Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the exploration of domestic cases about the life-cycle policy related to educational digital contents

교육용 디지털 콘텐츠 수명주기 정책에 대한 국내 사례 탐색 연구

  • Cha, Hyunjin (School of General Education, Dankook University)
  • 차현진 (단국대학교 교양교육대학)
  • Received : 2019.02.22
  • Accepted : 2019.05.20
  • Published : 2019.05.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In rapidly changing educational technology and trends, services providing educational digital contents have been focused on offering new contents customized on the state-of-the-art technology and trends, rather than re-evaluating or eliminating the contents on service based on the changed topics and video quality. This study explores domestic cases about educational digital contents in order to draw implications on proper life-cycle models and effective re-evaluation periods for the quality assurance of the contents. To achieve this objective, representative services in primary-secondary, higher, and lifelong education sectors were selected, and experts in the services were participated in focused group interview. Based on the interview results, the re-evaluation process and life-cycle issues in the management of contents were analyzed according to the educational levels and the implications on the life-cycle models were drawn. This study contributes to establishing a basis for the systematic life-cycle policy of the services in order to make more sustainable management of the digital contents.

급변하는 교육 기술과 트랜드로 교육용 디지털 콘텐츠를 제공하는 서비스는 기존 콘텐츠가 내용적 변화와 영상적/기술적 품질의 재평가 및 폐기 등이 필요한지에 대한 관리보다는 최신의 기술과 트랜드에 맞춤화된 콘텐츠를 제공하는데 급급했다. 본 연구에서는 교육용 디지털 콘텐츠의 질 관리를 위해 적합한 수명주기와 효과적인 재평가 주기에 대한 시사점을 도출하고자 국내 교육 서비스에 대한 사례를 탐색하였다. 이를 위해 국내 교육 서비스 중 초 중등, 고등, 평생교육에서 대표적인 서비스 사례를 선정하여 담당자로 구성된 초점그룹인터뷰(FGI, Focused Group Interview)를 실시하였다. 인터뷰 결과를 바탕으로 각각 학교급에 따른 교육용 디지털 콘텐츠에 대한 수명주기를 분석하고, 시사점을 도출하였다. 본 연구는 교육용 디지털 콘텐츠에 대해 수명주기에 의한 질 관리의 필요성을 제기함으로써 기관 자체적으로 체계 없이 수행하고 있는 기 콘텐츠의 관리를 좀 더 체계화된 수명주기 정책을 통해 관리하기 위한 기반을 마련하였다는데 의의가 있다.

Keywords

Table 1. FGI Participant‘s Profile

DJTJBT_2019_v17n5_11_t0001.png 이미지

References

  1. A. Freeman, S. Adams Becker, M. Cummins, A. Davis & C. Hall Giesinger. (2017). NMC/CoSN Horizon Report: 2017 K-12 Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
  2. S. Adams Becker, M. Brown, E. Dahlstrom, A. Davis, K. DePaul, V. Diaz & J. Pomerantz. (2018). NMC Horizon Report: 2018 Higher Education Edition. Louisville, CO: EDUCAUSE
  3. KERIS. (2017). 2017 White paper on ICT in education. Korea, KERIS
  4. H. J. Cha. (2018). A development study of checklists for quality assurance of K-MOOC. Journal of Lifelong Learning Society. 14(4), 137-166. DOI : 10.26857/JLLS.2018.11.14.4.137
  5. H. Shenton. (2003). Life Cycle Collection Management. LIBER Quarterly: the Journal of European Research 13(3), 254-272. DOI : 10.18352/lq.7739
  6. A. Stephens. (1988). The application of life cycle costing in libraries. British Journal of Academic Librarianship, 3, 82-88. DOI : 10.1177/034003529402000208
  7. S. J. Kwak, W. K. Sung & K. J. Bae. (2011). A study on the analysis and evaluation for the life-cycle model of digital content. Journal of Information Management, 42(1), 25-46. DOI : 10.1633/jim.2011.42.1.025
  8. C. I. Lim, Y. H. Cho & S. Y. Kim. (2014). A study on the practical solutions of promoting the use of e-learning in higher education. KERIS Research report RR 2014-5.
  9. K. A. Son, M. L. Ahn, T. I. Han, B. S. Ko & Y. Kim. (2005). Analysis of foreign e-learning quality assurance guidelines. KERIS research paper, RM 2005-29.
  10. J. H. Lim & C. S. Kim. (2007). Quality control of the educational contents based on life cycle. Journal of Korean Information Education, 11(4), 483-495. UCI : G704-000854.2007.11.4.002
  11. Y. W. Lim, J. S. Park, M. S. Kang & Y. T. Lee. (2012). A study on the guideline development of operation and management of educational contents in cyber universities. KERIS research paper CRC 2012-4.
  12. S. J. Kwak, J. M. Kim, Y. M. Jung, J. T. Kim & K. J. Bae. (2010). Best practices for archiving digital content by life cycle. KISTI research paper K-10-IR-12-01P-10.
  13. S. John. (2015). Product Life-cycle Management (Volume 1): 21st Century Paradigm for Product Realisation. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-17440-
  14. S. John. (2018). Product Lifecycle Management (Volume 3): The Executive Summary, Springer International Publishing. Springer International Publishing AG. DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-72236-8.
  15. S. M. Keever. (1970). Understanding Web Content Management Systems: Evolution, Lifecycle and Market. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 103(9), 686-692. DOI : 10.1108/02635570310506106
  16. Gartner. (2018). 5 trends emerge in the Gartner Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies. 2018. August 16, https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/5-trends-emerge-in-gartner-hype-cycle-for-emerging-technologies-2018/
  17. M. M. Coulibaly. (1999). White paper: Cisco IOS Reference Guide. Cisco Systems, from https://nag.ru/goodies/docs/Cisco%20IOS%20Reference%20Guide.PDF
  18. J. H. Lee, J. H. Kim, M. H. Cho & H. M. Jung (2014). Usage Trends of Products and Technology lifecycle. KISTI Technology Trends Analysis Paper from http://www.kosen21.org/info/gtbReport/gtbReportDetail.do?articleSeq=0000000760087
  19. J. H. Kim, J. H. Lee, M. K. Lee, H. M. Jung, & W. K. Sung. (2012). Technology opportunity discovery model using typical features and decision trees. Journal of KIISE, 39(3), 215-224. UCI : G704-E00398.2012.39.3.008
  20. H. W. Samuel & O. R. Zaïane. (2013). On Management of the Health Content Lifecycle. Journal of Public Health Frontier, 2(2), 83-96. DOI : 10.5963/phf0202005
  21. S. T. Kim & W. G. Lee. (2016). Knowledge Map Service based on Ontology of nation R&D information. Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(3), 251-260. DOI : 10.14400/jdc.2016.14.3.251
  22. G. McGovern & R. Norton. (2001). Content Critical. FT Press.
  23. A. Rockley. (2002). Managing Enterprise Content: A Unified Content Strategy. New Riders Press.
  24. The State government of Victoria in Australia. (2005). University of South Astralia, WHS Procedure: Document Control & Record Management. from http://w3.unisa.edu.au/safetyandwellbeing/SMS/procedures/document_control_and_record_management.pdf
  25. J. Preece, Y. Rogers & H. Sharp. (2015). Interaction Design: beyond human-computer interaction. 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. West Sussex:UK.
  26. G. Hodge. (2004). Digital preservation and permanent access to scientific information: the state of the practice. The International Council for Scientific and Technical Information (ICSTI) and CENDI. from http://www.icsti.org/IMG/pdf/preservationrpt-3.pdf
  27. Y. S. Kwak. (2009). Qualitative analysis: Philosophy, Art and Education. Seoul: Education Science Publication
  28. K. S. Kim, K. S. Han & H. W. Huh. (2012). A study on the benefits of PLM system based on data integration and process management. Journal of Digital Convergence, 10(6), 133-140. UCI : G704-002010.2012.10.6.023 https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2012.10.6.133
  29. H. Y. Kim & C. K. Youn. (2012). A case study for the application of storage tiering based on ILM through data value analysis. Journal of Digital Convergence, 10(8), 159-172. DOI : 10.1007/978-94-007-5860-5_126
  30. T. J. Park, H. J. Cha & G. Y. Lee. (2016). A study on design guidelines of learning analytics to facilitate self-regulated learning in MOOCs. Educational Technology International, 17(1), 117-150. ECN : I410-ECN-0102-2017-370-000454220
  31. M. L. Ahn, Y. Y. Choi, Y. M. Ko & Y. H. Bae. (2015). An international literature review on learning analytics: focused on empirical studies. Journal of Educational Information and Media, 21(4), 601-643. DOI : 10.15833/KAFEIAM.21.4.601