벤처혁신연구 (Journal of Venture Innovation)

한국벤처혁신학회 (Korean Academy of Venture Innovation)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

애플워치 만족도와 지속적 사용의도에 대한 실증연구 : 중국시장을 중심으로

A Study on the Apple Watch Satisfaction and Continuous Use Intention : Evidence from the Chinese Market

  • 완정훈 (중앙대학교 대학원 경영학과) ;
  • 송효정 (중앙대학교 대학원 경영학과) ;
  • 김태하 (중앙대학교 경영학부)
  • 투고 : 2023.07.26
  • 심사 : 2023.09.19
  • 발행 : 2023.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 애플워치 만족도에 영향을 미치는 요인 및 만족도와 지속적 사용의도 사이의 관계를 조사하였다. TAM모델을 기반으로 시스템 품질, 정보 품질 및 자기효능감을 독립변수로 설정하여 지각된 유용성, 지각된 사용용이성 및 만족도를 매개변수로 선정하고 지속적 사용의도를 종속변수로 최종 연구모형을 구성하였다. 본 연구는 온라인 설문조사를 통해 수집한 256부 데이터로 SPSS 26.0과 AMOS 26.0을 활용하여 신뢰도 분석, 요인 분석, 타당성 분석, 경로 분석, 가설 검증 및 매개효과를 분석하였다. 본 연구를 통해 소비자의 향후 애플워치 지속적 사용의도에 영향을 미치는 요인을 확인하였다. 요약하면 만족도는 지속적 사용의도에 긍정적인 영향을 미치고 지각된 유용성과 지각된 사용 용이성도 만족도에 긍정적인 영향을 미친다는 것을 확인했다. 하지만 시스템 품질, 정보 품질, 자기효능감 세 가지 요소 중 자기효능감은 지각된 유용성에 뚜렷한 영향을 미치지 않는다 것으로 나타났다. 이 외에 시스템 품질, 정보 품질 및 자기효능감이 애플워치 사용 과정에서 지각된 유용성, 지각된 사용용이성, 만족도 및 지속적 사용의도에 모두 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것을 확인하였다.

This study provides a prospect for the fast growing the smartwatch market by investigating the relationship between the satisfaction and the continuous use intention of Apple watch users, as well as the factors influencing their satisfaction. Based on the TAM, this study uses system quality, information quality, and self-efficacy as independent variables, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and satisfaction as mediators, and continuous use intention as the dependent variable. We analyze the data of 256 individuals who completed an online survey with SPSS 26.0 and AMOS 26.0 software. This study conducts several tests and analyses to empirically evaluate the data including reliability analysis, factor analysis, feasibility analysis, path analysis, hypothesis verification, and mediation analysis. Our results investigate which factors may influence consumers' intention to continuously using Apple Watch devices in the future. In summary, satisfaction has a positive effect on the intention to continuously use smartwatchs. Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use have a positive effect on satisfaction. Among the three factors (system quality, information quality, and self-efficacy), only self-efficacy has no significant impact on perceived usefulness but had a positive effect on perceived ease of use. In addition, system quality and information quality positively affect perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, satisfaction, and continuous intention to use an Apple Watch. Taking the Apple Watch as the subject of our research topic, this study provides theoretical value by exploring the impact of user's satisfaction with their smartwatch on their continuous usage intention. This study further explains the influence of system quality, information quality, and self-efficacy on user satisfaction. Additionally, this research offers valuable insight to practitioners by confirming that information quality, system quality, and self-efficacy are important features for enhancing satisfactory user experiences which in turn may increase users' intention to continued using smartwatches.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 권보아, 박상현(2021). 고객 인터렉티브 강화를 위한 지니뮤직의 전략 도입과 현황분석 : SWOT과 TOWS 분석을 중심으로. 벤처혁신연구, 4(1), 87-99.  https://doi.org/10.22788/4.1.6
  2. 권순동, 윤숙자(2010). 이러닝의 특성과 유용성이 지속적 이용의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 한국정보기술응용학회, 17(1), 35-54. 
  3. 권연선, 이형용(2013). 스마트폰의 사용자 수용 모형에 관한 연구. 한국정보기술응용학회, 20(1), 133-148. 
  4. 김민정(2017). 외식 배달 어플리케이션 서비스 지속이용의도에 관한 연구: 가치기반이론과 저항요인의 통합적 관점에서. 경희대학교 박사학위 논문. 
  5. 김상현, 박현선(2011). 모바일 애플리케이션의 품질이 사용자 만족과 애플리케이션 지불의도에 미치는 영향. 정보시스템연구, 20(3), 81-109. 
  6. 김서영(2013). 스마트기기의 구매의도에 영향을 미치는 요인, 홍익대학교 석사학위 논문. 
  7. 문설아, 변광인(2020). 확장된 기술수용모델 (ETAM) 을 적용한 외식 O2O 서비스의 지속사용의도에 관한 연구: 연령의 조절효과. 호텔경영학연구, 29(5), 119-137. 
  8. 서경화(2021). 외식산업의 키오스크 (Kiosks) 확산: 개인 혁신성, 자기효능감, 즐거움, 고객만족을 통합한 기술수용모델. 호텔경영학연구, 30(7), 73-92. 
  9. 서영수(2013). 소비자의 스마트폰 수용시점에 따른 만족도와 추천의도 연구, 건국대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문. 
  10. 손영준, 김옥태(2011). 스마트폰 이용자의 이용경험, 구입동기가 스마트폰 유용성, 용이성 인식에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 한국언론학보, 55(5), 286-311. 
  11. 이옥주, 양동우(2017). O2O서비스 품질이 사용자만족과 재이용의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 디지털융복합연구, 15(6), 165-178.  https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.6.165
  12. 정병규(2018). 기술수용 모델의 비교분석: UTAUT1 과 UTAUT2 를 중심으로. 벤처혁신연구, 1(2), 109-121.  https://doi.org/10.22788/1.2.8
  13. 정상희, 정병규(2020). 4 차 산업혁명시대의 디지털 고객경험과 구매간 영향관계-디지털 자기효능감의 조절된 매개 효과를 중심으로. 벤처혁신연구, 3(1), 101-115.  https://doi.org/10.22788/3.1.6
  14. 최민수(2011). 개인의 혁신성, 사회적 영향력, 사용자 인터페이스 요인이 스마트폰 수용에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 : 확장된 기술수용모델을 중심으로, 이화여자대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문. 
  15. 현용호, 남장현(2012). 패밀리레스토랑 스마트폰 어플리케이션 품질의 기술 수용모델(TAM)적용에 관한 연구: 자발성 (Voluntariness) 요인의 조절효과를 중심으로. 기업경영연구, 42(0), 149-167. 
  16. 노경섭(2019). 제대로 알고 쓰는 논문 통계분석: SPSS & AMOS(2020 4쇄), 서울: 한빛아카데미 
  17. Ahn, T., Ryu, S., & Han, I.(2007). The impact of web quality and playfulness on user acceptance of online retailing. Information & Management, 44(3), 263-275.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.12.008
  18. Al-Emran, M., Granic, A., Al-Sharafi, M. A., Ameen, N., & Sarrab, M.(2020). Examining the roles of students' beliefs and security concerns for using smartwatches in higher education. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 34(4), 1741-0398 
  19. Ariff, M. S. M., Yeow, S. M., Zakuan, N., Jusoh, A., & Bahari, A. Z.(2012), The effects of computer self-efficacy and technology acceptance model on behavioral intention in internet banking systems, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 57(9), 448-452.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1210
  20. Bandura, A.(1977), Self-efficacy: Towards a unifying theory of behavioral change, Psychology Review, 84(2), 122-147.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.84.2.191
  21. Bhattacherjee, A.(2001a). An empirical analysis of the antecedents of electronic commerce service continuance. Decision Support Systems, 32(2), 201-214.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(01)00111-7
  22. Bhattacherjee, A.(2001b). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 351-370. 
  23. Bitner, M. J.(1990). Evaluating service encounters: the effects of physical surroundings and employee responses. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 69-82.  https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400206
  24. Chan, S., & Ming-te, L.(2005), Understanding internet banking adoption and use behavior: A Hong Kong perspective. Journal of Global Information Management, 12(3), 21-43.  https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.2004070102
  25. Chatterjee, S., Chakraborty, S., Sarker, S., Sarker, S., & Lau, F. Y.(2009). Examining the success factors for mobile work in healthcare: A deductive study. Decision Support Systems, 46(3), 620-633.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2008.11.003
  26. Cheng, J. W., & Mitomo, H.(2017). The underlying factors of the perceived usefulness of using smart wearable devices for disaster applications. Telematics and Informatics, 34(2), 528-539.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.09.010
  27. Chi, T.(2018). Understanding Chinese consumer adoption of apparel mobile commerce: An extended TAM approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 44, 274-284.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.07.019
  28. Chuah, S. H. W., Rauschnabel, P. A., Krey, N., Nguyen, B., Ramayah, T., & Lade, S.(2016). Wearable technologies: The role of usefulness and visibility in smartwatch adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 276-284. 
  29. Davis, F. D.(1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319-340. 
  30. Delone, W. H., & McLean, E. R.(1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95.  https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60
  31. Delone, W. H., & McLean, E. R.(2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information, 19(4), 9-30. 
  32. Dutot, V., Bhatiasevi, V., & Bellallahom, N.(2019). Applying the technology acceptance model in a three-countries study of smartwatch adoption. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 30(1), 1-14. 
  33. Floropoulos, J., Spathis, C., Halvatzis, D., & Tsipouridou, M.(2010). Measuring the success of the Greek taxation information system. International Journal of Information Management, 30(1), 47-56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.03.013
  34. Fornell, C., & Lacker, D. F.(1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50  https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  35. Garrity, E. J., O'Donnell, J. B., Kim, Y. J., & Sanders, G. L.(2007). An extrinsic and intrinsic motivation-based model for measuring consumer shopping oriented web site success. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations(JECO), 5(4), 18-38.  https://doi.org/10.4018/jeco.2007100102
  36. George, A., & Kumar, G. S. G.(2013), Antecedents of customer satisfaction in internet banking: Technology acceptance model (TAM) redefined. Global Business Review, 14(4) 627-638.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150913501602
  37. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M.(2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1-2), 1-12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001
  38. Hawash, B., Mokhtar, U. A., & Yusof, Z. M.(2021). Users' acceptance of an electronic record management system in the context of the oil and gas sector in Yemen: an application of ISSM-TAM. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 20(1), 75-98.  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMED.2021.113661
  39. Hong, J. C., Lin, P. H., & Hsieh, P. C.(2017). The effect of consumer innovativeness on perceived value and continuance intention to use smartwatch. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 264-272.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.001
  40. Hsiao, K.(2017). What drives smartwatch adoption intention? comparing apple and non-apple watches. Library Hi Tech, 35(1), 186-206.  https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-09-2016-0105
  41. Hsiao, K. L., & Chen, C. C.(2018). What drives smartwatch purchase intention? Perspectives from hardware, software, design, and value. Telematics and Informatics, 35(1), 103-113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.10.002
  42. Hsu, M, H., & Chiu, C. M.(2004), Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance, Decision Support Systems, 38(3), 369-381. 
  43. Igbaria, M., & Iivari, J.(1995). The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. Omega, 23(6), 587-605.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(95)00035-6
  44. Jeong, H.(2011). An investigation of user perceptions and behavioral intentions towards the e-library. Library Collections. Acquisitions and Technical Services, 35(2-3), 45-60.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14649055.2011.10766298
  45. Jeong, J. G., & Jang, K. J.(2010). A study on the factors of smart-phone selection centered on actual users. The E-business Studies, 11(4), 361-379.  https://doi.org/10.15719/GEBA.11.4.201011.361
  46. Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L.(1999). Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of preadoption and post adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 183-213.  https://doi.org/10.2307/249751
  47. Kim, K. J.(2016). Round or square? How screen shape affects utilitarian and hedonic motivations for smartwatch adoption. Cyberpsychology. Behavior and Social Networking, 19(12), 733-739.  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0136
  48. Kim, K. J., & Shin, D. H.(2015). An acceptance model for smart watches: Implications for the adoption of future wearable technology. Internet Research, 25(4), 527-541.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-05-2014-0126
  49. Kranthi, A. K., & Ahmed, K. A.(2018). Determinants of smartwatch adoption among IT professionals-an extended UTAUT2 model for smartwatch enterprise. International Journal of Enterprise Network Management, 9(3-4), 294-316.  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJENM.2018.094669
  50. Kuo-Lun Hsiao.(2013). Android smartphone adoption and intention to pay for mobile internet: Perspectives from software, hardware, design, and value. Library Hi Tech, 31(2), 216-235.  https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831311329022
  51. Lee, B. G., Yeo, Y. K., Kim, K. Y., & Lee, J. H.(2010). Effects of trust and cognitive absorption on smart phone use and user satisfaction. The KIPS Transactions: PartD, 17(6), 471-480. 
  52. Lee, G. G., & Lin, H. F.(2005). Customer perceptions of e-service quality in online shopping. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 33(2), 161-176.  https://doi.org/10.1108/09590550510581485
  53. Lee, K. C., & Chung, N.(2009). Understanding factors affecting trust in and satisfaction with mobile banking in Korea: A modified DeLone and McLean's model perspective. Interacting with Computers, 21(5), 385-392.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2009.06.004
  54. Liu, D., & Guo, X.(2017). Can trust and social benefit really help? Empirical examination of purchase intentions for wearable devices. Information Development, 33(1), 43-56.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666916635724
  55. Martilla, John A. & John C. James.(1977). Importance-Performance Analysis, Journal of Marketing, 41(Jan), pp.77-79  https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297704100112
  56. Motti, V. G., & Caine, K.(2016). Smart wearables or dumb wearables? Understanding how context impacts the UX in wrist worn interaction. In Proceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication, pp.1-10. 
  57. Nelson, R. R., Todd, P. A., & Wixom, B. H.(2005). Antecedents of information and system quality: An empirical examination within the context of data warehousing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(4), 199-235. 
  58. Ogbanufe, O., & Gerhart, N.(2018). Watch it! Factors driving continued feature use of the smartwatch. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 34(11), 999-1014.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1404779
  59. Oliver, R. L.(1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460-469.  https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378001700405
  60. Oliver R. L.(1996). Varieties of value in the consumption satisfaction response. Advances in Consumer Research, 23, 143-147. 
  61. Pal, D., Funilkul, S., & Vanijja, V.(2020). The future of smartwatches: assessing the end-users' continuous usage using an extended expectation-confirmation model. Universal Access in the Information Society, 19(2), 261-281.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-018-0639-z
  62. Petter, S., & McLean, E. R.(2009). A meta-analytic assessment of the DeLone and McLean IS success model: An examination of IS success at the individual level. Information & Management, 46(3), 159-166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.12.006
  63. Phuong, N. N. D., Luan, L. T., Van Dong, V., & Khanh, N. L. N.(2020). Examining customers' continuance intentions towards e-wallet usage: The emergence of mobile payment acceptance in Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business (JAFEB), 7(9), 505-516.  https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no9.505
  64. Prasetyo, Y. T., Ong, A. K. S., Concepcion, G. K. F., Navata, F. M. B., Robles, R. A. V., Tomagos, I. J. T., ... & Redi, A. A. N. P.(2021). Determining factors Affecting acceptance of e-learning platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic: Integrating Extended technology Acceptance model and DeLone & Mclean is success model. Sustainability, 13(15), 8365. 
  65. Rafique, H., Almagrabi, A. O., Shamim, A., Anwar, F., & Bashir, A. K.(2020). Investigating the acceptance of mobile library applications with an extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Computers & Education, 145, 103732. 
  66. Reichheld, F. F., & Schefter, P.(2000). E-loyalty: your secret weapon on the web. Harvard Business Review, 78(4), 105-113. 
  67. Rezvani, S., Heidari, S., Roustapisheh, N., & Dokhanian, S.(2022). The effectiveness of system quality, habit, and effort expectation on library application use intention: the mediating role of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user satisfaction. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 1-18. 
  68. Ross, I., & Oliver, R. L.(1984). The accuracy of unsolicited consumer communications as indicators of &Quot; True&Quot; consumer satisfaction/dissatisfaction. ACR North American Advances, 11, 504-508. 
  69. Saracevic, T.(2007). Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part III: Behavior and effects of relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information, 58(13), 2126-2144.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20681
  70. Spreng, R. A., & Olshavsky, R. W.(1993). A desires congruency model of consumer satisfaction. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21, 169-177.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070393213001
  71. Steuer, J., Biocca, F., & Levy, M. R.(1995). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Communication in The Age of Virtual Reality, 33, 37-39. 
  72. Venkatesh, V. & Davis, F.(2000), A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  73. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D.(1996), A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test, Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451- 481.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01822.x
  74. Wu, L. H., Wu, L. C., & Chang, S. C.(2016). Exploring consumers' intention to accept smartwatch. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 383-392.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.005
  75. Yang, H., Yu, J., Zo, H., & Choi, M.(2016). User acceptance of wearable devices: An extended perspective of perceived value. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 256-269.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.08.007
  76. Yeh, C. H., Wang, Y. S., & Yieh, K.(2016). Predicting smartphone brand loyalty: Consumer value and consumer-brand identification perspectives. International Journal of Information Management, 36(3), 245-257. 
  77. Zhou, T.(2014). Understanding continuance usage intention of mobile internet sites. Universal Access in the Information Society, 13(3), 329-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-013-0313-4
  78. Counterpoint Research, Global Smartwatch Shipments Market Share Q4 2022,2023 02 
  79. Hayes, A. F.(2013). Mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach, 1, 20. 
  80. Horwitz, J.(2015). Apple announces watchOS 2 with third-party Apple Watch apps, new Timepieces, video playback, much more. URL https://9to5mac.com/2015/06/08/apple-announces-new-version-of-watchos/
  81. Fingas, R.(2016). IBM adopts Apple watch for internal fitness initiative & Watson-linked health app. 
  82. Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C., Cohen, M. S., Jacobs, S., Elmqvist, N., & Diakopoulos, N.(2016). Designing the User Interface: Strategies For Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Pearson. 
  83. Silbert, S.(2018). Apple Watch: Everything You Need to Know. Web Document. Lifewire. Accessed 2 April 2018. URL https://www.lifewire.com/apple-watch-models-4175232