Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2022.39.4.075

Understanding Research Trends of Open Access via Topic Growth Analysis  

Jaemin, Chung (한국과학기술정보연구원 오픈액세스센터 AccessON개발팀)
Wan Jong, Kim (한국과학기술정보연구원 오픈액세스센터 AccessON개발팀)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society for information Management / v.39, no.4, 2022 , pp. 75-97 More about this Journal
Abstract
To solve the problems of the traditional scholarly communication system, global interest in the open access paradigm continues. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of research to understand global research and growth trends in the field of open access through data-based quantitative methods. This study aims to identify which sub-fields exist in open access and analyze how long each research field will grow in the future. To this end, topic modeling and growth curve analysis were applied to global academic papers in the field of open access. This study identified 14 research topics related to open access, open data, and open collaboration, which are three key elements of open science, and foresaw that the field of open access will grow over the next 65 years. The results of this study are expected to support researchers and policymakers in understanding global research trends of open access.
Keywords
open access; open science; open data; open collaboration; topic modeling; growth curve analysis;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 9  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Choi, Hee-yoon & Seo, Tae-sul (2020). Open Science, the Path to Global Solidarity and Coexistence. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information. Available: https://repository.kisti.re.kr/handle/10580/15590
2 Choi, Jae-Hwang & Cho, Hyun-Yang (2005). The recent trends of open access movements and the ways to help the cause by academic stakeholders. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 22(3), 307-326. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2005.22.3.307   DOI
3 Kim, Jungwook, Jeong, Byeongki, & Yoon, Janghyeok (2016). A technology planning approach based on network and growth curve analyses: the case of augmented reality patents. Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 42(5), 337-351. https://doi.org/10.7232/JKIIE.2016.42.5.337   DOI
4 Kim, Pan Jun (2021). A study on the characteristics by keyword types in the intellectual structure analysis based on co-word analysis: focusing on overseas open access field. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 55(3), 103-129. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2021.55.3.103   DOI
5 Kim, Sun-Kyum, Kim, Wan-Jong, Seo, Tae-Sul, & Choi, Hyun-Jin (2019). Domain analysis on the field of open access by co-word analysis: based on published journals of library and information science during 2013 to 2018. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(1), 333-356. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.50.1.201903.333   DOI
6 Seo, SunKyung & Chung, EunKyung (2013). Domain analysis on the field of open access by co-word analysis. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 24(1), 207-228. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2013.24.1.207   DOI
7 Shin, Jueun & Kim, Seonghee (2021). A study on the intellectual structure of domestic open access area. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 55(2), 147-178. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2021.55.2.147   DOI
8 Song, Sungjeon & Shim, Jiyoung (2022). Identification of user preference factor using review information. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 39(3), 311-336. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2022.39.3.311   DOI
9 Yoon, Hee-Yoon & Kim, Sin-Young (2007). Trends analysis of open access for foreign and domestic scholarly journals in the field of library and information science. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 38(1), 257-276. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.38.1.200703.257   DOI
10 Adamuthe, A. C. & Thampi, G. T. (2019). Technology forecasting: a case study of computational technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 143, 181-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.03.002   DOI
11 Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993-1022.
12 Beall, J. (2012). Predatory publishers are corrupting open access, Nature, 489(7415), 179-179. https://doi.org/10.1038/489179a   DOI
13 Berger, R. D. (1981). Comparison of the gompertz and logistic equations to describe plant disease progress. Phytopathology, 71(7), 716-719. https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-71-716   DOI
14 Bianchi, F., Terragni, S., Hovy, D., Nozza, D., & Fersini, E. (2020). Cross-lingual contextualized topic models with zero-shot learning. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.07737   DOI
15 Braun, T., Schubert, A. P., & Kostoff, R. N. (2000). Growth and trends of fullerene research as reflected in its journal literature. Chemical Reviews, 100(1), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr990096j   DOI
16 Chen, B., Tsutsui, S., Ding, Y., & Ma, F. (2017). Understanding the topic evolution in a scientific domain: an exploratory study for the field of information retrieval. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 1175-1189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.10.003   DOI
17 Cho, J. (2020). Intellectual structure evolution of open access research observed through correlation index of keyword centrality. Scientometrics, 125(3), 2617-2635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03682-4   DOI
18 Cho, Y. & Daim, T. (2016). OLED TV technology forecasting using technology mining and the Fisher-Pry diffusion model. Foresight, 18(2), 117-137. https://doi.org/10.1108/fs-08-2015-0043   DOI
19 Chung, J., Ko, N., Kim, H., & Yoon, J. (2021). Inventor profile mining approach for prospective human resource scouting. Journal of Informetrics, 15(1), 101103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101103   DOI
20 Costa, M. P. D. & Leite, F. C. L. (2016). Open access in the world and Latin America: a review since the Budapest Open Access Initiative. TransInformacao, 28, 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-08892016002800003   DOI
21 Craig, I. D., Plume, A. M., McVeigh, M. E., Pringle, J., & Amin, M. (2007). Do open access articles have greater citation impact?: a critical review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 1(3), 239-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2007.04.001   DOI
22 Deerwester, S., Dumais, S. T., Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., & Harshman, R. (1990). Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 391-407. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6<391::AID-ASI1>3.0.CO;2-9   DOI
23 Dieng, A. B., Ruiz, F. J., & Blei, D. M. (2020). Topic modeling in embedding spaces. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 8, 439-453. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00325   DOI
24 Du, H., Liu, D., Lu, Z., Crittenden, J., Mao, G., Wang, S., & Zou, H. (2019). Research development on sustainable urban infrastructure from 1991 to 2017: a bibliometric analysis to inform future innovations. Earth's Future, 7(7), 718-733. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018ef001117   DOI
25 Elvers, D., Song, C. H., Steinbuchel, A., & Leker, J. (2016). Technology trends in biodegradable polymers: evidence from patent analysis. Polymer Reviews, 56(4), 584-606. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583724.2015.1125918   DOI
26 Eriksson, S. & Helgesson, G. (2017). The false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 20(2), 163-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-016-9740-3   DOI
27 European Commission (2021). Horizon Europe, open science: early knowledge and data sharing, and open collaboration. Available: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/18252
28 Jeong, B., Yoon, J., & Lee, J. M. (2019). Social media mining for product planning: a product opportunity mining approach based on topic modeling and sentiment analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 48, 280-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.09.009   DOI
29 Franses, P. H. (1994). A method to select between Gompertz and logistic trend curves. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 46(1), 45-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(94)90016-7   DOI
30 Hofmann, T. (1999). Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. In Proceedings of the 22nd annual international Annual Conference of the Association for computing Machinery Special Interest Group in Information Retrieval Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 50-57.
31 Ji, H. & Cha, M. (2021). Topic analysis of scholarly communication research. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 9(2), 47-65. https://doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2021.9.2.4   DOI
32 Ko, N., Jeong, B., Choi, S., & Yoon, J. (2017). Identifying product opportunities using social media mining: application of topic modeling and chance discovery theory. Institute of Electrical and Ectronics Engineers Access, 6, 1680-1693. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2017.2780046   DOI
33 Ma, T., Li, R., Ou, G., & Yue, M. (2018). Topic based research competitiveness evaluation. Scientometrics, 117(2), 789-803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2891-7   DOI
34 Ovadia, S. (2014). ResearchGate and Academia.edu: academic social networks. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 33(3), 165-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639269.2014.934093   DOI
35 Palmer, K. L., Dill, E., & Christie, C. (2008). Where there's a will, there's a way?: survey of academic librarian attitudes about open access. College & Research Libraries, 70(4), 315-335. https://doi.org/10.5860/0700315   DOI
36 Yoon, J., Jeong, B., Lee, W. H., & Kim, J. (2018). Tracing the evolving trends in electronic skin (e-skin) technology using growth curve and technology position-based patent bibliometrics. Institute of Electrical and Ectronics Engineers Access, 6, 26530-26542. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2834160   DOI
37 Ross-Hellauer, T. (2017). What is open peer review? a systematic review. F1000Research, 6, 588. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2   DOI
38 Sidorova, A., Evangelopoulos, N., Valacich, J. S., & Ramakrishnan, T. (2008). Uncovering the intellectual core of the information systems discipline. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 32(3), 467-482. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148852   DOI
39 Van Santen, J. A., Jacob, G., Singh, A. L., Aniebok, V., Balunas, M. J., Bunsko, D., Neto, F. C, Castano-Espriu, L., Chang, C., Clark, T. N., Cleary Little, J. L., Delgadillo, D. A., Dorrestein, P. C., Duncan, K. R., Egan, J. M., Galey, M. M., Haeckl, F. P. J., Hua, A., Hughes, A. H., Iskakova, D., Khadilkar, A., Lee, J., Lee, S., LeGrow, N., Liu, D. Y., Macho, J. M., McCaughey, C. S., Medema, M. H., Neupane, R. P., O'Donnell, T. J., Paula, J. S., Sanchez, L. M., Shaikh, A. F., Soldatou, S., Terlouw, B. R., Tran, T. A., Valentine, M., Van der Hooft, J. J. J., Vo, D. A., Wang, M., Wilson, D., Zink, K. E., & Linington, R. G. (2019). The natural products atlas: an open access knowledge base for microbial natural products discovery. American Chemical Society Central Science, 5(11), 1824-1833. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.9b00806   DOI
40 Yoon, J., Park, Y., Kim, M., Lee, J., & Lee, D. (2014). Tracing evolving trends in printed electronics using patent information. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 16(7), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-014-2471-6   DOI
41 Young, P. (1993). Technological growth curves: a competition of forecasting models. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 44(4), 375-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(93)90042-6   DOI
42 Zwietering, M. H., Jongenburger, I., Rombouts, F. M., & Van't Riet, K. J. A. E. M. (1990). Modeling of the bacterial growth curve. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 56(6), 1875-1881. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.56.6.1875-1881.1990    DOI