1 |
Matsumura H, Leinfelder KF. Three-body wear of four types of light-activated composite resin veneering materials. Quintessence Int 1994;25:425-30.
|
2 |
Peutzfeldt A. Resin composites in dentistry: the monomer systems. Eur J Oral Sci 1997;105:97-116.
DOI
|
3 |
Lee S. Prospect for 3D Printing Technology in Medical, Dental, and Pediatric Dental Field. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 2016;43:93-108.
|
4 |
Dikova T, Dzhendov DA, Ivanov D, Bliznakova K. Dimensional accuracy and surface roughness of polymeric dental bridges produced by different 3D printing processes. Arch Mater Sci Eng 2018;94:65-75.
|
5 |
Koumjian JH, Holmes JB. Marginal accuracy of provisional restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:639-42.
DOI
|
6 |
Burns DR, Beck DA, Nelson SK. A review of selected dental literature on contemporary provisional fixed prosthodontic treatment: report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:474-97.
DOI
|
7 |
Haselton DR, Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA. Flexural Strength of Provisional Crown and Fixed Partial Denture Resins. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:225-8.
DOI
|
8 |
Ireland MF, Dixon DL, Breeding LC, Ramp MH. In Vitro Mechanical Property Comparison of Four Resins Used for Fabrication of Provisional Fixed Restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:158-62.
DOI
|
9 |
Diaz-Arnold AM, Dunne JT, Jones AH. Microhardness of provisional fixed prosthodontics materials. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:525-8.
DOI
|
10 |
Park JY, Jeong ID, Lee JJ, Bae SY, Kim JH, Kim WC. In vitro assessment of the marginal and internal fits of interim implant restorations fabricated with different methods. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:536-42.
DOI
|
11 |
Kim KB, Kim JH, Kim WC, Kim JH. Three-dimensional evaluation of gaps associated with fixed dental prostheses fabricated with new technologies. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1432-6.
DOI
|
12 |
Park SM, Kim SK, Park JM, Kim KH, Jeon YT, Koak JY. Flexural strength of various kinds of the resin bridges fabricated with 3D printing. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci 2017;33:260-8.
DOI
|
13 |
Karaokutan I, Sayin G, Kara O. In vitro study of fracture strength of provisional crown materials. J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7:27-31.
DOI
|
14 |
Cho WT, Choi JW. Comparison analysis of fracture load and flexural strength of provisional restorative resins fabricated by different methods. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2019;57:225-31.
DOI
|
15 |
Goncalves TS, de Menezes LM, Silva LEA. Residual monomer of autopolymerized acrylic resin according to different manipulation and polishing methods. An in situ evaluation. Angle Orthod 2008;78:722-7.
DOI
|
16 |
Palitsch A, Hannig M, Ferger P, Balkenhol M. Bonding of acrylic denture teeth to MMA/PMMA and light-curing denture base materials: the role of conditioning liquids. J Dent 2012;40:210-21.
DOI
|
17 |
Yao J, Li J, Wang Y, Huang H. Comparison of the flexural strength and marginal accuracy of traditional and CAD/CAM interim materials before and after thermal cycling. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:649-57.
DOI
|
18 |
Wang X, Huyang G, Palagummi SV, Liu X, Skrtic D, Beauchamp C, Bowen R, Sun J. High performance dental resin composites with hydrolytically stable monomers. Dent Mater 2018;34:228-37.
DOI
|
19 |
Donovan TE, Hurst RG, Campagni WV. Physical properties of acrylic resin polymerized by four different techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:522-4.
DOI
|
20 |
Chee WW, Donovan TE, Daftary F, Siu TM. The effect of vacuum-mixed autopolymerizing acrylic resins on porosity and transverse strength. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:517-9.
DOI
|
21 |
Reeponmaha T, Angwaravong O, Angwarawong T. Comparison of fracture strength after thermo-mechanical aging between provisional crowns made with CAD/CAM and conventional method. J Adv Prosthodont 2020;12:218-24.
DOI
|
22 |
Ayman AD. The residual monomer content and mechanical properties of CAD/CAM resins used in the fabrication of complete dentures as compared to heat cured resins. Electron Physician 2017;9:4766-72.
DOI
|