Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2005.30.3.158

STUDY ON THE INTERFACE BETWEEN LIGHT-CURED GLASS IONOMER BASE AND INDIRECT COMPOSITE RESIN INLAY AND DENTIN  

Lee, Song-Hee (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, DSRI, Chonnam National University)
Kim, Dong-Jun (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, DSRI, Chonnam National University)
Hwang, Yun-Chan (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, DSRI, Chonnam National University)
Oh, Won-Mann (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, DSRI, Chonnam National University)
Hwang, In-Nam (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, DSRI, Chonnam National University)
Publication Information
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics / v.30, no.3, 2005 , pp. 158-169 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was done to evaluate the shear bond strength between light-cured glass ionomer cement (GIC) base and resin cement for luting indirect resin inlay and to observe bonding aspects which is produced at the interface between them by SEM. Two types of light cured GIC (Fuji II LC Improved, GC Co. Tokyo, Japan and Vitrebond$^{TM}$, 3M, Paul Minnesota U.S.A) were used in this study. For shear bond test, GIC specimens were made and immersed in 37$^{\circ}C$ distilled water for 1 hour, 24 hours, 1 week and 2 weeks. Eighty resin inlays were prepared with Artglass$^{(R)}$ (Heraeus Kultzer Germany) and luted with Variolink$^{(R)}$ II (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein). Shear bond strength of each specimen was measured and fractured surface were examined. Statistical analysis was done with one-way ANOVA. Twenty four extracted human third molars were selected and Class II cavities were prepared and GIC based at axiopulpal lineangle. The specimens were immersed in 37$^{\circ}C$ distilled water for 1 hour, 24 hours, 1 week and 2 weeks. And then the resin inlays were luted to prepared teeth. The specimens were sectioned vertically with low speed saw. The bonding aspect of the specimens were observed by SEM (JSM-5400$^{(R)}$, Jeol, Tokyo, Japan) .There was no significant difference between the shear bond strength according to storage periods of light cured GIC base. And cohesive failure was mostly appeared in GIC On scanning electron micrograph, about 30 - 120 $\mu$m of the gaps were observed on the interface between GIC base and dentin. No gaps were observed on the interface between GTC and resin inlay.
Keywords
Shear bond strength; GIC base; Interface; Resin inlay;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Stanley L, Karl F. Clinical evaluation of a heat-treated resin composite inlay:3-year results. Am J Dent 5:258-262, 1992.
2 Schwartz RS, Summitt JB, William Robbins J. Fundamentals of operative dentistry. Quintessence Publishing Co., Chicago, IL., p234-235, 1996
3 Dean AE. Multifunctional bases and liners. Esthet Dent 42:739-754, 1998.
4 Yap AUJ, Mok. BYY, Pearson G. An in vitro microleakage study of the 'bonded-base' restorative technique. J Oral Rehabil 24:230-236, 1997.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Smith DC. Composition and charateristics of glass ionomer cements. J Am Dent Assoc 120:20-22, 1990.   DOI
6 Mitra SB. Adhesion to Dentin and Physical Property of Light-cured Glass-ionomer Liner/Base. J Dent Res 70:72-74, 1991.   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
7 Aschheim KW, Dale BG. Composite resin: indirect technique restorations. Esthetic Dentistry. 2nd ed, St. Louis, Mosby Co. p97-111, 2001
8 Karaagaclioglu L, Zaimoglu A, Akoren AC. Microleakage of indirect inlays placed on different kinds of glass ionomer cement linings. J Oral Rehabil 19:457-469, 1992.   DOI   PUBMED
9 Wendt SL. The effect of heat used as secondary cure upon the physical properties of three composite resins. I. Diametral tensile strength, compressive strength, and marginal dimensional stability. Quintessence Int 18:265-271, 1987.   PUBMED
10 Eystein Ruyter I. Type of resin-based inlay materials and their properties. Inter Dent J 42:139-144, 1992.
11 Mclean JW, Prosser HJ. The Use of Glass-ionomer Cements in Bonding Composite Resin to Dentine. Br Dent J 158:410, 1985.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Jackson RD, Ferguson RW. An esthetic, bonded inlay/onlay technique for posterior teeth. Quintessence Int 21:7-12, 1990.
13 McCabe JF. Resin-modified glass-ionomers. Biomaterials 19:521-527, 1998.   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
14 Hotta M, Aono M. Adaptation to the cavity floor of the light-cured glass ionomer cement base under composite restoration. J Oral Rehabil 21:679-685, 1994.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Ferracame JL, Marker VA. Solvent Degradation and Reduced Fracture Toughness in Aged Composites. J Dent Res 71:13-19, 1992.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Hilton TJ. Cavity Sealers, Liners, and Bases: Current Philosphies and Indications for Use. Oper Dent 21:134-146, 1996.   PUBMED
17 Anthony HL, Glancy JF. Interfacial bond strengths between layers of visible light-activated composites. J Prothet Dent 59:25-29, 1988.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Munksgaard EC, Irie M, Asmussen E. Dentin-polymer bond promoted by Gluma and various resins. J Dent Res 64:1409-1411, 1985.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Smith GE. Surface Deterioaration of Glass-Ionomer Cement during Acid Etching: an SEM Evaluation. Oper Dent 13:3-7, 1988   PUBMED
20 Draheim RN, Franklin Garcia-Godoy, Titus HW. Shear bond strength of a posterior composite resin to glass ionomer bases. Quintessence Int 9:357-358, 1988.
21 Yip HK, Tay FR, Ngo HC, Smales RJ. Pashley DH. Bonding of contemporary glass ionomer cements to dentin. Dent Mater 17:56-470, 2001
22 Schwartz RS, Summitt JB, William Robbins J. Fundamentals of operative dentistry. Quintessence Publishing Co., Chicago IL. p229, 1996
23 Hinoura K, Onose H, Moore BK, Philips RW. Effect of the bonding agent on the bond strength between glass ionomer cement and composite resin. Quintessence Int 20:31-35, 1989
24 Hotta M, Kondoh K, Yamamoto K, Kimura K. Comparison of air-dried treatments after etching on the micromechanical bonding of the composite to ionomer surface. Oper Dent 16:169-174, 1991
25 Small ICB, Watson TF, Chadwick AV, Sidhu SK. Water sorption in resin-modified glass-ionomer cements : An in vitro comparison with other materials. Biomaterials 19:545-550, 1998.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Cattani MA, Dupuis V, Payan J. Effect of water on the physical properties of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Dent mater 15:71-78, 1999.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Parra M, Kopel HM. Shear bond strength of repaired glass ionomers. Am J Dent 5:133-136, 1992.
28 Schwartz RS, Summitt JB, William Robbins J. Fundamentals of operative dentistry. Quintessence Publishing Co., Chicago IL. p207-210, 1996.
29 Irie M, Suzuki K. Water Storage Effect on the Marginal Seal of Resin-modified Glass-Ionomer Resrotrations. Oper Dent 24:272-278, 1999.
30 Robinson PB, Moore BK, Swartz ML. Comparison of Microleakage in Direct and Indirect Composite Resin Restoration in vitro. Oper Dent 12:113-116, 1987.
31 Meyers R, Garcia-Godoy F, Norling BK. Failure mode of a posterior composite resin bonded to a glass-ionomer cement treated with various etching times and with or without a coupling agent. Quintessence Int 21:501-506, 1990.
32 Jan WV, van Dijken. A 6-year evaluation of a direct composite resin inlay/onlay system and glass ionomer cement-composite resin sandwich restoration. Acta Odontol Scan 52:368-376, 1994.   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
33 Farah CS, Orton VG, Collard SM. Shear bond strength of chemical and light-cured glass ionomer cements bonded to resin composites. Aust Dent J 43:81-86, 1998.   DOI
34 Shortall AC, Baylis RL, Wilson HJ: Composite inlay/luting resin bond strength-surface treatment effects. J Dent 24:129-135, 1996.   DOI   ScienceOn
35 장병성, 김성교. 내표면 처리에 따른 레진 인레이와 글래스아이오노머 베이스 간의 접착. 대한치과보존학회지 25:399-406, 2000.
36 Cooley RL, Barkmeier WW. Dentinal shear bond strength, microleakage and contraction gap of visible light-polymerized liners/bases. Quintessence Int 22:467-474, 1991.
37 Tay FR, Smales RJ, Ngo H, Wei SHY, Pashley DH. Effect of Different Conditioning Protocols on Adhesion of a GIC to Dentin. J Adhesive Dent 3:153-167, 2001.
38 Welbury RR, McCabe JF, Murray JJ, Rusby S. Factors affecting the bond strength of composite resin to etched glass-ionomer cement. J Dent 16:188-193, 1987.   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Schwartz RS, Summitt JB, William Robbins J. Fundamentals of operative dentistry. Quintessence Publishing Co., Chicago IL, p210-215, 1996
40 Vankerckhoven H, Lambrechts P, Beylen MV, Davidson CL, Vanherle G. Unreacted methacrylate groups on the surfaces of composite resins. J Dent Res 61:791-796, 1982.   DOI   ScienceOn
41 Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Cimmino A, Tyas MJ. The evaluation of four conditioners for glass ionomer cements using field-emission scanning electron microscopy. J Dent 29:131-138, 2001.   DOI   ScienceOn