Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15683/kosdi.2021.3.31.039

Performance Evaluation Method of Tunnel Scanner for Lining Crack Detection  

Bae, Sung-Jae (Department of Architecture, Inha University)
Jung, Wook (Department of Architecture, Inha University)
Chamrith, Sereivatana (Department of Architecture, Inha University)
Kim, Chan-Jin (Department of Architecture, Inha University)
Kim, Young-Min (Korea Authority of Land & Infrastructure Safety)
Hong, Sung-Ho (Korea Research Institute For Construction Policy)
Kim, Jung-Gon (Department of Research Planning, Disaster Research Management Center)
Kim, Jung-Yeol (Department of Architecture, Inha University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Society of Disaster Information / v.17, no.1, 2021 , pp. 39-52 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: Recently, due to increasing usage of high-tech equipment for facility inspection, the need of verifying high-tech equipment is being emphasized. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to develop performance evaluation methodology of tunnel scanners that inspect tunnel facilities. Method: This paper describes literature reviews regarding the performance evaluation methodology of high-tech based equipment for facility inspection. Based on these investigations and expert advisory meetings, this paper suggests a performance evaluation methodology of tunnel scanner. Result: First evaluation indicator states minimum performance standards of tunnel scanners. Second evaluation indicator is related to tunnel scanner quality. Conclusion: The performance evaluation methodology can provide reliable equipment performance catalogues, helping users to make a proper selection of equipment. Also, developers of equipment can get authorized verification of performances, preventing poor maintenance of facilities.
Keywords
Facility Management; Inspection Equipment; Tunnel Scanner; Performance Evaluation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Korea Infrastructure Safety & Technology Corporation (2019). Detailed Guidelines for Safety and Maintenance of Facilities (Safety Inspection and Diagnosis)_Tunnel. Korea.
2 Construction & Economy Research Institute of Korea (2016). Future changes in transportation infrastructure maintenance investment in Korea. Korea.
3 Hong, S.-H., Kim, J.-G., Cho, J.-Y., Kim, T.-H. (2020). "A Study on the necessity of verification and certification system of inspection and diagnostic equipment for infrastructure using advanced technologies." Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 163-177.
4 Korea Infrastructure Safety & Technology Corporation (2018). A Study on the Evaluation Method of Appropriateness in Field Performance of Diagnosis and maintenance technology (Equipment). Korea.
5 Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (2017). Development of Multi-channel 3-D GPR System for Roadbed Cavity Detection in the Urban Area. Korea.
6 Yoon, T.-G., Lee, S. (2008). "A study for tunnel management system development using a tunnel scanner." Korea institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, Vol. 12. No. 3, pp. 183-191.
7 Lee, Y.-H., Bae, S.-J., Jung, W., Cho, J.-Y., Hong, S.-H., Nam, W.-S., Kim, Y.-M., Kim, J.-Y. (2020). "Performance evaluation method for facility inspection and diagnostic technologies." Journal of the Society of Disaster Information, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 178-191.   DOI
8 New Energy and Industrial Technology (2018). Guidelines for Evaluating the Performance of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Bridge Inspection Ver.1.0. Japan.
9 American National Standards Institute (2020). Standardization Roadmap For Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Version 2.0. U.S.
10 Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (2013). Yeon Cheon SOC Demonstration Research Center-Road Test Track Construction Project(II). Korea.
11 Kim, I., Lee, C. (2018). "Development of video shooting system and technique enabling detection of micro cracks in the tunnel lining while driving." Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, Vol. 18, No. 5, pp 217-229.   DOI