The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The reliability of Anycheck device related to healing abutment diameter

  • Lee, Dong-Hoon (Department of Prosthodontics, Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University Medicine, Korea University) ;
  • Shin, Yo-Han (Department of Prosthodontics, Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University Medicine, Korea University) ;
  • Park, Jin-Hong (Department of Prosthodontics, Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University Medicine, Korea University) ;
  • Shim, Ji-Suk (Department of Prosthodontics, Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University Medicine, Korea University) ;
  • Shin, Sang-Wan (Department of Prosthodontics, Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University Medicine, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Jeong-Yol (Department of Prosthodontics, Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University Medicine, Korea University)
  • Received : 2019.11.18
  • Accepted : 2020.02.25
  • Published : 2020.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. The purpose of this in vitro study was to examine the reliability of the Anycheck device and the effect of the healing abutment diameter on the Anycheck values (implant stability test, IST). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty implants were placed into three artificial bone blocks with 10 Ncm, 15 Ncm, and 35 Ncm insertion torque value (ITV), respectively (n = 10). (1) The implant stability was measured with three different kinds of devices (Periotest M, Osstell ISQ Mentor, and Anycheck). (2) Five different diameters (4.0, 4.5, 4.8, 5.5, and 6.0 mm) of healing abutments of the same height were connected to the implants and the implant stability was measured four times in different directions with Anycheck. The measured mean values were statistically analyzed. RESULTS. The correlation coefficient between the mean implant stability quotient (ISQ) and IST value was 0.981 (P<.01) and the correlation coefficient between the meant periotest value (PTV) and IST value was -0.931 (P<.01). There were no statistically significant differences among the IST values with different healing abutment diameters. CONCLUSION. There was a strong correlation between the Periotest M and Anycheck values and between the ISQ and IST. The diameter of the healing abutment had no effect on the Anycheck values.

Keywords

References

  1. Atsumi M, Park SH, Wang HL. Methods used to assess implant stability: current status. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:743-54.
  2. Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:491-501.
  3. Sennerby L, Roos J. Surgical determinants of clinical success of osseointegrated oral implants: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:408-20.
  4. Sennerby L, Meredith N. Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications. Periodontol 2000 2008;47:51-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2008.00267.x
  5. Ostman PO, Hellman M, Wendelhag I, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency analysis measurements of implants at placement surgery. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19:77-83; discussion 84.
  6. Hayashi M, Kobayashi C, Ogata H, Yamaoka M, Ogiso B. A no-contact vibration device for measuring implant stability. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:931-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01934.x
  7. Feng SW, Ho KN, Chan YH, Chang KJ, Lai WY, Huang HM. Damping factor as a diagnostic parameter for assessment of osseointegration during the dental implant healing process: An experimental study in rabbits. Ann Biomed Eng 2016;44:3668-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1675-6
  8. Alsaadi G, Quirynen M, Michiels K, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D. A biomechanical assessment of the relation between the oral implant stability at insertion and subjective bone quality assessment. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34:359-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01047.x
  9. Winkler S, Morris HF, Spray JR. Stability of implants and natural teeth as determined by the Periotest over 60 months of function. J Oral Implantol 2001;27:198-203. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2001)027<0198:SOIANT>2.3.CO;2
  10. Truhlar RS, Morris HF, Ochi S. Stability of the bone-implant complex. Results of longitudinal testing to 60 months with the Periotest device on endosseous dental implants. Ann Periodontol 2000;5:42-55. https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.42
  11. Pang KM, Lee JW, Lee JY, Lee JB, Kim SM, Kim MJ, Lee JH. Clinical outcomes of magnesium-incorporated oxidised implants: a randomised double-blind clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:616-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12091
  12. Oh JS, Kim SG, Lim SC, Ong JL. A comparative study of two noninvasive techniques to evaluate implant stability: Periotest and Osstell Mentor. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107:513-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.08.026
  13. Cehreli MC, Karasoy D, Akca K, Eckert SE. Meta-analysis of methods used to assess implant stability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:1015-32.
  14. Devlin H, Horner K, Ledgerton D. A comparison of maxillary and mandibular bone mineral densities. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:323-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70245-8
  15. Lachmann S, Laval JY, Jager B, Axmann D, Gomez-Roman G, Groten M, Weber H. Resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Part 2: peri-implant bone loss follow-up. An in vitro study with the Periotest and Osstell instruments. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:80-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01174.x
  16. Herrero-Climent M, Santos-Garcia R, Jaramillo-Santos R, Romero-Ruiz MM, Fernandez-Palacin A, Lazaro-Calvo P, Bullon P, Rios-Santos JV. Assessment of Osstell ISQ's reliability for implant stability measurement: a cross-sectional clinical study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2013;18:e877-82.
  17. Zix J, Hug S, Kessler-Liechti G, Mericske-Stern R. Measurement of dental implant stability by resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment: comparison of both techniques in a clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:525-30.
  18. Andreotti AM, Goiato MC, Nobrega AS, Freitas da Silva EV, Filho HG, Pellizzer EP, Micheline Dos Santos D. Relationship between implant stability measurements obtained by two different devices: A systematic review. J Periodontol 2017;88:281-8. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2016.160436
  19. Walker L, Morris HF, Ochi S. Periotest values of dental implants in the first 2 years after second-stage surgery: DICRG interim report no. 8. Dental Implant Clinical Research Group. Implant Dent 1997;6:207-12. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199700630-00007
  20. Truhlar RS, Morris HF, Ochi S. Stability of the bone-implant complex. Results of longitudinal testing to 60 months with the Periotest device on endosseous dental implants. Ann Periodontol 2000;5:42-55. https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.42
  21. Meredith N, Friberg B, Sennerby L, Aparicio C. Relationship between contact time measurements and PTV values when using the Periotest to measure implant stability. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:269-75.
  22. van Steenberghe D, Tricio J, Naert I, Nys M. Damping characteristics of bone-to-implant interfaces. A clinical study with the Periotest device. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:31-9. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060104.x
  23. Morris HE, Ochi S, Crum P, Orenstein I, Plezia R. Bone density: its influence on implant stability after uncovering. J Oral Implantol 2003;29:263-9. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2003)029<0263:BDIIOI>2.3.CO;2
  24. Teerlinck J, Quirynen M, Darius P, van Steenberghe D. Periotest: an objective clinical diagnosis of bone apposition toward implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:55-61.
  25. Hurzeler MB, Quinones CR, Schupbach P, Vlassis JM, Strub JR, Caffesse RG. Influence of the suprastructure on the periimplant tissues in beagle dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:139-48. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060302.x
  26. Salvi GE, Lang NP. Diagnostic parameters for monitoring peri-implant conditions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:116-27.
  27. Sekiguhi J. An attempt to measure viscoelasticity of human facial skin by impact hammer method. J Kanagawa Odontol Soc 1992;26:387-411.
  28. Nedir R, Bischof M, Szmukler-Moncler S, Bernard JP, Samson J. Predicting osseointegration by means of implant primary stability. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:520-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01059.x
  29. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Linden B, Grondahl K, Lekholm U. Stability measurements of one-stage Branemark implants during healing in mandibles. A clinical resonance frequency analysis study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;28:266-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(99)80156-8

Cited by

  1. Comparison of 3D-Printed Dental Implants with Threaded Implants for Osseointegration: An Experimental Pilot Study vol.13, pp.21, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13214815
  2. Reliability and Agreement of Three Devices for Measuring Implant Stability Quotient in the Animal Ex Vivo Model vol.11, pp.8, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11083453
  3. Secondary stability achieved in dental implants with a calcium‐coated sandblasted, large‐grit, acid‐etched (SLA) surface and a chemically modified SLA surface placed without mechanic vol.32, pp.12, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13848