Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2017.18.4.048

Analysis of Construction Dispute Cases Considering Reward Ratio Focused on Arbitration Cases of Korean Commercial Arbitration Board  

Ahn, SangHyun (Department of Architectural Engineering, Kwangwoon University)
Choi, Heeju (Department of Architectural Engineering, Kwangwoon University)
Yu, Jungho (Department of Architectural Engineering, Kwangwoon University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management / v.18, no.4, 2017 , pp. 48-56 More about this Journal
Abstract
Construction Projects have many participants by characteristic, scale and contract. Those also have complicated communication structure. So, claim and dispute occur continuously for conflicting communication. In many claim and dispute cases, it usually occurs between builder and owner. Unfair practices by owners position cause main claim and dispute. This study analyses judgment type, cause and compensation ratio in korean commercial arbitration case and provides the dispute information for builder that has weak position by contract. It draws analysis information for managing and controlling dispute that order type, judgement type, cause and failure case. Using these analysis information, it hopes to help inducement of dispute agreement and save time and economic damage for builder during construction. It also hopes to rise construction completeness by providing dispute management information.
Keywords
Construction Dispute; Arbitration; Judgment Type; Cause; Reward Ratio;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Doo, S. H. (2003). "Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management" Construction Economy Reserch Institute of Korea.
2 Fair Trade Commission, Statistical Yearbook.
3 Kim, D. S., Cho, Y. J., Hyun, C. T., and Hong, T. H. (2008). "A study on the structure of indirect field negotiation system for effective dispute resolution at contract administration stage" Architectural Institute of Korea, 24(9), pp. 131-138.
4 Kim, I. H., Hong, Y. T., Ryu, H. G., and Lee, H. S. (2004). "A study on identification of the reasons od construction claim failure and proposal of improved methods of claims in the construction company's perspective" Architectural Institute of Korea Academic Conferences, 24(2), pp. 623-626.
5 Kim, J. H., Im, H. K., and Choi, J. H. (2016). "Forecasting the effects of the claims in the korean construction industry" Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 17(5), pp. 35-44.   DOI
6 Korean Commercial Arbitration Board, Claims Statistics. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Press Releases.
7 Park, S. Y., Tang, J. K., Kim, B. O., and Lee, S. B. (2009). "Identifying and analyzing pre-dispute factors for construction projects" Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 10(6), pp. 48-57.
8 Shin, C. J., Kim, Y. K., Cho, K. M., Hyun, C. T., and Hong, T. H. (2011). "Development of checklist to prevent claim through dispute case analysis of public construction projects" Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 12(1), pp. 13-22.   DOI
9 Yoon, S. M., Hyun, C. T., Han, S. W., and Cha, Y. W. (2015). "Identification of claim elenments for design build projects using FMEA method" Journal of KBIM, 5(2), pp. 26-33.   DOI
10 Cho, Y. J., and Lee, S. B. (2005). "A study on mitigation of construction dispute in public projects" Architectural Institute of Korea, 21(8), pp. 129-136.