DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Experiential Aspect of Meaning out on Improvement of Self-esteem and Subjective Well-being

미닝아웃의 체험적 측면이 자아존중감과 주관적 안녕감 향상에 미치는 영향

  • 정윤희 (건국대학교 글로컬캠퍼스 경영학과) ;
  • 강소영 (건국대학교 글로컬캠퍼스 경찰학과)
  • Received : 2022.01.15
  • Accepted : 2022.03.20
  • Published : 2022.03.28

Abstract

Recently, consumers are showing interest in social and environmental issues. In addition, consumers are increasingly participating in meaning-out that give meaning to their consumption and express moral values. However, unlike the spread of meaning-out, existing studies are lacking. This study approaches meaning out, which has become a recent issue, from an experiential point of view, and aims to study how the experiential characteristics of meaning out affect psychological effects such as improvement of self-esteem and subjective well-being. First, we hypothesized that the experience of meaning out(feel, think, act, relate) had an effect on subjective well-being through improvement of self-esteem. We tested the hypothesis on a total of 197 data using the structural equation model. As a result, it was found that three experiences excluding 'feel' have a positive effect on the improvement of self-esteem, and and improved self-esteem had a positive effect on improving subjective well-being. This study expands existing studies and provides practical implications by confirming that meaning out has a positive psychological effect.

최근에 소비자들은 사회 및 환경문제에 대한 관심을 소비에 반영할 뿐 아니라, 자신들의 소비에 의미를 부여하며 도덕적 가치를 표현하는 미닝아웃에 점차 더 참여하고 있다. 하지만 미닝아웃의 확산 속도와 달리 관련 연구는 매우 부족하다. 본 연구는 최근 이슈가 되고 있는 미닝아웃을 체험적 관점에서 접근하고 있으며, 미닝아웃의 체험적 특성이 자아존중감과 주관적 안녕감 향상과 같은 심리적 효과에 어떤 영향을 주는지 연구하고자 하였다. 먼저 미닝아웃의 체험(감정체험, 인지체험, 행동체험, 관계체험)이 자아존중감 향상을 통해 주관적 안녕감 향상에 주는 영향을 가정하였다. 구조방정식 모형을 이용해 총 197부의 데이터를 가설을 검증한 결과, 감정체험을 제외한 세 가지 체험이 자아존중감 향상에 긍정적 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났으며, 자아존중감 향상은 주관적 안녕감 향상에 긍정적 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 이 연구는 미닝아웃 체험의 긍정적 심리효과를 확인함으로써 기존 연구를 확장하고, 실무적 시사점을 제공하고 있다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This paper was supported by Konkuk University in 2021.

References

  1. F. Delpal & G. Hatchuel. (2007). La consommation engagee s'affirme comme une tendance durable. Consommation et modes de vie, 201, March, CREDOC.
  2. C. Gonzalez, M. Korchia, L. Menuet & C. Urbain. (2009). Comment les consommateurs socialement responsables se representent-ils la consommation? Une approche par les associations libres. Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 24(3), 26-41. DOI : 10.1177/076737010902400302
  3. N. Borin, D. C. Cerf & R. Krishnan. (2011). Consumer effects of environmental impact in product labeling. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(1), 76-86. DOI : 10.1108/07363761111101976
  4. L. A. Mohr, D. J. Webb & K. E. Harris. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2001.tb00102.x
  5. N. Ozgaglar-Toulouse. (2009). What meaning do responsible consumers give to their consumption? An approach by narratives. Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 24(3), 3-22. DOI : 10.1177/205157070902400305
  6. M. B. Holbrook & E. C. Hirschman. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 132-140. DOI : 10.1086/208906
  7. S. Shobeiri, L. Rajaobelina, F. Durif & C. Boivin. (2016). Experiential motivations of socially responsible consumption. International Journal of Market Research, 58(1), 119-139. DOI : 10.2501/IJMR-2016-007
  8. B. Schmitt. (1999). Experiential Marketing: How to Get Customers to Sense, Feel, Think, Act, and Relate to Your Company and Brands. New York, NY: The Free Press.
  9. H. R. Dodge. (1996). Consumer Transgressions in the Marketplace: Consumers' Perspectives. Psychology on Marketing.
  10. O. Uusitalo & R. Oksanen. (2004). Ethical Consumerism: a View from Finland. International. Journal of Consumer Studies, 28(3), 214-221. DOI : 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2003.00339.x
  11. S. Y. Oh. (2019). Meaning out trend. Excellence Marketing for Customer, 53(11), 55-61.
  12. P. Hartmann & V. A. Ibanez. (2008). Virtual nature experiences as emotional benefits in Green product consumption: the moderating role of environmental attitudes. Environment and Behavior, 40(6), 818-842. DOI : 10.1177/0013916507309870
  13. M. E. Matos & C. M. Rosell. (2012). Relationship between instrumental parameters and sensory characteristics in gluten-free breads. European Food Research and Technology, 235(1), 107-117. DOI : 10.1007/s00217-012-1736-5
  14. A. Schaefer & A. Crane. (2005). Addressing sustainability and consumption. Journal of Macromarketing, 25(1), 76-92. DOI : 10.1177/0276146705274987
  15. P. A. Nunes & E. Schokkaert. (2003). Identifying the warm glow effect in contingent valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45(2), 231-245. DOI : 10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00051-7
  16. L. J. Shrum, J. A. McCarty, T. M. Sc Lowrey. (1995). Buyer characteristics of the green consumer and their implications for advertising strategy. Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 71-82. DOI : 10.1080/00913367.1995.10673477
  17. M. Micheletti, (2003). Political Virtue and Shopping: Individuals, Consumerism, and Collective Action. New York, NY: Ealgrave Macmillan.
  18. J. A. Roberts. (1996). Green consumers in the 1990s: profile and implications for advertising. Journal of Business Research, 36(3), 217-231. DOI : 10.1016/0148-2963(95)00150-6
  19. F. Durif, C. Boivin, L. Rajaobelina & A. Frangois-Lecompte. (2011). Socially responsible consumers: profile and implications for marketing strategy. International Review of Business Research Papers, 7(6), 215-224. DOI : 10.1177/027614678400400203
  20. K. L. Granzin & J. E. Olsen. (1991). Characterizing participants in activities protecting the environment: a focus on donating, recycling, and conservation behaviors. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 10(2), 1-27. DOI : 10.1177/074391569101000201
  21. M. Rosenberg. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
  22. J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver & L. S. Wrightsman.(Eds.). (2013). Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes: Measures of social psychological attitudes (Vol. 1). Academic Press.
  23. S. Y. Lee & Y. G. Kim. (2013). Validation of the Motivation to Experience Healing Programs with Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Journal of Rural Tourism, 20(1), 7-22.
  24. J. H. Kim. (2016). Analyzing Cause and Effect Relationship of Escapism as a Tourist Motivation, On-site Experiences, and Perceived Healing, Graduate School Kyonggi University, Ph.D. Dissertation
  25. M. Douglas, and B. C. Isherwood. (1979). The World of Goods, Basic Books. New York.
  26. J. Y. Yang. (2012). Study on Relationship between Construction of Healing Experience and Behavior Intention for Transformation -Focused on the mediating effects and moderating effects of healing involvement-. Graduate School, Kyung-Hee University, doctoral dissertation.
  27. R. Veenhoven. (1989). Is happiness relative?. In J.P. Fargas & J.M. Innes(Ed.), Recent advances in social psychology: An international perspective(pp. 235-247). Elsevier Science.
  28. E. Diener. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 193, 542-575. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542
  29. A. Khurshid & D. A. Siddiqui. (2019). Ethical Consumption and Happiness: Evidence from Pakistan. Available at SSRN 3510913.
  30. K. H. Trzesniewski, M. B. Donnellan & R. W. Robins. (2003). Stability of self-esteem across the life span. Journal of personality and social psychology, 84(1), 205. DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.205
  31. K. M. DeNeve & H. Cooper. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 197-229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.197
  32. E. Diener & M. Diener. (1995). Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 653-663. DOI : 10.1007/978-90-481-2352-0_4
  33. E. Diener, R. A. Emmons, R. J. Larsen & S. Griffi. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13