• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2017.11a
• /
• pp.941-967
• /
• 2017

제조혁신 기술로서 엔지니어링 모델링 & 시뮬레이션(이하, Eng. M&S) 기술은 제조패러다임을 바꿀 대안기술로 주목되고 있으며, 해당분야 국가수준에서의 기술정책 육성을 위해 경쟁력 분석이 우선적으로 선행되어야 한다. 이를 위해 제조업에서 Eng. M&S가 갖는 의미를 고찰하고, 기존에 정립된 특허, 논문 계량 분석 경쟁력 평가모형을 기반으로 Eng. M&s 기술적 특성을 반영한 시장 관점에서 지표를 추가하여 Eng. M&S 기술에 대한 각국의 경쟁력을 도출을 시도하였다. 또한 모형의 통계적 검증을 통해 기존 계량정보 기반 평가모형보다 다양한 정보에 의한 높은 설명력을 확인하였고, 이에 따라 추가된 시장지표의 유용성을 확인할 수 있었다. Eng. M&S 기술경쟁력 분석 결과, 한국의 경쟁력은 최고기술보유국가인 미국대비 절반 수준으로 7개 주요국 중 가장 낮게 평가되었으며, 도출된 결과를 기반으로 경쟁국들의 정책적 노력에 대해 논의하였다. 본 연구를 통해 설계역량이 현저히 낮다고 평가된 한국 제조환경에 맞는 Eng. M&S 기술 육성 정책 수립이 필요하며, 보다 근본적인 차원에서의 해당 기술 활용을 촉구하는 바이다.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.12-21
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this study is to determine a national construction industry's competitiveness and establish strategies to expand into overseas construction markets. To evaluate the international competitiveness of overseas construction businesses, this study were selected as the target range of international comparisons among the countries cited by ENR, Global-Insight, IMF, OECD, and Transparency International. In result the United States ranked first, followed by China $2^{nd}$, Italy$3^{rd}$, U.K.$4^{th}$, and Germany $5^{th}$, while Korea ranked $9^{th}$ overall. In particular, Korea's competitiveness in the construction infrastructures by country ranking($11^{th}$) was higher than the competency assessment results of construction companies by country, therein ranking $12^{th}$. In addition, while Korea ranks $12^{th}$ among 22 countries, $3^{rd}$ in price competitiveness, $12^{th}$ in construction competitiveness, and $19^{th}$ in design competitiveness.

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2012.11a
• /
• pp.89-102
• /
• 2012

본 연구에서는 주요국에 대한 녹색기술 경쟁력을 살펴보기 위해 특허 인용 네트워크 위상 기반 핵심 특허 지표를 제안하고, 이를 활용하여 핵심 기술 경쟁력 지수를 구축하였으며, 유럽 특허청에 출원된 녹색 기술 특허 정보를 활용하여 녹색기술 특허 출원 상위 20개국에 대한 기술경쟁력을 측정하였다. 분석 결과 일본, 미국, 독일, 프랑스가 녹색기술 전반에 걸쳐 많은 특허를 출원하고 있는 것으로 나타났는데, 기술경쟁력을 측정 결과는 전반적으로 기술분야별 특허 출원 건수 측면에서 높은 순위에 위치하였던 일본, 독일, 미국의 경쟁력이 높게 나타나고 있는 가운데, 영향력과 위상적 핵심성에서 상대적으로 높은 평가를 받은 스페인, 핀란드 등의 국가들이 상위에 위치하고, 상대적으로 낮은 평가를 받은 미국 및 프랑스의 경우에는 낮은 순위에 위치하는 것을 확인할 수 있다. 우리나라는 E(배출가스저감기술) 분야에서 3위, G(배출가스저감기술) 분야에서 4위에 위치하여 높은 경쟁력을 보이고 있으며, C(배출완화 연소기술) 분야 및 D(기후변화완화기술) 분야에서는 각각 7위와 8위의 기술경쟁력 수준을 갖고 있는 반면, A(환경관리기술) 분야, B(신재생에너지기술) 분야, F(배출가스 저감 및 고효율화 교통기술) 분야에서는 낮은 경쟁력을 갖고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 실증 분석에 활용한 유럽 특허청에 출원된 특허 정보의 한계로 인해 일부 국가들의 기술경쟁력 측정에 있어서 편의가 나타날 우려가 발견되었는데, 향후 삼극특허 정보 등을 활용하는 방식으로 이러한 문제점을 보완하면 보다 정확한 기술경쟁력 측정이 가능하리라 예상한다.

• Informatization Policy
• /
• v.29 no.4
• /
• pp.91-108
• /
• 2022

Keen attention has been directed at "smart tourism cities" due to its role of solving urban problems arising from modern tourism development. However, some local governments are making huge investments in developing uniform tourism apps without specific directions or guidelines for the transformation of smart tourism cities. Accordingly, this study aims to develop a standardized and objective smart tourism competitiveness index and evaluate the competitiveness rankings of various cities around the world. The index comprises the five subindices of attractiveness, accessibility, digitalization readiness, sustainability, and co-partnership. The analysis results have shown that Singapore is the most competitive smart tourism city, followed by Amsterdam, New York City, Seoul and Barcelona, with Ho Chi Minh and Bangkok being relegated to the bottom of competitiveness rankings. We expect that this index can be employed as a global standard for continuously and systematically monitoring smart tourism city-related projects in the future.

• 한국상하수도협회지
• /
• s.12
• /
• pp.76-91
• /
• 2005

• Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics
• /
• v.23 no.1
• /
• pp.74-84
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this study is to develop competitiveness evaluation index for global aviation training organizations. Research and studies on relevant documents were conducted to establish the index. With no sufficient study results previously done directly associated with global aviation training organization, relevant and related documents, such as studies on competitiveness evaluation index of higher educational institutions, were reviewed as an alternative. Two rounds of delphi surveys were conducted based on the review and consultation from experts in aviation training and human resource management fields. First round of survey with 62 evaluation indices were carried out, through which a total of 29 were selected, and 19 indices were chosen during the second round of survey. However, factor analysis was conducted in order to justify the survey result, which eliminated 3 more indices, with 16 finally selected. This study will provide implications for aviation training organizations which need to further improve their competitiveness globally.

• Journal of Wetlands Research
• /
• v.22 no.4
• /
• pp.245-256
• /
• 2020

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the technological competitiveness of the environmental industry with developed countries in order to establish an international market expansion strategy of the Korean environmental industry and technology. In order to evaluate the competitiveness of the environmental industry and technology, core technologies were classified by the environmental industry sectors based on the classification system of the domestic and international environmental industry and technology. After developing the evaluation index data, the Delphi analysis, journal and patent analysis, as well as the export and import analysis were carried out and the standardization analysis was performed on the index data. Moreover, the weights of each evaluation index were calculated using the AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) method and the evaluation results of competitiveness of the environmental industry and technology in Korea, the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, and France were derived. As a result of the evaluation, the United States was rated with the highest technological competitiveness in all the environmental industry sectors, while Korea got the lowest technological competitiveness rating compared to the 4 developed countries. In particular, Korea got the lowest level of technological competitiveness in the sector of multi-media environmental management and development for a sustainable social system. Therefore, in order for the Korean environmental industry and technology to enter the global advanced market, it is necessary to strengthen the competitiveness through the development of the fourth environmental industry based on IoT(Internet of Things), cloud, big data, mobile, and AI(Artificial Intelligence), which are currently the country's domestic strengths.

• Journal of Korean Society for Geospatial Information Science
• /
• v.20 no.1
• /
• pp.73-81
• /
• 2012

This study ultimately aims to suggest directions for development of U-City Competitiveness Index through thorough analyses of U-City competitiveness concepts and previous research in U-City-related index. In an attempt to reach the aforementioned goals, the concept of U-City competitiveness is presented based on existing publications on informatization age, future city, and U-City. Next, insights on the development of U-City Competitiveness Index are provided via analysis of research on indices regarding U-City and future city. Finally, the process of developing UCity Competitiveness Index and cautionary comments for each developmental step has been provided. Based on the research results, U-City competitiveness refers to the ability to respond to demands of residents in a timely manner as well as to manage U-City, ICT, U-City infrastructure, and U-City services that maximizes the efficiency of urban space management. In order for proper assessment of these criteria, development of assessment tools, selection of indices, standardization, allocation of weight per index, and construction of assessment framework are required.

• Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea
• /
• v.20 no.2
• /
• pp.245-258
• /
• 2017

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport established a comprehensive plan for 83 old industrial complexes over 20-year. They implemented the competitiveness of industrial complex in September 2013, and revitalizing and remodelling comprehensive plan in December 2014. With significant influences of old industrial complex in September 2009, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport chose the 4 districts for the first pilot project. In December 2014, the second pilot project districts were established. In addition, there were 10 districts in April 2016 and 5 districts in April 2016 as the third pilot project and 5 distiricts in March 2017 as the fourth piolt project. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport currently suggests 23 districts to regenerate among 83 old industrial complex districts over 20 years. Even though the government suggests the certain 23 districts, this research selects the bottom 23 districts (30%) represented through the Focus Group Interview and compare them with the list government-suggested. As a result, there were some unlisted industrial complex districts. This research suggests the unlisted industrial complex districts which need to be regenerated and their problems, therefore this could be used as a guide for feasibility of old industrial complex regeneration implement.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
• /
• 2011.01a
• /
• pp.203-206
• /
• 2011

공개 경쟁에 의한 제안 업체 선정과 객관적이고 공정한 제안서의 평가는 공공IT 부문에 있어서 성공적인 사업 수행을 위한 필수요소이다. '소프트웨어 기술성 평가기준 적용 가이드'에서는 소프트웨어 기술성 평가기준을 적용하는데 필요한 절차와 단계별 적용방법 및 세부내용 해설과 평가척도 예시를 제시하여 활용이 가능하도록 하였다. 그러나 기술성을 평가하기 위한 평가부문별 평가항목 및 평가기준에 대한 부분이 구체적이지 않아 경쟁력 있는 제안 업체의 기술성을 정확하고 공정하게 평가하는데 어려움이 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 제안 업체의 기술성을 정확하게 평가하기 위하여 평가요소 중에서 기술 평가요소에 대한 부분을 평가지표로 선정하고 통계 기법으로 평가지표를 검증하는 방법을 제시하고자 한다.