DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

유튜브의 개인화 알고리즘이 유도하는 적극이용 경로에 대한 실증분석

An Empirical Analysis of the Active Use Paths induced by YouTube's Personalization Algorithm

  • 배승주 (경성대학교 미디어콘텐츠학과)
  • 투고 : 2022.10.10
  • 심사 : 2023.03.29
  • 발행 : 2023.04.30

초록

본 연구는 유튜브 이용자의 사용 시간이 양적으로 증대하면서 나타나는 질적 단계와 경로에 주목하였다. 그리고 심리학과 신경과학의 이론을 적용하여 추천시스템의 개인화 알고리즘과 적극이용의 구간을 세분화하였고, 이론연구와 실증연구를 병행하였다. 이론연구에서 심리학과 신경과학의 관점으로 포그의 행동모델(FBM), 가변적 보상, 도파민 중독을 적용하였다. 포그의 행동모델(FBM)은 연관 콘텐츠 제시 기능인 개인화 추천 알고리즘이 트리거(계기)로서 쉬운 클릭을 유발하고, 가변적 보상은 검색하는 콘텐츠에 대한 예측불가능성으로 동기부여의 효과성을 높이며, 도파민 중독은 도파민 신경을 자극하면 지속적 적극적으로 콘텐츠를 소비하게 하는 것으로 요약된다. 본 연구는 개인화 추천 알고리즘과 적극이용 구간에서 콘텐츠의 이용 목적을 심리적 측면에서 처음이용, 재이용, 지속이용, 적극이용의 4단계로 구분하고, 경로를 분석하였다는 점에서 학문적 실무적 기여를 할 것으로 기대한다.

This study deals with exploring qualitative steps and paths that appear as YouTube users' usage time increases quantitatively. For the study, I applied theories from psychology and neuroscience, subdivided the interval between the personalization algorithm of the recommendation system, and active use and analyzed the relationship between variables in this process. According to the theory behavioral model theory (FBM), variable reward, and dopamine addiction were applied. Personalization algorithms easy clicks as triggers according to associated content presentation functions in behavioral model theory (FBM). Variable rewards increase motivational effectiveness with unpredictability of the content you search, and dopamine nation is summarized as stimulating the dopaminergic nerve to continuously and actively consume content. This study is expected to make an academic and practical contribution in that it divides the purpose of use of content in the personalization algorithm and active use section into four stages from a psychological perspective: first use, reuse, continuous use, and active use, and analyzes the path.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2021년 정부(교육부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 기초연구사업임 (NRF-2021-R1I1A3054903)

참고문헌

  1. Bae, S. J. (2020). Trend Analysis of Movie Content Curation and Metadata Standards Research: Focus on the Art Management Perspective, Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 11(6), 163-171.
  2. Bae, S. J. and Lee, S. H. (2021). A Study on the Longitudinal Trend Changes in Media Service Addiction Variables - Focusing on Adolescents from 2000 to 2021, Journal of the Korea industrial information systems research, 26(5), 47-64.
  3. Choi, J. W. (2019). The Effect of YouTube Travel Contents Features on Flow and Satisfaction. Journal of Tourism Management Research, 23(2), 193-211. https://doi.org/10.18604/tmro.2019.23.2.10
  4. Cialdini, R. B. and Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske and G. Lindzy (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, 151-192. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  5. Dunwoody, S. and Griffin, R. (2014). The role of channel beliefs in risk information seeking. In Joseph Arvai and Louie Rivers III. (Eds.), Effective risk communication (pp. 220-233). London: Taylor & Francis.
  6. Fogg, B. J. (2019). Fogg behavior model. Behav. Des. Lab., Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA, USA, Tech. Rep.
  7. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  8. Ha, D. C. (2022). Governing our attention: YouTube recommendation system and psycho-algorithmic subjects. Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 22(1), 145-172.
  9. Hwang, R. G. (2022), Effect of The Thumbnail Service Type on Continuous Usage Intention of The OTT Platform: Focusing on YouTube Users, Journal of the Korea Entertainment Industry Association, 16(3), 13-27. https://doi.org/10.21184/jkeia.2022.4.16.3.13
  10. Han, S. U. and Kweon, S. H. (2022). The Influence of Personalized Recommendation Service and Expectancy Confirmation on the Intention of continuous Use on OTT : Focused on Youtube and Netflix's Thumbnail, Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 111, 151-180.
  11. Joinson, A. and Banyard, P. (2002). Psychological aspects of information seeking on the Internet. Aslib Proceedings, 54(2), 95-102. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530210435220
  12. Joo, J. H. (2019). Uses and Gratifications on Subscribed YouTube Channels : Centered on Motives for Ritualized use and Instrumental Use, Flow, and Satisfaction. The Korea Convergence Society, 10(12), 223-233.
  13. Jeong, Y. J., Lee, N. J. and Lee, J. H. (2021). The Effects of YouTube Summary Contents Features and Contents Provider Credibility on Users' Flow and Satisfaction. The Korea Convergence Society, 12(2), 35-44.
  14. Kora, A. and Hein, V. (2006). Perceptions of teachers' positive feedback and perceived threat to sense of self in physical education: A logitudinal study. European Physical Education Review, 12(2), 165-180.
  15. Kim, J. H. and Kim, S. C. (2016). A Case Study on the Internal and External Use of Information Sharing Network: A Qualitative Approach, International Commerce and Information Review, 18(3), 205-226.
  16. Kim, M. G., Lee, I. R. and In, T. J. (2021). Age of Leisure, Homilbat, August.
  17. Kang, M. J., Jeong, E. J. and Cho, H. Y. (2020). The Immersion Factors and Characteristics of Youtube Channels for Generation Z. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 20(2), 150-161.
  18. Kang, S. J. (2008). Recommendation System based on Tag Ontology and Machine Learning, Journal of the Korea industrial information systems research, 13(5), 133-141.
  19. Kim, Y. M. and Han, H. W. (2005). The Influence of Enjoyment of Dance sports on Leisure Flow Experience and Leisure Satisfaction. The Korean Journal of Physical Education, 44(6), 193-202.
  20. Korea Information Society Developement Institution(KISDI). (2021). Analysis of YouTube and Netflix content usage behavior by gender and age group.
  21. Lembke, A. (2021). Dopamine nation: Finding balance in the age of indulgence. Penguin.
  22. Lee, B. M., Kim, H. S. and Chung, Y. K. (2021). Factors Affecting the Number of Subscribed Channel and Subscription Satisfaction of YouTube Users. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 21(11), 100-111.
  23. Lee, J. S. (2006). A Longitudinal Study Examining Factors Meeting Changes of Attitudes towards Technology Use : Focusing on Individuals' Subjective Judgements and Social Influence of Technology Use, Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 50(6), 388-414.
  24. Lee, K. Y. and Sung, D. K. (2018). Factors Influencing on the Flow and Satisfaction of YouTube Users. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 18(12), 660-675.
  25. Lobato, R. (2019). Netflix nations : The geography of digital distribution. New York University Press.
  26. Lee, S. C. and Kim, Y. J. (2008). The Effects of the Fun Elements on The Sports Involvement in Water-Leisure Sports. Korean Journal of Lesure, Recreation & P ark, 32(4), 83-92.
  27. Li, T. T., Bae, S. J. and Lee, S. H. (2022). A Study on the Influencing Factors from Use Intention & Flow of Netflix Users, Journal of the Korea industrial information systems research, 27(4), 47-64.
  28. Marchionini, G. (1995). Information seeking in electronic environments. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  29. Miller, S. M. (1987). Monitoring and blunting: Validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 345-353. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.2.345
  30. Oh, S. W. (2016). An Exploratory Inquiry into the Convergence of Journalism and Algorithm, Journal of Cyber communication academic Society, 33(3), 51-101.
  31. Oh, S. W. (2019). YouTube's Media Orientation from an Algorithmic Perspective, Kwanhun Journal, 61(1), 11-17.
  32. Park, S. H., Choi, S. Y. and Lee, J. H. (2022). The Motivation for Using YouTube Cooking Education is Educational Satisfaction, Academic Achievement, and Continuous Use Intention. Culinary Science & Hospitality Research, 28(3), 63-73.
  33. Richard L. and John D. (1978). An Opponent-Process Theory of Motivation, The American Economic Review, 68(6), 12-24.
  34. Rice, R. E. and Aydin, C. (1991). Attitudes toward new organizational technology: network proximity as a mechanism for social information processing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 219-244. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393354
  35. Seaver, N. (2019). "Captivating algorithms: recommender systems as traps," Journal of Material Culture, 24(4), 421-436. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183518820366
  36. Schull, N. D. (2012). Design by addiction: Machine Gambling in Las Vegas, Princeton and London: Princeton University.
  37. Shin S. k. and Park. J. Y. (2020). A Study on the Factors Which Affect Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction of Global OTT Service: Focusing on Netflix, Journal of Cybercommunication Academic Society, 37(3), 53-94. https://doi.org/10.36494/JCAS.2020.09.37.3.53
  38. Sung, Y. S., Ko, D. W. and Jung, J. H. (1996). "Psychological Nature of Leisure Experience - What is 'Pleasure'?" Journal of Consumer Studies, 7(2), 35-57.
  39. Vogel, HL. (2003). Entertainment Industry Economic,(Hyun, D. W.), commbooks. http://www.brandbrief.co.kr.
  40. Wen. X., Bae, S. J. and Lee, S. H. (2022). A Study on the Influence Factors of One-person Media Continuous Subscription Intention of OTT Bilibili Users, Journal of Korea Multimedia Society, 25(12), 1756-1767. https://doi.org/10.9717/kmms.2022.25.12.1756