Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Understanding Research Trends of Open Access via Topic Growth Analysis

토픽 성장 분석을 통한 오픈액세스 분야 연구 동향 분석

  • 정재민 (한국과학기술정보연구원 오픈액세스센터 AccessON개발팀) ;
  • 김완종 (한국과학기술정보연구원 오픈액세스센터 AccessON개발팀)
  • Received : 2022.11.14
  • Accepted : 2022.12.09
  • Published : 2022.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

To solve the problems of the traditional scholarly communication system, global interest in the open access paradigm continues. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of research to understand global research and growth trends in the field of open access through data-based quantitative methods. This study aims to identify which sub-fields exist in open access and analyze how long each research field will grow in the future. To this end, topic modeling and growth curve analysis were applied to global academic papers in the field of open access. This study identified 14 research topics related to open access, open data, and open collaboration, which are three key elements of open science, and foresaw that the field of open access will grow over the next 65 years. The results of this study are expected to support researchers and policymakers in understanding global research trends of open access.

전통적인 학술 커뮤니케이션 체제의 문제점을 해결하기 위한 대안으로 오픈액세스 패러다임에 대한 국제적 관심과 확산이 지속되고 있다. 하지만 데이터 기반의 정량적인 방법을 통해 오픈액세스 분야의 글로벌한 동향이나 성장 추세를 파악하려는 노력은 아직까지 부족한 실정이다. 본 연구는 오픈액세스 분야의 학술논문 데이터에 토픽 모델링을 적용하여 세부 연구토픽을 식별하고, 성장곡선을 적합하여 각 연구토픽의 성숙도와 예상 잔여수명을 계산한다. 본 연구는 오픈 사이언스의 세 가지 핵심요소인 오픈액세스, 오픈데이터, 오픈협업과 관련된 14개 토픽들을 식별하였으며, 오픈액세스 분야가 앞으로 약 65년간 꾸준히 성장할 것으로 예상하였다. 본 연구의 분석 결과는 연구자들과 정책 의사결정자들이 오픈액세스 분야의 동향과 성장 추세를 이해하는 데 도움을 줄 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 2022년 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI)의 기본사업 과제로 수행되었음.

References

  1. Choi, Hee-yoon & Seo, Tae-sul (2020). Open Science, the Path to Global Solidarity and Coexistence. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information. Available: https://repository.kisti.re.kr/handle/10580/15590
  2. Choi, Jae-Hwang & Cho, Hyun-Yang (2005). The recent trends of open access movements and the ways to help the cause by academic stakeholders. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 22(3), 307-326. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2005.22.3.307
  3. Kim, Jungwook, Jeong, Byeongki, & Yoon, Janghyeok (2016). A technology planning approach based on network and growth curve analyses: the case of augmented reality patents. Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 42(5), 337-351. https://doi.org/10.7232/JKIIE.2016.42.5.337
  4. Kim, Pan Jun (2021). A study on the characteristics by keyword types in the intellectual structure analysis based on co-word analysis: focusing on overseas open access field. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 55(3), 103-129. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2021.55.3.103
  5. Kim, Sun-Kyum, Kim, Wan-Jong, Seo, Tae-Sul, & Choi, Hyun-Jin (2019). Domain analysis on the field of open access by co-word analysis: based on published journals of library and information science during 2013 to 2018. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(1), 333-356. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.50.1.201903.333
  6. Seo, SunKyung & Chung, EunKyung (2013). Domain analysis on the field of open access by co-word analysis. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 24(1), 207-228. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2013.24.1.207
  7. Shin, Jueun & Kim, Seonghee (2021). A study on the intellectual structure of domestic open access area. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 55(2), 147-178. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2021.55.2.147
  8. Song, Sungjeon & Shim, Jiyoung (2022). Identification of user preference factor using review information. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 39(3), 311-336. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2022.39.3.311
  9. Yoon, Hee-Yoon & Kim, Sin-Young (2007). Trends analysis of open access for foreign and domestic scholarly journals in the field of library and information science. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 38(1), 257-276. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.38.1.200703.257
  10. Adamuthe, A. C. & Thampi, G. T. (2019). Technology forecasting: a case study of computational technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 143, 181-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.03.002
  11. Beall, J. (2012). Predatory publishers are corrupting open access, Nature, 489(7415), 179-179. https://doi.org/10.1038/489179a
  12. Berger, R. D. (1981). Comparison of the gompertz and logistic equations to describe plant disease progress. Phytopathology, 71(7), 716-719. https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-71-716
  13. Bianchi, F., Terragni, S., Hovy, D., Nozza, D., & Fersini, E. (2020). Cross-lingual contextualized topic models with zero-shot learning. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.07737
  14. Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993-1022.
  15. Braun, T., Schubert, A. P., & Kostoff, R. N. (2000). Growth and trends of fullerene research as reflected in its journal literature. Chemical Reviews, 100(1), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr990096j
  16. Chen, B., Tsutsui, S., Ding, Y., & Ma, F. (2017). Understanding the topic evolution in a scientific domain: an exploratory study for the field of information retrieval. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 1175-1189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.10.003
  17. Cho, J. (2020). Intellectual structure evolution of open access research observed through correlation index of keyword centrality. Scientometrics, 125(3), 2617-2635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03682-4
  18. Cho, Y. & Daim, T. (2016). OLED TV technology forecasting using technology mining and the Fisher-Pry diffusion model. Foresight, 18(2), 117-137. https://doi.org/10.1108/fs-08-2015-0043
  19. Chung, J., Ko, N., Kim, H., & Yoon, J. (2021). Inventor profile mining approach for prospective human resource scouting. Journal of Informetrics, 15(1), 101103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101103
  20. Costa, M. P. D. & Leite, F. C. L. (2016). Open access in the world and Latin America: a review since the Budapest Open Access Initiative. TransInformacao, 28, 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-08892016002800003
  21. Craig, I. D., Plume, A. M., McVeigh, M. E., Pringle, J., & Amin, M. (2007). Do open access articles have greater citation impact?: a critical review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 1(3), 239-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2007.04.001
  22. Deerwester, S., Dumais, S. T., Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., & Harshman, R. (1990). Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 391-407. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6<391::AID-ASI1>3.0.CO;2-9
  23. Dieng, A. B., Ruiz, F. J., & Blei, D. M. (2020). Topic modeling in embedding spaces. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 8, 439-453. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00325
  24. Du, H., Liu, D., Lu, Z., Crittenden, J., Mao, G., Wang, S., & Zou, H. (2019). Research development on sustainable urban infrastructure from 1991 to 2017: a bibliometric analysis to inform future innovations. Earth's Future, 7(7), 718-733. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018ef001117
  25. Elvers, D., Song, C. H., Steinbuchel, A., & Leker, J. (2016). Technology trends in biodegradable polymers: evidence from patent analysis. Polymer Reviews, 56(4), 584-606. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583724.2015.1125918
  26. Eriksson, S. & Helgesson, G. (2017). The false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 20(2), 163-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-016-9740-3
  27. European Commission (2021). Horizon Europe, open science: early knowledge and data sharing, and open collaboration. Available: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/18252
  28. Franses, P. H. (1994). A method to select between Gompertz and logistic trend curves. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 46(1), 45-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(94)90016-7
  29. Hofmann, T. (1999). Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. In Proceedings of the 22nd annual international Annual Conference of the Association for computing Machinery Special Interest Group in Information Retrieval Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 50-57.
  30. Jeong, B., Yoon, J., & Lee, J. M. (2019). Social media mining for product planning: a product opportunity mining approach based on topic modeling and sentiment analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 48, 280-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.09.009
  31. Ji, H. & Cha, M. (2021). Topic analysis of scholarly communication research. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 9(2), 47-65. https://doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2021.9.2.4
  32. Ko, N., Jeong, B., Choi, S., & Yoon, J. (2017). Identifying product opportunities using social media mining: application of topic modeling and chance discovery theory. Institute of Electrical and Ectronics Engineers Access, 6, 1680-1693. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2017.2780046
  33. Ma, T., Li, R., Ou, G., & Yue, M. (2018). Topic based research competitiveness evaluation. Scientometrics, 117(2), 789-803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2891-7
  34. Ovadia, S. (2014). ResearchGate and Academia.edu: academic social networks. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 33(3), 165-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639269.2014.934093
  35. Palmer, K. L., Dill, E., & Christie, C. (2008). Where there's a will, there's a way?: survey of academic librarian attitudes about open access. College & Research Libraries, 70(4), 315-335. https://doi.org/10.5860/0700315
  36. Ross-Hellauer, T. (2017). What is open peer review? a systematic review. F1000Research, 6, 588. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2
  37. Sidorova, A., Evangelopoulos, N., Valacich, J. S., & Ramakrishnan, T. (2008). Uncovering the intellectual core of the information systems discipline. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 32(3), 467-482. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148852
  38. Van Santen, J. A., Jacob, G., Singh, A. L., Aniebok, V., Balunas, M. J., Bunsko, D., Neto, F. C, Castano-Espriu, L., Chang, C., Clark, T. N., Cleary Little, J. L., Delgadillo, D. A., Dorrestein, P. C., Duncan, K. R., Egan, J. M., Galey, M. M., Haeckl, F. P. J., Hua, A., Hughes, A. H., Iskakova, D., Khadilkar, A., Lee, J., Lee, S., LeGrow, N., Liu, D. Y., Macho, J. M., McCaughey, C. S., Medema, M. H., Neupane, R. P., O'Donnell, T. J., Paula, J. S., Sanchez, L. M., Shaikh, A. F., Soldatou, S., Terlouw, B. R., Tran, T. A., Valentine, M., Van der Hooft, J. J. J., Vo, D. A., Wang, M., Wilson, D., Zink, K. E., & Linington, R. G. (2019). The natural products atlas: an open access knowledge base for microbial natural products discovery. American Chemical Society Central Science, 5(11), 1824-1833. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.9b00806
  39. Yoon, J., Jeong, B., Lee, W. H., & Kim, J. (2018). Tracing the evolving trends in electronic skin (e-skin) technology using growth curve and technology position-based patent bibliometrics. Institute of Electrical and Ectronics Engineers Access, 6, 26530-26542. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2834160
  40. Yoon, J., Park, Y., Kim, M., Lee, J., & Lee, D. (2014). Tracing evolving trends in printed electronics using patent information. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 16(7), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-014-2471-6
  41. Young, P. (1993). Technological growth curves: a competition of forecasting models. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 44(4), 375-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(93)90042-6
  42. Zwietering, M. H., Jongenburger, I., Rombouts, F. M., & Van't Riet, K. J. A. E. M. (1990). Modeling of the bacterial growth curve. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 56(6), 1875-1881. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.56.6.1875-1881.1990