DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A case of direct restore using 4-META/MMA-TBB resin containing organic filler in patients with severe occlusal surface wear and enamel fracture

심한 교합면 마모 및 교두 파절 환자에서 유기필러를 함유한 4-META/MMA-TBB 레진을 활용한 직접수복 증례

  • Received : 2023.09.20
  • Accepted : 2023.10.23
  • Published : 2023.12.31

Abstract

Attrition is the loss of tooth hard tissue due to contact between teeth, and in severe cases, dentin is exposed, accompanied by selective corrosion and excessive wear of teeth, which is called cupping. If these lesions are left untreated, the size of the lesion gradually increases, breaking the unsupported enamel, resulting in a decrease in aesthetics and chewing function. In this case report, patients with cupping and enamel fracture due to severe attrition were directly restored using a resin with soft properties containing organic fillers. In the follow-up observation six years later, most of the filling of the occlusal surface was eliminated, but the filling on the buccal surfaces remained relatively intact, and it was confirmed that this type of resin was suitable for the area where the occlusal force was relatively weak rather than the area where the occlusal force was greatly applied.

교모는 치아 간의 접촉으로 인하여 치아 경조직이 소실되는 것으로, 심한 경우 상아질이 노출되어 선택적인 부식과 치아의 과도한 마모가 동반되는데, 이를 cupping이라고 부른다. 이러한 병소를 치료하지 않고 방치할 경우 병소의 크기가 점차 커지게 되어 지지되지 않는 법랑질이 파절되고, 결과적으로 심미성과 저작 기능이 저하된다. 본 증례보고에서는 심한 교모로 인해 cupping과 법랑질 파절이 동반된 환자에서 유기필러가 함유되어 부드러운 성질을 지닌 레진을 이용하여 직접수복을 실시하였다. 6년 후의 경과관찰에서 교합면의 충전은 대부분 탈락하였으나 협측의 충전은 비교적 온전하게 남아 있음을 관찰할 수 있었고, 이런 형태의 레진이 교합력이 크게 가해지는 부위보다는 교합력이 비교적 약하게 가해지는 부위에 적합한 재료임을 확인할 수 있었다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by research fund from Chosun University Dental Hospital, 2022.

References

  1. Chen SC, Chueh LH, Hsiao CK, Wu HP, Chiang CP. First untoward events and reasons for tooth extraction after nonsurgical endodontic treatment in Taiwan. J Endod 2008;34:671-4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.016
  2. The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms: Ninth Edition. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117(5S):e1-e105.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.12.001
  3. Mair LH. Wear in dentistry - current terminology. J Dent 1992;20:140-4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(92)90125-V
  4. Turner KA, Missirilian DM. Restoration of the extremely worn dentition. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:467-74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(84)90326-3
  5. Pintado MR, Delong R, Ko CC, Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH. Correlation of noncarious cervical lesion size and occlusal wear in a single adult over a 14-year time span. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:436-43.  https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.109477
  6. Kishen A. Mechanisms and risk factors for fracture predilection in endodontically treated teeth. Endod Topics 2006;13:57-83.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2006.00201.x
  7. Chun K, Choi H, Lee J. Comparison of mechanical property and role between enamel and dentin in the human teeth. J Dent Biomech 2014;5: 1758736014520809. 
  8. Dejak B, Mlotkowski A, Romanowicz M. Finite element analysis of mechanism of cervical lesion formation in simulated molars during mastication and parafunction. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:520-9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.10.001
  9. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Walter R. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. e-book. New York; Elsevier Health Sciences; 2022. p. 84. 
  10. Edelhoff D, Sorenssen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:503-9.  https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.124094
  11. Mehta SB, Banerji S, Millar BJ, Suarez-Feito JM. Current concepts on the management of tooth wear: part 3. Active restorative care 2: the management of generalised tooth wear. Br Dent J 2012;212:121-7.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.97
  12. Mehta SB, Banerji S, Millar BJ, Suarez-Feito JM. Current concepts on the management of tooth wear: part 4. An overview of the restorative techniques and dental materials commonly applied for the management of tooth wear. Br Dent J 2012;212:169-77.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.137
  13. Kilpatrick N, Mahoney EK. Dental erosion: part 2. The management of dental erosion. N Z Dent J 2004;100:42-7. 
  14. Rodrigues DS, Buciumeanu M, Martinelli AE, Nascimento RM, Henriques B, Silva FS, Souza JC. Mechanical Strength and Wear of Dental GlassIonomer and Resin Composites Affected by Porosity and Chemical Composition. J Bio Tribo Corros 2015;1:24. 
  15. Milosevic, M. Polymerization mechanics of dental composites - advantages and disadvantages. Procedia Eng 2016;149:313-20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.672
  16. Brunthaler A, Konig F, Lucas T, Sperr W, Schedle A. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig 2003;7:63-70.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-003-0206-7
  17. Zhang C, Yang B. Long-term marginal adaptation and nanoleakage of class V cavity restored with organic filler filled 4-META/MMA-TBB resin. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2019;107:2050-6.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34297
  18. Saeki K, Chin AF, Nonomura GT, Hilton JF, Chien YC, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW. In vitro evaluation of adhesive characteristics of 4-META/ MMA-TBB resin with organic filler. Dent Mater 2015;31:1567-78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.10.004
  19. Aoki K, Kitasako Y, Ichinose S, Burrow MF, Ariyoshi M, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Ten-year observation of dentin bonding durability of 4-META/MMATBB resin cement - a SEM and TEM study. Dent Mater J 2011;30:438-47.  https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2011-003
  20. Anatavara S, Sitthiseripratip K, Senawongse P. Stress relieving behaviour of flowable composite liners: A finite element analysis. Dent Mater J 2016;35:369-78. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2015-204