Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Influence of Textbooks Applying Gamification Motivation Strategy on Learners' Interest: Social Textbooks for 3rd Graders in Elementary School

게이미피케이션 동기 전략을 적용한 교과서가 학습자의 흥미에 미치는 영향: 초등 3학년 사회 교과서를 중심으로

  • Received : 2021.03.23
  • Accepted : 2021.06.20
  • Published : 2021.06.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The social studies, mathematics, and science textbooks of the elementary curriculum will begin to be authorized from 2022. This study explores the effect of textbooks based on a gamification motivation strategy on learner interest. For this purpose, this study analyzes whether the systematic application of the gamification motivation strategy to elementary studies textbooks, which will be authorized from 2022, can develop this textbook into a "learner-centered curriculum book that induces interest." More specifically, this study applied Kumsung Publishing's experimental social studies textbooks in class and conducted a questionnaire among 121 third graders to verify the effectiveness of the textbooks. The results show that studies textbooks based on a gamification motivation strategy greatly influence increased learner interest in the classroom. The textbooks also represent a positive influence in learner understanding, interest, and curiosity regarding the class content and assistance. Demonstrating that gamification motivation strategy is worthwhile to actively apply in future textbook development for the enhancement of learners' interests, this study is significant in that it has presented a meaningful textbook development model.

초등학교 국정 교과서의 검정 전환 정책이 실시됨에 따라 2022년부터 초등 사회, 수학, 과학 교과서가 검정화된다. 본 연구의 목적은 게이미피케이션 동기 전략이 적용된 교과서가 학습자의 흥미에 미치는 영향을 알아보는 것이다. 연구를 위해 2022년부터 검정화되는 초등 교과서가 '흥미를 유발하는 학습자 중심의 교과용 도서'로 발돋움할 수 있도록, 교과서에 '게이미피케이션' 동기 전략을 체계적으로 적용하였다. 금성출판사의 실험용 사회 교과서를 활용하여 초등학교 3학년생 121명을 대상으로 수업을 실시한 후 효과를 검증하기 위해 설문 조사와 앙케이트 조사를 실시하였다. 연구 결과, 게이미피케이션 동기 전략이 적용된 교과서는 학습자의 수업 궁금도에 큰 영향을 미쳤으며, 이외에 수업 내용 이해도, 수업 재미, 수업 도움도에도 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 '게이미피케이션' 동기 전략이 유효하였다는 것을 의미한다. 본 연구의 의의는 실제 교과서에 게이미피케이션을 적용해 본 실증적인 연구라는 데에 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. S. Harter. (1981). A new self-report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom: Motivational and informational components. Developmental Psychology, 17(3), 300-312. DOI : 10.1037 https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.17.3.300
  2. A. M. Dotterer, S. M. McHale & A. C. Crouter. (2009). The development and correlates of academic interests from childhood through adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 509-519. DOI : 10.1037 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013987
  3. KEDI. (2012). Analysis of school education status and level: Comprehensive analysis of elementary, middle, and high schools in 1-3 cycle. Seoul : KEDI.
  4. S. Sugitani. (2018). Possibility of gamification as a learning tool. Bulletin of Seinan Jogakuin University, 22, 71-79.
  5. X. Gu & H. S. Lee. (2021). Analysis of User's Continuous Utilization of Social Apps Using the Model of Gamification. Journal of Digital Convergence, 19(1), 315-325. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2021.19.1.315
  6. B. Burk. (2014). Gamify: How gamification motivates people to do extraordinary things. New York : Bibliomotion Inc. DOI : 10.4324
  7. G. Zichermann & C. Cunningham. (2011). Gamification by Design: Implememting game mechanics in web and mobile apps. Canada : O'Reilly Media Inc.
  8. D. Dicheva, C. Dichev, G. Agre & G. Angelova. (2015). Gamification in Education: A Systematic Mapping Study. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 75-88. DOI : 10.2307
  9. S. S. Abrams & S. Walsh. (2014). Gamified vocabulary. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(1), 49-58. DOI : 10.1002 https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.315
  10. T. Fujimoto. (2015). Development and practice of gamified coursework design framework(Paper on educational practice research). Japan Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 351-361. DOI : 10.15077
  11. M. S. Kim. (2020). Development of Gamification Add-on Prototype for Elementary School Science Digital Textbook. Doctoral dissertation. The Graduate School of Pusan National University, Pusan.
  12. Y. S. Jun. (2016). The effect of the gamification factor applied lessons on academic interest and academic self-efficacy: Focused on the high school technology Class. Master's thesis. Korea National University of Education, Cheongju.
  13. J. J. Lee & J. Hammer. (2011). Gamificatiom in Education: What, How, Why Bother? Academic Exchange Quarterly, 15(2), 146-151.
  14. Y. Y. Jang. (2017). The Effects of intervention using Gamification-based Reading instruction application on Word Recognition Ability of Children with Reading Difficulties. Master's thesis. The Graduate School of Ewha Womans University. Seoul.
  15. J. T. Kim et al. (2014). Gamification plays the world. Hongneung Publishing Company. Seoul.
  16. S. Hidi. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60(4), 549-571. DOI : 10.3102 https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060004549
  17. M. Ainley, S. Hidi & D. Berndorff. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 545-561. DOI : 10.1037 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.545
  18. J. I. Rotgans & H. G. Schmidt. (2011). Situational interest and academic achievement in the active-learning classroom. Learning and Instruction, 21, 58-67. DOI : 10.1016 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.11.001
  19. J. M. Harackiewicz, A. M. Durik, K. E. Barron, L. Linnenbrink-Garcia & J. M. Tauer. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 105-122. DOI : 10.1037 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.105
  20. S. Hidi & M. Ainley. (2008). Interest and self-regulation: Relationships between two variables that influence learning. New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  21. W. Lee, M. J. Lee & M. Bong. (2014). Testing interest and self-efficacy as predictors of academic self-regulation and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 39(2), 86-99. DOI : 10.1016 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.02.002
  22. S. M. Fulmer & J. C. Frijters. (2011). Motivation during an excessively challenging reading task: The buffering role of relative topic interest. The Journal of Experimental Education, 79, 185-208. DOI : 10.1080 https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2010.481503
  23. E. Tanaka & S. Ichikawa. (2019). How can we capture the development of interest?: Review and integration of previous research using a three-element model. Japanese psychological review, 60(3), 203-215. DOI : 10.24602
  24. A. Krapp, S. Hidi & K. A. Renninger. (1992). Interest, learning, and development. New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  25. K. Rathunde & M. Csikszentmihalyi. (1993). Undivided interest and the growth of talent: A longitudinal study of adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 22, 385-405. DOI : 10.1007 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537720
  26. M. S. Yoon. (2003). Effects of thinking styles on academic achievement with the mediators of academic motivation and subject-specific interests. Doctoral dissertation. The Graduate School of Korea University. Seoul.
  27. J. H. Kim. (2001). Regression Analysis of Related Variables Affecting High School Students' Academic Achievement. Korean Journal of Educational Research. 39(4). 349-366.
  28. M. R. Kim. (2006). The influence of peer-teaching group composition types by achievement goals according to compensation presentation and elimination on academic achievement and interest. Master's thesis. The Graduate School of Korea University. Seoul.
  29. H. K. Choi. (2020). To highlight the aspects of content change(content, choice, enjoyment, connection, reuse) regarding the untouch content revolution in the Corona era. Broadcasting and media magazine, 25(4). 61-72.
  30. J. Y. Na, Y. I. Park. & H. B. Kim. (2016). A Case study of "Branded Contents" applied Gamification concepts. Journal of Korea Game Society, 16(5), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.7583/JKGS.2016.16.5.45
  31. J. L. Shang & S. H. Ryu. (2021). Analysis of RPG Characters' Personality Performance. Journal of Digital Convergence, 19(2), 403-408. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2021.19.2.403
  32. D. L. Lee. (2018). A study on character change of game graphics according to media coverage and diversity of technology. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(8), 287-292. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.8.287
  33. W. S. Choi. (2016). The Proportion of Game Character and Game Image. Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(12), 165-172. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.12.165
  34. C. Araragi. (1992). Self-estim transformation and educational guidance. The Psychology of Self Esteem - The Search for Self Value(compilation). Teem's psychology, Nakanishya Corporation, 200-226. (セルフエスティームの変容と教育指導 遠藤辰雄他（編)). セルフエスティームの心理学 ナカニシヤ).
  35. Y. Taruki. (1995). Effects of computer use in functional classes Science Education, Science Education, Mathematics Education 456, Meijitosho Shuppan Corporation, 21-28. (数授業でのコンピュータ活用の効果 教育科学 数学教育456 明治図書)
  36. Y. Taruki, H. Lino. (1994) A Study on Stumbling and Student Interests in Basic Calculation, 49th Kanto Metropolitan Mathematical Education Research Conference thesis collection, 72. (基礎計算におけるつまづきと生徒の興味.関心に関する研究 第49回関東都県数学教育研究大会論文集)
  37. Y. Fukuyama, Y. Tokonabe & Y. M. (2017). A practice and evaluation of gamification-based digital teaching materials designed for japanese first graders. Journal of Digital Games Research, 9(2), 31-40. DOI : 10.9762 https://doi.org/10.9762/digraj.9.2_31