참고문헌
- Kang, D. (2023). The advent of ChatGPT and the response of Korean language education. Korean Language and Literature, 82, 469-496.
- Kwon O., Oh S., Yoon J., Lee K., Shin B., & Jung W. (2023). Analyzing mathematical performances of ChatGPT: Focusing on the solution of national assessment of educational achievement and the college scholastic ability test. Communication of Mathematical Education, 37(2), 233-256. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEE.2023.37.2.233
- Kwon, O., Shin, J., Jun, I., Kim, M., Kim, C., Kim, T., ..., & Hwang, S. (2019). High school mathematics. Kyohaksa.
- Kim, W., Cho, M., Bang, G., Yoon, J., Shin, J., Im, S., ..., & Jung, J. (2018). High school mathematics. Visang.
- Ko, S., Lee, J., Lee, S., Cha, S., Kim, Y., Oh, T., & Cho, S. (2018). High school mathematics. Seoul: Sinsago.
- Ministry of Education (2015). The 2nd comprehensive plan for mathematical education. Retrieved from https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/viewRenew.do?boardID=294&lev=0&statusYN=C&s=moe&m=020402&opType=N&boardSeq=58701
- Ministry of Education. (2020a). The 3rd comprehensive plans for mathematics education. Retrieved from https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/viewRenew.do?boardID=294&lev=0&statusYN=W&s=moe&m=020402&opType=N&boardSeq=80718
- Ministry of Education. (2020b). Mathematics curriculum. Proclamation of the Ministry of Education #2020-236[Annex 8]. Ministry of Education.
- Ministry of Education. (2022). Mathematics curriculum. Proclamation of the Ministry of Education #2022-33[Annex 8]. Ministry of Education.
- Kim N. (2002). A study on the GSP in the viewpoint of problem solving. School Mathematics, 4(1), 111-125.
- Kim N. (2006). Using the Cabri3D program for enhancing problem solving ability. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 16(4), 345-366.
- Kim, S. K. (2018). Analysis of high school students' learning characteristic appeared in the 2016 National Assessment of Educational Achievement. The Journal of Curriculum Evaluation, 21(4), 151-176. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2018.21.4.151
- Kim H., Park C. Jeong S., & Ko H. K. (2018). A view on complementary relation of human teacher and AI teacher in future education. Journal of Education & Culture, 24(6), 189-207.
- Ryu, H., Sunwoo, H., Shin, B., Cho, J., Lee, B., Kim, Y., ..., & Jung, S. (2018). High school mathematics. Chunjae.
- Mun, H. Y., & Kim, Y. (2011). An analysis of errors in problem solving of the function unit in the first grade highschool. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 14(3), 281-297.
- Park, K., Lee, J., Kim, J., Nam, J., Kim, N., Im, J., ..., & Yang, J. (2018). High school mathematics. Donga.
- 박장희, 유식규, & 이중권 (2012). The analysis of mathematics error type that appears from the process of solving problem related to real life. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 15(4), 699-718.
- Park J. M, & Lee J. K. (2013). An analysis of students' problem solving ability on the equivalent mathematics situations-Focused on equations, inequalities, and functions-. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 16(4), 883-898.
- Bae, J., Yeo, T., Cho, B., Kim, M., Chun, H., Cho, S., & Byun, D. (2018). High school mathematics. Geumsung.
- Byun, J., & Kwon, Y. (2023). An investigation of generative AI in educational application: Focusing on the usage of ChatGPT for learning biology. Brain, Digital, & Learning, 13(1), 1-17.
- Boo D. (2021). Improvement of the mathematical creativity using engineering tools in mathematics mentorship program. Communication of Mathematical Education, 35(1), 119-136. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEE.2021.35.1.119
- Son, T. (2023). Exploring the possibility of using ChatGPT in mathematics education: Focusing on student product and pre-service teachers' discourse related to fraction problems. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 26(2), 99-113. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEC.2023.26.2.99
- Shin, D. K., Jung, H. K., & Lee, Y. S. (2023). Exploring the potential of using ChatGPT as a content-based English learning and teaching tool. Journal of the Korea English Education Society, 22(1), 171-192.
- Shin, D. (2020). Artificial intelligence in primary and secondary education: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 30(3), 531-552.
- Oh, K. (2023). The impact of generative artificial intelligence on Korean education and response strategies - ChatGPT: A tool or threat for Korean education?. The Journal of Korean Language and Literature Education, 82, 143-189.
- Oh, S. (2023). A study on the case of using ChatGPT & learners' perceptions in college liberal arts writing. Korean Journal of General Education, 17(3), 11-23.
- Wang, G. (2023). Natural language analysis of Korean texts of AI-based chatbots and exploration of Korean education utilization -Focusing on ChatGPT and New-Bing. Culture & Convergence, 45(5), 01-17.
- Yu, I., & Park, H. (2023). Developing an AI-based sentence-generating web service for writing activities in elementary language education. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 27(2), 210-221. https://doi.org/10.24231/RICI.2023.27.2.210
- Yu, J. (2023). Application of artificial intelligence for geography education - Focusing on question answering on ChatGPT -. Jorunal of Photo Geography, 33(1), 162-173.
- Lee, J., Lee, J. H., & Kim, B. (2003). Middle school students' mathematical problem solving process through analogy: Focusing on clarity of thought. Communication of Mathematical Education, 16(0), 245-267.
- Lee, J., Choi, B., Kim, D., Lee, J., Jeon, C., Chang, H., ..., & Kim, M. (2018). High school mathematics. Chunjae.
- Huh N., & Ee J. H. (2018). A study on the relationship between artificial intelligence and change in mathematics education. Communication of Mathematical Education, 32(1), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEE.2018.32.1.23
- Jeon, S. K., & Cho, C. (2015). A study on the written texts of a high school mathematics textbook and teacher's classroom discourse - A focus on 'The relationship between quadratic functions and quadratic equations' -. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 25(4), 525-547.
- Cha, M., & Im, H. (2023). A Study on university professors' perception on educational applicability of ChatGPT in English classes. Culture & Convergence, 45(5), 109-118. 10.33645/cnc.2023.05.45.05.109
- Han. B. K. (2023, June, 2). US companies laid off 4,000 people due to AI in May... "AI appears for the first time in reasons for dismissal. KBS. Retrieved from https://news.kbs.co.kr/news/pc/view/view.do?ncd=7690005.
- Han, S. H. & Chang, K. Y. (2009). Instrumental genesis of Computer Algebra System(CAS) in mathematical problem solving among high school students. School Mathematics, 11(3), 527-546.
- Hong, S., Lee, J., Shin, T., Lee, C., Lee, B., Shin, Y., ..., & Kang, I. (2018). High school mathematics. Jihaksa.
- Hwang, S., Kang, B., Yoon, G., Lee, K., Kim, S., Lee, M., ..., & Park, S. (2018). High school mathematics. Miraen.
- Beghetto, R. A. (2023). A new horizon for possibility thinking: A conceptual case study of Human × AI collaboration. Possibility Studies & Society, 1(3), 324-341.
- Bull, C., & Kharrufa, A. (2023). Generative AI assistants in software development education. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.13936.
- Daun, M., & Brings, J. (2023, June). How ChatGPT will change software engineering education. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 1, 110-116,
- Drijvers, P. (2003). Algebra on screen, on paper, and in the mind. In J. Fey, A. Cuoco, C. Kieran, L. McMullin & R.M. Zbiek (Eds.), Computer Algebra Systems in secondary school mathematics education (pp. 241-267). NCTM.
- Giray, L. (2023). Prompt engineering with ChatGPT: A guide for academic writers. In Annals of Biomedical Engineering (pp.1-5).
- Heston, T. F., & Khun, C. (2023). Prompt engineering in medical education. International Medical Education, 2(3), 198-205.
- Lester, K. (1980). Research on problem solving. In R. J. Shumway (Ed.), Research in mathematics education. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- Liu, V., & Chilton, L. B. (2022, April). Design guidelines for prompt engineering text-to-image generative models. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-23).
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. NCTM.
- OpenAI (2023a). GPT4 technical report. arXiv:2303.08774 [cs.CL]
- OpenAI (2023b). Six strategies for getting better results. https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/gpt-best-practices
- Patel, N., Nagpal, P., Shah, T., Sharma, A., Malvi, S., & Lomas, D. (2023). Improving mathematics assessment readability: Do large language models help?. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(3), 804-822.
- Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it: a new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press.
- Raposo, G., Ribeiro, R., Martins, B., & Coheur, L. (2022, April). Question rewriting? Assessing its importance for conversational question answering. In European Conference on Information Retrieval (pp. 199-206). Springer International Publishing.
- Sallam, M. (2023, March). ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. In Healthcare, 11(6), 887.
- Shieh, J. (2023). Best practices for prompt engineering with OpenAI API. OpenAI, February https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6654000-best-practices-for-prompt-engineering-with-openai-api.
- Tall, D. (2003). Using technology to support an embodied approach to learning concepts in mathematics. Historia e tecnologia no Ensino da Matematica, 1, 1-28
- Trouche, L. (2004). Managing the complexity of human/machine interactions in computerized learning environments: Guiding students' command process through instrumental orchestrations. International Journal of Computers for mathematical learning, 9, 281-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-004-3468-5
- Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., ... & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30.
- Wei, J., Bosma, M., Zhao, V. Y., Guu, K., Yu, A. W., Lester, B., ... & Le, Q. V. (2021). Finetuned language models are zero-shot learners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.01652.
- Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Xia, F., Chi, E., ... & Zhou, D. (2022). Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 24824-24837.
- Zamfirescu-Pereira, J. D., Wong, R. Y., Hartmann, B., & Yang, Q. (2023, April). Why Johnny can't prompt: how non-AI experts try (and fail) to design LLM prompts. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-21). Association for Computing Machinery.