스아이오노머와 복합 레진 인레이 사이의 전단 결합강도는 통계학적으로 유의한 차이가 없었으며, 기저재 재료에 따른 전단 결합강도의 유의한 차이도 없었으며 대부분 시편에서 글라스아이오노머 내부에서 응집 파괴 (Cohesive failure)가 발생하였다. SEM 관찰 시 글래스아이오노머와 상아질 사이에 약 30-20 $\mu$rn 정도의 간극 (gap)이 형성되었으며 , 글래스아이오노머와 복합 레진 인레이 계면에서는 1시간 후 접착한 시편을 제외하고 간극은 발견되지 않았다.

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제37권1호
• /
• pp.24-34
• /
• 2010

본 연구의 목적은 광중합형 글라스아이오노머 시멘트에 마이크로 입자의 하이드록시아파타이트와 나노미터 입자의 하이드록시아파타이트를 첨가하였을 때 물리적 성질과 탈회 저항, 결합 강도의 차이를 비교하기 위함이다. 실험에 사용된 광중합형 글라스아이오노머 시멘트는 Fuji II LC 였고 순수한 Fuji II LC GIC는 대조군으로, 15% micro HA- Fuji II LC GIC는 실험군 1, 15% nano HA- Fuji II LC GIC는 실험군 2로 설정한 후 실험을 진행하였고 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. CLSM으로 탈회 표면 깊이를 관찰한 결과 대조군 보다 실험군에서 법랑질의 탈회가 덜 발생하였고, 실험군 1 보다 실험군 2에서 법랑질의 탈회가 적게 관찰되었다. 2. SEM을 이용한 탈회면 관찰시 대조군에서 법랑질의 탈회가 더 많이 일어났고, 실험군은 하이드록시아파타이트의 영향으로 탈회가 덜 일어나 표면입자가 보다 규칙적이었다. 두 실험군을 비교했을 때 실험군 2가 실험군 1 보다 탈회에 저항하였다. 3. 결합 강도는 대조군, 실험군 1, 실험군 2 순으로 증가했으며 세 군간에 통계학적으로 유의할 만한 차이가 있었다 (p < 0.05). 4. SEM 상에서 결합 강도 측정 후 파절된 면을 관찰한 결과 하이드록시아파타이트를 포함하는 실험군에서 골 유사 아파 타이트 추정 입자가 관찰되었으며 실험군 1 보다 실험군 2에서 더 많은 입자가 형성되었다.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.792-800
• /
• 1997

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the adaptation of self-cured glass ionomer cement and resin-modified glass ionomer cement and polyacid-modified resin composite, which are light-cured giass ionomer cements, to dentin surface. Twelve extracted human maxillary and mandibular molar teeth were used in this study. The entire occlusal dentin surfaces of teeth were exposed with Diamond Wheel Saw and smoothed with sand papers (300, 600, 1200grits). They were randomly assigned into 3 groups according to glass ionomer cements used; Control group- Fuji II, Expeimental group 1 - Fuji II LC, Expeimental group 2 - Dyract. According to the manufacturer's directions, three glass ionomer cements were bonded to exposed dentin surfaces of the tooth crown and cured. Crowns and glass ionomers were trimmed after 24hrs and sectioned horizontally and vertically with diamond saw. The interface of glass ionomer cements and dentin was examined under SEM. The results were as follows : 1. Good adatation between glass ionomer cement and dentin on the horizontal section was showed in control and experimental group 1, but the gap of $20{\mu}m$, which was observed distinct separation between glass ionomer cement and dentin, was showed in experimental group 2. 2. Good adatation between glass ionomer cements and dentin on the vertical section was showed in control and experimental group 1, but the gap of 80-$100{\mu}m$ was showed in experimental group 2. 3. Cohesive fracture within glass ionomer cements in control and experimental group 1 was showed, but no cohesive fracture was showed in experimental group 2.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.447-459
• /
• 1994

The purpose of this study is to evaluate of shear bond strength of light-curing composite resin to light-curing glass ionomer cement. Composite resin and glass ionomer cement have been widely used as an esthetic filling materials in dental clinics. To achieve better clinical results, sandwich technic was developed with conpensating for disadvantages of these two materials. Especially, light-curing glass ionomer cement provided greately improved bonding strength of teeth or composite resin, and then excellent clinical results can be acquired. In this study, 6 commercial light-curing glass ionomer cements(3 commercial restorative materials : Fuji II LC, Variglass VLC, Vitremer, and 3 commercial lining materials : Fuji Lining LC, Baseline VLC, Vitrebond) were devided two groups. According to manufacturer's appointment, no surface treatment was referred to N groups. Supposing. of clinical practice, surface grinding with water spray at 320 grit sand paper, 40 seconds etching with 37% phosphoric acid, 20 seconds washing, 20 seconds air drying was referred to N groups. Totally 12 experimental groups were devided, and all 120 specimens from 10 specimens of each groups were made. After light-curing composite resin was bonded to light-curing glass ionomer cement, shear bond strength was tested by Instron universal testing machine between glass ionomer cement and composit resin. The data were analyzed statistically by Student's t-test and ANOVA. The obtained results were as follows; 1. In light-curing glass ionomer cement, restorative materials showed higher shear bond strength to composite resin than lining materials(p<0.05). 2. Variglass VLC of restorative material group and Baseline VLC of lining material group have highest shear bond strength to composite resin(p<0.001). 3. In light-curing glass ionomer cement, surface grinding and acid etching reduced shear bond strength to composite resin(p<0.001)}. 4. VGN group 1s highest shear bond strength to composite resin, VBE group is lowest shear bond strength to composite resin(p<0.001).

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.832-838
• /
• 1995

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the amount of marginal microleakage of 2 light curable GI cements(Fuji II LC & VariGlass), which contain some resin components. 4 volunteers kept on acrylic resin plates, which contained dentin disks with cavities filled with test materials for 2 weeks. The time when polishing was done(5 minutes and 24 hours after filling) and the use of protective agents were varied, so 8 groups with each 6 specimens were tested. After having specimens(disks with cavities filled with materials) penetrated with 1% Methylene Blue solution, specimens were stored in 40% nitric acid solution for 4 days to extract adsorbed dye material. Supernatants of centrifuged samples were diluted 5 times and Spectrophotometer was used to determine the degree of absorption. Dye concentration was calculated through the pre-obtained Linear Regression Curve. The results were as follows. 1. The best result was seen in groups (PF24, PV24) which were protected and polished 24 hours later and the opposite phenomenon was seen in groups(NF24, NV24) which were held without protection and polished 24 hours later. Groups polished S minutes later showed moderate leakage pattern. 2. Groups polished 5 minutes later showed similar leakage amount irrespective of using of protective agent. But statistically insignificant lower values were seen in VariGlass than in Fuji II LC groups, So It was considered that VariGlass may be more resistant to early moisture attack than Fuji II LC. 3. In groups polished 24 hours later, there was no significant difference between materials but was definitely significant difference according to the use of protective agent. If the cement in which polishing will be done 24 hours later, Protective agent should be used to cover the surface.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.721-731
• /
• 1995

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the adaptability to tooth structure of light-cured glass ionomer cements. In this, study, class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surfaces of thirty extracted human premolar teeth, and they were randomly assigned into 3 groups with 10 teeth. The cavities of each groups were filled with the Fuji II LC(GC International Corp., Japan), Vitremer(3M Dental Products Division, U.S.A) and VariGlass VLC(Caulk/Dentsply Inc., U.S.A.). The specimens were immersed in 1% methylene blue solution and stored in 100% realtive humidity at $37^{\circ}C$ for 5 days. And then, the specimens sectioned buccolingually. Degree of eke penetration at tooth--restoration interfaces were examined by magnifying glass at occlusal and gingival margin. The results were as follows : 1. On the occlusal margin, among the experimental groups, the group 2 showed the lowest microleakage($1.40{\pm}1.17$) and the group 1 showed the highest microleakage($3.10{\pm}0.99$). There was significant difference between group 1 and group 2(P<0.01). 2. On the gingival margin, among the experimental groups, the group 2 showed the lowest microleakage($2.50{\pm}1.08$) and the group 1 showed the highest microleakage($3.50{\pm}0.84$). But there was not significant. difference among the experimental groups(P>0.05). 3. The degree of microleakage at occlusal margin was less than gingival margin in all experimental groups.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제24권1호
• /
• pp.136-146
• /
• 1999

The purpose of this study was to estimate the changes of marginal adaptation to the cavity floor of light-cured glass ionomer cement base after application of a composite restoration. Eighty non-carious extracted human molars were used in the present study. Circular cavities were prepared on the center of the exposed dentin surface to 0.5mm, 1.0mm, 1.5mm, 2.0mm in depth and the prepared cavities were pretreated with Dentin conditioner and filled with Fuji II LC(GC Int. Co., Japan). They randomly assigned into 3 groups according to the difference in application of a composite restoration; Group 1(control group): only glass ionomer base, Group 2: The application of a composite restoration surrounded by dentin with class I cavity over glass ionomer base after conventional dentin bonding to the exposed dentin and glass ionomer base, Group 3: The application of composite restoration not-surrounded by dentin over glass ionomer base after conventional dentin bonding to the exposed dentin and glass ionomer base. To examine the interface between cavity floor and light-cured glass ionomer cement base, each groups were sectioned vertically through the center of restorations with diamond saw and the gap size(${\mu}m$) of interface measured by SEM. The results were analyzed by using One Way ANOVA. The results were as follows: 1. Good adaptation between glass ionomer cement base and cavity floor was showed in specimens with 0.5mm, 1.0mm depth base of control group. But in specimens with 1.5mm, 2.0mm depth base of control group, the gap was measured about $15{\mu}m$, $40{\mu}m$ respectively. 2. Gap size in group 2 was significantly higher than that in control group(P<0.05). 3. Gap size in group 3 was significantly higher than that in control group and group 2(P<0.05). 4. It was possible to observe the good adaptation between glass ionomer cement base and dentin which was intermediated with 4-10${\mu}m$ hybrid layer in specimens with 0.5mm, 1.0mm depth base of control group. Cohesive fracture within cement base was observed in all specimens which had the gap between glass ionomer cement base & dentin. 5. It was possible to observe the gap formation between cement base and bonding agent and between composite resin and dentin in all specimens of group 2.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.148-158
• /
• 1994

The purpose of this study was to compare the adaptation to tooth structure of light - cured glass ionomer cement with that of self -cured glass ionomer cement. In this study, class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surfaces of 10 extracted human premolar teeth, and teeth were randomly assigned 2 groups of 5 teeth each. The cavities of self-curing glass ionomer cement group were restored with the Fuji n. and the cavities of lightcuring glass ionomer cement group were restored with the Fuji II LC. The surfaces of glass ionomer cements were applied with All-Bond 2 adhesive, and cured with visible light. The restored teeth were stored in 100% relative humidity at $37^{\circ}C$ for 24 hours. And then. the roots of the teeth were removed with the tapered fissure bur and the remaining crowns were sectioned occlusogingivally through the center of glass ionomer restorations. Adaptation at tooth-restoration interface was assessed occlusally. axially, and gingivally by scanning electron microscope. The results were as follows : 1. On the occlusal margin, the group of self - curing glass ionomer cement showed closer adaptation to both enamel and dentin than the group of light-curing glass ionomer cement showing 5/lm gap between cement and tooth structure. 2. On the axial wall. the group of light-curing glass ionomer cement showing 5-$7{\mu}m$ gap between cement and dentin showed closer adaptation to dentin than the group of self -curing glass ionomer cement showing 10-$15{\mu}m$ gap between cement and dentin. 3. On the gingival margin, the group of light-curing glass ionomer cement showing 2-$5{\mu}m$ gap between cement and dentin(X 1200) showed closer adaptation to dentin than the group of self-curing glass ionomer cement showing 20pm gap between cement and dentin(X 600). 4. The group of self -curing glass ionomer cement showed closer adaptation on the occlusal margin than on the gingival margin, and the group of light-curing glass ionomer cement showed similar adaptation on both occlusal and gingival margins.