Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2020.34.2.161

Effects of One-to-Many Tutoring Mathematics Cooperative Learning on the Cognitive and Affective Domains of High School Students  

Yoo, Ki Jong (Hyomyeong High School)
Publication Information
Communications of Mathematical Education / v.34, no.2, 2020 , pp. 161-177 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study constructed an experiment group and a comparative group, composed of high school students preparing for "Na" type math exam and provided one-to-many tutoring cooperative learning. This study tested the differences between group and between pre- and post-treatment scores by group using non-parametric statistics techniques. Moreover, this study conducted an open-type survey twice and had individual interviews to examine the affective domains of students. The difference in scores between the experimental group and the comparative group was not significant. However, the difference between pre- and post-treatment math scores was only significant in the experiment group among the three groups. Additionally, the student-teacher could reflect on him or her and improve self-efficacy while teaching other ordinary students. The ordinary students were more interested and motivated in the lessons and became more confident. In terms of mathematics competency, we could see that communication, problem-solving, reasoning, and attitude & practice were improved.
Keywords
Cooperative learning; Peer tutoring; Affective domain; Mathematics competency;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Hong, S. J. & Kim, I. S (2011). Pre-Service Teachers' Experience of the Jigsaw Cooperative Learning, The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 23(2), 277-298.   DOI
2 Hwang, I. S. & Lee, J. W. (2012). Analysis for cooperative learning effect with jigsaw model I, Educational Research, 55, 103-149.   DOI
3 Chao, G. T., Walz, P. & Gardner, P. D. (1992). Formal and informal mentorships: A comparison on mentoring functions and contrast with nonmentored counterparts, Personnel psychology, 45(3), 619-636.   DOI
4 Gaustad, J. (1993). Peer and cross-Age tutoring, ERIC Digest 79. Retrieved from https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1794/3300/digest079.pdf?seque(2018.12.20.)
5 Hossain, M. (2018). Integration of structured cooperative learning in mathematics classrooms, International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 5(1), 23-29.   DOI
6 Jenkins, J. & Jenkins, L. (1985). Peer tutoring in elementary and secondary programs, Focus on Exceptional Children, 17(6), 1-12.
7 Karcher, M. J. (2005). Cross-age peer mentoring, Handbook of youth mentoring, 2, 233-257.
8 Kopparla, M. & Goldsby, D. (2019). Preservice teacher experiences in formal and informal cooperative learning groups in a mathematics course, Journal of Instructional Research, 8(1), 51-61.
9 Niss, M., & Hojgaard, T. (Eds.) (2011). Competencies and mathematical learning. Ideas and inspiration for the development of mathematics teaching and learning in Denmark. Roskilde: Roskilde Universitet.
10 Slavin, R. E. (1983). Cooperative learning, Research on Teaching Monograph Series. Longman Inc., College Division, 1560 Broadway, New York, NY 10036.
11 Slavin, R. E. (1987). Cooperative learning and the cooperative school, Educational leadership, 45(3), 7-13.
12 Turgut, S. & Gulsen Turgut, I. (2018). The effects of cooperative learning on mathematics achievement in turkey a meta-analysis study, International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 663-680.   DOI
13 Warger, C. L. (1991). Peer tutoring: when working together is better than working alone, Research & Resources on Special Education, 30, 345-459.
14 An, J. S. (2018). The effect of mathematical disposition and learning attitude in instruction utilizing STAD cooperative learning model, Series E: Communications of mathematical education, 32(2), 147-174.
15 Ministry of Education (2015). Mathematics and curriculum, Ministry of Education Notice no. 2015-74 [appendix 8].
16 Ministry of Education, Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity(2015). A Study on developing 2015 Revised Mathematics Curriculum II , Research Report BD15110002.
17 Ku, B. D. (2014). A Meta-Analysis on the Effects of Academic Achievement in Cooperative Learning, Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 14(12), 91-114.
18 Park, S. I. & Goh, B. O. (2004). The development of web based teaching and learning system for the efficient operation of "professional learning activity" model, JOURNAL OF The Korean Association of information Education, 8(3), 293-306.
19 Park, H. H. (2007). The effect of reciprocal peer tutoring to mathematical achievement and self-efficacy in the underachiever class of the middle school, Ewha Womans University Master's Degree.
20 Seo, J. J. (2002). A basic study on collaborative learning in mathematics, Series E: Communications of mathematical education, 14, 229-250.
21 Yang, M. K. (2011). Exploring the principles of collaborative learning for realization of collective intelligence, The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 23(2), 457-483.   DOI
22 Yoo, K. J. (2015). High School Students' and Teachers' Perception for the Main Causes of the good Mathematics Teaching, Dankook University Doctor's Degree.
23 Yoo, K. J. & Kim, C. I. (2016). The Effects of Math Textbook Project Learning(MtPL) on Affective Domain, School Mathematics, 18(3), 479-501.
24 Yoo, K. J., Kim, C. I. & Choi-Koh, S. S. (2016). Comparison of High School Math Teachers' Preferences for 'Good Mathematics Teaching', The Mathematical Education, 55(1), 129-145.   DOI
25 Lee, J. K. (2005). A historical study of cooperative learning for mathematics, The Korean journal for history of mathematics, 18(2), 55-74.
26 Yoo, S. E. & Son, H. C. (2016). A study on the effect of applying jigsaw cooperative learning on mathematical affective characteristics of vocational high school students, Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 19(3), 309-328.
27 Yoon, J, G. (2000). Postmodernism, Constructivism, and the Images of a Desirable Teacher, The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 17(3), 213-229.
28 Yoon, K. Y., Jeong, M. S., Kang, M. B. & Noh, S. K. (2013). Models of instruction, Seoul: Dongmunsa.
29 Lim, J. T., Cho, M. G., Bak, J. S. & Lim, S. Y. (2018). An analysis of the record types of student-participatory curriculum activities in school transcripts, Admission Studies, 6, 65-98.
30 Lee, H. J. & Ko, H. K. (2015). The effect of cooperative learning and peer tutoring program on cognitive domain and affective aomain : a meta-analysis, Journal of educational research in mathematics, 25(1), 113-137.
31 Rim, J. M., Kim, S. K. & Park, J. H. (2018). Development of Assessment Framework and Items of NAEA Considering the Math Competencies of the 2015 Revised Mathematics Curriculum, School Mathematics, 20(1), 65-82.   DOI
32 Jang, Y. R. (2017). Selected one of the top 100 best school by the Ministry of Education...Developed cases such as 'participation class', Retrieved from http://moneys.mt.co.kr/news/mwView.php?type=1&no=2017121414498067411&outlink=1. (2017.12.30.)
33 Choi, S. H. & Kim, D. J. (2019). A mathematics teacher's discursive competence on the basis of mathematical competencies, Series E: Communications of mathematical education, 33(3), 377-394.
34 Jang, E. J. (2004). The Effects of goal structure strategy and team effectiveness on performance of students in wbe-based Project-Based Learning, Journal of Educational Technology, 20(2), 53-82.
35 Jung, M. J. & Kwon, S. Y. (2011). A study on the effects of the peer tutoring on mathematical inclination and mathematical communication ability of peer tutors, School Mathematics, 13(1), 127-153.
36 Choi, S. H. (2018). Mathematics teachers' discursive competency : based on the formation process of social norm and sociomathematical norm, Korea University Doctor's Degree.
37 Choi, S., Ha, J. & Kim, D. (2016). A communicational approach to mathematical process appeared in a peer mentoring teaching method, Communications of Mathematical Education, 30(3), 375-392.   DOI
38 Han, J. Y., Han, S. J. & Noh, T. H. (2002). The Effect of Grouping by Students' Agreeableness in Cooperative Learning, Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 22(4), 717-724.
39 Choi, W. (2010). A study on the Pythagorean theorem using Quilt based on Jigsaw model among the small grouping activity, Journal of Science Education for the Gifted, 2(2), 1-18.
40 Choi, E. Y. (2007). Learners' Experiences during Cooperative Learning in a College English Reading Classroom, English 21, 20(1), 133-180.