Journal of Engineering Education Research (공학교육연구)

Korean Society for Engineering Education (한국공학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Online Project-Based Learning Application: A Case of Engineering Accounting Course

온라인 프로젝트기반 학습모형 적용과 효과: 공학회계 사례

  • Kim, Moon-Soo (Department of Industrial & Management Engineering, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies)
  • 김문수 (한국외국어대학교 산업경영공학과)
  • Received : 2022.01.31
  • Accepted : 2022.02.22
  • Published : 2022.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In many existing studies, the analyses on the application and effect of the project-based learning model (PBL), a student-centered teaching and learning strategy, have been emphasized and carried out in various majors and courses. This case study analyzes the effects of applying a project-based learning model to the engineering accounting course for engineering students in 2021 in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, compared with the offline course in 2019 and the simple online course in 2020. Project team consisting of 2-3 students carried out online collaborative learning activities for solving open-ended problems through the 5-step PBL procedure including presenting the final result. Except for this online PBL application in 2021, textbooks, lecture contents, assignments, and tests were implemented the same for each semester for three years. Through lecture evaluation and survey by students, the online PBL application semester showed higher effects in inducing student-centered learning, lecture satisfaction, and student competency improvement compared to the non-applying semesters, further, it was evaluated that the online PBL application to the course and evaluation method were more appropriate than other semesters. It is expected that the online PBL method and operation procedure applied in this study can be utilized as a best practice for the design and operation of various online courses for student-centered collaborative learning activities and educational effects.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2017년 대한민국 과학기술정보통신부와 한국연구재단의 중견연구지원사업(NRF-2017R1A2B4005858)과 한국외국어대학교의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임.

References

  1. 강소연(2021). 2020년 1학기 공과대학 교수와 학생의 온라인 수업에 관한 인식 연구. 공학교육연구, 24(2), 20-28. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2021.24.2.20
  2. 김문수(2012). 문제기반학습모형에 근거한 공학회계의 웹기반 실습시스템 개발. 공학교육연구, 14(1), 55-63. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2011.14.3.55
  3. 김문수(2015). 공학교육에서 문제 및 프로젝트기반학습의 비교 고찰과 적용 방안. 공학교육연구, 18(2), 65-76. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2015.18.2.65
  4. 김문수(2020). 공과대학에서 회계 교과목의 온라인 강의 사례 및 개선 방안. 2020 공학교육학술대회. e-Conference.
  5. 김문수(2021). 온라인 교육에서의 PBL 적용 방안과 효과: 공과대학 회계 강좌 사례. 2021 공학교육학술대회. 제주.
  6. 김문수(2022). A Comparative Analysis of Students' Evaluations of Online and Offline Capstone Design Course. 공학교육연구, 25(1), 12-21. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2022.25.1.12
  7. 도남철(2022). 비대면 환경에서 제품자료관리 시스템 기반 협동제품개발실습과제 운영 사례. 공학교육연구, 25(1), 46-54. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2022.25.1.46
  8. 박용태(2007). 공학도와 경영마인드. 생능출판사.
  9. 이현경(2021). 공과대학 비대면 온라인 수업의 교수 자 평가와 경험분석. 공학교육연구, 24(5), 53-64. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2021.24.5.53
  10. 임철일 외(2000). 평생교육을 위한 웹기반 학습에서 상호작용유형에 따른 효과분석. 교육공학연구, 16(1), 223-246.
  11. 정재원.허정은.박효원(2020). 코로나19로 인한 공과대학 교수자의 온라인 수업 경험 탐색. 공학교육연구, 23(6), 60-67. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2020.23.6.60
  12. 한안나.이호철(2022). 비대면 수업에서 온라인 실습활동의 사례- '기초전기회로 및 실습' 교과목을 중심으로. 공학교육연구, 25(1), 22-32. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2022.25.1.22
  13. Allen, I.E., & Seaman, J.(2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Sloan Consortium. PO Box 1238, Newburyport, MA 01950.
  14. Bergeler, E., & Read, M.F.(2021). Comparing learning outcomes and satisfaction of an online algebra-based physics course with a face-to-face course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30, 97-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09878-w
  15. Brown, J.C., & Park, H.S.(2016). Longitudinal student research competency: Comparing online and traditional face-to-face learning platforms. Advances in Social Work, 17(1), 44-58. https://doi.org/10.18060/20870
  16. Cao, Y., & Sakchutchawan, S.(2011). Online vs. traditional MBA: an empirical study of students' characteristics, course satisfaction, and overall success. The Journal of Human Resources and Adult Learning, 7(2), 1-12.
  17. Cavanaugh, J.K., & Jacquemin, S.J.(2015). A large sample comparison of grade based student learning outcomes in online vs. face-to-face courses. Online Learning, 19(2), n2.
  18. Comer, D. R., Lengaghan, J. A., & Sengupta, K.(2015). Factors that affect students' capacity to fulfill the role of online learner. Journal of Education for Business, 90(3), 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2015.1007906
  19. Fatonia, N.A., et al.(2020). University students online learning system during Covid-19 pandemic: Advantages, constraints and solutions. Systematic Review in Pharmacy, 11(7), 570-576.
  20. Helms, J.L.(2014). Comparing student performance in online and face-to-face delivery modalities. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 18(1), n1.
  21. Johnson, D., & Palmer, C.C.(2015). Comparing student assessments and perceptions of online and face-to-face versions of an introductory linguistics course. Online Learning, 19(2), 33-42.
  22. Kartha, C.P.(2006). Learning business statistics: Online vs traditional. The Business Review, 5(1), 27-32.
  23. Kortemeyer, G.(2016). Work habits of students in traditional and online sections of an introductory physics course: a case study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, 697-703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9624-6
  24. Malopinsky, L. et al.(2000). An instructional design model for online PBL environments: The learning to teach with technology studio. Association for Educational Communications & Technology, 1-11.
  25. Moradi, M. et al.(2018). Enhancing teaching learning effectiveness by creating online interactive instructional modules for fundamental concepts of physics and mathematics. Education Sciences, 8(3), 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030109
  26. Nambiar, D.(2020). The impact of online during Covid-19: students' and teachers' perspective. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 8(2), 783-793.
  27. Nennig, H.T. et al.(2020). Comparison of student attitudes and performance in an online and a face-to-face inorganic chemistry course. Chemistry Education Research and Practice.
  28. Neuhauser, C.(2002). Learning style and effectiveness of online and face-to-face instruction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 99-113. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1602_4
  29. Ramlo, S.E.(2016). Students' views about potentially offering physics courses online. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, 489-496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9608-6
  30. Schoenfeld-Tacher, R., McConnell, S., & Graham, M.(2001). Do no harm-A comparison of the effects of on-line vs. traditional delivery media on a science course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(3), 257-265. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016690600795
  31. Xu, D., & Jaggars, S.S.(2011). The effectiveness of distance education across Virginia's community colleges: Evidence from introductory college-level math and English courses. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 360-377. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373711413814