DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

미군 사례 고찰을 통한 한국군 데이터 전략 및 공유 데이터 모델 개발방안 제안

Proposal of the development plan for the ROK military data strategy and shared data model through the US military case study

  • Lee, Hak-rae (Department of Military Digital Convergence, Ajou University) ;
  • Kim, Wan-ju (Department of Military Digital Convergence, Ajou University) ;
  • Lim, Jae-sung (Department of Military Digital Convergence, Ajou University)
  • 투고 : 2021.04.26
  • 심사 : 2021.05.11
  • 발행 : 2021.06.30

초록

2018년 미 국방부 국가안보전략에 포함된 다영역작전 수행을 위해서는 C4I 체계 간의 적시적인 데이터 공유가 선행되어야 가능하다는 것을 인식하고 문제 해결을 위해 노력하고 있다. 한국군도 수 차례 연구를 통해 C4I 체계간 데이터 연동과 표준화에 대한 문제가 제기 되었고, 이를 해결하기 위한 새로운 방안의 수립이 필요한 상황이다. 본 연구에서는 미국방성이 2003년 데이터 전략 수립 후 이를 구현하기 위해 약 20여 년간 추진해온 사례 분석을 통해 문제 해결 방안을 도출하고, 한국군 C4I체계 운용환경에 적합한 데이터 전략 수립, 데이터 모델 개발, 데이터 공유를 위한 표준 선정, 그리고 공유 데이터 개발 절차를 제안함으로써, 한국군 C4I체계간 데이터 공유 능력을 향상시키고자 한다.

To carry out multi-domain operations included in the U.S. Department of Defense's national security strategy in 2018, timely data sharing between C4I systems is critical. Several studies of the Korean military have also raised the problems of interface and standardization between C4I systems, and it is necessary to establish a new plan to solve this problem. In this study, a solution to the problem was derived through case analysis that the U.S. Department of Defense has been pursuing for about 20 years to implement the data strategy after establishing the data strategy in 2003. and by establishing a data strategy suitable for the ROK military C4I system operating environment, developing a data model, selecting a standard for data sharing, and proposing a shared data development procedure, we intend to improve the data sharing capability between ROK military C4I systems.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Department of Defenses OF USA, DoD Data Strategy, 2020. [Internet]. Available: https://media.defense.gov/2020/Oct/08/2002514180/-1/-1/0/DOD-DATA-STRATEGY.PDF.
  2. [Internet]. Available: https://www.c4isrnet.com/show-reporter/ausa/2020/10/13/before-joint-all-domain-operations-leaders -need-to-solve-data-problems-first/.
  3. K. H. Kim and S. J. Kang, "A Study on VV&A Application Method for Credibility Improvement of The DM&S for C4I Test and Evaluation," Journal of the KIMST, vol. 6, pp. 786-801, 2010.
  4. The Board of Audit and Inspection, Disposal request form as a result of audit, actual status of promotion of defense informatization [Internet]. Available: https://www.bai.go.kr/bai/cop/bbs/detailBoardArticle.do?bbsId=BBSMSTR_100000000009&nttId=1237&mdex=bai20&searchWrd=%EC%A0%95%EB%B3%B4%ED%99%94&searchBgnDe=&searchEndDe=&searchYear=&pageIndex=1&recordCountPerPage=10&buseo=&searchCate=&searchCateSub=.
  5. Weekly Dong-A, Military neural network c4i system data transmission 10% failure "shock" [Internet]. Available: https://www.donga.com/news/Politics/article/all/20111030/41467878/3.
  6. Joint Interoperability Technical Support Center, KMTF-based defense information system interface advancement study [Internet]. Available: https://www.prism.go.kr/homepage/.
  7. J. H. Hong, Y. D. Kim, H. H. Ko, and S. M. Hong, "Directions for improving data-driven information sharing in the battlefield environment of the Korean military," KIDA, seoul, 2020.
  8. [Internet]. Available: https://www.army.mil/standto/archive/2020/02/28/.
  9. [Internet]. Available: https://breakingdefense.com/2021/02/how-to-build-the-third-offset-the-combined-jadc2/.
  10. J. Y. Joo, "A Study on Multi Domain Operations in U.S. Army," The Quarterly Journal of Defense Policy Studies, vol. 36, no 1, pp. 9-41, 2020. https://doi.org/10.22883/JDPS.2020.36.1.001
  11. Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2), Congressional Research Service [Internet]. Available: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/IF11493.pdf.
  12. R. Schultz, LTC. K. Keelean, J. Jamison, and R. O'Connell. Data Sharing is a Critical Capability [Internet]. Available: https://www.modsimworld.org/papers/2017/Data_Sharing_is_a_Critical_Capability.pdf.
  13. Department of Defenses OF USA. DoD Net-centric Data Strategy [Internet]. Available: https://dodcio.defense.gov/portals/0/documents/net-centric-data-strategy-2003-05-092. pdf.
  14. P. Morosoff, R. Rudnicki, J. Bryant, R. Farrell, and B. Smith. Joint Doctrine Ontology: A Benchmark for Military Information Systems Interoperability [Internet]. Available: https://stids.c4i.gmu.edu/papers/STIDS_2015_T01_Morosoff_etal.pdf/.
  15. K. M. Lee, "A Study on Using XML for National Defense Shared Data Environment," Korea National Defense University, seoul, 2002.
  16. Adoption of the National Information Exchange Model within the Department of Defense, Department of Defenses OF USA [Internet]. Available: https://dodcio.defense.gov/Portals/0/Documents/2013-03-28%20Adoption%20of%20the%20NIEM%20within%20the%20DoD.pdf.
  17. Defense Interoperability/Standardization Technology Support Center, Defense architecture meta-model standardization and application plan research [Internet]. Available: https://www.prism.go.kr/homepage/.
  18. L. Winters and A. Tolk. C2 Domain Ontology within Our Lifetime [Internet]. Available: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/msve_fac_pubs/42/.
  19. K. Gupton, J. Abbott, C. Blais, K. Heffner, S. Y. Diallo, and C. Turnitsa. Management of C4I and M&S Data Standards with Modular OWL Ontologies [Internet]. Available: https://calhoun.nps.edu/handle/10945/30791.
  20. B. Smith, LTC. K. Miettinen, MAJ. W. Mandrick, The Ontology of Command and Control [Internet]. Available: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA503082.pdf.