KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research (대한토목학회논문집)

Korean Society of Civil Engeneers (대한토목학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Risk Influencing Factors in Performance of River Disaster Prevention Project

하천재해예방사업의 성과에 미치는 리스크 영향요인

  • Received : 2020.02.12
  • Accepted : 2020.03.27
  • Published : 2020.08.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The characteristics of the construction project involved various stakeholders' involvement from the planning stage until completion of the object, which caused the uncertainty to increase. Successful construction projects require risk analysis and appropriate responses. Therefore, this study aimed to confirm the influence of risk management factors on the success of river disaster prevention construction in construction projects and the effect of moderating communication between stakeholders involved in the construction process. The Delphi method was used to derive the risk management factors of the construction process. The survey used a snow ball sampling method. For analysis, SPSS Statistic 20 and SmartPLS 2.0 were used. As a result of the study, the impact of risk management factors on project performance was found to be large in the order of time risk, quality risk, cost risk, safety risk, and construction environment risk. In addition, the impact of the communication moderating effect was large in the order of cost risk, quality risk, construction environment risk, time risk, and safety risk. In this study, it was confirmed that communication between stakeholders related to river disaster prevention work has a moderating effect that changes the ranking of impacts on project performance. This shows the importance of communication in the construction process of river disaster prevention works. This study has important significance in that it identifies the importance of risk management factors and communication in river disaster prevention works.

건설프로젝트 특성은 기획단계에서부터 목적물이 완공될 때까지 다양한 이해관계자의 참여가 수반되며, 이러한 특성은 불확실성을 높이는 원인이 된다. 건설프로젝트 성공을 위해서는 리스크에 대한 분석과 적절한 대응이 필요하다. 따라서 본 연구는 건설프로젝트 중 하천재해예방사업의 성공을 위한 리스크 관리요인의 영향력과 시공과정에서 관련된 이해관계자 간의 커뮤니케이션 조절효과를 확인하고자 하였다. 시공과정의 리스크 관리요인의 도출은 델파이기법과 설문조사는 스노우볼 샘플링 방법을 그리고 분석은 SPSS Statistic 20과 SmartPLS 2.0을 이용하였다. 연구결과, 프로젝트 성과에 대한 리스크 관리 요소의 영향력은 공기리스크, 품질리스크, 원가리스크, 안전리스크, 건설환경리스크 순으로 나타났다. 또한, 커뮤니케이션 조절효과의 영향력은 원가리스크, 품질리스크, 건설환경리스크, 공기리스크, 안전리스크 순으로 나타났다. 본 연구에서 하천재해예방사업 관련 이해관계자 간의 커뮤니케이션은 프로젝트성과에 미치는 영향력의 순위를 바꿀 만큼 조절효과가 있다는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 이는 하천재해예방사업 시공과정에서 커뮤니케이션의 중요성을 보여주는 결과이다. 본 연구는 하천재해예방사업의 리스크 관리요인과 커뮤니케이션의 중요성을 규명했다는 점에서 중요한 의의를 가진다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, S. H. (2015). "Case study on risk identification in construction projects." Korean Institute of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 15-23 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2015.16.1.015
  2. Ahn, S. S. and Chung, J. M. (2018). "A study on the influential factors to power plant construction project quality control: Focused on collective civil complaints of nuclear power plant construction." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management, KSQM, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 351-374 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2018.46.2.351
  3. Chapman, R. J. (2001). "The controlling influences on effective risk identification and assessment for construction design management." International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 147-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00070-8
  4. Chin, W. W. (1998). "The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling." Modern Methods for Business Research, Vol. 295, No. 2, pp. 295-336.
  5. Cho, J. H. (2017). "An empirical study on top management's leadership in construction quality management activities and construction quality management performance." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management, KSQM, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 403-426 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2017.45.3.403
  6. Choi, J. H., Sohn, H. W. and Kim, S. K. (2011). "Key performance indicators of building project." Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 61-72 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIC.2011.02.1.061
  7. Cohen, S. and Brand, R. (1990). "Total quality management in the us environmental protection agency." Public Productivity & Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 99-114. https://doi.org/10.2307/3380525
  8. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. (1981). "Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics." Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 382-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313
  9. Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. and Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), SAGE Publications, California, USA.
  10. Han, S. H., Lee, Y., Kim, H. J. and Ock, J. H. (2001). "A study on the corporate portfolio risk management for multinational construction company." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KJCEM, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 68-80 (in Korean).
  11. Hong, S. W., Kim, H. I. and Ahn, Y. S. (2003). "A study on the actual condition analysis and improvement direction of risk management in Korean construction companies." Korean Institute of Architectural Studies-Structure, Vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 153-160 (in Korean).
  12. Jung, T. S. (2005). "The research and correspondence of schedule risk management at the pre-construction phase of curtain-wall." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KJCEM, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 71-79 (in Korean).
  13. Jung, W. J. (2016). "A study on PR communication strategies for enhancing governance effect of public conflict in energy facilities business; focusing on milyang transmission line construction project." Public Relations Studies, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 84-112 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.15814/jpr.2016.20.3.84
  14. Kang, S. J. and Hong, J. P. (2014). "A study on economic evaluation of SNG project using real option valuation model." Transactions of the Korean Hydrogen and New Energy Society, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 319-335 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.7316/KHNES.2014.25.3.319
  15. Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P. (2001). "Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: Part I." Accounting Horizons, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 87-104. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2001.15.1.87
  16. Kim, H. Y., Kang, S. B. and Lee, J. H. (2013). "Wiki-based expert knowledge collaboration effects on performance of project members." Journal of Information Technology Services, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 173-187 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.9716/KITS.2013.12.1.173
  17. Kwon, D. S. and Kim, J. H. (2011). "The effects of self-determination theory on reality, flow in online community." The Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 177-206 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.5859/KAIS.2011.20.2.177
  18. Lee, S. K., Lee, H. L. and Yu, J. H. (2010). "The effect of PMIS quality on project management success." Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction, Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 117-126 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIC.2010.12.6.117
  19. Lee, T. W., Park, N. S. and Kim, S. C. (2014). "A study on the effect of risk management factors on project performance in construction projects." Korea Project Management Research, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 1-11 (in Korean).
  20. Seo, J. W., Yoon, J. H., Kim, J. H. and Jee, S. H. (2010). "Development of risk analysis structure for large-scale underground construction in urban areas." Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 59-68 (in Korean).
  21. Zhi, H. (1995). "Risk management for overseas construction projects." International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 231-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(95)00015-I