DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on the Influence of Growth Mindset of University Students on Occupational Engagement: Testing the Mediation Effect of Career Adaptability

대학생의 성장마인드셋과 진로관여행동의 관계에서 진로적응성의 매개효과 검증

  • 장우정 (극동대학교 항공운항서비스학과)
  • Received : 2022.12.25
  • Accepted : 2023.03.20
  • Published : 2023.03.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to verify the mediating effect of career adaptability in the relationship between growth mindset and occupational engagement. A total of 203 data were collected through an online survey targeting university students. For data analysis, frequency analysis and descriptive statistics analysis were used via SPSS 25.0 and AMOS 25.0 software. As a result of the study, growth mindset had a direct effect on occupational engagement (𝛽=.254, p<.01) and the mediating effect of growth mindset on occupational engagement through career adaptability was also statistically significant. (𝛽=.137, p<.01). This study suggests that it is important to promote occupational engagement for students' correct career guidance, and to this end a practical strategy for cultivating a growth mindset and career adaptability is needed.

본 연구는 성장마인드셋과 진로관여행동의 관계에서 진로적응성의 매개효과를 검증하는데 그 목적이 있다. 서울,경기,충청도 소재 대학생을 대상으로 온라인 설문을 하여 최종 203개의 자료가 수집되었다. 자료분석은 SPSS 25.0, AMOS 25.0 소프트웨어를 활용하여 빈도분석, 기술통계 분석을 수행했고 구조방정식모형 분석은 확인적 요인분석을 기반으로 측정 모형을 평가한 이후 구조적 관계를 확인했다. 연구결과 성장마인드셋은 진로관여행동에 직접영향을 미쳤으며(𝛽=.254, p<.01) 성장마인드셋이 진로적응성을 거쳐 진로관여행동에 미치는 매개효과 또한 통계적으로 유의한 것으로 나타났다(𝛽 =.137, p<.01). 본 연구에서는 대학생의 올바른 진로 안내를 위해 진로관여행동의 촉진이 중요하며 이를 위해 성장마인드셋과 진로적응성의 함양을 위한 실질적인 전략이 필요하다는 것을 시사하고 있다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the 2021 Far East University Research Grant (FEU2021R30).

References

  1. S. R. Lee & K. H. Lee (2019), The Relation between Openness to Experience and Occupational Engagement: Moderated Mediation Effect of Planned Happenstance Skills and Conflict with Significant Others, The Journal of Career Education Research, 32(3), 201-222. DOI : 10.32341/JCER.2019.09.32.3.201
  2. Robert G. L. Pryor & Jim E.H. Bright (2003), Order and chaos: a twenty first century formulation of careers, Australian Journal of Psychology, 55(2,) 121-128. DOI : 10.1080/00049530412331312984
  3. Paul J. Hartung & David L. Blustein(2002), Reason, Intuition, and Social Justice: Elaborating on Parsons's Career Decision -Making Model, Journal of Counseling & Development, 80(1), 41-47. DOI : 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2002.tb00164.x
  4. O. H. Choi & B. W. Kim, (2006) Career Optimism and Adaptability of the College Students: The Korean Validation Study of the Career Futures Inventory (CFI), Korean Journal of Counseling, 7(3), 821-833
  5. Cox, D. W. (2008), The operationalization of occupational engagement and validation of the Occupational Engagement Scale for Students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas, Lawrence.
  6. H. M. Kim & A. R. Choi, (2022), The Mediating Effect of Grit in the Relationship between Growth Mindset and Career Preparation behavior of University Students, The Korean Journal of East West Science, 25(1), 129-144. DOI : 10.55586/kewms.2022.25.1.129
  7. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House.
  8. Bandura, M. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1985). The relationship of conceptions of intelligence and achievement goals to achievement-related cognit on, affect and behavior Unpublished manuscript. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University,
  9. M. J. Kim (2019), The Effects of Growth Mindset and Happiness on Self-Directed Learning Ability of University Students, Master's thesis, Soongsil University, Seoul
  10. M. N. Jung & E. J. Yang (2012), The Mediating Effects of Occupational Engagement on the Relationship Between Career Decision Making Style and Career Maturity of College Students. Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 19(9), 47-70.
  11. Krieshok, T. S., Black, M. D., & McKay, R. A. (2009). Career decision making: The limits of rationality and the abundance of nonconscious processes. Journal of vocational behavior, 75(3), 275-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.04.006
  12. Cox, D. W., Bjornsen, A. L., Krieshok, T. S., & Liu, Y. (2016). Occupational engagement and academic major satisfaction: Vocational identity's mediating role. The Career Development Quarterly, 64(2), 169-180
  13. C. Y. Jeong (2021), The Effect of Achievement Goal Orientation on the Occupational Engagement: The Mediating Effect of Career Adaptability and the Moderating Effect of Social Network Type, Master's thesis, Chung-Ang University, Seoul.
  14. Holland, J. L. (1996). Exploring careers with a typology: What we have learned and some new directions. American psychologist, 51(4), 397.
  15. Super, D. E., & Knasel, E. G. (1981). Career development in adulthood: Some theoretical problems and a possible solution, British journal of guidance and counselling, 9(2), 194-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069888108258214
  16. Savickas, M. L. (1997). Career adaptability: An integrative construct for life-span, life-space theory. The career development quarterly, 45(3), 247-259. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.1997.tb00469.x
  17. S. E. Kwon & J. A. Ahn (2020), The Journal of Career Education Research, 33(2), 67-88 DOI : 10.32341/JCER.2020.6.33.2.67
  18. Savickas, M. L., & Porfeli, E. J. (2012). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale: Construction, reliability, and measurement equivalence across 13 countries. Journal of vocational behavior, 80(3), 661-673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.011
  19. J. K. Kim & K. H. Lee(2016), The Influence of Career Decision-Making Autonomy on Career Adaptability and Occupational Engagement: A Moderated Mediation Model of Emotional and Personality Career Difficulties, Korean Journal of Counseling, 17(3), 205-223 https://doi.org/10.15703/kjc.17.3.201606.205
  20. Savickas, M. L. (2005). The theory and practice of career construction. Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work, 1, 42-70.
  21. Maggiori, C., Rossier, J., & Savickas, M. L. (2017). Career adapt-abilities scale-short form (CAAS-SF) construction and validation. Journal of career assessment, 25(2), 312-325. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072714565856
  22. Sensoy, G., Siyez, D. M., & Kalen, S. (2021). Occupational engagement scale-student: Psychometric properties in Turkish university students. Australian Journal of Career Development, 30(1), 64-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1038416220986557
  23. J. C. Anderson & D. W. Gerbing. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 453-460.
  24. R. B. Kline. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
  25. J. F, Hair, W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson Education International.
  26. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104