한국심리학회지 : 문화 및 사회문제 (Korean Journal of Culture and Social Issue)

한국문화및사회문제심리학회 (Korean Psychological Association of Culture and Social Issues)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대인 간 관용과 불관용에 영향을 주는 요인

Factors Affecting Interpersonal Tolerance and Intolerance

  • Joeng, Ju-Ri (Department of Education, Chonnam National University)
  • 투고 : 2022.05.03
  • 심사 : 2022.07.11
  • 발행 : 2022.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 대인 간 관용과 불관용을 구분하여 관용과 불관용에 영향을 미치는 요인을 탐색하고자 하였다. 구체적으로 인구통계학적 변인, 사회적 바람직성, 공감(인지적 공감, 정서적 공감), 타인을 향한 자비불안, 사회신뢰, 제로섬 신념이 관용과 불관용을 예측하는지를 알아보고자 하였다. 연구대상은 전국에 거주하는 성인 445명(남성 218명, 여성 227명)으로 온라인 설문조사를 통해 자료를 얻었다. 자료분석은 인구통계학적 변인과 사회적 바람직성의 영향을 통제하기 위해 위계적 회귀분석 방법을 사용하였다. 연구결과, 관용을 유의하게 예측하는 것은 성별, 주관적 사회경제적지위, 사회적 바람직성, 인지적 공감, 사회신뢰로 나타났고, 불관용은 사회적 바람직성, 타인을 향한 자비불안, 제로섬 신념이 유의하게 예측하는 것으로 나타났다. 이를 통해 관용과 불관용의 개념이 구분되며, 각각을 예측하는 요인도 다르다는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 따라서 관용을 높이기 위한 개입과 불관용을 낮추기 위한 개입방안을 함께 모색함으로써 다문화·다양성 사회에서 현실적인 공존방안을 마련해나갈 필요가 있을 것이다.

This study aimed to explore factors which can predict interpersonal tolerance and intolerance. Specifically, the study examined whether tolerance and intolerance would be explained by demographic variables, social desirability, empathy (cognitive empathy and affective empathy), fear of compassion for others, social trust, and zero-sum belief. Participants in the study were 445 adults (218 males and 227 females) who completed an online survey. Data were analyzed by using hierarchical regression analyses to control the effects of demographic variables and social desirability. The results indicated that tolerance was explained by gender, subjective socioeconomic status, social desirability, cognitive empathy, and social trust. In addition, intolerance was predicted by social desirability, fears of compassion for others, and zero-sum belief. It means that the constructs of tolerance and intolerance are distinct, and different factors predict tolerance and intolerance, respectively. Therefore, it would be necessary to develop realistic ways to promote tolerance and to prevent intolerance at the same time in order to achieve co-existence in a multicultural and diverse society.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 전남대학교 연구년 연구과제 지원에 의하여 연구되었음(과제번호: 2020-3881).

참고문헌

  1. 강진구, 이기성 (2019). 텍스트마이닝(text mining)을 통해 본 제주 예멘 난민. 다문화콘텐츠연구, 30, 103-135.
  2. 강혜정, 임은미 (2012). 대학생용 다문화태도 척도의 한국판 타당화 연구. 아시아교육연구, 13(4), 35-57. https://doi.org/10.15753/AJE.2012.13.4.002
  3. 구자영, 서은국 (2007). 행복의 양이 한정되어 있다는 믿음과 주관적 안녕감. 한국심리학회지; 사회 및 성격, 21(4), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2007.21.4.001
  4. 김성민, 민영 (2021). 고정관념과 오정보 수용이 난민 반대 정치참여에 미치는 영향: 분노와 두려움의 매개효과를 중심으로. 미디어, 젠더 & 문화, 36(4), 103-143.
  5. 김성현, 김성회 (2006). 관용성 척도 개발. 상담학연구, 7(2), 215-229.
  6. 김성현, 김성회 (2007). 관용성 척도의 표준화를 위한 연구. 상담학연구, 8(3), 793-806. https://doi.org/10.15703/KJC.8.3.200709.793
  7. 김용환 (1997). 관용과 열린사회. 서울: 철학과 현실사.
  8. 김용환, 김성호, 김성환, 김은주, 박삼열, 이경희, 이재영, 임건태 (2019). 혐오를 넘어 관용으로-관용: 혐오주의에 대항하는 윤리. 파주: 서광사.
  9. 김용환, 조영제 (1999). 관용을 위한 가치교육의 내용과 방법에 관한 연구. 시민교육연구, 30, 51-80.
  10. 모경환, 황혜원 (2007). 중등교사들의 다문화적 인식에 대한 연구. 시민교육연구, 39(3), 79-100. https://doi.org/10.35557/TRCE.39.3.200709.004
  11. 박성희 (1996). 공감과 친사회 행동. 서울: 문음사.
  12. 배병훈, 이동귀, 함경애 (2015). Rasch 모형을 이용한 한국판 사회적 바람직성 척도 단축형(SDS-9)의 타당화. 상담학연구, 16(6), 177-197. https://doi.org/10.15703/KJC.16.6.201512.177
  13. 배정은, 신희천, 이민규 (2010). 원만성이 용서 동기에 미치는 영향: 인지적 공감과 정서적 공감의 매개 과정. 상담학연구, 11(1), 111-123. https://doi.org/10.15703/KJC.11.1.201003.111
  14. 연합뉴스 (2018, 8, 30). 아프간 협력자 장기체류 허용...공감 68% 비공감 28%. Retrieved From https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20210830014300001.
  15. 전유정 (2016). 범죄뉴스의 선정성과 책임귀인이 사회신뢰에 미치는 영향. 고려대학교 석사학위 논문.
  16. 정주리 (2021). 한국판 제로섬 신념 척도 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 27(3), 285-303. https://doi.org/10.20406/KJCS.2021.8.27.3.285
  17. 정주리, 김은영, 최승애, 이유정, 김정기 (2015). 한국판 자비불안 척도들의 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 27(4), 881-903.
  18. 정주리, 이지혜 (2022). 주관적 사회경제적 지위, 연령, 공정성 인식 간의 관계: 연령의 조절효과를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 28(2), 219-239. https://doi.org/10.20406/KJCS.2022.5.28.2.219
  19. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge: Addison Wesley.
  20. Batson, C. D., Polycarpou, M. P., Harmon-Jones, E., Irnhoff, H. J., Mitchener, E. C., Bednar, L. L., Klein, T. R., & Highberger, L. (1997). Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 105-118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.105
  21. Belasheva, I. V., & Petrova, N. F. (2016). Psychological stability of a personality and capability of tolerant interaction as diverse manifestations of tolerance. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(10), 3367-3384.
  22. Boghian, I. (2017). A psycho-pedagogical approach to the concept of tolerance. Journal of Innovation in Psychology, Education and Didactics, 21(1), 97-110.
  23. Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., Najle, M. B., & Gervais, W. M. (2018). The illusion of political tolerance: Social desirability and self-reported voting preferences. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(3), 364-373. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618760147
  24. Butrus, N., & Witenberg, R. T. (2013). Some personality predictors of tolerance to human diversity: The roles of openness, agreeableness, and empathy. Australian Psychologist, 48, 290-298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-9544.2012.00081.x
  25. Cohen, A. J. (2004). What toleration is. Ethics, 115(1), 68-95. https://doi.org/10.1086/421982
  26. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  27. Crimston, C. R., Blessing, S., Gilbert, P., & Kirby, J. N. (2022). Fear leads to suffering: fears of compassion predict restriction of the moral boundary. British Journal of Social Psychology, 61(1), 345-365. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12483
  28. Cuadrado, I., Ordonez-Carrasco, J. L. Lopez-Rodriguez, L., Vazquez, A., & Bramvilla, M. (2021). Tolerance towards differences: Adaptation and psychometric properties of the Spanish version of a new measure of tolerance and sex-moderated relations with prejudice. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 84, 220-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.08.005
  29. Curtis, J., & Andersen, R. (2015). How social class shapes attitudes on economic inequality: The competing forces of self-interest and legitimation. International Review of Social Research, 5(1), 4-19. https://doi.org/10.1515/irsr-2015-0002
  30. Dangubic, M., Verkuyten, M. & Stark, T. H. (2021). Understanding (in)tolerance of Muslim minority practices: a latent profile analysis. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(7), 1517-1538. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1808450
  31. Davidai, S. & Ongis, M. (2019). The politics of zero-sum thinking: The relationship between political ideology and the belief that life is a zero-sum game. Science advances, 5(12), 1-20.
  32. Davis, M. H. (1994). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
  33. Devine, P. G., Evett, S. R., & Vasquez-Suson, K. A. (1996). Exploring the interpersonal dynamics of intergroup contact. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (pp. 423-464). New York: Guilford.
  34. Gilbert, P., McEwan, K., Matos, M., & Rivis, A. (2011). Fears of compassion: Development of three self-report measures. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 84(3), 239-255. https://doi.org/10.1348/147608310X526511
  35. Golebiowska, E. A. (1999). Gender gap in political tolerance. Political Behavior, 21(1), 43-66. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023396429500
  36. Hamamura, T., Heine, S. J., & Paulhus, D. L. (2008). Cultural differences in response styles: The role of dialectical thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(4), 932-942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.034
  37. Herreros, F. (2004). The problem of forming social capital: Why trust?. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  38. Hjerm, M., Eger, M. A., Bohman, A., & Connolly, F. F. (2020). A new approach to the study of tolerance: conceptualizing and measuring acceptance, respect, and appreciation of difference. Social Indicators Research, 147(3), 897-919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02176-y
  39. King, P. (2012). Toleration. London: Routledge.
  40. Moorman, R. H., & Podsakoff, P. M. (1992). A meta-analytic review and empirical test of the potential confounding effects of social desirability response sets in organizational behaviour research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65(2), 131-149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1992.tb00490.x
  41. Paulhus, D. L. (2002). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. In H. Braun, D. N. Jackson, & D. E. Wiley (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (pp. 67-88). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  42. Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 54(9), 741-754. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.9.741
  43. Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 65-85. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65
  44. Rapp, C., & Freitag, M. (2015). Teaching tolerance? Associational diversity and tolerance formation. Political Studies, 63(5), 1031-1051. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12142
  45. Reeskens, T., & Hooghe, M. (2008). Cross-cultural measurement equivalence of generalized trust: Evidence from the European Social Survey (2002 and 2004). Social Indicators Research, 85(3), 515-532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9100-z
  46. Reich, C., & Purbhoo, M. (1975). The effect of cross-cultural contact. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 7(4), 313-327. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0081917
  47. Robinson, J., Witenberg, R., & Sanson, A. (2001). The socialization of tolerance. In M. Augoustinos, & K. J. Reynolds (Eds.), Understanding prejudice, racism and social conflict (pp. 73-88). London, UK: Sage.
  48. Rozycka-Tran, J., Boski, P., & Wojciszke, B. (2015). Belief in a zero-sum game as a social axiom: A 37-Nation Study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(4), 525-548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022115572226
  49. Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. (2008). Research methods for social work (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  50. Rydgren, J., Dofi, D., & Hallsten, M. (2013). Interethnic friendship, trust, and tolerance: Findings from two north Iraqi cities. American Journal of Sociology, 118(6), 1650-1694. https://doi.org/10.1086/669854
  51. Sherif, M. (1966). Group conflict and co-operation: Their social psychology. London: Routlege & Kegan Paul.
  52. Stephan, W. G. (2014). Intergroup anxiety: Theory, research, and practice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(3), 239-255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314530518
  53. Stober, J. (2001). The social desirability scale-17 (SDS-17): Convergent validity, discriminant validity, and relationship with age. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17(3), 222-232. https://doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.17.3.222
  54. Taber, K. S. (2016). The use of Cronbach's alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
  55. Thomae, M., Birtel, M. D., & Wittemann, J. (2016, July 13-16). The interpersonal tolerance scale (IPTS): Scale development and validation [Paper presentation]. The 2016 Annual Meeting of The International Society of Political Psychology, Warsaw, Poland.
  56. UNESCO. (1995). Declaration of principles on tolerance. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000101803.page=75
  57. Verkuyten, M., Adelman, L., & Yogeeswaran, K. (2020). The psychology of intolerance: Unpacking diverse understandings of intolerance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(5), 467-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420924763
  58. Verkuyten, M., & Killen, M. (2021). Tolerance, dissenting beliefs, and cultural diversity. Child Development Perspectives, 15(1), 51-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12399
  59. Verkuyten, M. & Kollar, R. (2021). Tolerance and intolerance: Cultural meanings and discursive usage. Culture & Psychology, 27(1), 172-186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X20984356
  60. Verkuyten, M., & Yogeeswaran, K. (2017). The social psychology of intergroup toleration: A roadmap for theory and research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(1), 72-96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316640974
  61. Vogt, W. P. (1997). Tolerance & education-learning to live with diversity and difference. London: Sage.
  62. Wang, T. Y., & Chang, G. A. (2006). External threats and political tolerance in Taiwan. Political Research Quarterly, 59(3), 377-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290605900305