벤처창업연구 (Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship)

  • 제18권2호
  • /
  • Pages.95-111
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1975-7557(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-9509(eISSN)
한국벤처창업학회 (The Korean Society of Business Venturing)
권호 표지

기술창업기업의 기술지향성과 시장지향성이 경영성과에 미치는 영향: 입지환경 조절효과를 중심으로

The Effect of Technology Orientation and Market Orientation on Managerial Performance of Technology Start-Up: Focusing on the Moderating Effect of Location Environment

  • 윤재만 (세종창조경제혁신센터 ) ;
  • 최종인 (한밭대학교 융합경영학과 )
  • Yoon, Jae-Man (Sejong Center for Creative Economy & Innovation) ;
  • Choi, Jong-In (Department of Management, Hanbat National University)
  • 투고 : 2023.03.08
  • 심사 : 2023.04.24
  • 발행 : 2023.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

우리나라는 국가 경제와 산업발전을 위해 정부주도의 창업정책을 추진하여 높은 수준의 창업률을 달성하였다. 그러나 창업률만큼 높은 수준의 창업기업 폐업률은 국내 창업생태계의 질적 성장이 미흡하다는 것으로 판단할 수 있다. 본 연구는 창업기업이 죽음의 계곡을 극복하여 생존율을 높이는 방안을 입지환경 관점에서 연구하고자 한다. 창업기업의 기술지향성과 시장지향성이 경영성과에 미치는 영향과 입지환경을 구성하는 경제성, 접근성, 네트워크 요인의 조절효과를 분석한다. 본 연구목표를 달성하기 위해 혁신중개자의 기업지원사업을 받은 창업기업 대상으로 실증 분석하였다. 연구결과를 살펴보면, 기술지향성의 연구개발역량은 경영성과에 유의한 영향을 미치며, 시장지향성의 시장정보생성과 시장정보대응은 경영성과에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 입지환경의 하부요인인 접근성은 기술혁신성과 경영성과 간의 관계에서 정(+)의 조절효과를 미치고, 입지환경(경제성, 접근성, 네트워크)은 시장정보생성과 경영성과 간의 관계에서 정(+)의 조절효과를 미치는 것으로 확인할 수 있었다. 본 연구는 창업기업 성공실패 선행연구를 비교·분석 후 공통요인을 도출하였다. 실증분석과 관계자 인터뷰를 통해 창업기업의 지속적 성장을 위한 정책적 시사점을 제시하였다. 향후 연구에서는 수도권·비수도권 창업기업을 대상으로 비교·분석이 필요하며, 지역을 이탈하여 수도권 이전한 창업기업 대상으로 연구하여 지역창업생태계를 발전시키는 방안을 모색해야 할 것이다.

Korea has achieved a high startup rate by promoting government-led startup policies for national economic and industrial development. However, as high as the startup rate is, the closure rate of startup companies can be judged to be insufficient for the qualitative growth of the domestic startup ecosystem. This study aims to investigate how to improve the survival rate of startups by overcoming the valley of death from a location environment perspective. It analyzes the effects of technology orientation and market orientation of start-ups on management performance and the moderating effects of economic, accessibility, and network factors that constitute the location environment. To achieve the research objectives, the empirical analysis was conducted on start-up companies that received corporate support projects from innovation intermediary organizations. The results show that R&D capability of technology orientation has a significant effect on management performance, and market information generation and market information response of market orientation have a significant effect on management performance. As for the moderating effect, accessibility, a sub-factor of the location environment, has a positive moderating effect on the relationship between technological innovation and managerial performance, and the location environment (economy, accessibility, and network) has a positive moderating effect on the relationship between market information generation and managerial performance. This study compared and analyzed previous studies on the success and failure of start-ups and identified common factors. In addition, this study provides policy implications for the sustainable growth of startups through empirical analysis and interview with stakeholders. For future research, it is necessary to compare and analyze start-ups in metropolitan areas and non-metropolitan areas. In addition, it is necessary to study startups that have moved out of the region and into the metropolitan area to find ways to develop the regional startup ecosystem.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn H. J., & Ko S. C.(2019). The Effects of Location Characteristics of New Technology-Based Firms on Their Business Performance. Journal of The Korean Regional Development Association, 31(2), 91-121.
  2. An, B. R.(2014). An Empirical Study on the Effects of Bankers Competencies on the Customer Orientation and Performance. Master's thesis, Graduate School of Business Adminstration, Chosun.
  3. Atuahene-Gima, K.(1995). An exploratory analysis of the impact of market orientation on new product performance: a contingency approach. Journal of Product Innovation Management: an international publication of the product development & management association, 12(4), 275-293. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1240275
  4. Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P.(1996). R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovations and Production. American Economic Review, 86(3), 630-640.
  5. Borch, F. J.(1957). The Marketing concept: Its meaning to management. Marketing series, 99.
  6. Boso, N., Story, V. M., & Cadogan, J. W.(2013). Entrepreneurial orientation, market orientation, network ties, and performance: Study of entrepreneurial firms in a developing economy. Journal of business Venturing, 28(6), 708-727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.04.001
  7. Cacciolatti, L., & Lee, S. H.(2016). Revisiting the relationship between marketing capabilities and firm performance: The moderating role of market orientation, marketing strategy and organisational power. Journal of business research, 69(12), 5597-5610.
  8. Chandler, G. N., & Hanks, S. H.(1994). Market attractiveness, resource-based capabilities, venture strategies, and venture performance. Journal of business venturing, 9(4), 331-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)90011-6
  9. Choi, J. I.(2016). Traversing the valley of death. Seoul: HanKyungSa.
  10. Chung, B. I., & Hyun, B. H.(2018). Analysis of Success factors of Technology Transfer and Commercialization through Systematic Literature Review. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 8(1), 79-90.
  11. Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P.(1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic management journal, 10(1), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100107
  12. Czarnitzki, D., & Kraft, K.(2004). An empirical test of the asymmetric models on innovative activity: who invests more into R&D, the incumbent or the challenger?. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 54(2), 153-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2003.01.008
  13. Damanpour, F., & Evan, W. M.(1984). Organizational innovation and performance: the problem of organizational lag. Administrative science quarterly, 392-409.
  14. Dollinger, M. J., & Golden, P. A.(1995). Inter organizational and collective strategies in small firms: Environꠓmental effects and performance. Journal of management, 18(4), 695-715. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639201800406
  15. Florida, R.(2002). The Rise of the Creative Class - And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
  16. Fujita, M., Krugman, P. R., & Venables, A. J.(1999). The Spatial Economy: cities, regions and international trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  17. Gatignon, H., & Xuereb, J. M.(1997). Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379703400107
  18. Geroski, P. A.(1995). What do we know about entry?. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13(4), 421-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7187(95)00498-X
  19. Govindarajan, V., & Fisher, J.(1990). Strategy, control systems, and resource sharing: Effects on business-unit performance. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 259-285. https://doi.org/10.2307/256325
  20. Gupta, K. L.(1987). Aggregate savings, financial intermediation, and interest rate. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 303-311.
  21. Han, J, H., & Sin, J. G.(2004). A Study on the Factors of Startup Failure: Dynamic ERIS. Korean Society of Strategic Management's thesis presentation, 2004(1), 75-97.
  22. Han, K. D.(2019). The Effect of Characteristics of Venture Business Founders and Management Strategy on Business Performance. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 14(6), 29-43. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.14.6.201912.29
  23. Hayes, A. F.(2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.
  24. Heo, H. Y., & Yoon, B. S.(2013). A Study on the Effects of R&D Investment on the Companies' Performances in KOSDAQ Firms. The Journal of Business Education, 27(2), 161-187.
  25. Ho, W. K.(2013). The effects of marketing and training intensities on the relationship between technical resource competency and software firm's performance. Doctoral Dissertation, Konkuk University.
  26. Hoover, E. M.(1937). Location Theory and the Shoe and Leather Industries, Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
  27. Howells, J.(2006). Intermediation and the Role of Intermediaries in Innovation. Research Policy, 35(5), 715-728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005
  28. Hwang, W. I., & Park, J. H.(2002). Cluster Location Factors of Venture Firms and Technology Innovation Performance. Journal of Korea Planning Association, 37(7), 85-101.
  29. International Assembly Resarch service(2020). Korea and the major European countries Current status and implications of corporate life and death. Seoul: International Assembly Resarch service.
  30. Jang, B. M., Yoon, J. M., & Shin, J. H.(2022). Collaboration of Innovation Intermediary Organizations for Regional Economic Revitalization: Focused on Yong-in area. Next-Generation Convergence Information Service Technology Society, 11(4), 373-386. https://doi.org/10.29056/jncist.2022.08.03
  31. Jeon, I. S., & Han, J. Y.(1994). A Study on the Impact of Market Orientation on Business Performance. Korean Journal of Marketing, 9(1), 75-91.
  32. Jeong, S. H.(2019). Between the brilliant summit of the corporate location and the valley of death. Pressian. Retrieved from https://www.pressian.com/pages/articles/258690.
  33. Jo, D. H.(2018). Analysis of sustainable growth capability of start-up and survival rate improvement policy. Research report. Sejong: KEIT.
  34. Jung, I. S.(2023). Can't stand it here. Start-up Companies Leaving Science City. Daejonilbo, Retrieved from http://www.daejonilbo.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=2046345.
  35. Kang, M., & Lee, J. W.(2009). Survival Analysis of Small and Medium Size Construction Enterprises Using Cox Proportional Hazards Model. Real estate research, 15(2), 41-57.
  36. Kang, S. H., Choi, S. M., & Park, H. S.(2011). The Effect of Market Orientation on Business Performance: Focus on Mediating Role of New Product Development Performance. Yonsei Business Review, 48(1), 1-32.
  37. Katz, B., & Wagner, J.(2014). The rise of innovation districts: A new geography of innovation in America. Washington: Brookings Institution.
  38. Kenney, M.(2000). Understanding Silicon Valley. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  39. Kim, B. K.(2018). Startup Trends in Silicon Valley. Korea International Trade Association, 39(11).
  40. Kim, C. H., Ko, C. R., Seol, S. S.(2012). Case Studies on the Failure of Commercialization of Technology. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 15(1), 203-223.
  41. Kim, E. J.(2013). A Study on Spatial Characteristics of Startup Companies. Master's thesis, Seoul National University.
  42. Kim, J. J., & Kim, K. S.(2009). An Analysis on Locational Factors of Urban Industrial Cluster: The Case of Seoul Digital Valley. Journal of Korea Planning Association, 44(7), 85-96.
  43. Kim, Y. E.(2001). local development theory. Seoul: Beobmunsa.
  44. Ko, S. H.(2011). The structural relationship between competitive strategy and performance in SMEs and venture businesses. Doctoral Dissertation, Konkuk University.
  45. Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J.(1990). Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of marketing, 54(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400201
  46. Krugman, P.(1995). Development, Economic Geography and Economic Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  47. Kwak, J. G.(2016). The Effect of Market-Orientation and Technology Innovation-Orientation on the Innovation Activities and Performance in Companies. Doctoral dissertation, The Graduate School Korea University of Technology Education.
  48. Kwon, Y. C.(2004). Towards a Theoretical Foundation and Empirical Test on Network Advantages as a Internationalization Theory of Small Ventures. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Venture Studies, 7(2), 77-104.
  49. Kwon, Y. K.(2010). Does Open Innovation Contribute to Innovation Performance?: Empirical Evidences from Korean SMEs. The Journal of Small Business Innovation, 32(2), 145-168.
  50. Lee, H. J., & Kim, M. S.(2011). The Variation of Industrial Location Demand by Changing Policy of Seoul Metropolitan Area. Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea, 14(3), 286-306. https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2011.14.3.286
  51. Lee, H. Y., & Lee, S. W.(2012). Analyzing the Characteristics of Open Innovation Activity and the External Collaboration Network in SMEs. The Economic Geographical Society of Korea, 15(2), 147-165. https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2012.15.2.147
  52. Lee, J. B., & Kim, D. I.(2016). Analysis of Characteristics about the Location environment of Industrial Complex and Migration Company. Journal of Digital Policy, 14(11), 193-199.
  53. Lee, J. H., Kim, D. W., & Kim, C. H.(2010). Moderating Effects of Partnerships on Relationship Between Core Competences and Company Performances. Asia Pacific Journal of Samall Business, 32(2), 115-143.
  54. Lee, M. S.(2016). A study on the Location Factors Impact on the Satisfaction of Venture Companies: Around anyang City Development Stractegy. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 11(2), 207-219. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.11.2.201604.207
  55. Lee, S. J., & Jung, S. Y.(2017). The Effect of the Interaction with Innovation Intermediaries on Firm's Performance: Focusing on the Absorptive Capacity' Mediating Effect. Journal of technology innovation, 25(4), 313-340. https://doi.org/10.14386/SIME.2017.25.4.313
  56. Lee, Y. C.(2010). A Study on the Survival Probability and Survival Factors of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises Using Technology Rating Data. Journal of Knowledge Management Research, 11(2), 95-109.
  57. Mandel, M.(2014). San Francisco and the tech/info boom: making the transition to a balanced and growing economy. South Mountain Economic.
  58. McKitterick, J. B.(1957). What is the Marketing Management Concept?. Chicago: IL.
  59. Moon, S. H.(2017). A study on the relationship between private-led social innovation cluster's location factor and worker satisfaction. Master's thesis, Graduate School of University of Seoul
  60. Min, D. H.(2020). A Study on the Determining Factors of the Start-ups'Location in a Cluster of IT and Cultural Contents Industries: Focused on Honghap-Valley. Master's thesis, Seoul National University.
  61. Ministry of SMEs and Startups.(2021). An Analysis of Changes in the Ecosystem of Korean Entrepreneurship. Sejong: Ministry of SMEs and Startups.
  62. Ministry of SMEs and Startups.(2023). The survey of the start-up company in 2020. Sejong: Ministry of SMEs and Startups.
  63. National Institute of Korean Language(2023). WOORIMALSAEM, Retrieved(2023.04.26.) from https://opendic.korean.go.kr/dictionary/view?sense_no=796386&viewType=confirm, National Institute of Korean Language.
  64. Oh, J. Y.(2000). A Study on determinant factors in location of Venture firm. Master's thesis, Seoul National University.
  65. Oh, S. G.(2010). The Affect of Building Cross-enterprise Collaborative Environment and Trust on Operational Performance: From the Perspective of an Integrated Supply Chain. Journal of the Korean Production and Operations Management Society, 21(4), 413-426.
  66. Roger, E.(1983). Diffusion of Innovation, 3rd ed. N.Y.: Free Press.
  67. Saxenian, A. L.(1994). Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  68. Schoenecker, T., & Swanson, L.(2002). Indicators of firm technological capability:Validity and performance implications. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49, 36-44.
  69. Schumpeter, J. A.(1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  70. Son, E. H., & Kim, K. H.(2007). Effects of the Alignment between Core Competence and Competitive Strategy on the Business Performance in the Hotel Industry. Korea Hospitality and Tourism Acameme, 16(5), 93-111.
  71. Song, C. S., & Noh, Y. H.(2011). Characteristics of Korean Venture Firms and Their Survival Analysis: A Micro-Level Approach. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Venture Studies, 14(3), 1-24.
  72. Spanjol, J., Qualls, W. J., & Rosa, J. A.(2011). How many and what kind? The role of strategic orientation in new product ideation. Product Development and Management Association, 28(1), 236-250.
  73. Tsao, S. M., Lin, C. H., & Chen, V. Y.(2015). Family ownership as a moderator between R&D investments and CEO compensation. Journal of Business Research, 68(3), 599-606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.09.001
  74. Weber, A.(1929). Alfred Weber's theory of the location of industries. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  75. Yi, C. H.(2017). An Empirical Analysis of the Relation between the Survival of Start-up Firms and Their Location Characteristics: Focused on the Characteristics of Industrial Activities in which Start-ups are Established. Journal of Korea Planning Association, 52(5), 131-151. https://doi.org/10.17208/jkpa.2017.10.52.5.131
  76. Yoon, J. M., & Choi, J. I.(2021). A study on the effect of recognized location factors of technology start-up on business performance: Adjusting effect on absorption capacity. Korean Review of Corporation Management (KRCM), 12(4), 279-302. https://doi.org/10.20434/KRICM.2021.11.12.4.279
  77. Yoon, J. M., & Choi, J. I.(2022). A Study on the Collaboration Plan between Innovation Intermediaries: Focusing on the Sejong area. Korean Review of Corporation Management (KRCM), 13(1), 233-260.
  78. Zeng, S. X., Xie, X. M., & Tam, C. M.(2010). Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs. Technovation, 30(3), 181-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.003