Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회논문집)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Characteristics of the Criteria for Judging the Value of Architectural Assets by City - Comparison of Architectural Assets in Daejeon, Sejong, and Cheongju -

도시별 건축자산의 가치판단 기준 특성 - 대전광역시, 세종특별자치시, 청주시의 건축자산을 대상으로 -

  • Kang, Min-kyung ;
  • An, Dai-Whan (Interdisciplinary Program of Urban Regeneration / Department of Architecture, Chungbuk National University)
  • 강민경 (충북대학교 도시재생학협동과정) ;
  • 안대환 (충북대학교 도시재생학 학과간 협동과정 / 건축학과)
  • Received : 2021.09.28
  • Accepted : 2021.11.29
  • Published : 2021.12.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As of 2020, the '1st Basic Plan for the Promotion of architectural Assets' was carried out according to historical, scenic, artistic, and socio-cultural values for each city and province. When conducting the basic architectural asset survey, each city and province used the same value judgment criteria, but the value characteristics of architectural assets were different for each city. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between architectural assets and cities from the point of view of value judgment and the characteristics of architectural assets that appear in each city. Targeting Daejeon, Sejong, and Cheongju, the characteristics of the times of each city are identified. The characteristics were identified by classifying the types by historical, scenic, artistic, and socio-cultural values, which are the criteria for judging the value of architectural assets by city. As a result, historical values were given to the architectural assets that showed the characteristics of the times in the three cities. Sejong City, which developed relatively recently, gave historical value only to architectural assets in the form of hanok. Cheongju, with a long history, did not attach historical value to Gak Dang(閣堂). The scenic value is given to the architectural assets that harmonize with the surrounding environment. Daejeon and Cheongju were judged to be in harmony with the surrounding environment through the material and shape of the facade. Sejong City, where many buildings have been built in recent years, won the Architecture Award. In addition, a scenic value was given to architectural assets that would be in harmony with the natural scenic. Artistic value is given to architectural assets that reflect the characteristics of the times in architectural design and are in a good state of preservation. Also, Daejeon, Sejong, and Cheongju gave artistic value mainly to architectural assets that have won architectural awards. Through this study, it can be seen that the characteristics of architectural assets differ from city to city because the characteristics of cities and the criteria for value judgment for selecting architectural assets are related to each other. Accordingly, it shows that architectural assets should be preserved, managed, and utilized differently for each city.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 성과는 정부(과학기술정보통신부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(No. 2021R1F1A1061803).

References

  1. Kim, H. T.(2019). A full survey of Sejong's architectural assets
  2. Lee, J. S.(2019). Service report for basic survey and implementation plan establishment of Daejeon Architectural Assets, p35
  3. Lee, M. K., Lee, J. M., & Jin, T. S. (2020). Trust System Introduction Plan for Conservation and Utilization of Architectural Assets, Architecture & Urban Research Institute
  4. Lee, S. J.(2011). Preliminary study on defining and assessing heritage values for establishing conservation principles, Korean Journal of Cultural Heritage Studies, 44(4), 154-171.
  5. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2016). Guidelines for conducting basic survey on architectural assets
  6. Sim, K. M., & Cha, J. Y. (2013). A study on Systems for Compile List of Architectural Asset and Use of the Inventory, Architecture & Urban Research Institute
  7. Sim, K. M., Lim, Y. K., & Kang, K. H. (2015). Implementation Issues for Architectural Assets Promotion District, Architecture & Urban Research Institute
  8. Son, T. J. (2020). Implementation Plan for the Promotion of Architectural Assets in Chungcheongbuk-do
  9. You, K. H. (2012). A Study on the Establishment of Management Foundation for Preservation and Utilization of Local Architectural Assets, Architecture & Urban Research Institute
  10. Daejeon Cyber History Museum Modern History(Access Date: 2021.8.22. URL: https://www.daejeon.go.kr/drh/DrhContentsHtmlView.do?menuSeq=2041)
  11. Digital Sejong City Culture Exhibition, Jochiwon Station (Access Date: 2021.8.22., URL: http://sejong.grandculture.net/sejong/toc/GC07700271)
  12. Dongbuchanggo Website, (Access Date: 2021.8.6., URL: https://www.dbchangko.org/sub.php?code=26)