Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Formation and Institutionalization of Local Governance : A Case Study on the Green Village Project in Cheongju City

로컬거버넌스의 형성과 제도화: 청주시 초록마을사업 사례연구

  • Received : 2019.12.02
  • Accepted : 2020.01.20
  • Published : 2020.01.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to review the performance of the Green Village Project during the last 10 years, and examine the possibility of the institutionalization of a local governance. The Green Village Project was first initiated by an environmental movement group in Cheongju City, and now various actors, including Cheongju City and City Council members, public organizations, professionals etc, are participating. The project has been continuously and stably carried out for 10 years, and the participants now recognize that the project should be carried out every year. According to the analysis, the participants recognized the project as beneficial project for them on the basis of the rational choice. And the participants recognized the project as having legitimacy, and accumulating 'trust' between participants, accumulating the experiences of success. In conclusion, the sustainability and stability of the project has been strengthened, and the institutionalization possibility of the governance of the Green Village Project has been increased continuously.

본 연구는 2010년 청주시에서 시작된 초록마을사업의 지난 10년간 성과를 검토하고, 로컬거버넌스의 형성과 제도화 가능성을 확인하는 데 목적이 있다. 환경운동단체 주도로 처음 시작된 거버넌스형 사업이 10년간 지속적이고 안정적으로 추진되고 있으며, 청주시 등 다른 참여주체들에 의해 당연히 추진해야 할 사업으로 인식되고 있다는 것은 매우 의미 있는 성과이다. 분석 결과, 초록마을사업을 추진하는 거버넌스 참여 주체들은 사업 참여가 자신들에게 이익이 된다는 합리적 선택의 판단에 근거하여 참여하고 있다. 그리고 참여 주체들은 초록마을사업이 정당성을 갖춘 사업으로 인식하고 있으며, 거버넌스 참여 과정에서 서로에 대한 신뢰를 축적하고 있고, 지속적으로 성공 경험을 하고 있음을 확인하였다. 결론적으로 초록마을사업의 지속성과 안정성이 강화되는 것을 확인할 수 있었으며, 초록마을사업 추진의 거버넌스가 제도화될 가능성이 더 높아졌음을 확인하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Green Village Project Promotion Committee. (2013-2018). Annual Report of Green Village Project.
  2. H. W. J Rittel & M. M. Webber. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
  3. Y. P. Kim. (1991). Uncertainty and Policy Legitimacy. Seoul: Korea University Press.
  4. C. B. Lee. (2005). Exploration of procedural rationality in situations of uncertainty, ambiguity and dilemma. Administrative Review, 3(4), 1-27.
  5. M. S. Lee. (2002). Conceptualizing governance: Governance as social coordination. Korean Journal of Public Administration, 36(3), 321-338.
  6. R. A. W. Rhodes. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham, Open University Press.
  7. W. J. M. Kickert. (1997). Public governance in the Netherlands: An alternative to Anglo-American 'Managerialism'. Public Administration, 75(4), 731-752. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00084
  8. R. D. Lasker & E. S. Weiss, R. Miller. (2001). Partnership synergy: A practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage. The Milbank Quarterly, 79(2), 179-205. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.00203
  9. S. J. Kim et al. (2000). A Study on New Governance. Seoul: Daeyoung Moonhwasa Publishing Co.
  10. J. G. March & J. P. Olsen. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press.
  11. W. R. Scott. (2001). Institutions and organization(2nd). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  12. C. B. Lee. (1995). People and government bureaucracy(4th). Seoul: Korea University Press.
  13. J. Blom-Hansen. (1997). A 'New Institutional' perspective on policy networks. Public Administration, 75(4), 669-693. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00080
  14. M. C. Suchman. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1995.9508080331
  15. P. J. DiMaggio & W. W. Powell. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
  16. J. W. Meyer & B. Rowan. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
  17. L. G. Zucker. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443-464. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.13.080187.002303
  18. C. Ansell & A. Gash. (2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J-PART, 18(4), 543-571.
  19. R. D. Putnam. (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0002
  20. Depth interview with Cheongju City Official (2019. 12. 10.).
  21. Depth interview with the Korea Energy Agency official(2019. 12. 10.).
  22. M. S. Bae. (2009). Environmental performance of 10 years of '$CO_{2}$ reduction of the Green Village Project'. the Grass Dream Foundation's internal data.
  23. S. K. Lee. (2011. 10. 3). Joongangilbo. Cheongju City, Selected as 'Low Carbon Green City'.
  24. Y. J. Cheon. (2018. 2. 28). Joongangilbo. Cheongju City, Korea Green Climate Award.
  25. Y. R. Ahn. (2018. 6. 28). Chungbut News. Cheongju City received the Low Carbon Green Award.. Green Village Business Performance.
  26. S. H. Jeon. (2018. 4. 12). New Daily Economy. 'Standing at Local Ecosystem' Cable TV Association.
  27. S. J. Jang. (2019. 5. 9). Dongyangilbo. Jecheon City, Green Village Project Agreement Ceremony Held.
  28. N. K. Han. (2019. 1. 15). Chungnamilbo. Pilot operation of four Sejong Saving Power Plants.
  29. M. Woolcock. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27(2), 151-208. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006884930135