문화기술의 융합 (The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology)

  • 제10권3호
  • /
  • Pages.519-531
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2384-0358(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-0366(eISSN)
국제문화기술진흥원 (The International Promotion Agency of Culture Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대학혁신지원사업에서 '혁신'은 어디에 있는가? :부·울·경 지역 대학혁신전략을 중심으로

Study on the 'innovation' in higher education under the national university innovation support project

  • 조원겸 (동아대학교 대학혁신사업단) ;
  • 조연교 (울산과학대학교 간호학부)
  • Wongyeum Cho ;
  • Yeongyo Cho (Dept. of Nursing, Ulsan College)
  • 투고 : 2024.03.04
  • 심사 : 2024.04.20
  • 발행 : 2024.05.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 부·울·경 지역대학을 대상으로 대학현장에서 계획되고 실행되는 교육혁신의 양상과 특징을 분석하고 그 한계와 과제를 탐색하는데 있다. 이를 위하여 부·울·경 지역 대학 17개교의 대학혁신지원사업의 2020년 사업계획 중 혁신 전략 프로그램을 질적 내용 분석하였다. 분석의 기준은 투입, 프로세스, 인프라, 기타 요인으로 프로세스 요인은 교육영역, 연구영역, 산학협력영역으로 나누어 혁신의 양상과 특징을 살펴보았다. 연구 결과, 부·울·경 지역 대학의 대학혁신의 양상이 교육과 연구, 산학협력 영역에서 분석되었으며 그 특징으로는 융복합 교육 강조, 역량개발, 스마트기반, 학습자중심 교수법, 학생맞춤형 지원, 지역연계로 나타났다. 연구를 통하여 나타난 대학혁신의 한계와 과제는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 지역대학이 맥락을 고려한 특성화된 대학혁신의 사업구조가 마련되어야 한다. 둘째, 수립된 혁신성이 높은 전략들이 실행되고 지속될 수 있어야 하며 이를 위해서는 구성원들의 합의가 필요하다. 셋째, 대학의 혁신이 학문의 편중화를 의미해서는 안되고 연구기관으로서 대학의 역할 제고와 노력이 필요하다. 넷째, 대학혁신의 가시적인 혁신전략보다 더 중요한 것이 교육의 효과로 대학혁신은 궁극적으로 학생들에게 직접적으로 발생하는 교육의 혁신이라는 점이 간과되어서는 안된다.

The purpose of this study is to analyze the aspects and characteristics of educational innovation planned and implemented at the university site targeting universities in Busan, Ulsan, and Gyeongnam, and to explore their limitations and tasks. For this purpose, we analyzed the contents of innovation strategy programs among the plans of 17 universities in the national innovation support projects in Busan, Ulsan, and Gyeongnam area. First, the university innovation strategy was divided into input, process, infrastructure, and other factors, and among them, the process factor was divided into education, research, and industry-university cooperation to examine the aspects and characteristics of innovation. As a result of the study, the aspects of university innovation at universities in Busan, Ulsan, and Gyeongnam were analyzed in the areas of education, research, and industry-academia cooperation. Characteristics of innovation were emphasis on convergence education, competency development, smart system foundation, introduction of innovative teaching and learning techniques, consumer-centeredness, and regional linkage. The limitations and tasks of university innovation revealed through the research are as follows. First, a specialized university innovation business structure should be prepared in consideration of the context of local universities. Second, established strategies with high innovativeness must be implemented and sustained, and consensus among members is required for this. Third, the innovation of universities should not mean the centralization of academics, and the role and efforts of universities as a research institutions should be improved. Fourth, it should not be overlooked that more important than the visible innovation strategy of university innovation is the education innovation that occurs directly to students as a result of the education effect.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kim, J. H.(2010). The Conditions of the Educational Discourse on the Competency-Based Educational Innovation in Universities. Journal of Educational Principles, 15(1), 87-126.
  2. Duderstadt, J. J. (2000). A university for the 21st Century. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  3. Baek, P. G. & Kim, S. W. (2019) Analysis of Innovation Cases in the University From the Viewpoint of Education Service. Journal of Corporate Education and Human Resources, 21(3), 155-177.
  4. Jung, D. S. (2009). An Empirical Analysis Of Strategy Type And Performa.
  5. Park, J. S. (2006). Innovative measures for university education. Korean Association for Policy Studies Conference, 2006, 1-15.
  6. Lee, Y. T. (2018). Discussion for innovation in engineering education, focusing on innovation cases of world universities. Engineering Education and Technology Transfer, 20(4), 19-22.
  7. Chung, J. Y., Sun, M. S., & Kim, H. J. (2017). Analysis of Characteristics and Trends of the Crisis University. The Journal of Educational Administration, 35(4), 47-72.
  8. Hwang, H. C. (2020). The Direction of Innovation in Curriculum of Universities in the Fourth Industrial Revolution.. Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information, 25(11), 229-238.
  9. Nam, K. G.(2018). Was NURI(New University for Regional Innovation) Project Successful?: Analysis on the Labor Market Performance of University Graduates. Journal of Economics. 66(2), 149-187.
  10. Kang, K. L.(2020). Study on the Direction and Practice of University Education Innovation in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Korean Association for Learner-centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(3), 195-220.
  11. Khoe, K. I.(2020). A study on ways to vitalize educational innovation in universities in the era of the 4th industrial revolution. 2020 Fall The 67th Conference, 93-97.
  12. Kim, Y. M. (2018) .Changes in the 4th Industrial Revolution Ecosystem and Universities: Preparing for the Future Environment by Innovating Universities' Education Methods and Human Resource Development. Korea Local Information Research & Development Institute. 109, 52-53.
  13. Kim, S. Y.(2017). The 4th Industrial Revolution and Innovation in Education: Focusing on University Education. Korean Educational Ideas Research Association Summer Academic Presentation. 5-27.
  14. Seo, Y. H. & Joo. C. A.(2007). A Comparative Study on Successful School Innovation Cases in the United States. Comparative education research, 17(3), 191-215.
  15. An, J. B. (2017). Change of Education Paradigmin the 4th Industrial Revolution. MEDIA & EDUCATION, 7(1), 21-34.
  16. Yoo, H. G.. (2020) Beyond Corona and the 4th Industrial Revolution: The Challenge of University Education Innovation. FUTURE HORIZON, 16-21.
  17. Lee, T. U. (2018). How the 4th industrial revolution will change university education. THE UNIVERSITY: DISCOURSES AND ISSUES, (2), 104-114.
  18. Lee, H. J., Im, S. H., & Kang, S. M.(2019). Implications for Innovation in Higher Education from Minerva Schools. LIFELONG EDUCATION, 15(2), 59-84.
  19. Chung. J. E.(2020). 싱가포르 Republic Polytechnic의 사례 = How to Introduce the PBL(probelem-based learning) as a Moment for Innovation of Local Universities in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution: A Case Study of Republic Polytechnic in Singapore. Journal of Regional Studies and Development, 29(3), 75-98.
  20. Heo, H. O. (2019). Challenges and Changes of National Universities for Liberal Arts Education Innovation-Focused on the Case of S University. Korean Society of Liberal Education Conference. 47-52.
  21. Rogers, Everett M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
  22. Park, U. H., Choi, D. J., Park, D. J., Cho, S. J., & Ko, J. S. (2008). The Concept of Educational Innovation, It Recent Tendencies in Other Countries, and Its Prospect for the Future. Journal of Educational Innovation Research. 19(1), 1-24.
  23. Jang, Y. H. (2019). Exploring the success factors of University innovation : Focusing on success cases of private Universities. Doctoral dissertation, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul Korea.
  24. Park. Y. H. (2007). Study on elementary school teachers recognition of local educational innovations. Master's thesis, Jeonju National University of Education, Jeonju, Korea.
  25. Lee, C. W., Choi, C. H., & Choi, C. G. (2012) . New Organization Theory. Seoul: Daeyoung Munhwasa.
  26. Hannan, A., English, S., & Silver, H. (1999). Why innovate Some preliminary findings from a research project on 'innovations in teaching and learning in higher education˚ s. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 279-289.
  27. Jang, H. Y., Baek, P. G., Kim, S. W., Hong, J. S., (2018). A Theoretical Exploration for Establishing the Discipline of 'Education Service Science'. Journal of Corporate Education and Talent Research. 20(4), 125-147.
  28. Ryu, J. S., Par, Y. G., Lee, G. S., Cho, H. J. & Bae, S. O. (2006). University Innovation and Competitiveness. Samsung Economic Research Institute Research Report.
  29. Song, S. H., Lee. J. H., & Park, T. J. (2016). Educational Technology and Innovation in Korean Higher Education: Contributions and Future Directions, Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4) 677-750.
  30. Park, S. K. (2020). A Theoretical Study on the Coevolution Strategy of University Innovation Ecosystems. Journal of Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 21(12), 268-277.
  31. Bae, S. H. & Park, M. Y. (2019). Effective use of major-liberal education overlapping lectures for university education innovation. Thinking and Communication, 12(3), 39-71.
  32. Cho, S. S. (2018). The meaning of the 4th industrial revolution and sustainable university education. University: Discourses and Issues, 2, 85-103.
  33. Kim, G. W.(2019). University Innovation for Regional Development: A Preliminary Discussion via the Self-Reflection Approach. Journal of Regional Studies. 25-45.
  34. Lee, G. S. (2007). University Innovation and Competitiveness. Higher education, 146, 38-42.
  35. Elrehail, H., Emeagwali, O. L., Alsaad, A., & Alzghoul, A. (2018). The impact of Transformational and Authentic leadership on innovation in higher education The contingent role of knowledge sharing. Telematics and Informatics, 35(1). 55-67.