DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Risk Assesment Index for Construction Safety Using Statistical Data

통계자료를 활용한 건설안전 위험도 평가지수 개발

  • Park, Hwan-Pyo (Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology) ;
  • Han, Jae-Goo (Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology)
  • Received : 2019.03.04
  • Accepted : 2019.06.20
  • Published : 2019.08.20

Abstract

In 2017, the ratio of the number of victims and deaths in the construction industry was the highest with 25.2% and 29.6%, respectively. Especially, as safety accidents at construction sites continue to increase, the economic loss is greatly increased too. Therefore, in order to prevent safety accidents in the construction work, the safety risk assessment index by type of construction was developed, and the main results of this study are as follows. First, 17 factors related to safety accidents at construction sites were derived through survey and interview survey, and this study suggested 9 items(process, type of construction, progress rate, contract amount, number of floors, safety education, working days and weather) throughout the expert advisory meeting. Second, the risk assessment index for safety accidents was developed based on the ratio and intensity of safety accidents. Third, to verify the risk assessment model, the construction safety risk assessment index by type of construction was derived by surveying and analyzing the statistics of the construction accident. In addition, the risk strength was calculated by dividing human damage caused by construction safety accidents into those killed and injured. The risk assessment index based on the frequency and intensity of safety accidents by type of construction is expected to be utilized as basic data when assessing the risk of similar projects in the future.

2017년 전체 산업에서 건설업의 재해자와 사망자의 비중은 각각 25.2%, 29.6%로 가장 높은 실정이다. 특히 건축 현장의 안전사고가 지속적으로 증가하고 있어 경제적 손실이 매우 크다. 따라서 본 연구는 건축공사의 안전사고를 예방하기 위하여 공종별 안전위험도 평가지수를 개발하였고, 그 주요 연구결과는 아래와 같다. 첫째, 건축공사 현장의 안전사고와 관련된 위험요인을 설문조사와 면담조사를 통하여 17개 요인을 도출하여, 전문가 자문회의를 걸쳐 9개 항목(공종, 공사종류, 공정율, 계약금액, 층수, 공사기간, 안전교육, 현장근무일수, 날씨)을 제안하였다. 둘째, 건설현장의 안전사고 위험도 평가지수는 안전사고의 발생 비율과 발생강도를 토대로 공종별 평가지수 산정모델을 개발하였다. 셋째, 본 연구는 위험도 평가지수 평가모델을 검증하기 위하여 건설재해사고 통계자료를 조사 및 분석하여, 공종별 건설안전 위험 평가지수를 도출하였다. 또한 본 연구에서는 건설안전사고로 인한 인적손해를 사망자와 부상자로 구분하여 위험강도를 산출하였다. 공종별 안전사고 발생빈도와 발생강도에 따른 위험평가지수와 도출된 위험요인은 향후 건설안전 위험도 예측시스템 개발시 기초자료로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

GCSGBX_2019_v19n4_361_f0001.png 이미지

Figure 1. Methodology

GCSGBX_2019_v19n4_361_f0002.png 이미지

Figure 2. Percentage of accident victims by size in construction industry (2014-2016)

GCSGBX_2019_v19n4_361_f0003.png 이미지

Figure 3. Percentage of accident victims by period of accident in construction industry (2014-2016)

GCSGBX_2019_v19n4_361_f0004.png 이미지

Figure 4. Evaluation of the effect of risk assessment system in construction site

GCSGBX_2019_v19n4_361_f0005.png 이미지

Figure 5. Frequency and Incidence of safety accidents by construction type in construction projects

Table 1. Trends and specific gravity of the number of job accidents by age in construction industry (2014-2016)

GCSGBX_2019_v19n4_361_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Trends and specific gravity of the number of job accident victims by continuous service in construction industry (2014-2016)

GCSGBX_2019_v19n4_361_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Work breakdown system in building construction work(plan)

GCSGBX_2019_v19n4_361_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. High number of work-investment workers(10)

GCSGBX_2019_v19n4_361_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Safety accident rate and risk assessment index by construction type

GCSGBX_2019_v19n4_361_t0005.png 이미지

References

  1. Park HP, Han JG. A basis on the analysis of construction accident statistics data. Proceeding of Korea Institute of Building Construction; 2018 Nov 15-16; Seoul (Korea): Korea Institute of Building Construction; 2018. p. 122-3.
  2. Kim DS, Shin YS. A study on the risk factors according to the frequency of falling accidents in construction sites. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2019 Apr;19(2);185-92. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2019.19.2.185
  3. Cho YR, Shin YS, Shin JK. Checklist development for prevention of safety accidents in form work in small and medium sized construction sites. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2017 Dec;17(6);587-8. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2017.17.6.587
  4. Go SS, Song H, Lee JY. A study on the hazard of work types for building construction. Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction. 2004 May;20(5);137-44.
  5. Jang YR, Go SS. A risk assessment counterplan for reducing the accident rates in medium and small sized construction sites. Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2018 Sep;19(5):90-100. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2018.19.5.090
  6. Kim JM, Lee JB, Chang SR. Relationship between the risk level and the job stress level of work types in architectural work. Journal of the Korean Society of Safety. 2017 Aug;32(4);73-8. https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2017.32.4.73
  7. Shim UJ, Suh HS, Ahn YS. Highly efficient checklist for safety management of reinforced concrete construction. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2010 Dec;10(6);7-17. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIC.2010.12.6.007
  8. Shin WS, Son CB. An analysis on the safety networks in construction site. Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2018 Sep;19(5):101-2. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2018.19.5.101
  9. Yun HJ. A study on ways to improve construction safety management for a safer society. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements; c2014. Chapter 4(Improvement of Construction Safety Management System); p. 49-54.
  10. Cheo SY, Choi SI, Yoo WS. A study on the improvement of innovative safety management for the prevention of construction safety accidents. Construction Economy Research Institute of Korea; c2017. Chapter 7(Improvement Plan); p. 69-87.
  11. Industrial Safety and Health Act stress check system Implementation manual, 2nd ed(Edition). Japan, Safety and Health Division of Labor Standards Bureau, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; c2016. 182 p.