The Journal of the Korea Contents Association (한국콘텐츠학회논문지)

The Korea Contents Association (한국콘텐츠학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Team Process on Organizational Commitment : Mediating Effects of Members' Affect State

팀프로세스가 조직몰입에 미치는 영향: 구성원의 정서상태 매개효과를 중심으로

  • 윤주용 (한양대학교 일반대학원 평생학습학과 박사) ;
  • 정기수 (한양대학교 일반대학원 평생학습학과 교수)
  • Received : 2020.09.04
  • Accepted : 2020.10.05
  • Published : 2020.10.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to verify the effect of team process and affect state on members' organizational commitment. To this end, a valid questionnaire was received from 241 employees working at a company, and the collected questionnaire analyzed the relationship through regression analysis. As a result, we found that all of the team process factors - the conversion process, the execution process, and the interpersonal process - had a meaningful positive effect on organizational commitment. The conversion process had a positive effect on positive-activity and positive-inactivity - which is the types of the members' affect state. The interpersonal process had a positive effect on positive-activity and positive-inactivity, and negative effect on negative-inactivity and negative-activity. And the positive-activity had an intermediation effect on the relationship between team process and organizational commitment. Through this study, the significance of this study can be found in that it suggested the importance of building and managing the team process in order to maximize the efficiency of human resource management in the organization and improve the team effectiveness.

본 연구는 팀프로세스와 정서상태유형이 구성원의 조직몰입에 미치는 영향을 검증하는데 그 목적을 두었다. 이를 위해 기업체에서 근무하는 임직원 241명으로부터 유효한 설문을 받았으며, 수집된 설문은 회귀분석을 통해 관계를 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 팀프로세스 요인인 전환과정, 실행과정, 대인과정이 모두 조직몰입에 유의한 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 그리고, 팀프로세스 요인인 전환과정은 구성원의 정서상태유형 중 긍정활성과 긍정비활성에 유의한 정(+)의 영향을 나타냈고, 대인과정은 긍정활성, 긍정비활성에 유의한 정(+)의 영향을 부정비활성과 부정활성에 유의한 부(-)의 영향을 나타냈다. 또한 팀프로세스와 조직몰입의 관계에서 정서상태유형인 긍정활성이 매개효과를 가지는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구를 통해 조직 내 인적자원관리의 효율성을 극대화하고 팀의 효과성을 향상시키기 위해서는 팀프로세스의 구축과 관리에 대해 중요성을 제시하였다는 점에서 본 연구의 의의를 찾을 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. M. Weber, The theory of economic and social organization. Trans. AM Henderson and Talcott Parsons, New York: Oxford University Press, 1947.
  2. A. Etzioni, P. Marcus, R. K. Merton, A. Reiss, J. Q. Wilson, and H. White, Organizations. Prentice-Hall Publishing Co., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1964.
  3. E. Sundstrom, M. McIntyre, T. Halfhill, and H. Richards, "Work groups: From the Hawthorne studies to work teams of the 1990s and beyond," Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, Vol.4, No.1, p.44, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.4.1.44
  4. P. S. Widmer, M. C. Schippers, and M. A. West, "Recent developments in reflexivity research: A review," Psychology of Everyday Activity, Vol.2, No.2, pp.2-11, 2009.
  5. E. Salas, N. J. Cooke, and M. A. Rosen, "On teams, teamwork, and team performance: Discoveries and developments," Human factors, Vol.50, No.3, pp.540-547, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288457
  6. M. A. Campion and A. C. Higgs, "Design work teams to increase productivity and satisfaction," Hr Magazine, Vol.40, No.10, pp.101-104, 1995.
  7. E. D. Sundstrom, Supporting work team effectiveness: Best management practices for fostering high performance, Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1999.
  8. G. E. Prussia and A. J. Kinicki, "A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.81, No.2, p.187, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.2.187
  9. J. E. McGrath, Groups: Interaction and performance (Vol.14), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984
  10. M. A. Marks, J. E. Mathieu, and S. J. Zaccaro, "A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes," Academy of management review, Vol.26, No.3, pp.356-376, 2001. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4845785
  11. J. Mathieu, M. T. Maynard, T. Rapp, and L. Gilson, "Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future," Journal of management, Vol.34, No.3, pp.410-476, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316061
  12. W. S. Silver and K. M. Bufanio, "The impact of group efficacy and group goals on group task performance," Small Group Research, Vol.27, No.3, pp.347-359, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496496273001
  13. J. A. LePine, R. F. Piccolo, C. L. Jackson, J. E. Mathieu, and J. R. Saul, "A meta‐analysis of teamwork processes: tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria," Personnel psychology, Vol.61, No.2, pp.273-307, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00114.x
  14. 김진희, 정재삼, "대학생 대상 프로젝트 기반학습에 서 팀 리더십, 팀 프로세스, 팀 효과성의 구조적 관계 분석," 한국교육공학회 학술대회발표자료집, 제2호, pp.372-390, 2015.
  15. 오인수, 급진적 창의성, 점진적 창의성에 관한 다수준 연구, 한양대학교 대학원, 박사학위논문, 2017.
  16. D. R. Forsyth, Group dynamics, Cengage Learning, 2018.
  17. H. W. Weiss and R. Cropanzano, Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work, 1996.
  18. S. Lyubomirsky, L. King, and E. Diener, "The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success?," Psychological bulletin, Vol.131, No.6, p.803, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803
  19. J. Yang and J. M. Diefendorff, "The relations of daily counterproductive workplace behavior with emotions, situational antecedents, and personality moderators: A diary study in Hong Kong," Personnel Psychology, Vol.62, No.2, pp.259-295, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01138.x
  20. R. A. Guzzo and G. P. Shea, Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations, 1992.
  21. R. Saavedra and S. K. Kwun, "Affective states in job characteristics theory," Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, Vol.21, No.2, pp.131-146, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200003)21:2<131::AID-JOB39>3.0.CO;2-Q
  22. B. E. Ashforth, and R. H. Humphrey, "Emotion in the workplace: A reappraisal," Human relations, Vol.48, No.2, pp.97-125, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679504800201
  23. H. M. Weiss and R. Cropanzano, Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work, 1996.
  24. D. Watson, D. Wiese, J. Vaidya, and A. Tellegen, "The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence," Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol.76, No.5, p.820, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.820
  25. M. Yik, J. A. Russell, and J. H. Steiger, "A 12-point circumplex structure of core affect," Emotion, Vol.11, No.4, p.705, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023980
  26. J. P. Meyer and N. J. Allen, Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application, Sage, 1997.
  27. J. A. Wagner III, "Studies of individualismcollectivism: Effects on cooperation in groups," Academy of Management journal, Vol.38, No.1, pp.152-173, 1995. https://doi.org/10.2307/256731
  28. C. Hulin, Adaptation, persistence, and commitment in organizations, Consulting Psychologists Press, 1991.
  29. J. P. Meyer and N. J. Allen, "A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment," Human resource management review, Vol.1, No.1, pp.61-89, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
  30. J. E. Mathieu, M. M. Luciano, L. D'Innocenzo, E. A. Klock, and J. A. LePine, "The development and construct validity of a team processes survey measure," Organizational Research Methods, Vol.23, No.3, pp.399-431, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428119840801