구강회복응용과학지 (Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science)

  • 제37권1호
  • /
  • Pages.16-22
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2384-4353(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-4272(eISSN)
대한턱관절교합학회 (Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

표면연마와 제작방법에 따른 임시 수복용 레진의 굽힘강도에 관한 비교 연구

Comparative study of flexural strength of temporary restorative resin according to surface polishing and fabrication methods

  • 임재훈 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 이재인 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Lim, Jae-Hun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Lee, Jae-In (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
  • 투고 : 2021.02.01
  • 심사 : 2021.03.03
  • 발행 : 2021.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: 표면연마와 제작방법이 임시 수복용 레진의 굽힘강도에 미치는 영향을 분석하고자 한다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 4가지 제작방법을 이용하여 각각 30개의 임시 수복용 레진 시편을 제작하였고, 기계적 연마로 표면연마를 시행한 그룹과 연마를 시행하지 않은 2개의 그룹으로 나누었다. 시편은 37℃ 항온기에 24시간 보관 후 만능시험기(Universal testing machine)을 이용하여 3점 굽힘강도를 측정하였다. 통계분석은 Two-way ANOVA와 Tukey's HSD test, Paired t-test를 이용하여 분석하였다. 결과: 표면연마 여부와 관계없이 CAD/CAM milling으로 제작한 시편이 가장 높은 굽힘강도를 나타냈고, SLA 3D printing, DLP 3D printing, Conventional method 순으로 높은 굽힘강도를 나타냈다. 결론: 표면연마는 임시 수복용 레진의 굽힘강도에 유의한 영향을 끼치지 못했지만(P > 0.05), 제작방법에 의해서는 굽힘강도의 유의한 차이가 나타났다(P < 0.05).

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of surface polishing and fabrication method on the flexural strength of temporary restorative resin. Materials and Methods: Each of four fabrication methods was used to make 30 temporary restorative resin specimens and the specimens were divided into two groups depending on whether they were polished by mechanical polishing. Specimens were stored in 37℃ thermostat for 24 hours. Flexural strength was measured using a universal testing machine (UTM). The data obtained through the experiment were analyzed with Two-way ANOVA, Tukey's HSD test and Paired t-test. Results: CAD/CAM milling group showed the highest flexural strength regardless of surface polishing. In decreasing order, the flexural strength of the other fabrication method group was as follows SLA 3D printing, DLP 3D printing, and Conventional method group. Conclusion: Surface polishing did not affect flexural strength of the temporary restorative resin (P > 0.05). However, there were statistically significant differences in flexural strength depending on fabrication method (P < 0.05).

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Koumjian JH, Holmes JB. Marginal accuracy of provisional restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:639-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90320-C
  2. Burns DR, Beck DA, Nelson SK. A review of selected dental literature on contemporary provisional fixed prosthodontic treatment: report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:474-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00259-2
  3. Haselton DR, Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA. Flexural Strength of Provisional Crown and Fixed Partial Denture Resins. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:225-8. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.121406
  4. Ireland MF, Dixon DL, Breeding LC, Ramp MH. In Vitro Mechanical Property Comparison of Four Resins Used for Fabrication of Provisional Fixed Restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:158-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70104-0
  5. Diaz-Arnold AM, Dunne JT, Jones AH. Microhardness of provisional fixed prosthodontics materials. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:525-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70050-8
  6. Park JY, Jeong ID, Lee JJ, Bae SY, Kim JH, Kim WC. In vitro assessment of the marginal and internal fits of interim implant restorations fabricated with different methods. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:536-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.012
  7. Kim KB, Kim JH, Kim WC, Kim JH. Three-dimensional evaluation of gaps associated with fixed dental prostheses fabricated with new technologies. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1432-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.07.002
  8. Park SM, Kim SK, Park JM, Kim KH, Jeon YT, Koak JY. Flexural strength of various kinds of the resin bridges fabricated with 3D printing. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci 2017;33:260-8. https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2017.33.4.260
  9. Karaokutan I, Sayin G, Kara O. In vitro study of fracture strength of provisional crown materials. J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7:27-31. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.1.27
  10. Cho WT, Choi JW. Comparison analysis of fracture load and flexural strength of provisional restorative resins fabricated by different methods. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2019;57:225-31. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2019.57.3.225
  11. Goncalves TS, de Menezes LM, Silva LEA. Residual monomer of autopolymerized acrylic resin according to different manipulation and polishing methods. An in situ evaluation. Angle Orthod 2008;78:722-7. https://doi.org/10.2319/0003-3219(2008)078[0722:RMOAAR]2.0.CO;2
  12. Palitsch A, Hannig M, Ferger P, Balkenhol M. Bonding of acrylic denture teeth to MMA/PMMA and light-curing denture base materials: the role of conditioning liquids. J Dent 2012;40:210-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.12.010
  13. Wang X, Huyang G, Palagummi SV, Liu X, Skrtic D, Beauchamp C, Bowen R, Sun J. High performance dental resin composites with hydrolytically stable monomers. Dent Mater 2018;34:228-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.10.007
  14. Donovan TE, Hurst RG, Campagni WV. Physical properties of acrylic resin polymerized by four different techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:522-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90425-1
  15. Chee WW, Donovan TE, Daftary F, Siu TM. The effect of vacuum-mixed autopolymerizing acrylic resins on porosity and transverse strength. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:517-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90261-2
  16. Yao J, Li J, Wang Y, Huang H. Comparison of the flexural strength and marginal accuracy of traditional and CAD/CAM interim materials before and after thermal cycling. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:649-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.01.012
  17. Reeponmaha T, Angwaravong O, Angwarawong T. Comparison of fracture strength after thermo-mechanical aging between provisional crowns made with CAD/CAM and conventional method. J Adv Prosthodont 2020;12:218-24. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.4.218
  18. Ayman AD. The residual monomer content and mechanical properties of CAD/CAM resins used in the fabrication of complete dentures as compared to heat cured resins. Electron Physician 2017;9:4766-72. https://doi.org/10.19082/4766
  19. Matsumura H, Leinfelder KF. Three-body wear of four types of light-activated composite resin veneering materials. Quintessence Int 1994;25:425-30.
  20. Peutzfeldt A. Resin composites in dentistry: the monomer systems. Eur J Oral Sci 1997;105:97-116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb00188.x
  21. Lee S. Prospect for 3D Printing Technology in Medical, Dental, and Pediatric Dental Field. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 2016;43:93-108.
  22. Dikova T, Dzhendov DA, Ivanov D, Bliznakova K. Dimensional accuracy and surface roughness of polymeric dental bridges produced by different 3D printing processes. Arch Mater Sci Eng 2018;94:65-75.