Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association (한국가정과교육학회지)

Korea Home Economics Education Association (한국가정과교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study on Korean and American High School Home Economics Textbooks Based on Habermas's Three Systems of Action: Focusing on the Learning Objectives and Activities

Habermas의 세 행동체계의 관점에서 본 한국과 미국의 고등학교 가정교과서 식생활 단원의 학습목표와 활동과제 비교 연구

  • Received : 2020.02.22
  • Accepted : 2020.03.24
  • Published : 2020.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the dietary life units of Korean and American high school home economics textbook according to Habermas's three systems of action and to find out how the three systems of action are reflected in the learning objectives and activity tasks of the textbook. To achieve this purpose, this study analyzed the learning objectives and activity tasks of the dietary life units in the textbooks of 'technology & home economics' and 'home economics science' in Korea, and 'succeeding in life and career' in America using a content analysis technique based on Habermas's three systems of action. In analyzing the content, each learning objective or activity was matched with one of the three systems of action by examining the context. In some cases, two or more systems of actions were integrated in one activity. This is a case where a series of learning tasks that involve different action system were grouped into one. The numbers of learning objectives and activities of the units of 'technology & home economics', 'home economics science' textbooks of Korean high schools and 'succeeding in life and career' dietary life of American high schools were 3, 26, and 248, respectively. In Korean textbooks, the percentage of communicative action was highest among the three systems, that is, 66.7% for 'technology & home economics' textbooks and 50% for 'home economics science' textbooks. In comparison technical action was the highest in American textbooks at 66.5%. Activities related to technical action included cooking, conducting research on health and food, or conducting experiments. The activities related to communicative action included role play related to health and table manners, or writing reports after conducting surveys or interviewing professionals. The activities related to emancipative action were to social participation activities such as service project in relation to health and food, or to find problems that occur in dietary life and think about be best solution through practical reasoning.

본 연구의 목적은 우리나라와 미국의 고등학교 가정교과서 식생활 단원을 Habermas의 세 행동체계에 따라 분석하여 세가지 행동체계가 교과서의 학습 목표와 활동과제에 어떻게 반영되어 있는지 알아보는 데 있다. 이러한 목적을 이루기 위해서 우리나라 고등학교 '기술·가정', '가정과학', 미국 고등학교 'Succeeding in life and career' 교과서에서 식생활 단원의 학습목표와 활동과제를 Habermas의 세 행동체계를 기준으로 내용분석 기법을 사용하여 분석하였다. 분석방법은 문장을 통해 맥락 파악이 명확한 것을 해당 행동체계에 상응시켰다. 분석과정에서 한 개로 묶여 있지만 학습 활동이 여러 가지로 되어있으면서 행동체계가 달리 나타나는 경우에는 2가지 이상의 행동체계가 통합되어 있는 것으로 분석하였다. 우리나라 고등학교 '기술·가정', '가정과학' 교과서와 미국 고등학교 교과서' Succeeding in life and career' 식생활 단원의 학습 목표와 활동과제 수는 각각 3개, 26개, 248개로 나타났다. 우리나라 교과서는 의사소통적 행동의 비율이 '기술·가정' 교과서 66.7%, '가정과학' 교과서 50%로 가장 많은 것으로 나타났고, 미국 교과서는 기술적 행동의 비율이 66.5%로 가장 많은 것으로 나타났다. 기술적 행동과 관련된 활동과제들은 음식을 만들거나, 건강이나 음식에 대한 정보를 조사하거나, 조리 실험 등이 있었다. 의사소통적 행동과 관련된 활동과제들은 건강, 식사 예절과 관련된 역할극을 하거나, 직업 인터뷰나 설문 조사를 하여 결과를 작성하는 활동 등이 있었다. 해방적 행동과 관련된 활동과제들은 건강과 음식과 관련하여 봉사프로젝트 등 사회에 참여하는 활동이나, 식생활에서 일어나는 문제를 찾아 실천적 추론을 통해서 최선의 해결방안을 생각해보는 것이 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Brown, M. M. (1980). What is home economics education?. Minnesota Research and Development Center for Vocational Education. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
  2. Brown, M. M., & Paolucci, B. (1979). Home Economics: A definition. Washington, DC: American Home Economics Association.
  3. Choi, H. J., Kim, K. H., Kim E. J., Hong, E. J., Kwon, H. S., & Kwon, Y. M. (2018). 고등학교 가정과학 [High school home economics science]. Seoul: Chunjae textbook.
  4. Choi, S. E., & Chae, J.-H. (2014). Development of smart education-based teaching and learning plans and a smart textbook for 'healthy diet and meal plans' unit in 'technology & home economics'. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education, 26(4), 85-114.
  5. Choi, S., & Ju, S. (2018). Development teaching-learning plan for 'food and nutrition unit' of home economics based on backward design model. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education, 30(3), 175-193. doi:10.19031/jkheea.2018.09.30.3.175
  6. Choi, S.-Y., Lee, Y.-S., Choi, Y.-J., Joo, H.-J., Kim, S.-H., & Park, M.-J. (2018). Analysis of activities task using multiple intelligence in middle school 'technology & home economics' textbooks. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 30(3), 19-42. doi:10.19031/jkheea.2018.09.30.3.19
  7. Coomer, D., Hittman, L., & Fedje, C. (1997). Questioning: A teaching strategy and everyday life strategy. In J. Laster, & R. Thomas (Eds.), Thinking for ethical action in families and communities (pp. 173-183). (Family and Consumer Sciences Teacher Education Yearbook 17). Peoria, ILL: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill.
  8. Fox, W. S. (2007). Process framework for the national standards for family and consumer sciences education. Retrieved from http://www.nasafacs.org/process-frameworks.html
  9. Habermas, J. (1987). Knowledge and human interests. (J. J. Shapiro, Trans.). Malden, MA: Polity Press. (Original work published 1968).
  10. Jang, Y.-M., & Kim, Y. K. (2018). Content analysis of food and nutrition unit in middle school textbooks of home economics: focus on the national curriculums from 1st to 2009 revised. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education, 30(4), 93-112. doi:10.19031/jkheea.2018.12.30.4.93
  11. Jeon, S. K. (2010). Educational meanings and effective practical plans of school dietary life education. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education, 22(1), 117-135.
  12. Ju, S., & Yoo, T. (2015). Integrative home economics curriculum development from a critical science perspective through deliberation. Family and Environment Research, 53(4), 447-461. https://doi.org/10.6115/fer.2015.036
  13. Kim, J.-H. (2010). Studies inquiry on school dietary education in the home economics education. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education, 22(3), 189-203.
  14. Kim, J. H., Jeon, S. K., & Lee, M. J. (2010). A study of integrated dietary education programs based on textbook and curriculum for elementary school students(II)- Part 2: Application of Integrated Dietary Education Programs Based on Curriculum for Elementary School Students. Journal of Korean practical arts education, 23(4), 1-18.
  15. Kim, J.-H., & Kim, Y.-K. (2010). Dietary education support act and middle school dietary education. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education, 22(4), 1-13.
  16. Kim, Y.-H. (2010). A study on the needs of dietary education of high school students in Daegu and Gyeongbuk province. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education, 22(4), 77-90.
  17. Kim, Y.-J., & Chae, J.-H. (2018). Development and evaluation of Home Economics teaching.learning process plans applied problem based learning focusing on 'food and nutrition' unit: For students with intellectual disability. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education, 30(2), 39-56.
  18. Laster, J. F. (1982). A practical action teaching model. Journal of Home Economics, 74(3), 41-44.
  19. Lee, C. S., Song, J. W., Kwon, H. S., Yoon, Y. J., Kim, D. N., Kim, J. W.,...Kwon, Y. M. (2018). 고등학교 기술.가정 [High school technology & home economics]. Seoul: Chunjae textbook.
  20. Lee, H.-J., & Cho, J.-S. (2005). Importance of objectives of housing unit in home economics by three systems of action of home economics teachers in middle school. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education, 17(4), 117-131.
  21. Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development. (2007). 실과(기술.가정) 교육과정 [Practical arts(technology and home economics) curriculum] Notice No. 2007-79 [separate 10].
  22. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. (2011). 실과(기술.가정) 교육과정 [Practical arts(technology and home economics)]. Notice No. 2011-361 [separate 10].
  23. Ministry of Education. (2015). 실과(기술.가정)/정보과 교육과정 [Practical arts(technology and home economics) / Informatics curriculum]. Notice No. 2015-74 [Separate 10].
  24. Montgomery, B. (2008). Curriculum development: A critical science perspective. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 26(National Teacher Standards 3). Retrieved from http://www.natefacs.org/Pages/v26Standards3/v26Standards3Montgomery.pdf
  25. National Association of State Administrators for Family and Consumer Sciences (NASAFACS). (1998). National standards for family and consumer sciences education. Decatur, GA: Vocational-Technical Education Consortium of States.
  26. National Association of State Administrators for Family and Consumer Sciences (NASAFACS). (2008a). National standard for family and consumer sciences education. (2nd ed.). Decatur, GA: Vocational-Technical Education Consortium of States.
  27. National Association of State Administrators of Family and Consumer Sciences (2008b). National standards for FCS reasoning for action framework, standards & competencies, and process questions. Retrieved from http://www.nasafacs.org/uploads/1/8/3/9/18396981/process_framework_2019.pdf
  28. National Association of State Administrators of Family and Consumer Sciences. (2018). Family and consumer sciences national standards 3.0. Retrieved from http://www.nasafacs.org/national-standards-overview.html
  29. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. (2019). North Carolina Career and technical education. Retrieved from https://www.dpi.nc.gov/districts-schools/classroom-resources/career-and-technical-education/curriculum
  30. Oh, Y. H., & Chae, J. H. (2005). Middle school home economics teacher's family value and needs on leaning objective of family life area according to the three systems of action. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education, 17(2), 239-255.
  31. Parnell, F. B. (2017). Succeeding in life and career: Foundations of human studies, 11 Edition. Wilmington, NC: The Goodheart-Willcox Company, Inc.
  32. Ryu, H. R., Chong, Y. S., & Chae, J. H. (1997). A study needs perception toward education purposes of home economics subject in middle schools. Korean Journal of Human Ecology, 6(1), 111-127.
  33. Seo, D. S. (2006). 하버마스 '인식과 관심' [Habermas 'Knowledge and human interests']. Seoul: Seoul National University Institute of Philosophy and Thought.
  34. Staaland, E., & Strom, S. (1996). Family, food, and society: A teacher's guide. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
  35. Vincenti, V. B. (1993). Professional identity: Interferences within. In E. P. Anderson, & V. L. Clark, (Eds.). Marketing home economics: Issues and practices (pp. 41-62). Yearbook 13 of the American Home Economics Association. Peoria, IL: Macmillan McGraw-Hill.
  36. Yang, S. J., Chae, J. H., Yu, N. S., & Park, M. J. (2015). The analysis of duplicated contents of 'food and nutrition unit' of home economics and other subject textbooks for the middle school students. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education, 27(1), 31-50. doi:10.19031/jkheea.2015.03.27.1.31
  37. Yoo, N. S., & Kim, Y. N. (1997). Teacher's needs assessment on food/nutrition of secondary home economics education for three systems of action. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education, 9(1), 83-94.
  38. Yoon, P. J. (2000). 푸코와 하버마스를 넘어서 [Beyond Foucault and Habermas]. Seoul: Kyobo Bookstore.

Cited by

  1. 원격학습 환경에서 가정교과 실천적 추론 과정에 대한 중학생의 요구도 조사연구 vol.33, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2021.3.33.1.1