Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design (대한건축학회논문집:계획계)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Meaning of Joint in Carlo Scarpa's Fragmentary Architecture

카를로 스카르파의 단편적 건축에 있어서 접합의 의미

  • 이경진 (유한대학교 테크노산업디자인학과)
  • Received : 2019.02.25
  • Accepted : 2019.07.22
  • Published : 2019.08.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

According to Kenneth Frampton, the modern architecture starts to be recognized as the poetics of construction and lays a great weight in its value on the technology of making forms and the inherent meaning in the tectonics. The tectonic connotes not only the technological construction of the architecture but also ontological details as the joint of material and texture. The works of Carlo Scarpa are examples to prove the way how the ontological meanings are exposed in the tectonic form of architecture. The purpose of this study was to analyze the connections between Carlo Scarpa's architectural thoughts and visual logic(schemata) from the characteristic of details in his work during the 1950s to 1970s. Through the analysis, the Italian tradition in the architecture is reinterpreted through isolation and break of recollected montages. Carlo Scarpa makes spatial fragments and aspects of reinterpreting in surroundings and situation with the architectural place in Venezia. As a result, the unique details of his craftsmanship provide lessons on how to reinterpret the traditional architecture. In conclusion, Carlo Scarpa's architecture emphasizes the passage of its perceptive experience aspects as a dis-joint of tectonic forms. It may imply the significance of his philosophical approach, especially to the ontological architecture and tectonics.

Keywords

References

  1. Dal Co, F., & Mazzariol, G. (1985). Carlo Scarpa, the complete works. Electra Rizzoli, 279-304.
  2. Kim, J. (1999). Study on the spatial composition of Carlo Scarpa's Castelvecchio museum. thesis, Seoul University.
  3. Frampton, K. (1995). Studies in tectonics culture. MIT press, 321.
  4. Francesco, D., Giuseppe, M., & Carlo, S. (1985). The complete works. Electra e Rizzoli, 283.
  5. Frascari, M. (1996). The tell-the-Tale detail. Prinston press, 500-512.
  6. Hartoonian, G. (1994). Ontology of construction. Cambridge University, 17.
  7. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). The primacy of perception and other essays. Northwestern University, 25.
  8. Olsberg N., Guidi, G., & Carlo, S. (1999). Carlo Scarpa Architect, intervening with history. CCA, The Monacelli press, 103.
  9. Schulz, C. (1997). Existence, space & architecture. (K. H. Kim, Trans.). Taerim, 5, 33-55.(Original work published 1971)
  10. Song, T. (2003). Gaston Bachelard: de la philosophie des sciences a la philosophie de i'imagination. Assocition culutrelle france creenne, 42, 191-196.
  11. Tafuri, M. (1989). History of italian architecture, 1944-1985: two "master": Carlo Scarpa and Giuseppe Samona". MIT press, 111-116.
  12. Tafuri, M. (2009). Theories and history of architecture. (I. H. Kim, Trans.). Dongnyeok, 205. (Original work published 1977).
  13. Uchida, S., & Oki, k. (2003). Interior design. Rikuyosha, 33, 51.
  14. Yuuji, A. (2000). Aesthetics of architectural space. (D. Y. Lee, Trans.). Contemporary architects, 131. (Original work published 1996).