참고문헌
- Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, G. Hinton, Deep learning, Nature 521 (7553) (2015) 436. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539
- L. Deng, D. Yu, et al., Deep learning: methods and applications, Foundations and Trends(R) in Signal Processing 7 (3-4) (2014) 197-387.
- T. Poggio, H. Mhaskar, L. Rosasco, B. Miranda, Q. Liao, Why and when can deep-but not shallow-networks avoid the curse of dimensionality: a review, Int. J. Autom. Comput. 14 (5) (2017) 503-519.
- S.M. Erfani, S. Rajasegarar, S. Karunasekera, C. Leckie, High-dimensional and large-scale anomaly detection using a linear one-class SVM with deep learning, Pattern Recognit. 58 (2016) 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2016.03.028
- E. Keogh, A. Mueen, Curse of dimensionality, in: Encyclopedia of Machine Learning, Springer, 2011, pp. 257-258.
- R.C. Smith, Uncertainty Quantification: Theory, Implementation, and Applications, vol. 12, Siam, 2013.
- A. Saltelli, M. Ratto, T. Andres, F. Campolongo, J. Cariboni, D. Gatelli, M. Saisana, S. Tarantola, Global Sensitivity Analysis: the Primer, John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
- A.I. Forrester, A.J. Keane, Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization, Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 45 (1-3) (2009) 50-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2008.11.001
- K.K. Vu, C. D'Ambrosio, Y. Hamadi, L. Liberti, Surrogate-based methods for black-box optimization, Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 24 (3) (2017) 393-424. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12292
- J.D. Martin, T.W. Simpson, Use of kriging models to approximate deterministic computer models, AIAA J. 43 (4) (2005) 853-863. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.8650
- A. Marrel, B. Iooss, F. Van Dorpe, E. Volkova, An efficient methodology for modeling complex computer codes with Gaussian processes, Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 52 (10) (2008) 4731-4744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2008.03.026
- M.D. Buhmann, Radial Basis Functions: Theory and Implementations, vol. 12, Cambridge university press, 2003.
- S. Chan, A.H. Elsheikh, A machine learning approach for efficient uncertainty quantification using multiscale methods, J. Comput. Phys. 354 (2018) 493-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2017.10.034
- B. Sudret, Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 93 (7) (2008) 964-979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2007.04.002
- R. Tripathy, I. Bilionis, Deep UQ: learning deep neural network surrogate models for high dimensional uncertainty quantification, J. Comput. Phys. 375 (2018) 565-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.08.036
- Y. Zhu, N. Zabaras, Bayesian deep convolutional encoderedecoder networks for surrogate modeling and uncertainty quantification, J. Comput. Phys. 366 (2018) 415-447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.04.018
- A.G. Ivakhnenko, The group method of data of handling; a rival of the method of stochastic approximation, Soviet Automatic Control 13 (1968) 43-55.
- A.G. Ivakhnenko, Polynomial theory of complex systems, IEEE Trans. Sys. Man Cybern. (4) (1971) 364-378. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1971.4308320
- J. Schmidhuber, Deep learning in neural networks: an overview, Neural Netw. 61 (2015) 85-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003
- S.J. Farlow, The GMDH algorithm of ivakhnenko, Am. Statistician 35 (4) (1981) 210-215. https://doi.org/10.2307/2683292
- A. Ivakhnenko, G. Ivakhnenko, The review of problems solvable by algorithms of the group method of data handling (GMDH), Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis C/C of Raspoznavaniye Obrazov I, Analiz Izobrazhenii 5 (1995) 527-535.
- A. Ivakhnenko, Heuristic self-organization in problems of engineering cybernetics, Automatica 6 (2) (1970) 207-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(70)90092-0
- X. Jia, Y. Di, J. Feng, Q. Yang, H. Dai, J. Lee, Adaptive virtual metrology for semiconductor chemical mechanical planarization process using GMDH-type polynomial neural networks, J. Process Control 62 (2018) 44-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2017.12.004
- T. Kondo, J. Ueno, Multi-layered GMDH-type neural network self-selecting optimum neural network architecture and its application to 3-dimensional medical image recognition of blood vessels, Int. J. Innov. Comput. Inf. Control 4 (1) (2008) 175-187.
- M. Witczak, J. Korbicz, M. Mrugalski, R.J. Patton, A GMDH neural networkbased approach to robust fault diagnosis: application to the damadics benchmark problem, Contr. Eng. Pract. 14 (6) (2006) 671-683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2005.04.007
- S. Dolati, N. Amanifard, H.M. Deylami, Numerical study and GMDH-type neural networks modeling of plasma actuator effects on the film cooling over a flat plate, Appl. Therm. Eng. 123 (2017) 734-745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.05.149
- X. Tian, V. Becerra, N. Bausch, T. Santhosh, G. Vinod, A study on the robustness of neural network models for predicting the break size in LOCA, Prog. Nucl. Energy 109 (2018) 12-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2018.07.004
- T. Cong, G. Su, S. Qiu, W. Tian, Applications of ANNs in flow and heat transfer problems in nuclear engineering: a review work, Prog. Nucl. Energy 62 (2013) 54-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2012.09.003
- M.-G. Park, H.-C. Shin, Reactor power shape synthesis using group method of data handling, Ann. Nucl. Energy 72 (2014) 467-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.06.010
- F. Khoshahval, S. Yum, H.C. Shin, J. Choe, P. Zhang, D. Lee, Smart sensing of the axial power and offset in NPPs using GMDH method, Ann. Nucl. Energy 121 (2018) 77-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.07.007
- B. Lu, B. Upadhyaya, Monitoring and fault diagnosis of the steam generator system of a nuclear power plant using data-driven modeling and residual space analysis, Ann. Nucl. Energy 32 (9) (2005) 897-912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2005.02.003
- H. Kim, M.G. Na, G. Heo, Application of monitoring, diagnosis, and prognosis in thermal performance analysis for nuclear power plants, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 46 (6) (2014) 737-752. https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.04.2014.720
- H.R. Madala, A.G. Ivakhnenko, Inductive Learning Algorithms for Complex Systems Modeling, vol. 368, cRc press, Boca Raton, 1994.
- H. Akaike, A new look at the statistical model identification, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 19 (6) (1974) 716-723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
- C.E. Rasmussen, Gaussian processes in machine learning, in: Advanced Lectures on Machine Learning, Springer, 2004, pp. 63-71.
- C. Lataniotis, S. Marelli, B. Sudret, UQlab user manualekriging (Gaussian process modelling), Rep. UQLab-V0 (2015) 9-105.
- G. Blatman, B. Sudret, Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on least angle regression, J. Comput. Phys. 230 (6) (2011) 2345-2367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2010.12.021
- R.G. Ghanem, P.D. Spanos, Stochastic finite element method: response statistics, in: Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach, Springer, 1991, pp. 101-119.
- S. Marelli, B. Sudret, UQlab User ManualePolynomial Chaos Expansions, Chair of Risk, Safety & Uncertainty Quantification, ETH Zurich, 0.9-104 edition.
- S. Marelli, B. Sudret, UQlab: a framework for uncertainty quantification in Matlab, in: Vulnerability, Uncertainty, and Risk: Quantification, and Management, Mitigation, 2014, pp. 2554-2563.
- B. Neykov, F. Aydogan, L. Hochreiter, K. Ivanov, H. Utsuno, F. Kasahara, E. Sartori, M. Martin, NUPEC BWR full-size fine-mesh bundle test (BFBT) benchmark, in: Tech. rep., Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(OECD), Nuclear Energy Agency, 2006.
- M.I. Radaideh, K. Borowiec, T. Kozlowski, Integrated framework for model assessment and advanced uncertainty quantification of nuclear computer codes under bayesian statistics, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 189 (2019) 357-377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.04.020
- X. Wu, T. Kozlowski, H. Meidani, K. Shirvan, Inverse uncertainty quantification using the modular Bayesian approach based on Gaussian process, Part 2: application to trace, Nucl. Eng. Des. 335 (2018) 417-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.06.003
- N.V. Queipo, R.T. Haftka, W. Shyy, T. Goel, R. Vaidyanathan, P.K. Tucker, Surrogate- based analysis and optimization, Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 41 (1) (2005) 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.001
- U.S.NRC, TRACE v5.840 Theory Manual: Fields Equations, Solution Methods, and Physical Models, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., United States.
- S.M. Bowman, SCALE 6: comprehensive nuclear safety analysis code system, Nucl. Technol. 174 (2) (2011) 126-148.
- B.T. Rearden, M.A. Jessee, SCALE Code System, Tech. rep., Oak Ridge National Lab.(ORNL), 2018. Oak Ridge, TN (United States).
- M.I. Radaideh, S. Surani, D. O'Grady, T. Kozlowski, Shapley effect application for variance-based sensitivity analysis of the few-group cross-sections, Ann. Nucl. Energy 129 (2019) 264-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2019.02.002
- N. Horelik, B. Herman, B. Forget, K. Smith, Benchmark for evaluation and validation of reactor simulations (BEAVRS), v1. 0.1, in: Proc. Int. Conf. Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuc. Sci. & Eng, 2013. Sun Valley, Idaho, United States, May 5-9.
- I.M. Sobol, Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models, Math. Model. Civ. Eng. 1 (4) (1993) 407-414.
- G. Glen, K. Isaacs, Estimating sobol sensitivity indices using correlations, Environ. Model. Softw 37 (2012) 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.03.014
피인용 문헌
- Neural-based time series forecasting of loss of coolant accidents in nuclear power plants vol.160, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113699
- MODELING NUCLEAR DATA UNCERTAINTIES USING DEEP NEURAL NETWORKS vol.247, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202124715016