DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

해전 비교연구를 통한 해군의 임무형 지휘 필요성에 관한 연구 - 세인트 빈센트 곶 해전과 유틀란트 해전을 중심으로 -

A Study on the Necessity of Mission Command in Navy Through the Study of Naval Battle Comparison - Focus on Battle of St. Vincent and Battle of Jutland -

  • 조성진 (해군사관학교 군사전략학과 군사전략학교관) ;
  • 전윤재 (해군사관학교 군사전략학과 군사전략학교관)
  • Cho, Seon-Gjin (Naval Academy Instructor of Military History & Strategy) ;
  • Jeon, Yoon-Jae (Naval Academy Instructor of Military History & Strategy)
  • 투고 : 2020.01.09
  • 심사 : 2020.01.30
  • 발행 : 2020.02.28

초록

The origin of mission command can be traced to the era of the Prussian military reforms led by General Gerhard von Scharnhorst after defeats in battle of Jena and Auerstadt in 1806 against Napoleon I. Mission Command is the conduct of military operations through decentralized execution based upon mission-type orders. Commanders issue mission-type orders focused on the purpose of the operation rather than details of how to perform assigned tasks. The mission command has become the command philosophy of the German military and recently many countries in the west accept it as a command philosophy. This study compare and analyze the Battle of St. Vincent and the Battle of Jutland to make sure if the army-initiated mission commands were also useful for the navy. From the late 18th century, represented by the era of Nelson, Royal navy changed from the inherited rigid command culture to guaranteeing the disciplined initiative of its subordinate commanders. In the Battle of St. Vincent in 1797, Nelson acted contrary to the commander's orders at the crucial moment, which gave Britain a decisive victory. On the contrary more than 100 years later, the command culture of the Royal navy changed into a centralized command culture. In the Battle of Jutland in 1916, Royal Navy couldn't win because the rigid command culture did not guarantee initiative of subordinate commanders and subordinate commander's passive attitude of waiting for the commander's instructions even at critical moments. Therefore, a mission command that guarantees the initiative of subordinate commanders is a useful concept even in the navy because it makes subordinate commanders to take full advantage of a sudden change in battle. Today's advanced information and communication technologies have raised questions about mission command. But even advanced technology can't completely eliminate the fundamental nature of the war-the fog of war. War is chaotic and unpredictable. In the flood of lots of informations, senior commander's judgement is not always right because he(she) is also human, he(she) can make mistakes. In the age of informatization, mission command is still effective because it involves increasing interaction and synergy between senior and subordinate commanders by ensuring their independence. Therefore ROK navy also needs to activate mission command. ROK navy must dismantle the zero-defect mentality and apply from educations as Prussian did to establish a mission command culture.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김용주 외. 임무형 지휘 활성화 방안 연구. 서울: 육군사관학교 산학협력단, 2016.
  2. 디르크 W. 외팅. 박정이(옮김). 임무형 전술의 어제와 오늘. 서울: 도서출판 백암, 1997.
  3. 앤드루 램버트. 박아람(옮김). 넬슨. 서울: 생각의 나무, 2005.
  4. 웨인 휴스, 조덕현(옮김). 해전사 속의 해전. 서울: 신서원, 2009.
  5. 죠프리 틸. 배형수(옮김). 21세기 해양력. 서울: 한국해양전략연구소, 2011.
  6. 칼 하인츠 프리저. 진중근(옮김). 전격전의 전설. 서울: 일조각, 2007.
  7. 폴 케네디, 김주식 역. 영국 해군 지배력의 역사. 서울: 한국해양전략연구소, 2009.
  8. 해군본부. 지휘관 및 참모 교범. 대전: 해군본부, 2016.
  9. 해군본부. 해군의 임무형 지휘. 대전: 해군본부, 2015.
  10. Campbell, John. Jutland: An Analysis of the Fighting. London: Conway Maritime Press, 1998.
  11. Clowes, William Laird. The Royal Navy: A History from the Earliest Times to the present, Vol. 4. London: Chatham Publishing, 1997.
  12. Friedman, Norman. Fighting the Great war at Sea. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 2014.
  13. Gardiner, Robert. All the World's Fighting Ships, 1906-1921. London: Conway Maritime Press, 1985.
  14. Gordon, Andrew. The Rules of the Game: Jutland and British Naval Command. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 2000.
  15. Hough, Richard. Admirals in Collision. Penzance: Periscope Publishing, 2003.
  16. Ireland, Bernard. Naval Warfare in the Age of Sail. New York: W. W. Norton, 2000.
  17. Lambert, Andrew. War at Sea in the Age of Sail. London: Cassell, 2000.
  18. Leyland, John. The Royal Navy: Its Influence in English History and in the Growth of Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
  19. Mullins, Robert E. The Transformation of British and American Naval Policy in the Pre-Dreadnought Era: Ideas, Culture and Strategy. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016.
  20. Rodger, N. A. M. The Command of the Ocean. New York: W. W. Norton, 2004.
  21. Shamir, Eitan. Transforming Command : The Pursuit of Mission Command in the U.S., British, and Israeli Armies. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2011.
  22. Tritten, James J. Doctrine And Fleet Tactics In The Royal Navy. New York: Pickle Partners Publishing, 2015.
  23. Tucker, Spencer C. Instruments of War: Weapons and Technologies That Have Changed History. CA: ABC-CLIO, 2015.
  24. US JCS. JP 3-32 Joint Maritime Operations(2018. 6. 8.)
  25. US JCS. Mission Command White Paper(2012. 4. 3.) chrome-extension://ieepebpjnkhaiioojkepfniodjmjjihl/data/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jcs.mil%2FPortals%2F36%2FDocuments%2FPublications%2Fmissioncommandwhitepaper2012.pdf
  26. US Navy. A Design for Maintaining Maritime Superiority Ver.2.0(2018.12.17.) chrome-extension://ieepebpjnkhaiioojkepfniodjmjjihl/data/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.navy.mil%2Fnavydata%2Fpeople%2Fcno%2FRichardson%2FResource%2FDesign_2.0.pdf
  27. Weigley, Russel Frank. The Age of Battles: The Quest for Decisive Warfare from Breitenfeld to Waterloo. IN: Indiana University Press, 2004.
  28. Wright, Donald P. Eds. 16 Cases of Mission Command 2nd ed. Fort Leavenworth: USACAS, 2013.
  29. 강연수. 해군의 임무형 지휘 발전방안 연구(정책현안연구과제 11-17). 서울: 국방대학교 안보문제연구소, 2011.
  30. 안효주. "임무형 지휘 적용사례 연구 : 해전사를 중심으로." 해군 리더십 연구-제8호. 진해: 해군리더십센터, 2014.
  31. King, Anthony C. "Mission Command 2.0 : From an Individualist to a Collectivist Model." Parameters 47(1) Spring 2017.
  32. Rubel, Robert C. "Mission Command in a Future Naval Combat Environment," Naval War College Review: Vol. 71: No.2, Article 8
  33. Vego, Milan. "Mission Command and Zero Error Tolerance Cannot Coexist." Proceedings July 2018, https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2018/july/mission-command-and-zero-error-tolerance-cannot-coexist
  34. Widder, Werner. "Auftragstaktik and inner Fuhrung : Trademarks of German Leadership." Military Review Sep-Oct.(2002)
  35. Kime, Patricia. "Navy to Embrace 'Mission Command' Concepts to Match Adversaries." Miltary.com(2019.1.15.)https://www.military.com/ daily -news/2019/01/15/navy-embrace- mission-command- concepts-match-adversaries.html
  36. Lekic, Slobodan. "Historians: Hitler's Blitzkrieg Was a Fluke," CBS NEWS(2010.5.10.)