DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Regional Profiling by Considering Educational Facilities - Centered on Gwangjin-gu, Seoul -

교육 시설 생활인프라 특성을 고려한 지역 프로파일링 연구 - 서울시 광진구 중심으로 -

  • Kang, Woo-Seok (Dept. of Urban Planning and Design, University of Seoul) ;
  • Lee, Hee-Chung (Dept. of Urban Planning and Design, University of Seoul)
  • Received : 2019.09.05
  • Accepted : 2019.09.20
  • Published : 2019.09.30

Abstract

This study has a purpose to profile local sectors into meaningful groups by using facilities rates of Social Overhead Capital(SOC) for daily life. Comparing SOC for daily life among the meaningful groups, the profiling and comparison results bring the comprehensive understanding about the educational facilities in local sectors. For the research purpose, this study utilized Latent Profile Analysis(LPA) by using variables such as population, road information, SOC for daily life, usage of land, possession of land, and appraised value of land from the 2018 Geographic Information System(GIS) dataset of Gwangjin-gu, where is one of the administrative district of Seoul City. Results showed that there are four latent groups of sectors among 904 local sectors(100 squared-meters sector per each) in Gwangjin-gu. By comparing the four latent groups by using LPA, the results diagnose each sector's status and help to improve the policy about educational facilities. Specifically, by using dataset for SOC of daily life, there are four groups of local sectors and each group has different features. Based on the different features of local sector groups, there can be improved management of educational facilities matching with each group's features.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2018). Basic Forum for Reorganizing National Minimum Standards
  2. Office for Government Policy Coordination (2019). Living SOC 3year Plan(2020-2022)
  3. Seoul Metropolitan Government Facility Division (2012). 10 minute neighborhood project
  4. Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317-332. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294359
  5. Cho, P. (2013). Living Infrastructure Supply Status and Policy Tasks, Planning and Policy, 382, 5-14.
  6. Crosby, R. D., Wonderlich, S. A., Engel, S. G., Simonich, H., Smyth, J., and Mitchell, J. E. (2009). Daily mood patterns and bulimic behaviors in the natural environment. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47, 181-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2008.11.006
  7. Lim, J., Cho, A. (2018). The relationship between parental rearing attitudes and life goals using latent profile analysis(LPA), Studies on Korean Youth, 29(1), 323-346. https://doi.org/10.14816/sky.2018.29.1.323
  8. Muthen, B. (2004). Latent variable analysis. The Sage Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences, 345-368.
  9. Kraft, Michael, E., and Scott R. Furlong. (2018). Public Policy: Politics, Analysis, and Alternatives. 6th ed. Thousandoak, CA: SAGE publication.
  10. Kwon, J. (2011). Developmental patterns of bullying experience and changes in internalization and externalization problem behavior: Longitudinal Layer Growth Analysis (LCGA), Longitudinal Study using Multi-group Growth Mixture Model (GMM). Korea Child Welfare, 34, 96-127.
  11. Park, J. (2013). Era of Life-based Infrastructure Supply, Planning and Policy, 382.
  12. Patton, Carl, V. David, S. Sawicki, and Jennifer J. Clark. (2016). Basic Methods of Policy Analysis and Planning. 3rd ed. New York: Rouledge.
  13. Shin, H. (2015). Academic Achievement and Community Awareness of Elementary School Students : Classification of Potential Profiles and Influencing Factors on School Happiness. Education Evaluation Research, 28(1), 53-76.
  14. Scolve, L. S. (1987). Application of a model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52, 333-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294360
  15. Oberski D. (2016). Mixture Models: Latent Profile and Latent Class Analysis. In: Robertson J., Kaptein M. (eds) (pp.275-287). Modern Statistical Methods for HCI. Human-Computer Interaction Series. Springer
  16. Tein, J., Coxe, S., and Cham, H. (2013). Statistical power to detect the correct number of classes in latent profile analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20 (4), 640-657. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2013.824781
  17. Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov T., and Muthen, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simuation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14 (4), 535-569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396