DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Performance Evaluation Method of Tunnel Scanner for Lining Crack Detection

터널 균열 검출에 활용되는 터널스캐너의 성능검증 방법론

  • Received : 2020.11.10
  • Accepted : 2021.01.21
  • Published : 2021.03.31

Abstract

Purpose: Recently, due to increasing usage of high-tech equipment for facility inspection, the need of verifying high-tech equipment is being emphasized. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to develop performance evaluation methodology of tunnel scanners that inspect tunnel facilities. Method: This paper describes literature reviews regarding the performance evaluation methodology of high-tech based equipment for facility inspection. Based on these investigations and expert advisory meetings, this paper suggests a performance evaluation methodology of tunnel scanner. Result: First evaluation indicator states minimum performance standards of tunnel scanners. Second evaluation indicator is related to tunnel scanner quality. Conclusion: The performance evaluation methodology can provide reliable equipment performance catalogues, helping users to make a proper selection of equipment. Also, developers of equipment can get authorized verification of performances, preventing poor maintenance of facilities.

연구목적: 최근 시설물 점검 및 진단에 있어 활용되는 첨단장비들이 증가하여 첨단장비의 검·인증제도의 필요성이 대두되고 있다. 본 연구는 시설물 점검 및 진단에 활용되는 터널스캐너의 성능검증 방법론을 제시하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 연구방법: 시설물 점검 및 진단에 활용되는 첨단장비의 성능검증 사례를 조사하고 전문가 자문회의를 통해 터널스캐너 성능검증 방법론을 제시하였다. 연구결과: 본 연구에서 제안하는 터널스캐너 성능검증 방법론은 1차 평가와 2차 평가로 구성된다. 1차 평가지표는 최소요구성능을 기준으로 구성되고, 2차 평가지표는 터널스캐너의 품질에 관여된 지표들로 구성된다. 결론: 본 연구에서 제시한 터널스캐너의 성능검증 방법론은 장비 사용자에게 공인된 성능 카탈로그를 제공할 수 있으며, 장비 개발자는 장비의 공인된 검증을 받을 수 있어 부실한 유지관리를 예방할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 국토교통부/국토교통과학기술진흥원의 지원으로 수행되었음(과제번호 19CTAP-C152144-01).

References

  1. American National Standards Institute (2020). Standardization Roadmap For Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Version 2.0. U.S.
  2. Construction & Economy Research Institute of Korea (2016). Future changes in transportation infrastructure maintenance investment in Korea. Korea.
  3. Hong, S.-H., Kim, J.-G., Cho, J.-Y., Kim, T.-H. (2020). "A Study on the necessity of verification and certification system of inspection and diagnostic equipment for infrastructure using advanced technologies." Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 163-177.
  4. Kim, I., Lee, C. (2018). "Development of video shooting system and technique enabling detection of micro cracks in the tunnel lining while driving." Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, Vol. 18, No. 5, pp 217-229. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2018.18.5.217
  5. Korea Infrastructure Safety & Technology Corporation (2018). A Study on the Evaluation Method of Appropriateness in Field Performance of Diagnosis and maintenance technology (Equipment). Korea.
  6. Korea Infrastructure Safety & Technology Corporation (2019). Detailed Guidelines for Safety and Maintenance of Facilities (Safety Inspection and Diagnosis)_Tunnel. Korea.
  7. Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (2013). Yeon Cheon SOC Demonstration Research Center-Road Test Track Construction Project(II). Korea.
  8. Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (2017). Development of Multi-channel 3-D GPR System for Roadbed Cavity Detection in the Urban Area. Korea.
  9. Lee, Y.-H., Bae, S.-J., Jung, W., Cho, J.-Y., Hong, S.-H., Nam, W.-S., Kim, Y.-M., Kim, J.-Y. (2020). "Performance evaluation method for facility inspection and diagnostic technologies." Journal of the Society of Disaster Information, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 178-191. https://doi.org/10.15683/KOSDI.2020.3.31.178
  10. New Energy and Industrial Technology (2018). Guidelines for Evaluating the Performance of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Bridge Inspection Ver.1.0. Japan.
  11. Yoon, T.-G., Lee, S. (2008). "A study for tunnel management system development using a tunnel scanner." Korea institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, Vol. 12. No. 3, pp. 183-191.