Fig. 1. Current density-voltage (J-V) characteristics of the each devices with different ionic salt in acetonitrile HDMII (■), PBDMIDI (●), EBDMIDI (▲), PBPyDI (▼) measured under AM1.5G illumination from a calibrated solar simulator with irradiation intensity of 100 mW cm-2
Fig. 2. Current density-voltage (J-V) characteristics of the each devices with different ionic salt HDMII (■), PBDMIDI (●), EBDMIDI (▲), PBPyDI (▼) with different ratios of solvent (a) AcCN:PC=7:3, (b) AcCN:PC=5:5, (c) AcCN:PC=3:7, (d) PC, (v/v) measured under AM1.5G illumination from a calibrated solar simulator with irradiation intensity of 100 mW cm-2
Fig. 3. Current density-voltage (J-V) characteristics of the each devices with different ionic salt HDMII (■), PBDMIDI (●), EBDMIDI (▲), PBPyDI (▼) with different ratios of solvent (a) AcCN:EC=7:3, (b) AcCN:EC=5:5, (c) AcCN:EC=3:7 (v/v), measured under AM1.5G illumination from a calibrated solar simulator with irradiation intensity of 100 mW cm-2
Fig. 4. Current density-voltage (J-V) characteristics of the each devices with different ionic salt in GBL: EC=7:3 (v/v), HDMII (■), PBDMIDI (●), EBDMIDI (▲), PBPyDI (▼) measured under AM1.5G illumination from a calibrated solar simulator with irradiation intensity of 100 mW cm-2
Table 1. Ionic salts for the experiment and their abbreviations
Table 2. Electrolyte ionic conductivity and photovoltaic parameters of the devices different salts dissolved in acetonitrile
Table 3. Photovoltaic parameters of the devices different salts dissolved in different acetonitrile (AcCN):propylene carbonate (PC) volume ratios.
Table 4. Photovoltaic parameters of the devices different salts dissolved in different acetonitrile (AcCN):propylene carbonate (EC) volume ratios
Table 5. Photovoltaic parameters of the devices different salts dissolved in acetonitrile(AcCN): γ-Butyrolactone=7:3 (v/v)
References
- Y. Jun, J. H. Park, and M. G. Kang, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48(52), 6456-6471. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cc30733b
- C. L. Jung, Han, C. H., D. K. Moon, and Y. Jun, Chemsuschem, 2014, 7(10), 2839-2844. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201402232
- C. L. Jung, J. Lim, J. H. Park, C. H. Han, and Y. Jun, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 243-247. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RA45507F
- A. K. Arof, I. M. Noor, M. H. Buraidah, I. Albinsson, B. E. Mellander, Electrochim. Acta, 2017, 251, 223-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.08.129
- Wang, X. & Stanbury, and D. M. Inorg. Chem., 2006, 45(8), 3415-3423. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic052022y
- M. Wang, N. Chamberland, L. Breau, J. Moser, R. Humphry-Baker, B. Marsan, S. M. Zakeeruddin, M. Gratzel, Nat. Chem. 2010, 2(5), 385-389. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.610
- N. Jeon, S. G. Jo, S. H. Kim, M. S. Park, D. W. Kim, J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol., 2017, 8(3), 257-264. https://doi.org/10.5229/JECST.2017.8.3.257
- K. Zouhri, Renewable Energy, 2018, 126, 210-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.03.045
- H. Kusama, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem., 2018, 357, 60-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2018.02.024
- I. Sagaigak, G. Huertas, A. Nguyen Van Nhien, F. Sauvage, Green Chem., 2018, 20(5), 1059-1064. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7GC03429F
- S. Jeon, Y. Jo, K.J. Kim, Y. Jun, and C.H. Han, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2011, 3(2), 512-516. https://doi.org/10.1021/am101093b
- R. Kern, R. Sastrawan, J. Ferber, R. Stangl, and J. Luther, Electrochimica Acta, 2002, 47(26), 4213-4225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-4686(02)00444-9
- C. Zafer, K. Ocakoglu, C. Ozsoy, and S. Icli, Electrochimica Acta, 2009, 54(24), 5709-5714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2009.05.016
- R. P. Seward, and E. C. Vieira, J. Phys. Chem., 1958, 62(1), 127-128. https://doi.org/10.1021/j150559a041
- A. Chagnes, H. Allouchi, B. Carre, G. Odou, P. Willmann, and D. Lemordant, J. Appl. Electrochem., 2003, 33(7), 589-595. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024904918401
- A. Chagnes, B. Carre, P. Willmann, R. Dedryvere, D. Gonbeau, and D. Lemordant, J. Electrochem.Soc., 2003, 150(9), A1255-A1261. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1597882