• Proceedings of the Korean Institute Of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• autumn
• /
• pp.305-310
• /
• 2001

The purpose of this study is to calculate delay damages for contractors. The study has been performed by investigation of delay cost occurrence status and the analysis of subway construction cases. The results of this study are as follows: 1. Delay cost( 1day) equivalent to $0.005\%$ of total construction cost by analysis case studies. 2. Including bank interest, dealy cost is analysed as the following; $1.1\~9.2\%$ of total construction cost in part extension period, $3.3\~11.0\%$ of total construction cost in total extension period. 3. In comparison between liquidated damages and delay cost, liquidated damages account for average 20.1 times of delay costs. 4. Acceleration cost will be calculate on the basis of delay cost calculation method. In the result of this method, acceleration cost is equal to delay cost at least or must be large than delay cost

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.18 no.4
• /
• pp.48-56
• /
• 2017

Construction Projects have many participants by characteristic, scale and contract. Those also have complicated communication structure. So, claim and dispute occur continuously for conflicting communication. In many claim and dispute cases, it usually occurs between builder and owner. Unfair practices by owners position cause main claim and dispute. This study analyses judgment type, cause and compensation ratio in korean commercial arbitration case and provides the dispute information for builder that has weak position by contract. It draws analysis information for managing and controlling dispute that order type, judgement type, cause and failure case. Using these analysis information, it hopes to help inducement of dispute agreement and save time and economic damage for builder during construction. It also hopes to rise construction completeness by providing dispute management information.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.136-145
• /
• 2008

Recently the Ministry of Finance and Economy of Korea launched two new project delivery systems called "Best Value Contract (Design-Bid-Build)" and "Bridging Contract (Design-Build)" in October of 2007 by revising enforcement ordinances of "Act on Contracts to Which the State is a Party". These project delivery systems require the bidders to submit technical proposal adjusted to the project characteristics and objectives for selecting the contractor by evaluating technical proposals. This research aimed to suggest guideline to effectively operate the project delivery systems described above. To reach the goal of the research, the framework of the operation model was developed, which includes the four categories: the standard bidding process, the technical proposal requirements, the technical proposal evaluation criteria, and the award methods. The contents of the four categories above were fulfilled throughout conferring with the advisory experts. In particular, the award methods, which are the important decision-making factor in the perspective of the owner, consist of four types: Low Bid-Fully Qualified, Weighted Criteria, Adjusted Bid, and Adjusted Score. The quantitative features and application criteria of these four types of award methods were suggested throughout the simulation using the virtual case.

• Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
• /
• v.12 no.2
• /
• pp.87-94
• /
• 2017

The utilization of the achievements derived from the national R & D project is a key task of the science and technology industry policy that should lead the national economic growth by enhancing the investment efficiency of the national R&D. Although Korea has implemented various programs supporting technology transfer, commercialization, Performance is not sufficient. One of several causes may include inflexibility of a small or medium-sized company Priority System. This study is exploratory research on the directions for improving the current a small or medium-sized company Priority System. Results: First, Because the current SMEs Priority System contributes positively to enhancing SMEs R&D capability, We have to keep the system in principle. However, it is necessary to improve the direction of giving the strategic flexibility of the system so that the system is not operated formally. First, it is appropriate to make an exceptional contract with a person other than a small or medium-sized company, if a small and medium-sized company is not suitable for a technology execution contract due to the nature of technology. Second, it is desirable to consider the fulfillment of the obligations of this system when "sufficient efforts" are made to find a technical user.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute Of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• autumn
• /
• pp.294-298
• /
• 2003

Recently, Design-build project as delivery system public construction sector tends to be increased according to the Masterplan for promotion of construction technologies, and construction projects are increasing their complexity, variety and scale. And owner's requirements become various. Preliminary design for design eligibility judging of design-build has been designed excessively to get a good point and this tendency includes the elements which is capable of wasting the budget. Because of excessive design, owners require to apply VE study into the design development phase but in the Design-build system, VE application has not been of no effect that owners expect, owing to the characters of lum-sum contracts. The purpose of this study is to propose the plan for effective application of VE in the design development phase in order to solve the problems such as excessive design of preliminary design in the design-build project. This study established plans for VE application through investigating and analyzing VE application case and then proposed the applications in the aspect of regulations and contracts, parties participated in project, VE operation through research for verification of usefulness.

• The Journal of Information Technology
• /
• v.6 no.3
• /
• pp.137-150
• /
• 2003

Recently, developing information technology and increasing internet usage, e-Learning service industry is rapidly growing. However institutions and regulations related e-Learning service are insufficient. Users of e-Learning service were lower grade in school relatively, spent average 40,000won/month and used other private education service. Users answered that they were generally satisfied at e-Learning service but were not satisfied at e-Learning 'fee'and 'the contract process'. Specially, the result suggest that consumer's satisfaction is affect by experience of demage and complains related e-Learning usage.

• The Korean Journal of Financial Management
• /
• v.15 no.1
• /
• pp.245-261
• /
• 1998

본 논문은 다기간 대리모형에서 나타날 수 있는 대리비용 중에서 대리인과 위임자의 의사 결정고려기간(decision-making horizon)의 차이로 인해서 발생할 수 있는 과소투자유인을 연구 대상으로 하고 있다. 대리인인 경영자는 자신의 명성을 고려해서 투자효과가 자신의 임기내에 나타나는 투자안에 높은 관심을 가질 것이다. 그런데 계속기업을 전제로 하면 대리인인 경영자는 위임자인 주주보다 투자의사결정시 고려하는 기간이 짧아서 과소투자의 가능성이 존재한다. 동적최적화 기법을 이용한 이론적 모형의 결과도 대리계약기간이 짧을수록 투자수준이 낮을 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 내용을 한국상장기업들을 대상으로 임원근속기간과 설비투자수준의 관계에 대해서 실증분석한 결과, 이론적 기대와 일치하지만 통계적 유의성은 낮은 편이었다. 이같은 결과는 전문경영체제가 확립되어 있지 않은 한국기업환경의 특성에 기인한다고 생각된다.

• 월간낙농육우
• /
• v.30 no.4
• /
• pp.100-130
• /
• 2010

그 동안 정부는 한. 육우 및 젖소에서 조사료와 농후사료의 비율 40 : 60을 60 : 40으로 개선 하기 위해 각종 정책을 추진하여 왔다. 그러나 아직도 조사료 생산 기반확충, 작부 체계의 개편, 조사료의 유통 활성화, 품질 및 안전관리 강화 이를 위한 법적 제도적 지원 방안과 관련 산업의 부가가치 향상을 위한 정책 보완이 필요하다. 그 대안을 찾아보는 것이 본 연구의 목적이다. 생산기반을 수요와 공급 면에서 보면 지역적으로 불균형 현상이 일어나고 있고 지역별로 재배 여건에 적합한 다수확 우량 조사료 종자 보급이 필요한 경우도 있다. 실수요자에 대한 정부 지원에 대하여 미흡하다는 의견도 있는가 하면 특히 조사료 생산의 작업일수가 짧은 탓에 기계장비의 이용률이 저하되기도 하였는데 이에 대한 정부 지원 방안 개선의 여지가 있다. 유통 기반에서 보면 조사료의 특성상 부피가 크고 단가는 낮아 단위당 유통비용이 높아지므로 유통이 활성화되는 데 애로사항이 되어 왔다. 조합 간에만 유통비를 지급하게 되어 비조합 공급자에게는 판매가 어렵거나 구매력이 약해지는 문제점 개선이 필요하였는데 법인이 아닌 경종 농가와 축산농가가 상호 계약에 의해 효과적으로 공존 공영하는 일본의 사례를 벤치마킹해 볼 필요가 있다고 연구에서 밝히고 있다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute Of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• 2006.11a
• /
• pp.584-587
• /
• 2006

Quality assessment of the building is strongly dependent upon satisfying owner's requirements. To develop indicators for the assessment of design quality, survey on current situation of design process and analysis of Design Quality Indicator(DQI) is performed. The survey revealed that the main cause of frequent design changes is variability feature of owner's requirements. DQI, an indicator developed in UK, questionnaire encompasses questions which are relevant throughout the development stages of a building, and can be used at every key stage of the process. Further research will focus on the development of indicators for the assessment of design quality applicable to Korean market. In addition, research on the visualization method to present assessment results and supporting tools to facilitate assessment will be considered.

• Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
• /
• v.26 no.2
• /
• pp.229-235
• /
• 2021

Blockchain, recognized as one of the core technologies of the 4th industrial revolution, is an Internet-based distributed data management system which does not require centralized control. Blockchain is characterized by the integrity and reliability of information, and blockchains can be used where such characteristics are required. Typical applications of blockchain include finance, transaction, and evaluation management. In this paper, we designed a blockchain-based evaluation management system that allows users to freely create and manage evaluation instances. Evaluation managers can create an evaluation instance according to their purpose and allocate evaluation items and evaluators. When the evaluators finish evaluating the evaluation items, the evaluation manager can aggregate the evaluation results for the instance. Someone, who want to perform evaluation for various purposes but do not have an evaluation system, can implement the evaluation system relatively simply by using this system. In addition, due to the characteristic of the blockchain, evaluators cannot modify the evaluation scores they have already recorded, and neither the system administrator nor the evaluation administrator can modify the evaluation scores. For this reason, the reliability of the evaluation increases.