• Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
• /
• 2012.05a
• /
• pp.105-106
• /
• 2012

대부분의 의사결정은 단순한 계층 뿐만 아니라 상 하위 요소간의 상호작용과 종속성이 존재하기 때문에 매우 복잡한 절차를 거쳐 신중하게 처리해야 한다. 본 연구에서는 시민들이 하천을 이용함에 있어 어떠한 요소들을 우선적으로 선택하는지에 대하여 다기준 의사결정법을 이용하여 분석하고자 한다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2009.05a
• /
• pp.1754-1758
• /
• 2009

본 연구에서는 개정된 하천법에 의거하여 지방하천들 중에서 국가하천으로 지정하기에 적합한 하천들을 선별하여 이들의 관리등급을 조정하기 위한 방법론을 개발하였다. 대상 하천들 사이의 관리등급조정에 대한 우선순위를 결정하기 위하여 다기준의사결정법을 적용하였다. 개발된 하천평가지수에서는 세부기준을 하천중요도, 하천관리상태, 하천관리능력으로 구분하였으며, 지형 및 수문학적, 사회 및 경제적, 환경적 측면에서 각 세부기준들을 평가할 수 있는 지표들을 선정하였다. 또한, 수자원 분야 전문가들을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하고 계층적 분석기법을 사용하여 평가기준들과 평가지표들의 상대적 중요도를 결정하였다. 국가하천지정 우선순위는 대상하천의 등급을 8개로 구분하고 각 등급 내에서 하천평가지수의 상대적 크기를 비교하여 결정하였다.

• Journal of Industrial Technology
• /
• v.18
• /
• pp.27-34
• /
• 1998

According to growing interest in environmental quality with improvements of a standard of living site selection problems such as waste landfill sites, caused regional conflicts. This study investigates a waste landfill estimation method that was used to for storage, management, analysis and display of environmental information provided by geo-spatial information system(GIS) and analytic hierarchy process(AHP) as a decision-making method. If GIS is integrated with AHP, site selection problems of environmental hatred facilities shall be able to be very useful, because of AHP with flexibility which appropriately reflects opinions of the related group.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2016.05a
• /
• pp.257-259
• /
• 2016

선박교통관제사의 자격인증 교육은 IMO와 IALA에서 권고한 교육과정, 교육과목 및 교육기간 등을 표준으로 한다. 국제적 기준이 현재 교육과 차이가 있고, 대한민국 관제사들이 생각하는 교육의 중요성에도 차이가 있기 때문에 이에 본 연구에서는 선박교통관제사 자격인증 교육 현황을 분석하고, 이를 구체적인 교과목으로 나눈 다음 기존 직원들의 의견을 취합하여 AHP 분석을 통해 상대적 중요도를 평가해 보았다.

• Journal of Korean Society of Transportation
• /
• v.35 no.3
• /
• pp.183-196
• /
• 2017

In this study, policy evaluation scheme was established to encourage the efficient implementation of EcoMobility which has been expanding gradually all around the world. A total of eight evaluation goals and 22 evaluation items are reviewed and suggested based on the three major evaluation categories of "Basic elements for EcoMobility", "Land use and transport system for EcoMobility", and "Implications and impact of EcoMobility". The results of this study are as follows: the result of AHP analysis which reflects only the hierarchical structure shows a high priority in "Elements for EcoMobility promotion", "Eco-fiendly transport infrastructure", and "Safety in transport". While in result of ANP which considered the elements' dependencies, "Eco-fiendly transport Services", "Welfare in transport", and "Environment by transport" have high weights and importances. In conclusion, this study would be useful to make reasonable judgment based on the analysis results of the two techniques in order to ensure reliability in evaluation of EcoMobility policy. Furthermore we have confirmed appropriate evaluation technique between AHP and ANP which is better to reflect the features of EcoMobility.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.9 no.5
• /
• pp.159-167
• /
• 2008

This study provides a effective approach to the construction management problem with the limited number or amount of available resources using the analytic hierarchy process. Construction management is a series of decision making processes for planning and controling of cost, time and quality as main objectives in construction works. When several activities need the limited same resource at the same time, it is very hard to decide the priority of the activities in the real situations. For that the scientific decision making method and procedure for resource allocation are required. This study solves the resource allocation problem by dealing with the decision making problem which the activities are distributed to multiple projects and under multiple criteria. The analytic hierarchy process is a method devised to solve complex multi-criteria decision problems. The result shows that this study can be effectively used to make decisions in situations involving multiple objectives by evaluating the prioritized ranking and degree of the activity alternatives based on the overall preferences.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.5 no.5 s.21
• /
• pp.143-150
• /
• 2004

Nowaday, The tendency of complexity and extension of construction fields increase the need for efficient works managements like a construction management. Consequently, by the introduction of Decision-Making Theories, researches for improving construction field's efficiencies are actively performed. Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process method is invented, so that describes a decision maker's ambiguous linguistic judgment with fuzzy numbers. but most of researches on Fuzzy-AHP use symmetric triangular fuzzy function for estimating each evaluation item with the consequence that exact judgments are impossible. those limits are caused by the point that employed fuzzy ranking methods can not support dissymmetric fuzzy numbers. In this research, we aims to overcome this problem with R.P.R(Relative Preference Ratio) method and suggest improved Fuzzy-AHP method which can use dissymmetric fuzzy triangular numbers.

• Proceedings of the Korean Information Science Society Conference
• /
• 2007.06c
• /
• pp.299-302
• /
• 2007

최근 기업 정보에 대한 온톨로지 구축 필요성이 대두되면서 기업의 투자 비용과 시간을 고려한 온톨로지 구축 대상 선정을 위한 효율적인 기법이 요구되고 있다. 그러나 기존의 온톨로지 구축 방법론에서 제시한 대상선정 기법은 전체를 대상으로 하거나, 특정 영역만을 대상으로 한다는 한계가 있다. 본 논문에서는 정성적요소를 포함하는 다기준 의사결정에서 정량적인 평가를 지원하는 의사결정지원기법인 AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process:계층화분석법)기법을 온톨로지 구축 대상 선정에 적용하는 방법을 제안한다. 이러한 방법을 통해 온톨로지 적용대상의 우선순위를 결정지을 수 있으며, 기업의 온톨로지 구축시 목표와 전략에 맞는 대상선정의 정량적 기준을 제공할 수 있다.

• Environmental and Resource Economics Review
• /
• v.13 no.2
• /
• pp.245-269
• /
• 2004

While the role of local community is getting important in reducing greenhouse gases, current financial supports have not considered these efforts. Instead, development activities have been the only basis of fiscal distribution, which have led to unsustainable development. In this context, this paper analyzes the emission and absorb of air pollutants by local districts in Daegu Metropolitan city and constructs an empirical energy database for local energy use and environmental emissions. Based on the data, it prioritized environmental contribution by region through using MCDM methods, that include maximin & maximax method, simple additive weighting (SAW) and hierarchical additive weighting method (HAW). This concludes the possibility of policy methodology through which we can input environmental variables in distributing local budget.

• The Journal of The Korea Institute of Intelligent Transport Systems
• /
• v.22 no.1
• /
• pp.192-207
• /
• 2023

Commercialization of level-4 (Lv.4) autonomous driving applications requires the definition of a safe road environment under which autonomous vehicles can operate safely. Thus, a risk assessment model is required to determine whether the operation of autonomous vehicles can provide safety to is sufficiently prepared for future real-life traffic problems. Although the risk factors of autonomous vehicles were selected and graded, the decision-making method was applied as qualitative data using a survey of experts in the field of autonomous driving due to the cause of the accident and difficulty in obtaining autonomous driving data. The fuzzy linguistic representation of decision-makers and the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP), which converts uncertainty into quantitative figures, were implemented to compensate for the AHP shortcomings of the multi-standard decision-making technique. Through the process of deriving the weights of the upper and lower attributes, the road alignment, which is a physical infrastructure, was analyzed as the most important risk factor in the operation risk of autonomous vehicles. In addition, the operation risk of autonomous vehicles was derived through the example of the risk of operating autonomous vehicles for the 5 areas to be evaluated.