디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제20권4호
  • /
  • Pages.63-72
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대학 온라인 교육의 스캐폴딩 전략 및 효과 탐색을 위한 체계적 문헌고찰

An Exploratory Study on Online Education Scaffolding Stategy and Effect at the University Using a Systematic Review

  • 홍수민 (서울대학교 사범대학 교육학과) ;
  • 권현지 (서울대학교 경력개발센터) ;
  • 한형종 (한국교통대학교 교육대학원 교육공학전공)
  • Hong, Sumin (Department of Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kwon, Hyun-G (Career Development Center, Seoul National University) ;
  • Han, Hyeongjong (Graduate School of Education, Korea National University of Transportation)
  • 투고 : 2022.02.17
  • 심사 : 2022.04.20
  • 발행 : 2022.04.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

COVID-19의 확산으로 인해 온라인 교육에 대한 관심이 증가하고 있다. 특히, 온라인 환경에서 교수자 또는 유능한 동료 학습자가 제공하는 도움과 지원을 의미하는 스캐폴딩(scaffolding)의 중요성이 강조되고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 2010년도부터 2021년까지 국내 대학 맥락의 온라인 스캐폴딩 전략의 유형과 그 효과를 탐색하고자 하였다. 연구 방법으로 체계적 문헌고찰을 활용하여 여섯 개의 데이터 베이스에서 총 578편의 문헌을 검색하였고 선정 및 배제 기준에 따라 최종적으로 총 7편의 논문을 연구 대상으로 선정하였다. 연구 결과는 대학 온라인 교육에서의 스캐폴딩 관련 연구의 일반적인 특징, 온라인 교육에서의 스캐폴딩 유형 및 특징, 그 효과를 종합하여 제시하였다. 본 연구를 통해 추후 대학 온라인 교수학습 환경에서 효과적인 학습을 위한 스캐폴딩과 관련한 경험적 연구가 이루어지길 기대한다.

The interest in online education has increased due to the spread of COVID-19. Especially, in the online environment, the importance of scaffolding, which refers to the help and support provided by instructors or peer learners, is being emphasized. This study aimed to review the antecedents of online scaffolding at the university of Korea through the method of systematic review. For this purpose, we collected 578 studies conducted from 2010 to 2021 and selected 7 studies according to the criteria of selection and exclusion. As a result, we found general features, types, and effects of online scaffolding at the university of Korea. Based on these results, we discussed suggestions and implications for a follow-up study. We hope many empirical kinds of research will be conducted about online scaffolding at the university.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. K. Y. Kim, H. R. Min, M. W. Nam, H. G. Kwon. (2021). A Study on the current status of Online education and the best case in university due to COVID-19. Korean Association of Private University Presidents.
  2. S. H. Hwang. (2021). A systematic review of scaffolding related research trends in Korea. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 21(7), 217-237. DOI : 10.22251/jlcci.2021.21.7.217
  3. S. H. Hwang. (2021). A case study on the development of one-to-one scaffolding-based writing class: Focusing on the online learning environment. Korean Journal of General Education, 15(1), 105-119. DOI : 10.46392/kjge.2021.15.1.105
  4. C. B. Cazden. (1979). Peekaboo as an instructional model: Discourse development at home and at school. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 17, 1-29. DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4899-1525-2_3
  5. S. Y. Jang. (2014). The effects of scaffolding types on the problem-solving phases in an online learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology, 30(2), 193-220. DOI : 10.17232/kset.30.2.193
  6. M. Hannafin, S. Land & K. Oliver. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory. 2, 115-140. NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. DOI : 10.1007/springerreference_301827
  7. M. B. Rosson & J. M. Carrol. (1996). Scaffolded examples for learning object-oriented design. Communications of the ACM, 39(4), 46-47. DOI : 10.1145/227210.227223
  8. J. Van de Pol, M. Vloman & J. Beishuizen (2010). Scaffolding in Teacher-Student Interaction: A Decade of Research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271-296. DOI : 10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
  9. J. H. Shin. (2011). Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Lessons Using a Scaffolding Strategy. The Journal of Elementary Education, 24(2), 25-46.
  10. L. L. Davis. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research, 5(4), 194-197. DOI : 10.1016/s0897-1897(05)80008-4
  11. X. Ge & S. M. Land. (2003). Scaffolding students' problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51, 21-38. DOI : 10.1007/bf02504515
  12. S. McNaughton & J. Leyland. (1900). The shifting focus of maternal tutoring across different difficulty levels on a problem-solving task. British Journal of Developmental Pyschology, 8(2), 147-155. DOI : 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1990.tb00829.x
  13. R. L. Rohler & D. J. Langer. (1997). Scaffolding: A powerful tool in social constructivist classrooms. In K. Hogan & M. Pressley(Eds.), Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues(pp. 6-42). MA: Brookline Books.
  14. J. W. Saye & T. Brush. (2002). Scaffolding critical reasoning about history and social issues in multimedia-supported learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50, 77-96. DOI : 10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
  15. R. G. Tharp & R. Gallimore. (1991). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, Learning, and schooling in social context. NY: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Van der Stuyf, R. R. (2002). Scaffolding as a teaching strategy. Adolescent learning and development, 52(3), 5-18.
  17. S. W. van Rooij. (2009). Scaffolding project-based learning with the project management body of knowledge. Copmuter & Edcuation, 52(1), 210-219. DOI : 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.012
  18. K. Winnips & C. McLoughlin. (2000). Applications and categorization of software-based scaffolding. In J. Bourdeau & R. Heller (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2000--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, 1798-1799.
  19. D. J. Wood, J. Bryber & G. Ross. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Alled Disciplines, 17, 89-199. DOI : 10.1109/icalt.2008.115
  20. S. Y. Kim, J. E. Park, H. J. Seo, H. J. Son, C. M. Shin, Y. J. Lee, B. H. Jang & D. S. Heo (2011). NECA's guidance for undertaking systematic reviews and meta-analyses for intervention. Seoul: National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency. 1-287.
  21. M. J. Kim. (2017). A systematic literature review of user-centered interaction design methods in augmented reality system for learning. Master's thesis, Hongik University.
  22. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 8(5), 336-341. DOI : 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007
  23. J. S. Kwon & C. W. Nam. (2018). The effects of scaffolding strategies on university students' teaching presence in on-line cooperative learning environments. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(20), 19-38. DOI : 10.22251/jlcci.2018.18.20.19
  24. K. Y. Lim, H. Park, J. Y. Kim. (2015). Exploratory Study on the Patterns of Interaction and Team Performance according to the Scaffolding Types in a Web-Based Collaborative Problem Solving, Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 15(8),1-25.
  25. S. Kyun, S. A. Kim, J. K. Lee, H. Lee. (2015). Facilitating Adult Learning : The Effects of Scaffolding Strategies and Self-Regulation on Discussion Participation and Performance in Online Learning. Journal of Information Technology Services, 14(1), 115-128. DOI : 10.9716/KITS.2015.14.1.115
  26. S. Jang. (2014). The Effects of Scaffolding Types on the Problem-Solving Phases in an online learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology, 30(2), 193-220. DOI : 10.17232/kset.30.2.193
  27. M. Lee & S. Jang. (2012). Development of Scaffolding Design Model for Supporting Learners' Task Performing in an Online Project-based Learning Environment. Journal of Educational Technology, 28(2), 371-408. DOI : 10.17232/KSET.28.2.371
  28. H. J. Lee & S. Jang. (2010). Developmental Study of a Scaffolding Guideline for Improving Tutor's Performance in e-PBL. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 18(1), 67-96.
  29. Schetz, K. F., & Stremmel, A. J. (1994). Teacher-assisted computer implementation: A Vygotskian perspective. Early Education and Development, 5(1), 18-26. DOI : 10.1207/s15566935eed0501_2
  30. Collis, B., & Verhagen, P. W. (1996). Scaffolding the development of meta-cognitive design skills with hyperlinked units of learning material. University of Twente, Faculty Educational Science and Technology, 22.
  31. D. G. Lim & J. G. Jo. (2007). The Effect of Academic Achievement of Student with Autistic Spectrum Disorder on Scaffolding Teaching Strategy in Web-Based Learning Environment. The Korean Society of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 23(1), 287-309.
  32. S. Jang. (2021). Scaffolding Strategies for Facilitating Students' Learning Outcomes in Team-based Learning. Journal of Educational Technology, 37(4), 983-1014. DOI : 10.17232/KSET.37.4.983
  33. Kelly, B., Longbottom, J., Potts., & Willoamson, J.(2004). Applying emotinal intelligence : Exploring the promoting alternative thinking strategies curriculum. Educational Psychology in Practice, 20(3), 221-249. DOI : 10.1080/0266736042000251808
  34. Schutz, P. A. & Lanehart, S. L. (2002). Introduction: Emotions in Education. Educational psychologist, 37(2), 67-68. DOI : 10.1207/S15326985EP3702_1