DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

행정정보 데이터세트 기록관리 환경개선 모델 연구: 의료영상저장전송시스템(PACS)의 데이터세트를 중심으로

A Study on the Improvement Model of Administrative Information Dataset Records Management Environment: Focused on the Dataset of Picture Archiving and Communication System

  • 투고 : 2022.04.18
  • 심사 : 2022.05.12
  • 발행 : 2022.05.31

초록

현재 행정정보 데이터세트 기록관리 실행방안은 마련되었으나 약 1.3%(EA 포털 등록 시스템: 16,199개, 컨설팅 시스템: 214개)의 사례를 적용하여 다양한 행정정보시스템에 대한 특수성을 분석하고 합리적 수준의 관리기준표를 작성하기에는 한계가 있다. 본 연구는 행정정보 데이터세트에 있어 기록관리 환경의 중요성을 인식하는 것에서 출발하였다. 의료영상저장전송시스템(PACS)의 관리기준표 6개 영역을 세 개의 그룹으로 나누고 기술(description)된 정보를 기초로 현재의 기록관리 환경을 분석하였다. 그 결과 현장에서 데이터세트 기록관리의 효과를 높이기 위한 체계적인 환경개선 모델을 제안하였다. 다양한 기관의 데이터세트 기록관리 환경 중 하나의 사례 분석이라는 한계는 있으나 기록관리 연구의 지평을 넓히는데 도움이 되고자 한다.

Currently, an implementation plan of administrative information dataset record management has been prepared; however, analyzing the specificity of various administrative information systems and preparing a reasonable level of management reference table by applying about 1.3% (EA portal registration system: 16,199, consulting system: 214) has its limitations. This study started by recognizing the importance of the records management environment in administrative information datasets. Based on the described information, the current records management environment was analyzed by dividing the six areas of the management reference table of the picture archiving and communication system (PACS) into three groups. Thus, a systematic environmental improvement model was proposed, enhancing the effectiveness of dataset records management in the field. Although there is a limitation in analyzing one of the dataset records management environments of various institutions, it is intended to help broaden the horizons of records management research.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Electronic Government Act. Act No.18744.
  2. Enforcement Decree of the Public Records Management Act. Presidential Decree No.32558.
  3. Lee, Gyu-cheol (2017). Understanding administrative information system datasets and records management considerations. Recorded, 37, 56-76.
  4. Lee, Hae-young (2013). Records Organization. Research Institute for Korean Archives and Records Series of Education, 1. Seoul: Seon-in.
  5. Lee, Jeong-eun, Kim, Ji-hye, Wang, Ho-sung, & Yang Dong-min (2022). A study on the improvement of the management reference tables for datasets in administrative information systems. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 22(1), 177-200. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2022.22.1.177
  6. Lee, Sang-hyuen (2020). A study on the activation of public data records management and the utilization of curation. Records Management Information and Culture Research, 11, 115-153. https://doi.org/10.23035/KAICS.2020.1.11.115
  7. Military Service Act. Act No.18540.
  8. Ministry of the Interior and Safety (2018). On-Nara document 2.0 system user training.
  9. National Archives (2020a). Administrative Information Dataset Records Management Criteria - Specification for Preparation and Transfer of Management Standards, NAK 35:2020 (v1.0).
  10. National Archives (2020b). Administrative Information Dataset Records Management Implementation Manual.
  11. National Archives (2020c). Report on the results of the 2020 Administrative Information Dataset Records Management System.
  12. Oh, Se-ra & Lee, Hae-young (2019). Administrative information dataset records management plan. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 19(2), 51-76. https://doi.org/10.14404/jksarm.2019.19.2.051
  13. Public Records Management Act. Act No.16661.
  14. Regulations for the management of military service examination equipment. Administrative Rules No.1862.
  15. Rules for inspection of military service judgment, physical examination, etc. Ordinances of Ministries No.1061.
  16. Seo, Ji-in (2020). A study on the improvement of administrative information dataset management. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 20(4), 41-58. https://doi.org/10.14404/jksarm.2020.20.4.041
  17. Seol, Mun-won (2018). Redesignation of the records evaluation system for strengthening the accountability of public institutions. Journal of Archival Studies, (55), 5-38. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2018.55.005
  18. Shin, Jung-yeop (2021). Analysis of the application of administrative information dataset records management. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 21(3), 227-246. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2021.21.3.227
  19. The rules for military service examination. Administrative Rules No.1859.
  20. Wang, Ho-sung & Seol, Mun-won (2017). A study on managing dataset records in government information systems. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 17(3), 23-47. https://doi.org/10.14404/jksarm.2017.17.3.023.
  21. Yim, Jin-Hee (2013). Electronic records management. Research Institute for Korean Archives and Records Series of Education, 2. Seoul: Sun-In.
  22. Information and documentation-Records management-Part 1: Concepts and principles. ISO 15489-1:2016.