Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2022.20.4.063

An Exploratory Study on Online Education Scaffolding Stategy and Effect at the University Using a Systematic Review  

Hong, Sumin (Department of Education, Seoul National University)
Kwon, Hyun-G (Career Development Center, Seoul National University)
Han, Hyeongjong (Graduate School of Education, Korea National University of Transportation)
Publication Information
Journal of Digital Convergence / v.20, no.4, 2022 , pp. 63-72 More about this Journal
Abstract
The interest in online education has increased due to the spread of COVID-19. Especially, in the online environment, the importance of scaffolding, which refers to the help and support provided by instructors or peer learners, is being emphasized. This study aimed to review the antecedents of online scaffolding at the university of Korea through the method of systematic review. For this purpose, we collected 578 studies conducted from 2010 to 2021 and selected 7 studies according to the criteria of selection and exclusion. As a result, we found general features, types, and effects of online scaffolding at the university of Korea. Based on these results, we discussed suggestions and implications for a follow-up study. We hope many empirical kinds of research will be conducted about online scaffolding at the university.
Keywords
distance education; online education; scaffolding; scaffolding strategy; systematic review;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 K. Y. Kim, H. R. Min, M. W. Nam, H. G. Kwon. (2021). A Study on the current status of Online education and the best case in university due to COVID-19. Korean Association of Private University Presidents.
2 S. H. Hwang. (2021). A systematic review of scaffolding related research trends in Korea. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 21(7), 217-237. DOI : 10.22251/jlcci.2021.21.7.217   DOI
3 S. H. Hwang. (2021). A case study on the development of one-to-one scaffolding-based writing class: Focusing on the online learning environment. Korean Journal of General Education, 15(1), 105-119. DOI : 10.46392/kjge.2021.15.1.105   DOI
4 S. Y. Kim, J. E. Park, H. J. Seo, H. J. Son, C. M. Shin, Y. J. Lee, B. H. Jang & D. S. Heo (2011). NECA's guidance for undertaking systematic reviews and meta-analyses for intervention. Seoul: National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency. 1-287.
5 S. Jang. (2014). The Effects of Scaffolding Types on the Problem-Solving Phases in an online learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology, 30(2), 193-220. DOI : 10.17232/kset.30.2.193   DOI
6 D. J. Wood, J. Bryber & G. Ross. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Alled Disciplines, 17, 89-199. DOI : 10.1109/icalt.2008.115   DOI
7 Schetz, K. F., & Stremmel, A. J. (1994). Teacher-assisted computer implementation: A Vygotskian perspective. Early Education and Development, 5(1), 18-26. DOI : 10.1207/s15566935eed0501_2   DOI
8 S. Kyun, S. A. Kim, J. K. Lee, H. Lee. (2015). Facilitating Adult Learning : The Effects of Scaffolding Strategies and Self-Regulation on Discussion Participation and Performance in Online Learning. Journal of Information Technology Services, 14(1), 115-128. DOI : 10.9716/KITS.2015.14.1.115   DOI
9 M. Lee & S. Jang. (2012). Development of Scaffolding Design Model for Supporting Learners' Task Performing in an Online Project-based Learning Environment. Journal of Educational Technology, 28(2), 371-408. DOI : 10.17232/KSET.28.2.371   DOI
10 H. J. Lee & S. Jang. (2010). Developmental Study of a Scaffolding Guideline for Improving Tutor's Performance in e-PBL. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 18(1), 67-96.
11 M. Hannafin, S. Land & K. Oliver. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory. 2, 115-140. NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. DOI : 10.1007/springerreference_301827   DOI
12 M. B. Rosson & J. M. Carrol. (1996). Scaffolded examples for learning object-oriented design. Communications of the ACM, 39(4), 46-47. DOI : 10.1145/227210.227223   DOI
13 Schutz, P. A. & Lanehart, S. L. (2002). Introduction: Emotions in Education. Educational psychologist, 37(2), 67-68. DOI : 10.1207/S15326985EP3702_1   DOI
14 C. B. Cazden. (1979). Peekaboo as an instructional model: Discourse development at home and at school. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 17, 1-29. DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4899-1525-2_3   DOI
15 Collis, B., & Verhagen, P. W. (1996). Scaffolding the development of meta-cognitive design skills with hyperlinked units of learning material. University of Twente, Faculty Educational Science and Technology, 22.
16 D. G. Lim & J. G. Jo. (2007). The Effect of Academic Achievement of Student with Autistic Spectrum Disorder on Scaffolding Teaching Strategy in Web-Based Learning Environment. The Korean Society of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 23(1), 287-309.
17 S. Jang. (2021). Scaffolding Strategies for Facilitating Students' Learning Outcomes in Team-based Learning. Journal of Educational Technology, 37(4), 983-1014. DOI : 10.17232/KSET.37.4.983   DOI
18 Kelly, B., Longbottom, J., Potts., & Willoamson, J.(2004). Applying emotinal intelligence : Exploring the promoting alternative thinking strategies curriculum. Educational Psychology in Practice, 20(3), 221-249. DOI : 10.1080/0266736042000251808   DOI
19 X. Ge & S. M. Land. (2003). Scaffolding students' problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51, 21-38. DOI : 10.1007/bf02504515   DOI
20 S. Y. Jang. (2014). The effects of scaffolding types on the problem-solving phases in an online learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology, 30(2), 193-220. DOI : 10.17232/kset.30.2.193   DOI
21 Van der Stuyf, R. R. (2002). Scaffolding as a teaching strategy. Adolescent learning and development, 52(3), 5-18.
22 J. S. Kwon & C. W. Nam. (2018). The effects of scaffolding strategies on university students' teaching presence in on-line cooperative learning environments. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(20), 19-38. DOI : 10.22251/jlcci.2018.18.20.19   DOI
23 J. H. Shin. (2011). Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Lessons Using a Scaffolding Strategy. The Journal of Elementary Education, 24(2), 25-46.
24 L. L. Davis. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research, 5(4), 194-197. DOI : 10.1016/s0897-1897(05)80008-4   DOI
25 S. McNaughton & J. Leyland. (1900). The shifting focus of maternal tutoring across different difficulty levels on a problem-solving task. British Journal of Developmental Pyschology, 8(2), 147-155. DOI : 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1990.tb00829.x   DOI
26 J. W. Saye & T. Brush. (2002). Scaffolding critical reasoning about history and social issues in multimedia-supported learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50, 77-96. DOI : 10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6   DOI
27 S. W. van Rooij. (2009). Scaffolding project-based learning with the project management body of knowledge. Copmuter & Edcuation, 52(1), 210-219. DOI : 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.012   DOI
28 J. Van de Pol, M. Vloman & J. Beishuizen (2010). Scaffolding in Teacher-Student Interaction: A Decade of Research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271-296. DOI : 10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6   DOI
29 R. L. Rohler & D. J. Langer. (1997). Scaffolding: A powerful tool in social constructivist classrooms. In K. Hogan & M. Pressley(Eds.), Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues(pp. 6-42). MA: Brookline Books.
30 R. G. Tharp & R. Gallimore. (1991). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, Learning, and schooling in social context. NY: Cambridge University Press.
31 K. Winnips & C. McLoughlin. (2000). Applications and categorization of software-based scaffolding. In J. Bourdeau & R. Heller (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2000--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, 1798-1799.
32 M. J. Kim. (2017). A systematic literature review of user-centered interaction design methods in augmented reality system for learning. Master's thesis, Hongik University.
33 Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 8(5), 336-341. DOI : 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007   DOI
34 K. Y. Lim, H. Park, J. Y. Kim. (2015). Exploratory Study on the Patterns of Interaction and Team Performance according to the Scaffolding Types in a Web-Based Collaborative Problem Solving, Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 15(8),1-25.