Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7470/jkst.2017.35.3.183

Evaluation Scheme for EcoMobility Policy Based on Multi-criteria Decision Making, AHP and ANP  

KIM, Junghwa (Urban Management, Kyoto University)
KIM, Sukhee (Department of Urban and Environment, Suwon Research Institute)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Transportation / v.35, no.3, 2017 , pp. 183-196 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study, policy evaluation scheme was established to encourage the efficient implementation of EcoMobility which has been expanding gradually all around the world. A total of eight evaluation goals and 22 evaluation items are reviewed and suggested based on the three major evaluation categories of "Basic elements for EcoMobility", "Land use and transport system for EcoMobility", and "Implications and impact of EcoMobility". The results of this study are as follows: the result of AHP analysis which reflects only the hierarchical structure shows a high priority in "Elements for EcoMobility promotion", "Eco-fiendly transport infrastructure", and "Safety in transport". While in result of ANP which considered the elements' dependencies, "Eco-fiendly transport Services", "Welfare in transport", and "Environment by transport" have high weights and importances. In conclusion, this study would be useful to make reasonable judgment based on the analysis results of the two techniques in order to ensure reliability in evaluation of EcoMobility policy. Furthermore we have confirmed appropriate evaluation technique between AHP and ANP which is better to reflect the features of EcoMobility.
Keywords
AHP; ANP; ecomobility; multicriteria deciosion making techniques; policy evaluation;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Ahangari H., Garrick N., Atkinson-Palombo C. (2016), Relationship Between Human Capital and Transportation Sustainability or the United States and Selected European Countries, Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2598, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 92-101.   DOI
2 Al-Atawi A., Kurmar R., Saleh W. (2016), Transportation Sustainability Index for Tabuk city in Saudi Arabia: an analytic hierarchy process, Tramsport, 31(1), 47-55.
3 Busan Development Institute (2014), Analysis and Evaluation Indicators of Ecological Transportation in Busan City.
4 Hamalainen R.P., Seppalainen T.O. (1986) The Analytic Network Process in Energy Policy Planning Science, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 20(6), 399-405.   DOI
5 ICLEI (2013) EcoMobility Suwon 2013, ICLEI.
6 Jeon C., Amekudzi A., Guensler R. (2010), International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 4, 227-247.   DOI
7 Jeong K. (2009), Development of Green Indicators and Models for 3G Implementation, Gyeonggi Research Institute.
8 Kim J., Lee S. (2013), A Study on Evaluation Indices for Sustainable Urban Transport Systems, 14(2), 245-257.
9 Kim S., Lee S. (2014), An Analysis of Residential Satisfaction at The Ecomobility World Festival 2013 Suwon, Transportation Technology and Policy, 11(4), Korean Society of Transportation, 64-72.
10 Korea Ministry of Environment (2001), Study on Development and Utilization of National Indicators of Sustainable Development.
11 Korea Transport Institute (2009), Development of Transport Indicators for Green Growth Index and DB Construction Plan.
12 KRIHS (2003), Sustainable Land Development Index.
13 KRIHS (2007), Sustainable Land Development Index.
14 Lee S. (2009), A Study on Sustainability Evaluation of Transportation Policy, Seoul studies, 10(1), 209-221.
15 Lee Y. (2006), Designing Customer-Oriented Marketing Decision Making Model Using ANP, Journal of -Quality Management, 33(2), 32-39.
16 Matsui D., Asahi Y., Yamaguchi T. (2006), Consideration on leadership Evaluation System of Preliminary School Teachers Using AHP and ANP, Proceedings for Conference of Japan Operations Research Society, 54-55.
17 Mead L., Sarkis J. (1999) Analyzing Organizational Project Alternatives for Agile Manufacturing Process: An Analytical Network Approach, International Journal of Production Research, 37(2), 241-261.   DOI
18 Mead L., Sarkis J. (2002) A Conceptual Model for Selection and Evaluating Third party Reverse Logistics Provider, Supply Chain Management: An international Journal, 7(5), 283-295.   DOI
19 OECD (2001), Toward Sustainable Development.
20 Saaty T.L. (1996), Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process, RWS Publications.
21 Suwon Research Insitutue (2013), A Study on the Policy Direction through the Analysis of the Effect of Eco-Transportation Suwon 2013 Project.
22 Seoul Research Institute (2008), Development and Utilization of Sustainable Traffic Policy Indicators.
23 Shim Y., Byun G., Lee B. (2011), Deriving Strategic Priorities of Green ICT Policy Using AHP and ANP, Jornal of Internet Computing and Services, 12(1), 85-98.
24 Son E., Bae S. (2011), Calculation of Weighting Factors for Sustainable Transportation Index, Journal of Transportation Research, 18(2), 47-60.
25 The Commission on Sustainable Development (2008), National Sustainable Development Indicators.
26 UNSCSD (2007), Indicators of Sustainable Development: Guidance and Methodologies.
27 Yang J., Kim N., Ahn K. (2015), A Study on the Development of Sustainable Indicators of Transportation Department of Local Governments Through Compare Internal and External Indicators, The 72nd Conference of KST, Korean Society of Transportation, 421-426.