산업진흥연구 (Industry Promotion Research)

  • 제8권1호
  • /
  • Pages.69-82
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2466-1139(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2714-013X(eISSN)
산업진흥원 (Industrial Promotion Institute)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

중소제조기업의 연구개발역량과 자원배분역량이 제품성과에 미치는 영향

A Study on the Effects of SEMs R&D Capabilities and Resource Allocation Capabilities on Product Performance

  • 정종서 (대전대학교 융합컨설팅학과) ;
  • 서영욱 (대전대학교 융합컨설팅학과)
  • 투고 : 2022.12.15
  • 심사 : 2023.01.27
  • 발행 : 2023.01.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 연구개발역량과 자원배분역량이 기술사업화역량에 미치는 영향과 기술사업화역량이 제품성과에 미치는 영향을 검증하였다. 기술사업화역량은 사업화속도, 시장범위, 기술의 폭을 변인으로 하여 영향을 검증하였다. 중소제조기업의 재직자 307명을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였으며, SPSS 25와 Smart PLS 3.0으로 연구의 모형과 가설을 검증하였다. 연구개발역량은 기술사업화역량의 사업화속도, 시장범위, 기술의 폭에 유의한 영향을 미쳤으며, 자원배분역량은 기술사업화역량의 사업화속도, 시장범위, 기술의 폭에 유의한 영향이 있는 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 기술사업화역량의 사업화속도, 시장범위, 기술의 폭은 기업의 제품성과에 유의한 영향이 있는 것으로 확인되었다. 본 연구결과를 통해 자원기반관점에서 기업의 연구개발역량과 자원배분역량은 강화하는 것이 사업화속도, 시장범위, 기술의 폭과 같은 기술사업화역량을 확대하며, 기술사업화역량의 강화가 기업의 제품성과에 영향을 미친다는 것을 밝힘으로써 기업의 사업화 성과를 위한 시사점을 제공했다는데 의의가 있다.

This study verified the effect of R&D capabilities and resource allocation capabilities on technology commercialization capabilities and the effect of technology commercialization capabilities on product performance. The effect of technology commercialization capability was verified by using commercialization speed, market scope, and technology breadth as variables. A survey was conducted for employees of SMEs companies, and the model and hypotheses of the study were verified using SPSS 25 and Smart PLS 3.0. It was confirmed that R&D capabilities and resource allocation capabilities had a significant effect on technology commercialization capabilities, and technology commercialization capabilities had a significant effect on the company's product performance. Through the results of this study, strengthening a company's R&D capabilities and resource distribution capabilities from a resource-based perspective expands technology commercialization capabilities such as commercialization speed, market scope, and technology breadth, and strengthening technology commercialization capabilities affects product performance of a company. It is meaningful in providing implications for the commercialization performance of companies by revealing the impact.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 권용덕. (2006). 자원기반관점에서 기술적자원과 효율성에 관한 연구 : 농가공업체를 중심으로. 중소기업연구, 28(3), 135-163.
  2. 김언수, 김재욱. (1999). 글로벌 환경하에서의 정보기술과 경쟁우위 : 한국, 미국, 유럽 제조기업들의 비교연구. 한국정보전략학회지, 2(1), 60-84.
  3. 남유현, 이철. (2013). 한국기업의 수출성과결정요인 통합모형 개발 : 산업조직 이론, 자원기반이론, 관계적 관점의 결합을 중심으로. 국제경영연구, 24(1), 77-118.
  4. 반재인, 손현철, 김성홍. (2013). 기업의 혁신성공요인이 기술혁신역량과 혁신성과에 미치는 영향. 한국생산관리학회지, 24(3), 409-430. https://doi.org/10.21131/KOPOMS.24.3.201309.409
  5. 손수정 외. (2021). 기술사업화 정책 20년의 성과와 과제. 과학기술정책연구원.
  6. 안재광, 김진한. (2015). 중소기업의 기술혁신 역량이 혁신성에 미치는 영향. 한국생산관리학회지, 26(1), 103-121. https://doi.org/10.21131/KOPOMS.26.1.201502.103
  7. 양수희, 김명숙, 정화영. (2011). 기술창업기업의 기업가역량과 기술사업화능력이 경영성과에 미치는 영향. 한국벤처 창업학회 학술대회 논문집, 1-23.
  8. 이병윤. (2007). 신제품 개발의 성공요인분석 : 총체적 관점. 한국산업기술재단 연구보고서.
  9. 이춘우. (2009). 자원기반관점의 연구지평확장 방향 탐색 : 중소기업자원 경영의 전략적과제를 중심으로. 중소기업연구, 31(1), 53-71.
  10. 전재일. (2016), 수출중소기업의 내부특유자원, 전략적지향성 및 동적역량이 해외진출성과에 미치는 영향. 한양대학교 대학원 박사 학위논문.
  11. 황경연, 성을현, 문희철. (2016). 기업의 학습능력 및 지식 창출이 기술사업화 및 수출성과에 미치는 영향. 경영과 정보연구, 35(5), 1-19.
  12. Aarikka-Stenroos, L., & Sandberg, B. (2012). From new-product development to commercialization through networks. Journal of Business Research, 65(2), 198-206.
  13. Adler, P. S., & Shenbar, A. (1990). Adapting your technological base: the organisational challenge. Sloan Management Review, 25, 25-37.
  14. Akwei, C. A. (2007). The process of creating dynamic capabilities. Ph.D. thesis, Loughborough University.
  15. Allen, I. V., & McKeown, S. R. (1979). Ahistological, histochemical and biochemical study of the macroscopically normal white matter in multiple sclerosis. Journal of the neurological sciences, 41(1), 81-91.
  16. Almus, M., & Czarnitzki, D. (2003). The Effects of Public R&D Subsidies on Firms Innovation Activities: The Case of Eastern Germany. Journal of Business Economics Statistics, 21, 226-236. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500103288618918
  17. Amit R., & Schoemaker. P. J. H. (1993). Strategic Assets and Organizationrent, Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33-46.
  18. Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance : anempirical investigation. MIS quarterly, 24, 169-196. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250983
  19. Brown, & Eisenhardt, K. M.. (1995). Product development : Pastresearch. present findings, and future directions. Academy of management review, 20(2), 343-378.
  20. Burgelman, R., Maidique, M.A., Wheelwright, S. C. (2004). Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation. McGraw-Hill, New York, 8-12.
  21. Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M.. (1981). The Management of Innovation. Tavistock, London.
  22. Carter, C. F., & Williams, B. R. (1957). Industry and technical progress. Oxford University Press.
  23. Chen, C. J. (2009). Technology commercialization, incubator and venture capital, and new venture performance. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 93-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.003
  24. Christensen, J. F. (1995). Asset profiles for technological nnovation. Research Policy, 24, 727-745. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)00794-8
  25. Collis, D. J., & Montgomery, C. A. (1995). Competing on Resources : Strategy in the 1990s. Knowledge and strategy, 73(4), 25-40.
  26. Cooper, R. G. (1983). A process model for industrial new product development. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-30, 2-11. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.1983.6448637
  27. Cooper, R. G. (1996). Overhauling the new product process. Industrial Marketing Management, 25, 465-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(96)00062-4
  28. Cornford, S. L., & Sarsfield, L. (2004). Quantitative methods for maturing and infusing advanced spacecraft technology. In 2004 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings(1).
  29. Dess, G.. (1987). Consensus in the strategy formulation and organisational performance: competitors in a fragmented industry. Strategy Management Journal, 8(3), 259-277.
  30. Dierickx, I., Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation andsustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35, 1504-1511. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.12.1504
  31. Dutta, S., Narasimhan, O., & Rajiv, S. (1999). Success in high-technology markets : Is marketing capability critical?, Marketing science, 18(4), 547-568. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.18.4.547
  32. Eagel, J. F., Blackwell, P. D., & Minard, P. W. (1993). Consumer Behavior, 7th ed, The Dryden Press.
  33. Ettlie, J. E. (1982). The commercialization of federally sponsored technological innovations. Research Policy, 11(3), 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(82)90018-X
  34. Evangelista, R., Perani, G., Rapiti, F., Archibugi, D. (1997). Nature and impact of innovation in manufacturing : some evidence from the Italian innovation survey. Research Policy, 26, 521-536. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00028-0
  35. G. G. Dess, & G. T. Lumpkin. (2005). The role of entrepreneurial orientation in stimulating effective corporate entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Perspectives, 19(1), 147-156.
  36. Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based the ory of competitive advantage : implications forstrategy formulation. California management review, 33(3), 114-135. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166664
  37. Guan, J., Ma, N.. (2003). Innovative capability and export performance of Chinese firms. Technovation, 23(9), 737-747. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00013-5
  38. Hamel, G., & Heene, A. (1994). Conclusions: which theory of strategic management do we need for tomorrow?, InCompetence-based competition, Wiley, 315-320.
  39. J. Barney. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  40. L. V. Ngo. & A. O'Cass. (2012). In search of innovation and customer-related performance superiority : The role of market orientation, marketing capability, and innovation capability interactions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(5), 861-877. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00939.x
  41. Lawless, M. J., & Fisher, R. J. (1990). Sources of durable competitive advantage in new products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 7(1), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.710035
  42. Li, Y., Guo, H., Liu, Y., & Li, M. (2008). Incentive mechanisms, entrepreneurial orientation, and technology commercialization : Evidence from China's transitional economy. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(1), 63-78.
  43. Li, Y., Li, L., Liu, Y., & Wang, L. (2005). Linking management control system with product development and process decisions to cope with environment complexity. International Journal of Production Research, 43(12), 2577-2591. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540500045634
  44. Lin, B. W., Lee, Y., & Hung, S. C. (2006). R&D intensity and commercialization orientation effects on financial performance. Journal of Business Research, 59(6), 679-685.
  45. Lynn, G. S., Akgun, A. E., & Keskin, H. (2003). Accelerated learning in new product development teams. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6(4), 201-212.
  46. March-Chorda, I., Gunasekaran, A., & Lloria-Aramburo, B. (2002). Product development process in Spanish SMEs : an empirical research. Technovation, 22(5), 301-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00021-9
  47. Mitchell, W., & Singh, K. (1996). Survival of businesses using collaborative relationships to commercialize complex goods. Strategic Management Journal, 17(3), 169-195.
  48. Mitra, S., & Chaya, A. K. (1996). Analyzing cost-effectiveness of organizations : the impact of information technologyspending. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(2), 29-57.
  49. Nevens, T. M. (1990). Commercializing technology : What the best companies do. Planning review, 18(6), 20-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb054310
  50. Nevens, T. M., Summe, G. L., & Uttal, B. (1990). Commercializing technology: What the best companies do?. Harvard Business Review, 68, 154-163.
  51. Peteraf, M.. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage : a resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal 14(3), 179 -191. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140303
  52. Rothwell, R., Freeman, C., Horlsey, A., Jervis, V. T. P., Robertson, A. B., & Townsend, J. (1974). SAPPHO updated-project SAPPHO phaseII. Researchpolicy, 3(3), 258-291.
  53. Saaty, T. L. (1996). Multicriteria Decision Making. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA.
  54. Saaty, T. L. (1994). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, seconded. McGraw Hill, New York.
  55. Song, X. M., & Parry, M. E. (1997). A cross-national comparative study of new product development processes : Japan and the United States, The Journal of Marketing, 34(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297003400101
  56. Song, X. M., Di Benedetto, C. A., & Song, L. Z. (2000). Pioneering advantage in new service development : A multi country study of managerial perceptions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17(5), 378-392. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1750378
  57. Stevens, G., Burley, J., & Divine, R. (1999). Creativity business discipline higher profits faster from new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16(5), 455-468. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1650455
  58. T. Ravichandran & C. Lertwongsatien. (2005). Effect of information systems resources and capabilities on firm performance : A resource-based perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(4), 237-276.
  59. Teo, T. S., & Ang, J. S. (1999). Critical success factors in the alignment of Splans with business plans. International journal of information management, 19(2), 173-185.
  60. Thomas, K. (2000). Creating regional cultures of innovation? The regional innovation strategies in England and Scotland. Regional Studies, 34(2), 190-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400050006104
  61. Vander Panne, G., Van Beers, C., & Kleinknecht, A. (2003). Success and failure of innovation : a literature review, International Journal of Innovation Management, 7(03), 309-338.
  62. Yam, R. C. M., Cheng, J., Fai, K., & Tang, E. P. Y. (2004). An audit of technological innovation capabilities in chinese firms : some empirical findings in Beijing. China, Research Policy, 33. 1123-1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.05.004
  63. Yam, R. C. M., William Lo, Esther, P. Y. Tang, Antonio K.W.Lau. (2011). Analysis of sources of innovation, technological innovation capabilities, and performance : An empirical study of Hong Kong manufacturing industries, Research policy, 2011, 40(3), 391-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.10.013
  64. Zahra, S. A., & Nielsen, A. P. (2002). Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization. Strategic Management Journal, 23(5), 377-398.
  65. Zirger, B. J., & Maidique, M. A.(1990). A model of new product development : An empirical test, Management science, 36(7), 867-883. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.7.867