DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Strengthening Consequence Management System Against CBRN Threats

CBRN 위협에 대비한 사후관리체계 강화방안

  • Kwon, Hyuckshin (Seoul National University of Science & Technology) ;
  • Kwak, Minsu (Seoul National University of Science & Technology) ;
  • Kim, Kwanheon (Seoul National University of Science & Technology)
  • 권혁신 (서울과학기술대학교 국방방호공학과) ;
  • 곽민수 (서울과학기술대학교 국방방호공학과) ;
  • 김관헌 (서울과학기술대학교 국방방호공학과)
  • Received : 2019.11.14
  • Accepted : 2020.04.14
  • Published : 2020.08.01

Abstract

North Korea declared itself complete with nuclear force after its sixth nuclear test in 2017. Despite efforts at home and abroad to denuclearize the Korean Peninsula, the prospects for the denuclearization are not bright. Along with political and diplomatic efforts to deter NK's WMD threats, the government is required to strengthen its consequence management capabilities against 'catastrophic situations' expected in case of emergency. Accordingly, this study was conducted to present measures to strengthen follow-up management against CBRN threats. The research model was partially supplemented and utilized by the THIRA process adopted and utilized by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security among national-level disaster management plan development models. Korea's consequence management (CM) system encompasses risk and crisis management on disaster condition. The system has been carried out in the form of a civil, government and military integrated defense operations for the purpose of curbing the spread or use of CBRNs, responding to threats, and minimizing expected damages. The preventive stage call for the incorporation of CBRN concept and CM procedures into the national management system, supplementing the integrated alarm systems, preparation of evacuation facilities, and establishment of the integrated training systems. In the preparation phase, readjustment of relevant laws and manuals, maintenance of government organizations, developing performance procedures, establishing the on-site support systems, and regular training are essential. In the response phase, normal operations of the medical support system for first aid and relief, installation and operation of facilities for decontamination, and development of regional damage assessment and control guidelines are important. In the recovery phase, development of stabilization evaluation criteria and procedures, securing and operation of resources needed for damage recovery, and strengthening of regional damage recovery capabilities linked to local defense forces, reserve forces and civil defense committees are required.

북한은 2017년 6차 핵실험 이후 스스로 핵 무력의 완성을 선언하였다. 한반도 비핵화를 위한 국내외의 노력에도 불구하고 그 해결전망은 밝지 않다. 북한의 WMD위협을 억제하기 위한 정치·외교적 노력과 함께 유사시 예상되는 '재앙적 상황'에 대비한 사후관리 능력의 강화가 요구된다. 이에 따라 본 연구는 CBRN 위협에 대비한 사후관리 강화방안을 제시하기 위해 수행되었다. 연구모델은 국가 차원의 재난관리 계획발전모델 중 미 국토안보부가 채택하여 활용 중인 THIRA 프로세스를 일부 보완하여 활용하였다. 한국의 사후관리 체계는 재난에 대비한 위험관리와 위기관리를 포괄한다. 이 체계는 전·평시 CBRN의 확산 또는 사용의 억제, 위협의 대응, 예상피해 최소화 등을 목적으로 민·관·군 통합방위작전의 형태로 수행된다. 예방단계에는 CBRN의 개념과 사후관리 절차를 국가관리체계 속에 반영, 통합경보체계의 보완, 대피시설의 준비 그리고 통합훈련체계의 구축 등이 요구된다. 대비단계에는 관련 법규와 매뉴얼의 정비, 정부 조직의 정비와 수행절차의 발전, 통합대응이 가능한 현장 지원체계의 구축, 그리고 주기적인 훈련 등이 필수적이다. 대응단계에는 응급처치와 구호를 위한 의료지원체계의 정상가동, 제염시설의 설치 및 운영, 그리고 피해평가 및 통제지침의 발전이 중요하다. 복구단계에서는 안정화 평가 기준 및 절차의 발전, 피해복구에 필요한 자원의 확보 및 운용, 그리고 지역방위군과 향토예비군, 민방위가 연계된 지역피해복구 역량 강화가 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cha, J. H., Kang, T. H., Kim, D. S., Lee, H. C. (2019). "Study on police-led national response against CBRN terror by strengthening the standing cooperation system of the interagencies." Korean Security Journal, Vol. 59, pp. 217-242 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.36623/kssa.2019.59.9
  2. Cho, K. H. (2017). "A study on Korea's nuclear civil defense system construction against north Korea's nuclear attacks." Korean Journal of Military Affairs, Vol. 2, pp. 71-102 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.33528/kjma.2017.12.2.71
  3. Eun, J. H. (2010). "A study for applying the system of U.S.'s CM (Consequence Management) to Korea - Focused on WMD-CM." Crisisonomy, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 31-50.
  4. Ham, H. P. (2012). "Assessing the status of PSI and reinforcing ROK's utilization." The Quarterly Journal of Defense Policy Studies (JDPS), Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 169-203 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.22883/JDPS.2012.28.2.005
  5. Hur, J. Y. and Lee, J. H. (2014). "Study on building a disaster management system responding to future disaster -Using expert survey method-." Korean Review of Crisis & Emergency Managemen, Vol. 10, No. 10, pp. 173-195 (in Korean).
  6. Ju, S. H. (2016). "Implications of U.S. national disaster management system to Korea." Korean Journal of Local Government & Administration Studies, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 365-393 (in Korean).
  7. Kim, E. S. (2017). "An empirical study for efficient preparation for enhancing North Korean nuclear threat: Focusing on non-military field." Korean Security Science Review, Vol. 53, pp. 255-279 (in Korean).
  8. Kim, H. K. (2009). "A study on UK emergency management development -Focused on suggestions for the future of the Korean emergency management-." Journal of Police and Law, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 186-212 (in Korean).
  9. Kim, H. K. and Kang, W. (2017). "Learning from the UK disaster management and risk assessment systems." Korean Security Journal, Vol. 50, pp. 9-32 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.36623/kssa.2017.50.1
  10. Kim, H. M. (2016). "Republic of Korea's Direction for preparedness and response against NK's fourth nuclear test." The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, Vol.32, No.2, pp. 31-61 (in Korean).
  11. Kim, H. M. (2018). "A study for a national nuclear protection system establishment." The Quarterly Journal of Defense Policy Studies, Vol. 119, No. 1, pp. 37-70 (in Korean).
  12. Kim, Y. J. and Lim, S. B. (2018). "A study of the capability-based planning approach to emergency management in local communities." Korean Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 56, No. 3 , p p. 103-129 (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.24145/kjpa.56.3.4
  13. Lee, C. G. (2017). "Improvement of nuclear protection and civil defense system in response to North Korea's increase in nuclear threat." STEPI Insight, Vol. 217, pp. 1-25 (in Korean).
  14. Park, H. R. (2019a). "A comparison on nuclear defense measures of South Korea and Japan with implications for South Korea." Journal of Northeast Asia Studies, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 43-63 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.21807/JNAS.2019.03.90.043
  15. Park, J. W. (2019b). "North Koreas EMP threat and South Korea's response." Korea Journal of Military Affairs, Vol. 5, pp. 93-129 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.33528/kjma.2019.06.5.93
  16. Park, N. K. and Paik, S. K. (2014). "A study on the planning of civil defense shelter and design 1 -On the ideas of the state of civil defense shelter & design criteria-." Journal of the Society of Disaster Information, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 358-365 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.15683/kosdi.2014.10.3.358
  17. Petak, W. J. (1985). "Emergency management: A challenge for public administration." Public Administration Review, Vol. 45, pp. 3-7. https://doi.org/10.2307/3134992
  18. Yeo, W. H., Park, N. H., Kim, T. W. and Koo, W. Y. (2012). "Development of optimal evacuation model using civil defense evacuation facilities survey data." Journal of The Korean Society of Disaster Information, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 71-80 (in Korean).