Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science (한국문헌정보학회지)

Korean Society For Library And Information Science (한국문헌정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Development of Education Method and Model for Convergence Reading Education in School Library

학교도서관 융합독서교육을 위한 교육방법 및 모형개발

  • 조수연 (경기대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 조미아 (경기대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2022.04.18
  • Accepted : 2022.05.17
  • Published : 2022.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, the direction and contents of public education to develop competencies that are in line with the 2022 revised curriculum and the paradigm of future education were sought, and a plan for reading education was prepared. A creative and cooperative problem-solving method and process as not only information literacy ability to read, select, and reconstruct information but also transformative competency to respond to uncertain future and diversified situations are important amid the complex, pluralistic and rapid development of information and communication technology It was intended to give an experience of exploring and communicating through reading in order to explore and derive it. Analyze the general outline and syllabus of the curriculum, international education project definitions and indicators, and organize academic theories and research to set the direction and goal of high school reading education, and organize creative and convergence class strategies and reading activities A library reading class model was developed. Accordingly, the class model was revised by applying the development research method, and the final model was developed by supplementing it through field application evaluation. In order to achieve the research purpose end, a two-round Delphi survey was conducted on 10 reading education and curriculum experts. The model modified through the Delphi survey was developed in the final school library convergence reading class model by demonstrating the class in the educational field and supplementing it through application evaluation.

이 연구에서는 2022개정 교육과정과 미래 교육의 패러다임에 부합하는 역량을 함양하기 위한 공교육의 방향과 내용을 모색하며 독서교육의 방안을 마련하고자 하였다. 복잡하고 다원적이며 급격한 정보통신 발전의 속도 속에서 정보를 읽고 선별하며 재구성하는 정보활용능력 뿐만 아니라 불확실한 미래와 다변적인 상황에 대응하는 변혁적 역량이 중요함에 따라 창의적이고 협력적인 문제해결의 방법 및 과정을 탐색하고 도출하기 위해 독서를 매개로 탐구하고 소통하는 경험을 부여하고자 하였다. 교육과정의 총론 및 각론, 국제 교육 프로젝트의 및 평가의 영약과 지표를 분석하고 학문적 이론과 연구를 정리하여 고등학교 독서교육의 방향과 목표를 설정하고 창의·융합 수업전략과 독서활동 내용을 구성하여 학교도서관 독서수업모형을 개발하였다. 독서수업모형은 독서교육 및 교육과정 관련 전문가 10명을 대상으로 2차에 걸친 델파이 조사를 실시하여 수정하였다. 델파이 조사를 통해 수정한 모형은 교육 현장에서 수업을 실연하고 적용평가를 통해 보완하여 최종 학교도서관 융합독서 수업모형을 개발하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kang, Bong-Suk (2013). A qualitative study on benefits of library assisted instruction recognized by middle and high school students. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 47(4), 169-186. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.4.169
  2. Kang, Jung-Chan (2015a). The development of instructional design principles for creativity convergence education. Education Method Research, 27(3), 276-305.
  3. Kang, Jung-Chan (2015b). The development of teaching-learning method and instructional design model for creativity convergence reading education. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 19(3), 713-742. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2015.19.3.713
  4. Gyeonggi Provincial Office of Education (2021). School Library Indicators and Guidelines for Operation Consulting. Available: https://www.goe.go.kr/home/bbs/bbsDetail.do?menuId=100000000000279&bbsMasterId=BBSMSTR_000000030141&menuInit=13,1,2,0,0&bbsId=1007821
  5. Ministry of Education (2015). Notice of Elementary and Secondary School Curriculum Overview and Curriculum. Available: https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/viewRenew.do?boardID=141&lev=0&statusYN=C&s=moe&m=0404&opType=N&boardSeq=60747
  6. Ministry of Education (2019). The 3rd Bssic Plan for School Library Promotion (2019-2023). Available: https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/viewRenew.do?boardID=316&lev=0&statusYN=W&s=moe&m=0302&opType=N&boardSeq=77321
  7. Ministry of Education (2021). The Main Points of the General Outline in 2022 Revised Educational Curriculum(plan). Available: https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/viewRenew.do?boardID=294&boardSeq=89671&lev=0&searchType=null&statusYN=W&page=1&s=moe&m=020402&opType=N
  8. National Education Statistics Center (2021). Key Indicators: International Statistics. Available: https://kess.kedi.re.kr/index.
  9. Kim, Ra-Yeon (2015). Analysis of the workbook development case for fusion reading. Journal of reading research, 35, 343-368. https://doi.org/10.17095/JRR.2015.35.12
  10. Kim, Youngmi (2016). The development of project-based instructional model for promoting the creative convergent competency. Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering, 20(11), 2172-2180. https://doi.org/10.6109/JKIICE.2016.20.11.2172
  11. Kim, Jong-Yun (2015). A critical review of reading as creation-convergence process. Journal of reading research, 35, 79-109. https://doi.org/10.17095/JRR.2015.35.3
  12. Kim, Jong-chul, Yoon, Yeo-tak, Koo, Bon-gwan, Min, Byung-gon, & Ko, Jung-hee (2015). Korean Language Education for Creativity and Convergence Seoul: A Social Review.
  13. Kim, Ju-Ah, Kim, Youngmin, & Lee, Mee-Kyung (2014). Deliberation on possibilities and desirability of interdisciplinary curriculum development. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(4), 47-75. https://doi.org/10.15708/kscs.32.4.201412.003
  14. Kim, Jun-Soo, Kim, Jong-Wook, & Kim, Jinsoo (2015). Analysis of KOFAC STEAM education program. The Journal of Practical Arts Education Research, 21(2), 25-44.
  15. Kim, Jinsoo (2013). STEAM Education Theory. Paju: Yangseowon.
  16. Nam, Yeong-ok & Yu, Byeong-min (2016). An analysis of structural relationship of team members characteristics, team mental model and team effectiveness depending on team activity style. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(9), 517-541.
  17. Noh, Myeong-Wan (2015). The reading-writing as creative processes and technology. Journal of Reading Research, (35), 9-48.
  18. Ryu, Dae-Sung (2018). Development and Validation of the Diagnostic Test for Convergence Ability for Creativity. Doctoral dissertation, Korea National University of Education.
  19. Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism (2021). National Library Management Evaluation Indicators for 2022 (plan). Sejong: Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism.
  20. Baek, Yoon-Su, Park, Hyun-Ju, Kim, Youngmin, Noh, Suk-Goo, Park, Jong-Yoon, Lee, Jooyon, Jeong, Jin-Su, Choi, Yu-Hyun, & Han, Hyesook (2011). STEAM education in Korea. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 11(4), 149-171.
  21. Suh, Jin-Won (2011). A study on the school library assisted instruction as a practical element of constructivism. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(2), 215-236. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.2.201106.215
  22. Song, Gi-Ho (2019). An analysis of teacher librarians' role recognition. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 53(4), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2019.53.4.005
  23. Yang, So Ra (2009). Meta-Analysis and Empirical Study on the Educational Excellence of Students through Library-assisted Instruction. Master's thesis, Yonsei University.
  24. Yang, Ji Sun & Yoo, Taemyung (2019). Analysis on reflection characteristics of the key competencies proposed by the OECD education 2030 in the 2015 revised home economics curriculum. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 31(2), 113-135. https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2019.06.31.2.113
  25. Lee, Byeong-Ki (2015). A study on the measurement tool development of reading motivation using self-determination theory. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science. 49(3), 311-332. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.3.311
  26. Chang, Jung A (2006). A case study of problem design process for PBL. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 14(1), 65-92.
  27. Chong, Hee Mo (2015). Writing and writing instruction as creative fusion process. Reading research, (35), 49-77.
  28. Cho, Kyoo-Lak (2003). A study on constructivistic learning theories. Journal of Educational Technology, 19(3), 3-40.
  29. Cho, Yeon-soon (2006). Theory and Practice of Problem-Based Learning. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  30. Cha, Yun-kyung (2008). Multicultural education as an alternative educational model in the era of globalization. Multicultural Education Studies, 1(1), 1-23.
  31. Cha, Yun-kyung, Kim, Sun-ah, Kim, Si-jung, Moon, Jong-eun, Song, Ryun-jin, Park, Young-seok, Park, Joo-ho, Ahn, Sung-ho, Lee, Sam-hyung, Lee, Sun-kyung, Lee, Eun-yeon, Joo, Mi-kyung, Ham, Seung-hwan, & Hwang, Se-young (2014). Theory and Practice of Convergence Education. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  32. Chun, Seyeoung, Lee, Ok-hwa, & Jeon, Mi-ae (2017). Analysis of teachers' teaching effectiveness by utilizingthe I CALT observation tool. Journal of Educational Technology, 33(2), 517-536. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.33.2.517
  33. Choi, Sujin, Kim, Hye-jin, Park, Kyun-yeol, Park, Sang-wan, Lee, Sang-eun, & Jang, Am-mi (2018). OECD Education 2030 Participation Study: Exploration of competency education policy application task (RR2018-08). [KEDI] Research Report, 1-269.
  34. Korea Curriculum and Evaluation Institute (2013). Designing a national curriculum based on core competencies. (Research data ORM 2013-22-4) [KICE] Research Report, 1-46.
  35. Ham, Seung-Hwan, Ku, Hara, Kim, Sunah, Kim, Sijeong, Moon, Jong-Eun, Park, Young serk, Park, Joo-Ho, Ahn, Sung-Ho, You, Byungkyu, Lee, Sam Hyung, Lee, Sun-Kyung, Ju, Mi-Kyung, Cha, Yun Kyung, & Hwang, Seyoung (2013). Conceptualizing yungbokhap education: an analysis of focus group interviews with school teachers. The Jounal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 16(1), 107-136. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2013.16.1.107
  36. Aronson, E. (1978). The Jigsaw Classroom. Washington: Sage.
  37. Banks, J. (2008). An Introduction to Multicultural Education(4th eds.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  38. Barrows, H. S. & Myers, A. C. (1993). Problem-Based Learning in Secondary Schools. Unpublished Monograph. Springfield, IL: Problem-Based Learning Institute, Lanphier High School and Southern Illinois University Medical School.
  39. Brown, G. T. & Harris, L. R. (2014). The future of self-assessment in classroom practice: reframing self-assessment as a core competency. Frontline Learning Research, 3(1), 22-30.
  40. Campbell, D. T. & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81-105. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016
  41. Fadel, C., Bialik, M., & Trilling, B. (2015). Four-Dimensional Education. South Carolina: Create Space Independent Publishing Platform.
  42. Falchikov, N. & Boud, D. (1989). Student self-assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59(4), 395-430. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543059004395
  43. Gardner, H. (1991). Intelligence in seven steps. Creating the Future: Perspective on Educational Change, 395-406.
  44. Gordon, T. J. (1994). The delphi method. Futures Research Methodology, 2(3), 1-30.
  45. Greenberger, E. (1984). Defining psychosocial maturity in adolescence. Advances in Child Behavioral Analysis & Therapy, 3, 1-37.
  46. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  47. IMD (2020). IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook. Available: https://www.imd.org/centers/world-competitiveness-center/rankings
  48. Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
  49. OECD (2018). Future of Education and Skills 2030. Concept Note.
  50. OECD (2018). The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030. OECD Education Working Papers.
  51. Richey, R. C. & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and Development Research: Methods, Strategies, and Issues. New York: Routledge.
  52. Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  53. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
  54. Slavin, R. E. (1978). Student teams and comparison among equals: effects on academic performance and student attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(4), 532-538. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.70.4.532
  55. Tracey, M. W. & Richey, R. C. (2005). The evolution of distance education. Distance Learning, 2(6), 17-21.
  56. Tracey, M. W. & Richey, R. C. (2007). ID model construction and validation: a multiple intelligences case. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(4), 369-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9015-4
  57. Triangulation, D. S. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545-547. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547
  58. Trilling, B. & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. CA: Jossey-Bass.
  59. Van de Grift, W. (2007). Quality of teaching in four European countries: a review of the literature and application of an assessment instrument. Educational Research, 49(2), 127-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880701369651
  60. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  61. WEF (2020) Global Competitiveness Report: Special Edition 2020. Available: https://www.weforum.org/reports
  62. Yakman, G. & Kim, J. (2007). STE@M: Integration aspects of go into the core curriculum. American Go Association. Available: http://www.usgo.org//teach/method.html.