DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

US, China and the Russo-Ukraine War: The Conditions for Generating a Mutually Perceived Hurting Stalemate and Consequent Ceasefire In Moscow and Kyiv

  • Benedict E. DeDominicis (Dept. of International Studies, The Catholic Univ. of Korea)
  • Received : 2023.10.07
  • Accepted : 2023.11.05
  • Published : 2023.12.31

Abstract

A prerequisite for a lasting ceasefire is the emergence of a prevailing view in Moscow and Kyiv that the fighting has reached a hurting stalemate. In sum, they both lose more through continuing warfare than by a ceasefire. This study applies social identity dynamics of nationalism to this escalatory conflict. It generates findings that imply that China as a third-party great power intervening mediator can potentially play a pivotal role. Shifting the respective prevailing views in Moscow and Kyiv of their interaction from a zero-sum foundation requires proffering powerful economic and political third-party incentives. Effective inducement would facilitate national defense, development and prestige for Moscow as well as Kyiv. China arguably has the underutilized potential power capabilities necessary to alter the respective prevailing views of strategic relationships among the great powers within Moscow, Brussels and Washington. A prerequisite for success in striving effectively towards this strategic goal is cooperation with the Beijing despite skepticism from Washington. This study utilizes a process tracing methodological approach. It highlights that the foundations of the Russo-Ukraine war lie in the institutionalization within Euro-Atlantic integration of the Cold War assumption that the USSR was an imperialist revisionist actor. Russia is the USSR's successor state. Moscow's prevailing view is that Russian national self-determination was unjustly circumscribed in the multinational Soviet totalitarian Communist system. The Euro-Atlantic community is perceived as a neocolonial imperial threat by allying with post-1991 Ukrainian nationalism at Russia's expense. The study finds that acknowledging Eurasian regional multipolarity is necessary, if not sufficient, to coopt Beijing into a global political stabilization strategy. It functionally aims to promote international balancing to lessen potentials for horizontal as well as vertical escalation of the Russo-Ukrainian conflict.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The author would like to thank the anonymous peer reviewers as well as the journal editors for their thoughtful critiques and comments. The author would also like to thank the Virtual Open Research Laboratory program in the Russian, East European, and Eurasian Center at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign for digital access to library resources. Any errors and omissions are solely the responsibility of the author.

References

  1. US Department of Defense, "Transcript: Pentagon Press Secretary John Kirby Holds an On-Camera Press Briefing," February 23, 2022. Accessed June 18, 2023. https://www.defense.gov/News/Transcripts/Transcript/Article/2944427/pentagon-press-secretary-john-kirby-holds-an-on-camera-press-briefing/
  2. President of Russia, "Joint Statement of the Russian Federation and the People's Republic of China on the International Relations Entering a New Era and the Global Sustainable Development," 2022. Accessed June 18, 2023. http://en.kremlin.ru/supplement/5770#sel=1:21:S5F,1:37:3jE.
  3. E. Dou, "What is - And Isn't - in the Joint Statement from Putin and Xi," Washington Post, Feb. 4, 2022. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/02/04/russia-china-xi-putin-summit-statement-beijing/.
  4. The White House, "National Security Strategy," Oct. 2022. Accessed June 18, 2023. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Biden-Harris-Administrations-National-Security-Strategy-10.2022.pdf.
  5. B.E. DeDominicis, "Historical Analogies and the Ukraine Crisis: Comparisons and Contrasts of Interwar German with Post-Cold War Serbian and Russian Irredentism and Western Responses," International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 15-46. 2022. https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibf/ijmmre/v15y2022i1p15-46.html.
  6. P. Zarrow, "Prospects for a Chilly War: China Advice at the Dawn of the Biden Era," Journal of American-East Asian Relations, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 82-112, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1163/18765610-29010002.
  7. M. Goodman, "China: Enemy Du Jour? But Why?," CounterPunch, Jan. 27, 2021. Accessed June 18, 2023. https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/01/27/china-enemy-du-jour-but-why/.
  8. C. Buckley, "In a Brother Act with Putin, Xi Reveals China's Fear of Containment," New York Times, March 22, 2023. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/22/world/asia/china-xi-putin-ukraine.html?searchResultPosition=3.
  9. S. Touval and I.W. Zartman, "International Mediation in the Post-Cold War Era," In Turbulent Peace: The Challenges of Managing International Conflict, C.A. Crocker, F.O. Hampson, and P. Aall, eds., pp. 427-443, 2001. United States Institute of Peace Press.
  10. R.W. Cottam and G. Gallucci, The Rehabilitation of Power in International Relations, 1978. University Center for International Studies, University of Pittsburgh.
  11. R.K. Herrmann, "Conclusions: The End of the Cold War: What Have We Learned?" In International Relations Theory and the End of the Cold War, R.N. Lebow and T. Risse-Kappen, eds. Pp. 259-284, 1995. Columbia University Press. https://libraryoflights.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/international-relations-theory-and-the-end-of-the-cold-war.pdf.
  12. R. Doshi, The Long Game: China's Grand Strategy to Displace American Order. Oxford University Press, 2019.
  13. M.L. Cottam and R.W. Cottam, Nationalism and Politics: The Political Behavior of Nation States. Lynne Rienner, 2001.
  14. US Department of Defense, "Transcript: Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken and Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III Remarks to Traveling Press," Apr. 25, 2022. Accessed June 18, 2023. https://www.defense.gov/News/Transcripts/Transcript/Article/3009051/secretary-of-state-antony-j-blinken-and-secretary-of-defense-lloyd-j-austin-iii/.
  15. A. Zurcher, "Why Biden's Off-Script Remarks about Putin Are So Dangerous," BBC News, Mar. 27, 2022. Accessed June 18, 2023. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-60895392.
  16. S. Boros, "The Role and Effects of the Russian-Ukrainian War in the Geopolitical Rivalry of the US and China: The Unfolding Thucydidcs Trap," Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations, Vol. 8, No, (3,Dec.), pp. 725-753, 2022. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/role-effects-russian-ukrainian-war-geopolitical/docview/2807413223/se-2.
  17. D. Pierson, "China's Role in Iran-Saudi Arabia Deal Shows Xi's Global Goals," New York Times, Mar. 11, 2023. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/11/world/asia/china-saudi-arabia-iran-us.html?searchResultPosition=4.
  18. E. Todor, "The Political Program of President Volodymyr Zelensky," In Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference Strategies XXI - The Complex and Dynamic Nature of the Security Environment - Volume 10, pp. 112-121, 2019. https://www.ceeol.com/search/chapter-detail?id=826878.
  19. H. Richard, "US Faces Dilemma Over Arming Ukraine," Le Monde Diplomatique, Jan. 2013. https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/354323/LMD_JAN23_pp4_7.pdf?sequence=1.
  20. "Russian Foreign Minister Outlines Vision of 'Genuine," BBC Monitoring Former Soviet Union, May 8, 2023.
  21. C.W. Leach and A. Cidam, "When is Shame Linked to Constructive Approach Orientation? A Meta-Analysis," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 109, No. 6(Dec.), pp. 983-1002, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000037.
  22. "Russia's Lavrov Pens Article for Latin American Media Ahead of Regional Tour," BBC Monitoring Former Soviet Union, Apr. 13, 2023.
  23. I. Kershaw, Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 239-254, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022009404042130.
  24. F. Sayers, Freddie, "John Mearsheimer: We're Playing Russian Roulette," UnHerd, Nov. 30, 2022. Accessed May 14, 2023. https://unherd.com/2022/11/john-mearsheimer-were-playing-russian-roulette/.
  25. M. Schwirtz, A. Troianovski, Y. Al-Hlou, M. Froliak, A. Entous and T. Gibbons-Neff, "Putin's War: The Inside Story of a Catastrophe," New York Times, Dec. 16, 2022. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/12/16/world/15ussia/15ussia-putin-war-failures-ukraine.html.
  26. B. Fozouni, "Confutation of Political Realism," International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 1995, No. 39, pp. 479-510, 1995. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600803.
  27. V. Pin-Fat, "The Metaphysics of the National Interest and the 'Mysticism' of the Nation-State: Reading Hans J. Morgenthau," Review of International Studies, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 217-236, 2005. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40072094. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021050500642X
  28. R. Jervis, Perception and Misperception in International Politics, Princeton University Press, 1976.
  29. A. Wolfers, Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics, John Hopkins University Press, 1962.
  30. T. Solomon, "Human Nature and the Limits of the Self: Hans Morgenthau on Love and Power," International Studies Review, Vo. 14, No. 2, pp. 201-24, 2012. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23279993. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2012.01109.x
  31. C. Gaudreault and E. Duchesne, "The Traps have Sprung? Sino-American Challenges for Hegemonic Leadership," The School of Public Policy Publications (SPPP), Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 1-17, 2022. https://doi.org/10.11575/sppp.v15i1.75011.
  32. R.W. Cottam, Competitive Interference and Twentieth Century Diplomacy, University of Pittsburgh, 1967.
  33. P. Popovic, "Hans Morgenthau and the Lasting Implications of World War I," Journal of Military Ethics, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 121-34, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2020.1794509.
  34. H.J. Morgenthau, "Justice and Power," Social Research, Vol. 41, No. 1(Spr.), pp. 163-175, 1974. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/justice-power/docview/1297190950/se-2.
  35. T. Kurianowicz and M. Eichhorn, "Gerhard Schroder in an Interview: This is How the Peace Negotiations between Ukraine and Russia Failed," Berliner Zeitung, Oct. 21, 2023. Accessed Oct. 22, 2023. https://www.berliner-zeitung.de/politik-gesellschaft/gerhard-schroeder-im-exklusiv-interview-was-merkel-2015-gemacht-hat-war-politisch-falsch-li.2151196.
  36. J. Szoke and K. Kusica, "Military Assistance to Ukraine and its Significance in the Russo-Ukrainian War," Social Sciences, Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 1-17, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12050294. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/military-assistance-ukraine-significance-russo/docview/2819457225/se-2.
  37. M. Bielieskov, "The Russian and Ukrainian Spring 2021 War Scare," Center for Strategic and International Studies, Sept. 21, 2021. Accessed Apr. 2, 2023. https://www.csis.org/analysis/15ussia15-and-ukrainian-spring-2021-war-scare.
  38. H. Yamazoe, "Escalation of the Crisis in Ukraine in the Spring of 2021," National Institute of Defense Studies, NIDS Commentary, No. 165, May 13, 2021, pp. 1-6. Accessed Apr. 2, 2023. http://www.nids.mod.go.jp/15ussia15/publication/commentary/pdf/commentary165e.pdf.
  39. Reuters, "Ukraine's Yermak Assured of "Ironclad" US Support in Call with Sullivan - Tweet," Reuters, Nov. 27, 2021. Accessed Apr. 2, 2023. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraines-yermak-assured-ironclad-us-support-call-with-sullivan-tweet-2021-11-26/.
  40. R. Prodi, "Statement on European Commission President Prodi, March 20, 2003" [sic] in "Iraq: March 20-April 9: U.S. and U.K. Forces Seize Bagdad, Oust Saddam Hussein, in Aggressive Three Week Campaign," Foreign Policy Bulletin, vol. 14(3-4), pp. 2-128, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1052703600010388.
  41. M.A. Reynolds, "Against 'the Blob' America's Foreign Policy in Eurasia's Heartland is Becoming its Own Greatest Enemy," Baku Dialogues, Vol. 4, No, 1, pp. 40-58, 2020. http://31.171.108.163/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20.500.12181/178/BD%204.1.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. 108.163/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20.500.12181/178/BD%204.1.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  42. L. Najslova, "Refugees and Fish Fingers: How Visegrad Policymakers used Emancipatory Narratives to Establish a 'Right to Reject'," Anthropological Journal of European Cultures, Vol. 30, No, 1(Mar.), pp. 52-73, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3167/ajec.2021.300104.
  43. I. Traynor and I. Black, "East Europe Dismayed at Chirac Snub," The Guardian, Feb. 19, 2003. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/feb/19/16uss.france.
  44. "Russia's 'Vision of a Multipolar World'," BBC Monitoring Former Soviet Union, Feb. 20, 2023.
  45. C.A. Crocker, "The Place of Grand Strategy, Statecraft, and Power in Conflict Management" In Leashing the Dogs of War: Conflict Management in a Divided World, C.A. Crocker, F.O. Hampson and P. Aall, eds., pp. 355-368, 2007. United States Institute of Peace Press.
  46. I. Tharoor, "The 'Old Europe' vs. 'New Europe' Paradigm Is Back," Washington Post, Apr. 17, 2023. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/04/17/old-europe-new-rumsfeld-eastern-europe/
  47. M. Rose, "Macron Tells Eastern Europe - We Should Have Listened to You Over Russia," Reuters, June 1, 2023. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/frances-macron-offers-mea-culpa-eastern-eu-nations-russia-2023-05-31/.
  48. L. Abboud, "Macron Offers 'Strategic Humility' to Woo Europe's East," Financial Times, June 3, 2023. https://www.ft.com/content/c8cb44f2-9651-498d-840c-6dc18159226e
  49. D. Dinan, "How Did We Get Here?" In The European Union: How Does It Work? D. Kenealy, A. Hadfield, R. Corbett and J. Peterson, eds., pp. 28-48. 2022. Oxford University Press.
  50. D. Kenealy, A. Hadfield, R. Corbett, "Introduction," In The European Union: How Does It Work? D. Kenealy, A. Hadfield, R. Corbett and J. Peterson, eds., pp. 3-28. 2022. Oxford University Press.
  51. European Council, "Nobel Peace Prize for the European Union - 10th Anniversary," Dec. 15, 2022. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/documents-publications/library/library-blog/posts/nobel-peace-prize-for-the-european-union-10th-anniversary/#:~:text='The%20Norwegian%20Nobel%20Committee%20has,and%20human%20rights%20in%20Europe'.