Communications of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of One-to-Many Tutoring Mathematics Cooperative Learning on the Cognitive and Affective Domains of High School Students

일대다 튜토링 수학 협동학습이 고등학생의 인지적·정의적 영역에 미치는 영향

  • Received : 2020.03.19
  • Accepted : 2020.05.14
  • Published : 2020.05.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study constructed an experiment group and a comparative group, composed of high school students preparing for "Na" type math exam and provided one-to-many tutoring cooperative learning. This study tested the differences between group and between pre- and post-treatment scores by group using non-parametric statistics techniques. Moreover, this study conducted an open-type survey twice and had individual interviews to examine the affective domains of students. The difference in scores between the experimental group and the comparative group was not significant. However, the difference between pre- and post-treatment math scores was only significant in the experiment group among the three groups. Additionally, the student-teacher could reflect on him or her and improve self-efficacy while teaching other ordinary students. The ordinary students were more interested and motivated in the lessons and became more confident. In terms of mathematics competency, we could see that communication, problem-solving, reasoning, and attitude & practice were improved.

본 연구는 고등학생을 대상으로 실험집단과 비교집단을 구성하고, 일대다(一對多) 튜토링 협동학습을 실시하였다. 집단 간 점수 차이와 집단별 사전·사후 점수 차이에 대한 유의성 검증은 비모수 통계기법을 사용하였으며, 학생들의 정의적 영역을 살펴보기 위하여 개방형 설문조사 2회와 개별 면담하였다. 실험집단과 비교집단 간 점수 차이는 통계적으로 유의하지 않았지만, 세 집단의 사전·사후 수학 점수 차이 검증 결과는 실험집단만 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있었다. 그리고 학생교사는 일반학생을 가르치는 동안 자신을 성찰하고 자기효능감이 향상되었으며, 일반학생은 학생교사에게 도움을 받음으로써 수업에 대한 재미와 관심을 더 두게 되고 자신감이 향상되었다. 수학 교과 역량 측면은 의사소통, 문제해결, 추론, 태도 및 실천 역량이 향상되었음을 알 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Education (2015). Mathematics and curriculum, Ministry of Education Notice no. 2015-74 [appendix 8].
  2. Ministry of Education, Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity(2015). A Study on developing 2015 Revised Mathematics Curriculum II , Research Report BD15110002.
  3. Ku, B. D. (2014). A Meta-Analysis on the Effects of Academic Achievement in Cooperative Learning, Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 14(12), 91-114.
  4. Park, S. I. & Goh, B. O. (2004). The development of web based teaching and learning system for the efficient operation of "professional learning activity" model, JOURNAL OF The Korean Association of information Education, 8(3), 293-306.
  5. Park, H. H. (2007). The effect of reciprocal peer tutoring to mathematical achievement and self-efficacy in the underachiever class of the middle school, Ewha Womans University Master's Degree.
  6. Seo, J. J. (2002). A basic study on collaborative learning in mathematics, Series E: Communications of mathematical education, 14, 229-250.
  7. An, J. S. (2018). The effect of mathematical disposition and learning attitude in instruction utilizing STAD cooperative learning model, Series E: Communications of mathematical education, 32(2), 147-174.
  8. Yang, M. K. (2011). Exploring the principles of collaborative learning for realization of collective intelligence, The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 23(2), 457-483. https://doi.org/10.17927/TKJEMS.2011.23.2.457
  9. Yoo, K. J. (2015). High School Students' and Teachers' Perception for the Main Causes of the good Mathematics Teaching, Dankook University Doctor's Degree.
  10. Yoo, K. J. & Kim, C. I. (2016). The Effects of Math Textbook Project Learning(MtPL) on Affective Domain, School Mathematics, 18(3), 479-501.
  11. Yoo, K. J., Kim, C. I. & Choi-Koh, S. S. (2016). Comparison of High School Math Teachers' Preferences for 'Good Mathematics Teaching', The Mathematical Education, 55(1), 129-145. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2016.55.1.129
  12. Yoo, S. E. & Son, H. C. (2016). A study on the effect of applying jigsaw cooperative learning on mathematical affective characteristics of vocational high school students, Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 19(3), 309-328.
  13. Yoon, J, G. (2000). Postmodernism, Constructivism, and the Images of a Desirable Teacher, The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 17(3), 213-229.
  14. Yoon, K. Y., Jeong, M. S., Kang, M. B. & Noh, S. K. (2013). Models of instruction, Seoul: Dongmunsa.
  15. Lee, J. K. (2005). A historical study of cooperative learning for mathematics, The Korean journal for history of mathematics, 18(2), 55-74.
  16. Lee, H. J. & Ko, H. K. (2015). The effect of cooperative learning and peer tutoring program on cognitive domain and affective aomain : a meta-analysis, Journal of educational research in mathematics, 25(1), 113-137.
  17. Lim, J. T., Cho, M. G., Bak, J. S. & Lim, S. Y. (2018). An analysis of the record types of student-participatory curriculum activities in school transcripts, Admission Studies, 6, 65-98.
  18. Rim, J. M., Kim, S. K. & Park, J. H. (2018). Development of Assessment Framework and Items of NAEA Considering the Math Competencies of the 2015 Revised Mathematics Curriculum, School Mathematics, 20(1), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.29275/sm.2018.03.20.1.65
  19. Jang, Y. R. (2017). Selected one of the top 100 best school by the Ministry of Education...Developed cases such as 'participation class', Retrieved from http://moneys.mt.co.kr/news/mwView.php?type=1&no=2017121414498067411&outlink=1. (2017.12.30.)
  20. Jang, E. J. (2004). The Effects of goal structure strategy and team effectiveness on performance of students in wbe-based Project-Based Learning, Journal of Educational Technology, 20(2), 53-82.
  21. Jung, M. J. & Kwon, S. Y. (2011). A study on the effects of the peer tutoring on mathematical inclination and mathematical communication ability of peer tutors, School Mathematics, 13(1), 127-153.
  22. Choi, S. H. (2018). Mathematics teachers' discursive competency : based on the formation process of social norm and sociomathematical norm, Korea University Doctor's Degree.
  23. Choi, S. H. & Kim, D. J. (2019). A mathematics teacher's discursive competence on the basis of mathematical competencies, Series E: Communications of mathematical education, 33(3), 377-394.
  24. Choi, S., Ha, J. & Kim, D. (2016). A communicational approach to mathematical process appeared in a peer mentoring teaching method, Communications of Mathematical Education, 30(3), 375-392. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2016.30.3.375
  25. Choi, W. (2010). A study on the Pythagorean theorem using Quilt based on Jigsaw model among the small grouping activity, Journal of Science Education for the Gifted, 2(2), 1-18.
  26. Choi, E. Y. (2007). Learners' Experiences during Cooperative Learning in a College English Reading Classroom, English 21, 20(1), 133-180.
  27. Han, J. Y., Han, S. J. & Noh, T. H. (2002). The Effect of Grouping by Students' Agreeableness in Cooperative Learning, Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 22(4), 717-724.
  28. Hong, S. J. & Kim, I. S (2011). Pre-Service Teachers' Experience of the Jigsaw Cooperative Learning, The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 23(2), 277-298. https://doi.org/10.17927/TKJEMS.2011.23.2.277
  29. Hwang, I. S. & Lee, J. W. (2012). Analysis for cooperative learning effect with jigsaw model I, Educational Research, 55, 103-149. https://doi.org/10.17253/swueri.2012.55..004
  30. Chao, G. T., Walz, P. & Gardner, P. D. (1992). Formal and informal mentorships: A comparison on mentoring functions and contrast with nonmentored counterparts, Personnel psychology, 45(3), 619-636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1992.tb00863.x
  31. Gaustad, J. (1993). Peer and cross-Age tutoring, ERIC Digest 79. Retrieved from https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1794/3300/digest079.pdf?seque(2018.12.20.)
  32. Hossain, M. (2018). Integration of structured cooperative learning in mathematics classrooms, International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 5(1), 23-29. https://doi.org/10.17220/ijpes.2018.01.004
  33. Jenkins, J. & Jenkins, L. (1985). Peer tutoring in elementary and secondary programs, Focus on Exceptional Children, 17(6), 1-12.
  34. Karcher, M. J. (2005). Cross-age peer mentoring, Handbook of youth mentoring, 2, 233-257.
  35. Kopparla, M. & Goldsby, D. (2019). Preservice teacher experiences in formal and informal cooperative learning groups in a mathematics course, Journal of Instructional Research, 8(1), 51-61.
  36. Niss, M., & Hojgaard, T. (Eds.) (2011). Competencies and mathematical learning. Ideas and inspiration for the development of mathematics teaching and learning in Denmark. Roskilde: Roskilde Universitet.
  37. Slavin, R. E. (1983). Cooperative learning, Research on Teaching Monograph Series. Longman Inc., College Division, 1560 Broadway, New York, NY 10036.
  38. Slavin, R. E. (1987). Cooperative learning and the cooperative school, Educational leadership, 45(3), 7-13.
  39. Turgut, S. & Gulsen Turgut, I. (2018). The effects of cooperative learning on mathematics achievement in turkey a meta-analysis study, International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 663-680. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11345a
  40. Warger, C. L. (1991). Peer tutoring: when working together is better than working alone, Research & Resources on Special Education, 30, 345-459.

Cited by

  1. Peer Tutoring Effects on Students’ Mathematics Anxiety: A Middle School Experience vol.11, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01610