벤처창업연구 (Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship)

  • 제18권2호
  • /
  • Pages.81-93
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1975-7557(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-9509(eISSN)
한국벤처창업학회 (The Korean Society of Business Venturing)
권호 표지

신생 기업의 플랫폼 활용 전략과 성장에 관한 연구: '지니더바틀' 사례를 중심으로

A Study on the Platform Utilization Strategy and Growth of a Start-Up: Focusing the Case Study of 'Genie the Bottle'

  • 김주희 (고려대학교 기업경영연구원 ) ;
  • 신민주 (고려대학교 경영학과)
  • Juhee Kim (Korea University, Institute for Business Research and Education) ;
  • Minju Shin (Korea University Business School)
  • 투고 : 2023.01.13
  • 심사 : 2023.04.18
  • 발행 : 2023.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

디지털 경제 아래에서 기업들은 새로운 비즈니스 환경을 맞이하고 있다. 선행 연구에 따르면 신생 기업은 대기업이나 기존 기업에 비해서 자원을 확보하고 새로운 관계를 구축하는 데에 있어서 여러 측면에서 불리한 위치에 놓여져 있다고 설명한다. 하지만 디지털 경제와 플랫폼 생태계를 다루고 있는 최근 연구에서는 디지털 플랫폼이 창업 기업의 규모의 불리함(Liability of smallness)과 신생의 불리함(Liability of newness)를 극복하는 효율적인 수단이 될 수 있음을 시사하고 있다. 이러한 점에 주목하여 본 연구에서는 신생 기업이 플랫폼을 효과적으로 활용하여 신생의 불리함(Liability of newness)과 규모의 불리함(Liability of smallness)이라는 제약적 상황을 효과적으로 극복하고 성장하는 과정을 '지니더바틀' 기업의 사례를 통해 살펴보고자 하였다. 본 연구를 위해 먼저 신생 기업인 지니더바틀이 플랫폼을 통해 자원의 불리함을 극복하고 시장 규모를 확대하는 과정을 분석하였다. 이커머스 시장에서 지배적인 우위를 차지하고 있으며 충성도가 높은 고객을 확보하고 있는 플랫폼에 보완자(complementor)로서 합류하여 신규 고객을 확보하고 시장 내 입지를 다지는 메커니즘을 설명하고자 하였다, 둘째, 소비자의 고관여라는 특성이 지배적인 뷰티 분야에서 신생 기업이 효과적으로 인지도와 정당성을 확보할 수 있는 방안으로 플랫폼 활용 전략이 유용한 선택이 될 수 있음을 살펴보고자 하였다. 특히 이러한 과정들을 기존 조직 이론에서의 논의와 플랫폼 우산효과를 결합하여 설명함으로써 이론적 측면에서 공헌하고자 하였다. 나아가 디지털 플랫폼이 전통적인 시장의 경쟁 구도를 변화시키며 이러한 환경에서 신규 기업들이 경쟁 우위를 확보하는 방안에 대한 향후 연구에 대한 방향성을 제시하고자 하였다.

Under the digital economy, companies are facing a new business environment. Previous studies with a traditional perspectives on start-ups explained they are at a disadvantaged compared to large companies in mobilizing resources and building new relationships. However, recent researches on the digital economy and platform ecosystems have suggested that digital platforms can be an efficient means of overcoming the liabilities of smallness and newness for start-up companies. Through platforms start-ups can secure routes to mobilize resources, collect and analyze market information. Especially as various platorms are established within categorized industry or market, unique characteristics and market awareness regarding an individual startup company have been formed. Accordingly there is also an advantage that startup companies have umbrella effect by participating in the platform. From this point of view, this study describes the process by which a start-up company effectively utilizes a platform to overcome the liabilities of newness and smallness through the case the study of 'Genie the Bottle'. The results suggest that platforms play a crucial role for start-ups to secure awareness and legitimacy and grow the market in the beauty industry in which high consumer involvement is dominant.

키워드

과제정보

이 연구는 (주)네이버의 재원으로 국민대학교 플랫폼 SME 연구센터의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임.

참고문헌

  1. Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M.(1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645-670.
  2. Audia, P. G., Lock, E. A., & Smith, K. G.(2000). The paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 837-853. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556413
  3. Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E.(2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3) 329-366. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329
  4. Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., & Sanden, B. A.(2008). 'Legitimation' and 'development of positive externalities', two key processes in the formation phase of technological innovation systems. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(5), 575-592. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320802292768
  5. Boudreau, K. J., & Jeppesen, L. B.(2015). Unpaid crowd complementors: The platform network effect mirage. Strategic Management Journal, 36(12), 1761-1777. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2324
  6. Busch. C.(2020). Small and medium-sized enterprises in the platform economy, Towards fairness for SMEs in digital martkets. WISO Disckurs, 2-20.
  7. Carroll, G. R., & Swaminathan, A.(2000). Why the microbrewery movement? Organizational dynamics of resource partitioning in the US brewing industry. American Journal of Sociology, 106(3), 715-762. https://doi.org/10.1086/318962
  8. Cenamor, J., Parida, V., & Wincent, J.(2019). How entrepreneurial SMEs compete through digital platforms: The roles of digital platform capability, network capability and ambidexterity. Journal of Business Research, 100, 196-206.
  9. CMN(2017). 2017 Korea's Best Cosmetics. Retrieved on (2023.01.15.) from https://www.cmn.co.kr/sub/news/print.asp?news_idx=223440.
  10. Dacin, M. T., Oliver, C., & Roy, J. P.(2007). The legitimacy of strategic alliances: an institutional perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 28(2), 169-187. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.577
  11. Delmar, F., & Shane, S.(2004). Legitimating first: Organizing activities and the survival of new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(3), 385-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00037-5
  12. Deephouse, D. L., Bundy, J. Tost, L. P., & Suchman, M. C.(2017) In Greenwood, R., Meyer, R. E., Lawrence, T. B., & Oliver, C. (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizatinal Institutionalism. Pulications: London. SAGE
  13. de Reuver, M., Sorensen, C., & Basole, R. C.(2018). The digital platform: A research agenda. Journal of Information Technology, 33(2), 124-135. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-016-0033-3
  14. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W.(1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 147-160.
  15. Diez-Olivan, A., Del Ser, J., Galar, D., & Sierra, B.(2019). Data fusion and machine learning for industrial prognosis: Trends and perspectives towards Industry 4.0. Information Fusion, 50, 92-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2018.10.005
  16. Dougherty, D.(1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization science, 3(2), 179-202. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.2.179
  17. Elia, G., Margherita, A., & Passiante, G.(2020). Digital entrepreneurship ecosystem: How digital technologies and collective intelligence are reshaping the entrepreneurial process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, 119791.
  18. Evans, D. S., & Schmalensee, R.(2016). Matchmakers: The new economics of multisided platforms. Harvard Business Review Press.
  19. Financial Supervisory Service(2023). Naver. Retrieved from (23.01.15) https://dart.fss.or.kr.
  20. Garud, R., & Karnoe, P.(2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32(2), 277-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00100-2
  21. Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A.(2014). Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 417-433. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12105
  22. Genie the Bottle(2023). Company report. Retrieved from(2023.01.15.) http://gtbcos.com.
  23. Gersick, C. J.(1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 9-41. https://doi.org/10.2307/256496
  24. Ghauri, P. N., & Firth, R.(2009). The formalization of case study research in international business. der markt, 48(1), 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12642-009-0003-1
  25. Gimenez-Fernandez, E. M., Sandulli, F. D., & Bogers, M.(2020). Unpacking liabilities of newness and smallness in innovative start-ups: Investigating the differences in innovation performance between new and older small firms. Research Policy, 49(10), 104049.
  26. Hausberg, J. P., & Spaeth, S.(2020). Why makers make what they make: motivations to contribute to open source hardware development. R&D Management, 50(1), 75-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12348
  27. Innoforest(2023). Kurly. Retrieved(2023.01.15.) from https://www.innoforest.co.kr.
  28. Jin, H., & Hurd, F.(2018). Exploring the impact of digital platforms on SME inter- nationalization: New Zealand SMEs use of the Alibaba platform for Chinese market entry. Journal of Asia Pacific Business, 19(2), 72-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10599231.2018.1453743
  29. Kang, K. M., & Kim, H. C.(2022). Effect of small businesses' digital competences on business performance. Korean Review of Corporation Managment, 13(1), 37-52.
  30. Kang, S. K., Park, H. J., & Choi, W. Y.(2022). Market Curly's Management Strategy Analysis in the Era of COVID-19: Focusing on VRIO Framework and Strategic Innovation, common and culture. Journal of Cultural Industry Studies, 22(4), 105-114.
  31. Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C.(1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. The American Economic Review, 75(3), 424-440.
  32. Kidder, L. H.(1982). Face validity from multiple perspectives. New Directions for Methodology of Social & Behavioral Science, 12, 41-57.
  33. Kim, D. J., Song, Y. I., Braynov, S. B., & Rao, H. R.(2005). A multidimensional trust formation model in B-to-C e-commerce: A conceptual framework and content analyses of academia/practitioner perspectives. Decision Support Systems, 40(2), 143-165.
  34. Kim, Y., & Heshmati, A.(2010). Analysis of Korean IT startups' initial public offering and their post-IPO performance. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 34(2), 133-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-010-0176-0
  35. KOTRA(2018). Global Cosmetics Industry Report. Global Market Report, 18-30.
  36. Kyobo Securities(2022). Era of Non-Face-to-Face: A Time When You Can Communicate Without Meeting (KIF 2022). Seoul: Kyobo Securities.
  37. Kwak, J., Zhang, Y., & Yu, J.(2019). Legitimacy building and e-commerce platform development in China: The experience of Alibaba. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 139, 115-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.038
  38. Lee, M. J., Baek, U. J., Ryu, M. H., Lee, J. T., & Kim, E. H.(2018). How the umbrella effect occurs in the online environment of O2O platfrms: An empirical study on Korea's NAVER shopping window. Information Society & Media, 19(1), 47-72. https://doi.org/10.52558/ISM.2018.04.19.1.47
  39. Lee, H. H., Hwangbo, Y., & Gong, C. H.(2017). A study on the factors that determine the initial success of start-up. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 1-13.
  40. LG Research Institute(2017). Global beauty industry competition is changing. Retrieved on(2023.01.15.) from https://www.lgbr.co.kr/report/view.do?idx=19549.
  41. Lin, F. J., & Lin, Y. H.(2016). The effect of network relationship on the performance of SMEs. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1780-1784.
  42. Malone, T. W., Yates, J., & Benjamin, R. I.(1994). Electronic Markets and Electronic Hierarchies, In T.J. Allen and M.S. Morton (Eds.), Information Technology and the Corporation of the 1990s. New York: Oxford University Press.
  43. McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C.(2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334-359. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81
  44. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B.(1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
  45. Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H.(1984). A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle. Management Science, 30(10), 1161-1183. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.10.1161
  46. Nambisan, S., Siegel, D., & Kenney, M.(2018). On open innovation, platforms, and entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(3), 354-368.
  47. Nielsen(2020). 2020 Maternal and Baby Consumption Trend Report. Nielsen.
  48. Oxley, J. E., & Yeung, B.(2001). E-commerce readiness: Institutional environment and international competitiveness. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(4), 705-723. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490991
  49. Park, S. H.(2021). The effect of CEO's digital competence on the innovation activities of companies. Journal of Human Resource Management Research, 28(4), 73-101. https://doi.org/10.14396/jhrmr.2021.28.4.73
  50. Pinfield, L. T.(1986). A field evaluation of perspectives on organizational decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 365-388.
  51. Qing, C. L., & Kim, Y. H.(2022). The effect of digital competencies on start-up companies sustainability: Focusing on the mediating effect of the entrepreneurial innovativeness. Journal of Digital Convergence, 20(4), 405-410. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2022.20.4.405
  52. Rochet, J. C., & Tirole, J.(2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990-1029.
  53. Rroshi, D., & Weichselbaumer, M.(2021). Umbrella branding effects, Effects evidence from product tests. the 48th Annual Conference of the European Association for Research in Industrial Economics (EARIE). Bergen(online)
  54. Sahut, J. M., Iandoli, L., & Teulon, F.(2021). The age of digital entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 56(3), 1159-1169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00260-8
  55. Salkin, C., Oner, M., Ustundag, A., & Cevikcan, E.(2018). A conceptual framework for Industry 4.0. In Industry 4.0, managing the digital transformation(pp. 3-23). Springer: Cham.
  56. Salunke, S., Weerawardena, J., & McColl-Kennedy, J. R.(2013). Competing through service innovation: The role of bricolage and entrepreneurship in project-oriented firms. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1085-1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.03.005
  57. Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S.(2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226.
  58. Shin, J. M., & Kang, H. K.(2021). Effect of entrepreneurial characteristics and market characteristics of small business owners on business performance with the mediation of digital literacy. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 16(5), 75-89.
  59. Shu, R., Ren, S., & Zheng, Y.(2018). Building networks into discovery: The link between entrepreneur network capability and entrepreneurial opportunity discovery. Journal of Business Research, 85, 197-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.048
  60. Snyder, H., Witell, L., Gustafsson, A, Fombelle, P., & Kristensson, P.(2016). Identifying categories of service innovation: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Business Research, 69(7), 2401-2408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.009
  61. Stinchcombe, A. L.(1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of Organzations: 142-193. New York: Rand McNally.
  62. Song, A. K.(2019). The Digital Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: a critique and reconfiguration. Small Business Economics, 53(3), 569-590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00232-y
  63. Suchman, M. C.(1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
  64. Teo, T. S., & Yu, Y.(2005). Online buying behavior: a transaction cost economics perspective. Omega, 33(5), 451-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.06.002
  65. Van Alstyne, M. W., Parker, G. G., & Choudary, S. P.(2016). Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 94(4), 54-62.
  66. Varadarajan, P. R.(1985). Joint sales promotion: An emerging marketing tool, Business Horizons, 28(5), 43-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(85)90067-9
  67. Varas, G., Sabaj, O., Spinuzzi, C., Fuentes, M., Gerard, & Cabezas, P.(2023). Value creation in start-up discourse: Linking pitch and venture through logics of justification. International Journal of Business Communication, online published
  68. Varis, M., & Littunen, H.(2010). Types of innovation, sources of information and performance in entrepreneurial SMEs. European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(2), 128-154. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061011040221
  69. Williamson, O. E.(1989). Transaction cost economics. Handbook of industrial organization, 1, 135-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-448X(89)01006-X
  70. Yu, X., Li, Y., Chen, D. Q., Meng, X., & Tao, X.(2019). Entrepreneurial bricolage and online store performance in emerging economies. Electronic Markets, 29(2), 167-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-018-0302-9
  71. Zacca, R., Dayan, M., & Ahrens, T.(2015). Impact of network capability on small business performance. Management Decision, 53(1), 2-23.
  72. Zukin, S., & DiMaggio, P.(1990). Structures of Capital: The Social Organization of the Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.